If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
"fat_boy" wrote in message
ups.com... I saw this on half baked, and it spiraled into a discussion on the granularity of the surface of the piste. What will really work though? OK, my hands are in the air!!! I did get the idea from the halfbakery.... I thought it could work though. For many years I have wanted to find my skiing speed and allways thought about a device with a wheel attachment until portable GPS became available and cheaper. I did use a Garmin Legend for a few years but for this year I will be using my Windows smartphone (SPV C500) with a bluetooth GPS unit and the software called Skido http://www.skido.info/ . The only problem with this is that they have not done any calculations to incorporate the vertical as you say. The problem with the GPS altitude is that there is a degree of error. They are aware of this problem and I have suggested they could sample the data and give two speeds which are the non-altitude related speed and then an estimated speed based on the actual based on distance along with altitude. With some clever calculation im sure you could get within 5-10% of the actual speed, this is no good for any serious record attempt measurements but it is good enough for the recreational skiier. What about one of these? http://www.rei.com/online/store/Prod...ry_rn=40001903 It uses radar, no data given on accuracy though Paul |
Ads |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
davidof above rekoned all GPSs look at altitude too. But I gues not.
If it didnt, you could do the cos slope angle to get thre ratio of true speed to measured speed. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
"Alun Evans" wrote in message
... On Wed 18 Jan '06 at 10:51 "fat_boy" wrote: OK all, here is the challenge, come up with a viable way of measuring your speed on skis. I have heard tell of using GPS, but since it will only get your horizontal speed component, and not the verticla, it will always read low. What else can you think of? Agree it does 3-d, but besides, your max speed will likely be on the horizontal, i.e. when you bottom out of the run... They claim to measure speed pretty well: http://www.garmin.com/products/etrexVista/spec.html Velocity: 0.05 meter/sec steady state (that's about +/- 1.1mph) Remember, it has the big error on your exact location, but velocity is measured between two locations with the same error, thus that error is removed. My friend clocked 91.5mph last week. I'm not sure if that's good or not... A. 91 is fast, I haven't been over 70 yet and that feels really fast. I usually get 55-65 without to much problem but that is on steeper slopes and I think there must be something to do with the vertical factor. When I did about 70 it was on a really steep start but it flattened toward the end of the run so I was traveling really fast on a flatish run. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Why?
Think of a flat, grid defined plane. If an object is programmed to get to xx,yy the satelite(s) can take care of that. Altitude is more easilly taken care of by an altimiter. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
"fat_boy" wrote in message oups.com... Why? Think of a flat, grid defined plane. If an object is programmed to get to xx,yy the satelite(s) can take care of that. Altitude is more easilly taken care of by an altimiter. Well the world isn't a flat grid. Usually the positioning is calculated from several (5-8) satellites, and will calculate the exact location including altitude. Though, due to the spread of the satellites the accuracy of the altitude can be less than the that for the horizontal plane it is far more accurate than altimeters, which as you pointed out in a previous post have calibration issues and are not nearly accurate enough. In the first gulf war John Simpson reported about the flight paths of the cruise missiles following the main thoroughfares in Baghdad at building height! -- Paul Schofield |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Altitude can be calculated with a GPS when it can see more than 3
satellites.. and it is not calculated using Barometric pressure.. "fat_boy" wrote in message oups.com... And not only that, because air is compressible its density with respect to altitude is not constant, so the device would need calibrating (at set altitude) to get an accurate change in altitude. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
OK all, here is the challenge, come up with a viable way of measuring
your speed on skis. In about any Austrian ski resort there is a run where you can measure your speed like in a ski race. Look for a sign like WISBI (wie schnell bin ich - how fast am I?) Turan |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
On Wed 18 Jan '06 at 13:51 "fat_boy" wrote: 91? Thats extraordinary. Does he often get that speed with GPS or is it a freak result? nah, that was peak, and a schuss down a pisted black. Though we'd regularly hit around 50mph carving reds / blacks. You can test the GPS in the car, it's quite accurate. Actually, what was a good test was that it would hit chair lift speeds dead on, and they do change altitude significantly. A. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
"fat_boy" wrote in message
oups.com... davidof above rekoned all GPSs look at altitude too. But I gues not. If it didnt, you could do the cos slope angle to get thre ratio of true speed to measured speed. oh, I didn't mean that really, my gps DOES measure altitude and the Skido program does report it but they do not calculate the speed with altitude in mind. I can see why too, if I sit in my living room and get a fix on some satalites and I can watch the altitude go up and down, sometimes quite a big difference too. This is why I said a my previous post that they could probably throw out the odd results and get the average and then work out a more accurate speed. Paul |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
fat_boy wrote:
: I have heard tell of using GPS, but since it will only get your : horizontal speed component, and not the verticla, it will always read : low. Last time this came up someone did the maths and came to the conclusion that ski slopes are nowhere near steep enough to make a major impact on the speed - even if only the horizontal speed is measured (despite what skiers might like to think!). As others have pointed out GPS receivers account for height anyway - some (the barometric sensor types) better than others! |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Speedometer | Peter | Snowboarding | 8 | January 1st 04 10:44 PM |