If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Sweet lowcut boots on clearance!
I just received a pair of these lowcut Madshus Tour Boots. They're 45%
off. http://gearx.com/madshus-nnn-tour-boot-laceup.html They seem very well made. Great torsionally stiff sole but nice forward flex. They're quite unusual looking but whatever---a bit like b-ball shoes! They're quite lightweight but seem substantial enough for touring. They seem to be the only high-end lowcut boots out there these days. (Maybe there's a cheapy 75mm lowcut.) I like their normal, thick laces. I suppose speedlaces are the new thing. I have several boots with them and seem to get mixed results with slippage. I suppose race boots now have them---and they couldn't tolerate slippage. Everyone has gone to higher boots but why weren't they usually made high in previous decades? Until the mid-80's only tele boots went over ankle. I think it's because good classic technique needs maximum free range of flex. I see that race boots have mostly lightweight stretch stuff above the ankle which restricts motion less. I suppose ankle coverage is good to keep snowing from balling up on socks and such in long events. Anyway, low boots are lighter---and I really notice weight on a long outing. I even ordered the model without the zip- cover over the laces. I haven't ever had much problem with frozen laces. In deeper snow people always used light cloth gaiters to protect laces and ankles. But here's more, maybe the biggest news: they seem like D or E width with huge toe-box. Lastly: that "BCX" binding bit seems like a typo---that's what the shop guy thought. They're just NNN. They fit my bindings fine (haven't skied with em yet though). I've used hightops for the past 2 seasons and enjoy them well enough--- although I've REALLY noticed the new heavy weight of my heavier plastic-cuffed Rossignol X7 combi boot and heavier Fischer Country ski. Last year I used a cuffless zip-cover Rossi X3---it only seemed a little heavier but its laces blew out. I might be willing to go to an over-ankle design in exchange for a ton of stability and support if the weight can be kept off. I'm actually also going to try a cuffless Rossignol X1---the model with exposed laces. There seem to be 2 models floating around that look quite different. Fingers crossed on this one---the laces seem better anchored. I recall a wonderful range of motion with my old Merrell lowcuts. They were great for 10 years but in recent years they got really sloppy in both sole and beak (old SNS bindings). I'm looking forward to trying these fresh new Madshus NNN lowcuts! I suspect they'll give me totally fine support---I think it mostly comes from the soles anyway. We'll find out. --JP outyourbackdoor.com |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Sweet lowcut boots on clearance!
PS: Actually this new Madshus boot is pretty much a lowcut boot at the
back of it, by the heel, but like most boots today it sweeps upward some to above-ankle height where the laces tie. So the front is an inch taller than my old Merrells. It's still quite a bit lower than today's typical high-end boot, though. And I'd say it's a solid E width---very wide. Maybe a multiple of E's. The wide part of the boot is 4 3/8" wide for my size 44's. My Rossi X7 44's are 4" wide. Exterior of Rossi's are 11" long; Madshus is 11.25". So maybe they come a bit big in both width and length. My feet are 43.5 D width and fit the Rossi 44's pretty good, especially with 2 socks. The Madshus 44's were WAY too big and wide---3 socks still didn't give a fit, so I'm trying a pair of 43's. --JP |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Sweet lowcut boots on clearance!
OK, I've tested the Madshus now in size 43---the inner liners are the
same size as Rossi's 44. It looks like they'll work out fine for me. A short ski in my twist yard trail showed them to be just dandy and nice and light. More testing soon! But note the sizing. ---JP |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Sweet lowcut boots on clearance!
PS: I skied em an hour today in challenging terrain: perfect! Yay!
Light, supportive, total free range of motion. I am a happy camper with these new boots. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Sweet lowcut boots on clearance!
Update: I RETRACT my endorsement of these boots. The upper "pleather"
material is fragile. It cracks and slices easily, especially where the boot bends at the ball. I've been patching them with my new G-Flex West Systems epoxy (I think it's the only flex epoxy out there---hot new stuff). Now, I ski really hard in rough conditions and I've made my other 2 pairs of recent boots fail in serious ways but that's no excuse. (Rossi X3 laces and zipper; and X7 zipper.) I've had several other pairs last for 10+ years in the same conditions with no problem. Anyway, I still like the boots well enough (they're wide and light) but the fragility is a big problem. --JP |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Sweet lowcut boots on clearance!
PS: I'd also update my review to say that these lowish boots are
better for firm trails and stable terrain. If you're skiing much homebrew trail I suggest something with a low, light pivoting cuff--- it's a great innovation for stability without a penalty as long as it's minimal. (Beware of taller, heavier combi boots, though, unless you have steep, tricky terrain and won't be going out for very long.) --JP |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FA: classic rollerskis on ebay -- sweet! | [email protected] | Nordic Skiing | 4 | May 6th 07 06:56 PM |
Massive stock clearance sale (Brighton UK 12th Oct) | NoahT | Marketplace | 0 | October 2nd 03 08:40 PM |
Massive stock clearance sale (Brighton UK 12th Oct) | NoahT | Snowboarding | 0 | October 2nd 03 08:40 PM |