If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#961
|
|||
|
|||
The nutless gutlessness of Bob Thompson, Dickless Freak
In article ,
"Two Buddha" wrote: Alan, what part of "I wouldn't play your sick games" don't you understand? I was there. You weren't. You ran. Reality. Now go see a shrink, wack job. What part of "Why could you only meet my condition (play my "sick game") *after* the meeting was over?" can't you understand? See, it doesn't wash Scotty. First you claimed you didn't post it because you couldn't have because you'd already left. You're story only changed to "not playing your sick games" after I proved that you were still posting after my message was already up. And if it was a "sick game" you wouldn't play when it would have given you an ironclad claim that I wouldn't show despite having agreed to, why did play it afterwards when the information had become utterly useless? -- ---------------------------------------------------- This mailbox protected from unsolicited email by Spam Alarm from Dignity Software http://www.dignitysoftware.com "Alan Baker" wrote in message ... In article , "Two Buddha" wrote: Alan, Alan. You COULD have shown up, since you have admitted that you knew exactly where you were supposed to show up. And I said at the time precisely *why* I was unwilling to show up unless you met my condition. But rather than provide the one sentence clarification that was necessary -- a sentence you provided only afterwards when it became useless -- you decline. You were just playing a sick game, and I don't play your sick games. But you happily "played the game" afterwards, right? Then, when it was safe, you happily provided the *one sentence* that was necessary. You didn't show. Because you're insane, not crazy. And not a man. Just another nutless, gutless rsa coward making laughable excuses for his dicklessness. And if I hadn't shown after you'd met my condition, you're claim would be ironclad. So why didn't you meet it? -- ---------------------------------------------------- This mailbox protected from unsolicited email by Spam Alarm from Dignity Software http://www.dignitysoftware.com "Alan Baker" wrote in message ... In article , "Two Buddha" wrote: "Sven Golly" wrote in message ... "Two Buddha" wrote in news:rtdPh.257463$BK1.132231 @newsfe13.lga: Anytime it is convenient for me. Anywhere it is convenient for me. PING JEFFY: Note the conditions demanded. Yeah. Real difficult conditions. I demand a verifiable identity, too. How burdensome to a dickless coward like this dickless freak. And I demanded a one sentence clarification... ...but that was too much effort... ...until afterwards... ...when the effort had not point at all... ...and then it wasn't too much. Interesting, that. -- "The iPhone doesn't have a speaker phone" -- "I checked very carefully" -- "I checked Apple's web pages" -- Edwin on the iPhone and how he missed the demo of the iPhone speakerphone. -- "The iPhone doesn't have a speaker phone" -- "I checked very carefully" -- "I checked Apple's web pages" -- Edwin on the iPhone and how he missed the demo of the iPhone speakerphone. -- "The iPhone doesn't have a speaker phone" -- "I checked very carefully" -- "I checked Apple's web pages" -- Edwin on the iPhone and how he missed the demo of the iPhone speakerphone. |
Ads |
#962
|
|||
|
|||
The nutless gutlessness of Bob Thompson, Dickless Freak
"Alan Baker" wrote in message
... In article , "Two Buddha" wrote: Alan, what part of "I wouldn't play your sick games" don't you understand? I was there. You weren't. You ran. Reality. Now go see a shrink, wack job. What part of "Why could you only meet my condition (play my "sick game") *after* the meeting was over?" can't you understand? I didn't play your sick game, Baker. I told you how sick you are. You do not understand the difference, because you are mentally ill. See, it doesn't wash Scotty. Of course it doesn't. Reality never does with you. First you claimed you didn't post it because you couldn't have because you'd already left. You're story only changed to "not playing your sick games" after I proved that you were still posting after my message was already up. Yeah, but I wasn't reading your posts, dumb****. Because I wasn't playing your sick games. I'd set a time and a place. You didn't show. Reality. Go get help, freak. And if it was a "sick game" you wouldn't play when it would have given you an ironclad claim that I wouldn't show despite having agreed to, why did play it afterwards when the information had become utterly useless? That is a truly insane statement. Get help. -- ---------------------------------------------------- This mailbox protected from unsolicited email by Spam Alarm from Dignity Software http://www.dignitysoftware.com "Alan Baker" wrote in message ... In article , "Two Buddha" wrote: Alan, Alan. You COULD have shown up, since you have admitted that you knew exactly where you were supposed to show up. And I said at the time precisely *why* I was unwilling to show up unless you met my condition. But rather than provide the one sentence clarification that was necessary -- a sentence you provided only afterwards when it became useless -- you decline. You were just playing a sick game, and I don't play your sick games. But you happily "played the game" afterwards, right? Then, when it was safe, you happily provided the *one sentence* that was necessary. You didn't show. Because you're insane, not crazy. And not a man. Just another nutless, gutless rsa coward making laughable excuses for his dicklessness. And if I hadn't shown after you'd met my condition, you're claim would be ironclad. So why didn't you meet it? -- ---------------------------------------------------- This mailbox protected from unsolicited email by Spam Alarm from Dignity Software http://www.dignitysoftware.com "Alan Baker" wrote in message ... In article , "Two Buddha" wrote: "Sven Golly" wrote in message ... "Two Buddha" wrote in news:rtdPh.257463$BK1.132231 @newsfe13.lga: Anytime it is convenient for me. Anywhere it is convenient for me. PING JEFFY: Note the conditions demanded. Yeah. Real difficult conditions. I demand a verifiable identity, too. How burdensome to a dickless coward like this dickless freak. And I demanded a one sentence clarification... ...but that was too much effort... ...until afterwards... ...when the effort had not point at all... ...and then it wasn't too much. Interesting, that. -- "The iPhone doesn't have a speaker phone" -- "I checked very carefully" -- "I checked Apple's web pages" -- Edwin on the iPhone and how he missed the demo of the iPhone speakerphone. -- "The iPhone doesn't have a speaker phone" -- "I checked very carefully" -- "I checked Apple's web pages" -- Edwin on the iPhone and how he missed the demo of the iPhone speakerphone. -- "The iPhone doesn't have a speaker phone" -- "I checked very carefully" -- "I checked Apple's web pages" -- Edwin on the iPhone and how he missed the demo of the iPhone speakerphone. |
#963
|
|||
|
|||
Scottie Sighting
"Alan Baker" wrote in message ... In article , "Two Buddha" wrote: Alan, I reason with you. You continue your delusional and insane postings. Get help. That is reason, you sick freak. You'll reason by avoiding answering a simple question? And here's another: After I showed you up by providing the name of my employer, as you said I'd never dare do, why didn't you send them my "insane ramblings", as you said you'd do? I took pity on you because you are insane. But I talked to him on Wednesday. Want me to have another chat, this time with a fair sampling of rsa insanity, and tell him you are right in the middle of this ****? I can and will, Alan, if it makes you get psychiatric help. You need it. Desperately. |
#964
|
|||
|
|||
The nutless gutlessness of Bob Thompson, Dickless Freak
In article ,
"Two Buddha" wrote: "Alan Baker" wrote in message ... In article , "Two Buddha" wrote: Alan, what part of "I wouldn't play your sick games" don't you understand? I was there. You weren't. You ran. Reality. Now go see a shrink, wack job. What part of "Why could you only meet my condition (play my "sick game") *after* the meeting was over?" can't you understand? I didn't play your sick game, Baker. I told you how sick you are. You do not understand the difference, because you are mentally ill. Actually, you just stopped replying (another explanation in which you contradict yourself, BTW) But afterwards -- when it didn't matter at all -- then you played! See, it doesn't wash Scotty. Of course it doesn't. Reality never does with you. First you claimed you didn't post it because you couldn't have because you'd already left. You're story only changed to "not playing your sick games" after I proved that you were still posting after my message was already up. Yeah, but I wasn't reading your posts, dumb****. Because I wasn't playing your sick games. I'd set a time and a place. You didn't show. Reality. Go get help, freak. Make up your mind, Scott. Did you not tell me where because you *couldn't* respond because you'd already left (excuse 1), because you *wouldn't* respond because you'd be playing my "sick game" (excuse 2), or (now) that you weren't reading my posts? Do you even realize that each of your excuses is mutually contradictory? And if it was a "sick game" you wouldn't play when it would have given you an ironclad claim that I wouldn't show despite having agreed to, why did play it afterwards when the information had become utterly useless? That is a truly insane statement. Get help. Actually, it was a *question*. One which should be simple for you to answer. -- ---------------------------------------------------- This mailbox protected from unsolicited email by Spam Alarm from Dignity Software http://www.dignitysoftware.com "Alan Baker" wrote in message ... In article , "Two Buddha" wrote: Alan, Alan. You COULD have shown up, since you have admitted that you knew exactly where you were supposed to show up. And I said at the time precisely *why* I was unwilling to show up unless you met my condition. But rather than provide the one sentence clarification that was necessary -- a sentence you provided only afterwards when it became useless -- you decline. You were just playing a sick game, and I don't play your sick games. But you happily "played the game" afterwards, right? Then, when it was safe, you happily provided the *one sentence* that was necessary. You didn't show. Because you're insane, not crazy. And not a man. Just another nutless, gutless rsa coward making laughable excuses for his dicklessness. And if I hadn't shown after you'd met my condition, you're claim would be ironclad. So why didn't you meet it? -- ---------------------------------------------------- This mailbox protected from unsolicited email by Spam Alarm from Dignity Software http://www.dignitysoftware.com "Alan Baker" wrote in message ... In article , "Two Buddha" wrote: "Sven Golly" wrote in message ... "Two Buddha" wrote in news:rtdPh.257463$BK1.132231 @newsfe13.lga: Anytime it is convenient for me. Anywhere it is convenient for me. PING JEFFY: Note the conditions demanded. Yeah. Real difficult conditions. I demand a verifiable identity, too. How burdensome to a dickless coward like this dickless freak. And I demanded a one sentence clarification... ...but that was too much effort... ...until afterwards... ...when the effort had not point at all... ...and then it wasn't too much. Interesting, that. -- "The iPhone doesn't have a speaker phone" -- "I checked very carefully" -- "I checked Apple's web pages" -- Edwin on the iPhone and how he missed the demo of the iPhone speakerphone. -- "The iPhone doesn't have a speaker phone" -- "I checked very carefully" -- "I checked Apple's web pages" -- Edwin on the iPhone and how he missed the demo of the iPhone speakerphone. -- "The iPhone doesn't have a speaker phone" -- "I checked very carefully" -- "I checked Apple's web pages" -- Edwin on the iPhone and how he missed the demo of the iPhone speakerphone. -- "The iPhone doesn't have a speaker phone" -- "I checked very carefully" -- "I checked Apple's web pages" -- Edwin on the iPhone and how he missed the demo of the iPhone speakerphone. |
#965
|
|||
|
|||
Scottie Sighting
In article ,
"Two Buddha" wrote: "Alan Baker" wrote in message ... In article , "Two Buddha" wrote: Alan, I reason with you. You continue your delusional and insane postings. Get help. That is reason, you sick freak. You'll reason by avoiding answering a simple question? And here's another: After I showed you up by providing the name of my employer, as you said I'd never dare do, why didn't you send them my "insane ramblings", as you said you'd do? I took pity on you because you are insane. LOL But I talked to him on Wednesday. Want me to have another chat, this time with a fair sampling of rsa insanity, and tell him you are right in the middle of this ****? Absolutely! BTW, what was "his" name? Ooooh. Tricky. I can and will, Alan, if it makes you get psychiatric help. You need it. Desperately. Bring it on, big boy! -- "The iPhone doesn't have a speaker phone" -- "I checked very carefully" -- "I checked Apple's web pages" -- Edwin on the iPhone and how he missed the demo of the iPhone speakerphone. |
#966
|
|||
|
|||
The nutless gutlessness of Bob Thompson, Dickless Freak
You are insane. Get help.
-- ---------------------------------------------------- This mailbox protected from unsolicited email by Spam Alarm from Dignity Software http://www.dignitysoftware.com "Alan Baker" wrote in message ... In article , "Two Buddha" wrote: "Alan Baker" wrote in message ... In article , "Two Buddha" wrote: Alan, what part of "I wouldn't play your sick games" don't you understand? I was there. You weren't. You ran. Reality. Now go see a shrink, wack job. What part of "Why could you only meet my condition (play my "sick game") *after* the meeting was over?" can't you understand? I didn't play your sick game, Baker. I told you how sick you are. You do not understand the difference, because you are mentally ill. Actually, you just stopped replying (another explanation in which you contradict yourself, BTW) But afterwards -- when it didn't matter at all -- then you played! See, it doesn't wash Scotty. Of course it doesn't. Reality never does with you. First you claimed you didn't post it because you couldn't have because you'd already left. You're story only changed to "not playing your sick games" after I proved that you were still posting after my message was already up. Yeah, but I wasn't reading your posts, dumb****. Because I wasn't playing your sick games. I'd set a time and a place. You didn't show. Reality. Go get help, freak. Make up your mind, Scott. Did you not tell me where because you *couldn't* respond because you'd already left (excuse 1), because you *wouldn't* respond because you'd be playing my "sick game" (excuse 2), or (now) that you weren't reading my posts? Do you even realize that each of your excuses is mutually contradictory? And if it was a "sick game" you wouldn't play when it would have given you an ironclad claim that I wouldn't show despite having agreed to, why did play it afterwards when the information had become utterly useless? That is a truly insane statement. Get help. Actually, it was a *question*. One which should be simple for you to answer. -- ---------------------------------------------------- This mailbox protected from unsolicited email by Spam Alarm from Dignity Software http://www.dignitysoftware.com "Alan Baker" wrote in message ... In article , "Two Buddha" wrote: Alan, Alan. You COULD have shown up, since you have admitted that you knew exactly where you were supposed to show up. And I said at the time precisely *why* I was unwilling to show up unless you met my condition. But rather than provide the one sentence clarification that was necessary -- a sentence you provided only afterwards when it became useless -- you decline. You were just playing a sick game, and I don't play your sick games. But you happily "played the game" afterwards, right? Then, when it was safe, you happily provided the *one sentence* that was necessary. You didn't show. Because you're insane, not crazy. And not a man. Just another nutless, gutless rsa coward making laughable excuses for his dicklessness. And if I hadn't shown after you'd met my condition, you're claim would be ironclad. So why didn't you meet it? -- ---------------------------------------------------- This mailbox protected from unsolicited email by Spam Alarm from Dignity Software http://www.dignitysoftware.com "Alan Baker" wrote in message ... In article , "Two Buddha" wrote: "Sven Golly" wrote in message ... "Two Buddha" wrote in news:rtdPh.257463$BK1.132231 @newsfe13.lga: Anytime it is convenient for me. Anywhere it is convenient for me. PING JEFFY: Note the conditions demanded. Yeah. Real difficult conditions. I demand a verifiable identity, too. How burdensome to a dickless coward like this dickless freak. And I demanded a one sentence clarification... ...but that was too much effort... ...until afterwards... ...when the effort had not point at all... ...and then it wasn't too much. Interesting, that. -- "The iPhone doesn't have a speaker phone" -- "I checked very carefully" -- "I checked Apple's web pages" -- Edwin on the iPhone and how he missed the demo of the iPhone speakerphone. -- "The iPhone doesn't have a speaker phone" -- "I checked very carefully" -- "I checked Apple's web pages" -- Edwin on the iPhone and how he missed the demo of the iPhone speakerphone. -- "The iPhone doesn't have a speaker phone" -- "I checked very carefully" -- "I checked Apple's web pages" -- Edwin on the iPhone and how he missed the demo of the iPhone speakerphone. -- "The iPhone doesn't have a speaker phone" -- "I checked very carefully" -- "I checked Apple's web pages" -- Edwin on the iPhone and how he missed the demo of the iPhone speakerphone. |
#967
|
|||
|
|||
Scottie Sighting
You are insane. Get help.
-- ---------------------------------------------------- This mailbox protected from unsolicited email by Spam Alarm from Dignity Software http://www.dignitysoftware.com "Alan Baker" wrote in message ... In article , "Two Buddha" wrote: "Alan Baker" wrote in message ... In article , "Two Buddha" wrote: Alan, I reason with you. You continue your delusional and insane postings. Get help. That is reason, you sick freak. You'll reason by avoiding answering a simple question? And here's another: After I showed you up by providing the name of my employer, as you said I'd never dare do, why didn't you send them my "insane ramblings", as you said you'd do? I took pity on you because you are insane. LOL But I talked to him on Wednesday. Want me to have another chat, this time with a fair sampling of rsa insanity, and tell him you are right in the middle of this ****? Absolutely! BTW, what was "his" name? Ooooh. Tricky. I can and will, Alan, if it makes you get psychiatric help. You need it. Desperately. Bring it on, big boy! -- "The iPhone doesn't have a speaker phone" -- "I checked very carefully" -- "I checked Apple's web pages" -- Edwin on the iPhone and how he missed the demo of the iPhone speakerphone. |
#968
|
|||
|
|||
The nutless gutlessness of Bob Thompson, Dickless Freak
In article ,
"Two Buddha" wrote: You are insane. Get help. Right on time! -- ---------------------------------------------------- This mailbox protected from unsolicited email by Spam Alarm from Dignity Software http://www.dignitysoftware.com "Alan Baker" wrote in message ... In article , "Two Buddha" wrote: "Alan Baker" wrote in message ... In article , "Two Buddha" wrote: Alan, what part of "I wouldn't play your sick games" don't you understand? I was there. You weren't. You ran. Reality. Now go see a shrink, wack job. What part of "Why could you only meet my condition (play my "sick game") *after* the meeting was over?" can't you understand? I didn't play your sick game, Baker. I told you how sick you are. You do not understand the difference, because you are mentally ill. Actually, you just stopped replying (another explanation in which you contradict yourself, BTW) But afterwards -- when it didn't matter at all -- then you played! Ooops. See, it doesn't wash Scotty. Of course it doesn't. Reality never does with you. First you claimed you didn't post it because you couldn't have because you'd already left. You're story only changed to "not playing your sick games" after I proved that you were still posting after my message was already up. Yeah, but I wasn't reading your posts, dumb****. Because I wasn't playing your sick games. I'd set a time and a place. You didn't show. Reality. Go get help, freak. Make up your mind, Scott. Did you not tell me where because you *couldn't* respond because you'd already left (excuse 1), because you *wouldn't* respond because you'd be playing my "sick game" (excuse 2), or (now) that you weren't reading my posts? Ooops. Do you even realize that each of your excuses is mutually contradictory? Ooops. And if it was a "sick game" you wouldn't play when it would have given you an ironclad claim that I wouldn't show despite having agreed to, why did play it afterwards when the information had become utterly useless? That is a truly insane statement. Get help. Actually, it was a *question*. One which should be simple for you to answer. Ooops. -- "The iPhone doesn't have a speaker phone" -- "I checked very carefully" -- "I checked Apple's web pages" -- Edwin on the iPhone and how he missed the demo of the iPhone speakerphone. |
#969
|
|||
|
|||
The nutless gutlessness of Bob Thompson, Dickless Freak
On Mar 30, 1:53 pm, Alan Baker wrote:
In article , "Two Buddha" wrote: "Sven Golly" wrote in message .. . "Two Buddha" wrote in news:rtdPh.257463$BK1.132231 @newsfe13.lga: Anytime it is convenient for me. Anywhere it is convenient for me. PING JEFFY: Note the conditions demanded. Yeah. Real difficult conditions. I demand a verifiable identity, too. How burdensome to a dickless coward like this dickless freak. And I demanded a one sentence clarification... ...but that was too much effort... ...until afterwards... ...when the effort had not point at all... ...and then it wasn't too much. Interesting, that. -- "The iPhone doesn't have a speaker phone" -- "I checked very carefully" -- "I checked Apple's web pages" -- Edwin on the iPhone and how he missed the demo of the iPhone speakerphone. Drop it Alan. He has an identity for me. It doesn't matter when it comes down to it. |
#970
|
|||
|
|||
The nutless gutlessness of Bob Thompson, Dickless Freak
In article ,
"Two Buddha" wrote: I think you rescinded your balls a long time ago. Yeah, I was born with an unrescinded testicle, but got it fixed when I was 5. Dave |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Sighting: Tai-Chi Skiing at Alta | Walt | Alpine Skiing | 6 | December 16th 05 03:26 PM |
First snowman sighting | John Roden | Nordic Skiing | 1 | October 18th 04 01:57 AM |
Hey Scottie, have you entered yet? | Scottabe | Alpine Skiing | 5 | January 21st 04 01:31 PM |
did scottie change his name? | Scottabe | Alpine Skiing | 0 | December 25th 03 07:38 PM |
Scottie Bob-tails tele skis | Daymiller | Backcountry Skiing | 1 | October 28th 03 12:12 PM |