If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
I apologize for my previous comments that were conceived without much
thought or knowledge. It was a knee-jerk reaction to what I thought were poor choices and glaring omissions to the US Olympic Team. It seems the selection process set by the USSA is too concrete and the FIS quota of atheletes should not be based off the USSA points list. The selection should include the second section of the rules, not defer to it after Section I is exhausted. The discretionary seletion based on an outstanding result or recent trend of an athelete's reults would allow for the selection of someone like David Chamberlain who deserves to be on the team based on his performance at the National Championships. Would this eliminate all of the controversy? No, but it would give more flexability to the selection process. Jim Howe |
Ads |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
What exactly are the USSA, FIS and Olympic rules under which the team
was selected? I've read something about the best four races over the past year for the USST, but don't know much else. I'm not convinced a points system is a sign of strength - is that how the Norwegians, Swedes and Finns choose their teams? - though Jay's analogy to USGA and Ryder Cup selection is something to think about, and a points system does minimize favoritism. Cross-country skiing is somewhat closer to golf than track and field in that there are more ups and downs race to race and other variables involved. Gene "Jim Howe" wrote: I apologize for my previous comments that were conceived without much thought or knowledge. It was a knee-jerk reaction to what I thought were poor choices and glaring omissions to the US Olympic Team. It seems the selection process set by the USSA is too concrete and the FIS quota of atheletes should not be based off the USSA points list. The selection should include the second section of the rules, not defer to it after Section I is exhausted. The discretionary seletion based on an outstanding result or recent trend of an athelete's reults would allow for the selection of someone like David Chamberlain who deserves to be on the team based on his performance at the National Championships. Would this eliminate all of the controversy? No, but it would give more flexability to the selection process. Jim Howe |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Gene-
Click on the link within Nathan Schultz's reply to find USSA team selection rules. Jim |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
I followed that link, but it's hard to find that e.g., these 14 races
count towards points, and points are awarded by this, that, and the other thing. I'm green at this, so I kind of follow the idea that Babikov blowing everyone away at Nationals kind of screws up points, but I don't know exactly why. It seems to the outsider that a national champ (1st in the US) should get a certain number of points at nationals regardless if Babikov is rippin' or not. Other races...well, yeah, not everyone shows up, so there's some fudge factor to normalize the field. (Math geeks out there will like including "normalize" in a post.) Jay (wannabe geek) Wenner |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Here's what the system is for the first eight:
Athletes ranking in the top 50 in the World Cup Overall or the top 30 in the Sprint World Cup or Distance World Cup standings as of January 16, 2006 shall be nominated to the team... Objective selections shall be based on the results achieved by athletes in World Cup competitions held between October 1, 2005 and January 16, 2006 (tentative) (the “objective selection period�). Discretionary selections, if any, may be based on a variety of factors. Additional objective team selections, if any, shall be based on the USSA National Ranking List, developed from competitor’s best four (4) USSA scored competitions (in which he/she competed as a USSA member) between January 13, 2005 and the closing of the selection list on January 12, 2006 (tentative). Is that all there's to it? I've heard talk of FIS points and rules for who can compete in how many events, or who is even eligible to be on the team. Other limits? Gene "Jim Howe" wrote: Gene- Click on the link within Nathan Schultz's reply to find USSA team selection rules. Jim |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
My understanding of the rules was that the enitre FIS quota of skiers
was to be selected using the objective process of points earned during WC and USSA selected events. If this process does not complete the FIS quota then the discretionary selections will be made until the quota has been reached. Jim |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Gene Goldenfeld wrote:
What exactly are the USSA, FIS and Olympic rules under which the team was selected? I've read something about the best four races over the past year for the USST, but don't know much else. I'm not convinced a points system is a sign of strength - is that how the Norwegians, Swedes and Finns choose their teams? - though Jay's analogy to USGA and We select almost all our athletes without using any rigid rules: This effectively says that we assign a coach and then trust him/her to pick the best racers for the day/race. Ryder Cup selection is something to think about, and a points system does minimize favoritism. Cross-country skiing is somewhat closer to golf than track and field in that there are more ups and downs race to race and other variables involved. There have been (suspected?) instances of 'coach favourite' selections, but mostly it works much better than a mathematically predetermined rule. Terje -- - "almost all programming can be viewed as an exercise in caching" |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
There's been a background discussion about points and whether this or
that skier has enough for one or more events. What's that about? In fact, how are these races graded vis a vis points? "Jim Howe" wrote: My understanding of the rules was that the enitre FIS quota of skiers was to be selected using the objective process of points earned during WC and USSA selected events. If this process does not complete the FIS quota then the discretionary selections will be made until the quota has been reached. Jim |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Gene Goldenfeld wrote:
I've read something about the best four races over the past year for the USST, but don't know much else. Unfortunately it doesn't even do the four best races (important ones or not) over the past year. It does the four best point races. There is a difference, especially for the women at nationals. The starting value for points in a race is determined by the average ranking points for the top few finishers, so when Wagner (top ranked) only got 10th and 16th in the individual start classic and skate races, her points weren't averaged into the starting values. A similar thing happened in the first race, no highly ranked/low point women were in the top 5. In reality those two weekend races were the most competitive ones, with over 160 skiers in each, but they couldn't provide good points with starting values of 93.6 and 90.11 (before adding more points based on percent back). The last race at nationals was much less competitive, with most of the top skiers in the weekend races sitting out/gone home and only 21 skiers finishing, but since Wagner won and another highly ranked skier Weier was 2nd (also didn't do well enough in the first 3 races to be counted in the starting score for those) the starting points for that race was much, much lower at 79.7 and the points were much better. If the highest ranked women had performed well in the first three races, Stephen and Arritola (the 2nd and 3rd best performers at nationals) probably would have had a chance to meet the FIS requirement. It's almost a no win situation for Stephen and Arritola if they both do well, because the points for those races will not be low. |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Andrew, It sounds like you understand the FIS point system, so would
you mind going a step back and explaining how these points are set up, and how specifically it's determined within a race so that some count more than others. Perhaps a simple example of two. I'd finally like to understand this system and probably others would too. Thanks, Gene "Andrew Lee" whatsupandrewathotmaildotcom wrote: Gene Goldenfeld wrote: I've read something about the best four races over the past year for the USST, but don't know much else. Unfortunately it doesn't even do the four best races (important ones or not) over the past year. It does the four best point races. There is a difference, especially for the women at nationals. The starting value for points in a race is determined by the average ranking points for the top few finishers, so when Wagner (top ranked) only got 10th and 16th in the individual start classic and skate races, her points weren't averaged into the starting values. A similar thing happened in the first race, no highly ranked/low point women were in the top 5. In reality those two weekend races were the most competitive ones, with over 160 skiers in each, but they couldn't provide good points with starting values of 93.6 and 90.11 (before adding more points based on percent back). The last race at nationals was much less competitive, with most of the top skiers in the weekend races sitting out/gone home and only 21 skiers finishing, but since Wagner won and another highly ranked skier Weier was 2nd (also didn't do well enough in the first 3 races to be counted in the starting score for those) the starting points for that race was much, much lower at 79.7 and the points were much better. If the highest ranked women had performed well in the first three races, Stephen and Arritola (the 2nd and 3rd best performers at nationals) probably would have had a chance to meet the FIS requirement. It's almost a no win situation for Stephen and Arritola if they both do well, because the points for those races will not be low. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Kris Freeman training video clip | Zachary Caldwell | Nordic Skiing | 7 | July 6th 04 01:12 AM |
Freeman on Fischer Boots | Eli Brown | Nordic Skiing | 4 | April 28th 04 05:06 PM |
Ski Clinic with Kris Freeman | Rob Bradlee | Nordic Skiing | 3 | December 29th 03 06:41 PM |
Freeman 5th in Davos! | Trukweaz | Nordic Skiing | 1 | December 14th 03 01:55 PM |