If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Non-standard rollerski designs, your opinions/idea's?
Since I've been researching what rollerski's to buy or even which to have
made (budgetary reasons) I've recently come across these : http://www.rolec.ch/ and these : http://www.siriro-shop.de/pd10948203...rch0_EQ_Blau%2 0eloxiert_AND_search1_EQ_ohne%20Bindung_AND_{EOL}& categoryId=0 Both sport 4 wheels per ski, supposedly for extra speed in racing, and a more snow-like feel (they sure are long for skating rollerski's). The speed I can see, inliner skaters also seem to prefer 5x84mm over 4x84mm for racing, even if the wheelbase remains the same. I am especially intriqued with the Siriro Double Quatro's, obviously. Not a lot of technical info there on how it works, but it looks like the pairs of wheels sit on a centre pivoting swing arm. I did a little sketch, and it seems that if there's a 1cm tall obstacle to roll over, the individual bumps on the frame (pivot point between the front wheels) are just 0,5cm each. Might be a nice way to get better roll-over ability without larger wheels than the apparently max 100mm allowed in racing, smart stuff! Do people actually race or train such 4-wheelers, apart from the sponsored athletes shown on the Rolec website? How do they compare to the lighter and seemingly globally popular super-short 2-wheelers? I'm not really interested in trying a 4-wheel design as my first set of proper rollerski's (I'm on 10" wheeled Crosskates now), but these advanced technical aspects do intrigue me. Your thoughts on these and other "odd" designs out there, please? Any idea why the Siriro's have 2 differently sized wheels per pair? For now I'm still most interested in getting a 2-wheel 150mm pneumatic setup, with extra axle holes for 125mm, 100mm, or even smaller wheels. I've seen slow 100mm rubber wheels which might be nice for lightweight resistance training. 150mm tubeless air wheels would be for endurance/technique workouts over varying road surfaces (copycat of like the V2 Aero 150). 145mm 85A PU wheels might be fun for the occasional silly-fast workout, setting fast times around my time trial courses, or skiing along friends on bikes. 200x40mm PU scooter wheels exist as well, but will be harder to get to fit a stiff rollerski to without raising the ride height. It will be hard to incorporate on the same 2-wheel frame, but perhaps a setup as the Siriro with two 150mm or even 250mm front wheels and a single 10-14" rear wheel might make for a potent off-road set, weight be damned. I like that swing arm idea and the halved weight and movement on the front wheels, and the possibly increased rolling speed over soft soil. My Crosskates are supposed to be the mountainbikes of rollerski's, but really roll like crap offroad. I think it can be improved upon for true XC skating over flowing fire roads I wish were snowed over all winter. Yes it will be heavy, but my Crosskates are 7.4kg including boots now. Like a road bike on my feet, and I handle that just fine. A man can dream? Happy Easter from Holland, J |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Jan Gerrit Klok wrote: Since I've been researching what rollerski's to buy or even which to have made (budgetary reasons) I've recently come across these : http://www.rolec.ch/ and these : http://www.siriro-shop.de/pd10948203...rch0_EQ_Blau%2 0eloxiert_AND_search1_EQ_ohne%20Bindung_AND_{EOL}& categoryId=0 Both sport 4 wheels per ski, supposedly for extra speed in racing, and a more snow-like feel (they sure are long for skating rollerski's). The speed I can see, inliner skaters also seem to prefer 5x84mm over 4x84mm for racing, even if the wheelbase remains the same. I am especially intriqued with the Siriro Double Quatro's, obviously. Not a lot of technical info there on how it works, but it looks like the pairs of wheels sit on a centre pivoting swing arm. I did a little sketch, and it seems that if there's a 1cm tall obstacle to roll over, the individual bumps on the frame (pivot point between the front wheels) are just 0,5cm each. Might be a nice way to get better roll-over ability without larger wheels than the apparently max 100mm allowed in racing, smart stuff! Do people actually race or train such 4-wheelers, apart from the sponsored athletes shown on the Rolec website? How do they compare to the lighter and seemingly globally popular super-short 2-wheelers? I'm not really interested in trying a 4-wheel design as my first set of proper rollerski's (I'm on 10" wheeled Crosskates now), but these advanced technical aspects do intrigue me. Your thoughts on these and other "odd" designs out there, please? Any idea why the Siriro's have 2 differently sized wheels per pair? For now I'm still most interested in getting a 2-wheel 150mm pneumatic setup, with extra axle holes for 125mm, 100mm, or even smaller wheels. I've seen slow 100mm rubber wheels which might be nice for lightweight resistance training. 150mm tubeless air wheels would be for endurance/technique workouts over varying road surfaces (copycat of like the V2 Aero 150). 145mm 85A PU wheels might be fun for the occasional silly-fast workout, setting fast times around my time trial courses, or skiing along friends on bikes. 200x40mm PU scooter wheels exist as well, but will be harder to get to fit a stiff rollerski to without raising the ride height. It will be hard to incorporate on the same 2-wheel frame, but perhaps a setup as the Siriro with two 150mm or even 250mm front wheels and a single 10-14" rear wheel might make for a potent off-road set, weight be damned. I like that swing arm idea and the halved weight and movement on the front wheels, and the possibly increased rolling speed over soft soil. My Crosskates are supposed to be the mountainbikes of rollerski's, but really roll like crap offroad. I think it can be improved upon for true XC skating over flowing fire roads I wish were snowed over all winter. Yes it will be heavy, but my Crosskates are 7.4kg including boots now. Like a road bike on my feet, and I handle that just fine. A man can dream? Happy Easter from Holland, J Hi Jan, I have a set of Swenor combi with small (55mm?) ratchet wheels. Standard design 2 wheels per ski. One thing I don't like about 2 wheel is the susceptibility to stopping on cracks. I have only used them a few times, so I am far from an expert, but they sure felt rough and problematic on bad surfaces. Your big-wheeled cross-skates may be masking the problems of only two wheels on rough surfaces just because they are so big. Or maybe your surfaces are smooth enough not to matter. I see lots of people around here roller skiing past my house, so I guess it doesn't bother them, but I'm still a bit chicken particularly on descents. I wonder if the "Doppel Quattro" ones sort of defeat the stability of having 4 wheels? I know I am much more comfortable (mentally) on my cheap-o department store inlines than I am on my roller skis. I think is from the 4 wheels vs 2. The front wheel of the skate doesn't drop down into every crack like the roller skis do. After your cross-skates, smaller harder wheeled roller skis may seem very harsh on all but the best surfaces. The cross skates look really cool. Lots of dirt roads around here that would suit tthem well. Let me know if you ever want to get rid of them! Joseph |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Hey Joseph,
I know I am much more comfortable (mentally) on my cheap-o department store inlines than I am on my roller skis. I think is from the 4 wheels vs 2. The front wheel of the skate doesn't drop down into every crack like the roller skis do. I had not thought of that before, smart thinking! The Siriro's most front wheel probably would get into the crack, but with less weight on it might get stuck less severely. And I can't get over this : the front of the ski drops only half the crack depth, less impact on the foot, and easier to roll out of it. Then, 2-wheelers half to conquer obstacles twice, these four times. After your cross-skates, smaller harder wheeled roller skis may seem very harsh on all but the best surfaces. I do fear this. The 150's should be okay though, I'm running a tad more than the allowed 60psi in these fatties, which makes them pretty harsh already. Off-road and on bad surfaces I notice they should be aired down for best roll-over performance. But right now my main objective is to stay as close to my buddy on high-end 4x80mm rollerblades as possible. He says with tailwind I lose only 2kph, with headwind 7kph. I blaim my height and lack of V2 for this. Working on V2, it's worth it with headwind it seems, but a sucker to excecuted correctly. But it won't be long before I manage to go faster against the wind with V2 than with V2alt. My arms hate V2 though. The cross skates look really cool. Lots of dirt roads around here that would suit tthem well. Let me know if you ever want to get rid of them! I only have size 9 and 13 proprietary boots with mine, they don't fit proper boots. That feature was planned vor version 2 that never happened. Like faster/ligher road tires, unfortunately. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Jan:
Those four wheel skis look interesting, but they may be for the Euro roller racing market, especially the first one. Jenex has or had some similar, and with their Black Mamba wheels I'm sure they were very quick. I'm more interested in realistic snow speed and resistance, so my Aeros fit the bill very well there. Inline skate racers travel twice as fast (26 vs. 13mph), but that's not what I want. We saw some beautiful hard wheel skate roller skis with spring suspension and interchangable springs in Norway two years ago. Don't recall the name. Randy |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
schreef in bericht ups.com... I'm more interested in realistic snow speed and resistance, so my Aeros fit the bill very well there. I don't think I have a use for such long and fast glides myself, but the science behind it does intrigue me a lot. I too just want simple rollerski's to log miles on, skating as close to snow conditions as possible. But as I get used to the skating, speed does grow some attraction. I just drew up a sketch of a rollerski with three 150mm wheels, 2 in front mounted like on the Siriro's. The rear could be either a single 150mm for ease of construction, two 150's for optical balance, or one really large wheel. I'm trying to figure out what options there are in the bicycle/trailer market, 12" or 14" might be fun if gotten to work. Bike technology (tensioned spokes) might make for a light and strong wheel. The front wheel pair might make for a really effective speed reducer mounted on the swing arm, being forced vertically down right in between both wheels, slowing them doen both. Might make for a light solution with double efficiency? With a third 150mm wheel, and the front two "suspended", actual offroad-ability might be a lot better. I wonder what an extra rear wheel would do, mounted directly next and on the outside on the existing one. Dead weight turning freely during most of the skate motion? Helpful while double poling? No idea how that would affect turning, but I'm sure it would. We saw some beautiful hard wheel skate roller skis with spring suspension and interchangable springs in Norway two years ago. Don't recall the name. I've seen some with LOTS of suspension travel, the boots really up high above the trial. It looked very mean, but also impossible to skate forward. Perhaps the spring kick-back is supposed to make it skate-able. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
The rollerskis you saw are the dynaskate DS600SE I have been on them for 3
years and highly recommend them. They are pricey at 3,299 KR ($500) with bindings, but give an excellent ski like feel and, because of the dual suspension, ride well over rough roads (chipseal included). They have a model with only one suspension spring in the front that is cheaper, but I have no experience with that model. I have them set up with Marwe 100mm wheels which are very durable (3,000 miles) and medium speed, but you can use most 100mm wheels to adjust speed. You can see them at www.dynasports.com . The FrontRunner wrote in message ups.com... Jan: Those four wheel skis look interesting, but they may be for the Euro roller racing market, especially the first one. Jenex has or had some similar, and with their Black Mamba wheels I'm sure they were very quick. I'm more interested in realistic snow speed and resistance, so my Aeros fit the bill very well there. Inline skate racers travel twice as fast (26 vs. 13mph), but that's not what I want. We saw some beautiful hard wheel skate roller skis with spring suspension and interchangable springs in Norway two years ago. Don't recall the name. Randy |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
FrontRunner wrote: The rollerskis you saw are the dynaskate DS600SE I have been on them for 3 years and highly recommend them. They are pricey at 3,299 KR ($500) with bindings, but give an excellent ski like feel and, because of the dual suspension, ride well over rough roads (chipseal included). They have a model with only one suspension spring in the front that is cheaper, but I have no experience with that model. I have them set up with Marwe 100mm wheels which are very durable (3,000 miles) and medium speed, but you can use most 100mm wheels to adjust speed. You can see them at www.dynasports.com . The FrontRunner Those look very interesting. How much do you weigh? What sort of surfaces do you ski on? Joseph wrote in message ups.com... Jan: Those four wheel skis look interesting, but they may be for the Euro roller racing market, especially the first one. Jenex has or had some similar, and with their Black Mamba wheels I'm sure they were very quick. I'm more interested in realistic snow speed and resistance, so my Aeros fit the bill very well there. Inline skate racers travel twice as fast (26 vs. 13mph), but that's not what I want. We saw some beautiful hard wheel skate roller skis with spring suspension and interchangable springs in Norway two years ago. Don't recall the name. Randy |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Jan:
Man, I think with all those wheels you'll aproach the weight of your Crosskates. I'm really dubious of any roller skis ever being very useful off-road, except perhaps on smooth grass like golf courses. How well do the Crosskates do? I've got one and maybe two solutions for off-road. First, Catskis. See 'em at Catskier.com or planetxc.com. I've owned two pair; the originals, and the much better second generation. Great classic diagonal stride (only) intense workout. I like 'em best on a big soccer field, or several next to each other, but they will go over just about anything. On level ground it always feels like you're climbing a noticable grade. I usually avoid hills, not because it's not a great intereval climbing, but because going down you still have to diagonal stride, and it's worthless, both technique and effort wise. Especially nice for after dark workouts. The other idea I haven't yet tried. I bought some used Italian Rolskis, which I think were also called Grasskis. They were sold as a way to downhill ski in the summer. Think of miniature free-rolling tank treads with a platform over the middle for bindings. They feel ather heavy, and the platform is probably at least two inches off the ground, but I'm hoping they may function okay as off-road skate skis. I'll let you know when I get around to them. Randy |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
I'm about 170lbs. They provide three sets of springs with the skis. I am
using the medium set-up, but you could adjust depending on weight. I ski country roads with varying degrees of pavement some smooth to quite rough. The primary road resurfacing technique around here is chip seal. Depending on the amount of traffic it takes 2 to 3 years after the dreaded treatment before the road is skiable again. The FrontRunner wrote in message ups.com... FrontRunner wrote: The rollerskis you saw are the dynaskate DS600SE I have been on them for 3 years and highly recommend them. They are pricey at 3,299 KR ($500) with bindings, but give an excellent ski like feel and, because of the dual suspension, ride well over rough roads (chipseal included). They have a model with only one suspension spring in the front that is cheaper, but I have no experience with that model. I have them set up with Marwe 100mm wheels which are very durable (3,000 miles) and medium speed, but you can use most 100mm wheels to adjust speed. You can see them at www.dynasports.com . The FrontRunner Those look very interesting. How much do you weigh? What sort of surfaces do you ski on? Joseph wrote in message ups.com... Jan: Those four wheel skis look interesting, but they may be for the Euro roller racing market, especially the first one. Jenex has or had some similar, and with their Black Mamba wheels I'm sure they were very quick. I'm more interested in realistic snow speed and resistance, so my Aeros fit the bill very well there. Inline skate racers travel twice as fast (26 vs. 13mph), but that's not what I want. We saw some beautiful hard wheel skate roller skis with spring suspension and interchangable springs in Norway two years ago. Don't recall the name. Randy |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
schreef in bericht
ups.com... I've got one and maybe two solutions for off-road. First, Catskis. See 'em at Catskier.com or planetxc.com. The other idea I haven't yet tried. I bought some used Italian Rolskis, which I think were also called Grasskis. They were sold as a way to downhill ski in the summer. Think of miniature free-rolling tank treads with a platform over the middle for bindings. They feel ather heavy, and the platform is probably at least two inches off the ground, but I'm hoping they may function okay as off-road skate skis. I'll let you know when I get around to them. Randy, The Grasskis look interesting http://timefortuckerman.com/photopos...&password=&sor t=1&size=medium&cat=616&page= I wonder how effcient they are though. Catski's seem a great solution for classic skiers. I'm just not into that very much, and think my Crosskates could handle that just fine, if I cared for it. The whole movement doesn't work with my sense of balance, while skating seems pretty natural to me. I feel fluent, and people comment on it looking natural and fluent. I do realize I most likely look like a total noob to experienced skiers. I run the crosskates at high pressure to get some sort of snow-like speeds from them on pavement. At least, I hope I'll manage such speeds on snow. It's well below Worldcup level, obviously. With the hard tires, the slightest obstacle or bump stops them dead. What doesn't help I think, is the high boot position (who need ground clearance, really, we're not attacking rockgardens or root fields) combined with my tall height. 610mm wheelbase just isn't much, I bet I could handle 10cm more, the front wheel moved forward. Less weight on the front wheel, and less leverage to send me flying. I think I could be much faster with the 240m wheels, if they'd have nicer tires/tubes and were a stiffer whole. The pivoting front wheels gave my butt more than once, but kill the efficiency of my skate, they're like a brake that engages when I load one skate with my full weight, let alone push off. Too much technology for XC, but great for alpine I'm sure. Yes, two extra 150mm wheels would add weight over the V2 Aero 150's, and perhaps indeed with all the linkages come close to or match the Crosskates. But that's okay. Some rolling will be worth the weight. I CAN handle the Crosskates weight, quite well really, and a bit more wouldn't be disastrous either, as long as I get some speed from it. Just too bad for climbing practice. Being able to escape traffic and just ski over any dirt or fire road just seems way cool, and as close to the snow experience as you can get. As a mountainbiker I hardly enjoy pavement at all. The Doppel Quatro technology seems like it could make all the difference in making a wheelsize off-road capable. Less weight per wheel, and if it comes across a bump or obstacle, it's got leverage on the rest of the ski to roll over it, pure genious. Not sure if it adds up that simply, but if you'd have a Doppel Duattro setup on medium pressure 150mm wheels, it might roll faster than ordinary V2's on pavement, and on dirt come close to the V's pavement speed. They'd be huge, a bit over a meter long in total (4x150mm + spacing + size 13 boots), but then, so am I. Using technniques hardly more advanced than kid's scooter wheels (one-dollar-tires) and home crafted frames, offroad skiing will probably always be heavy and slow. To get snow-like performance over low-traffic forrest roads may require more expensive techiques such as MTB-quality tires and carbon fibre frame parts. An example, though very affordable for it's seemingly high quality : the ?200 Powerslide Nordic Trainer http://www.funbox-shop.de/shop_detail.asp?id=40771 big pic here : http://www.sportobchod.cz/brusle-pow...ic-trainer.htm With that technology level, a longer wheelbase, some extra or just much larger wheels....I see a lot possible. Just too bad about the huge ground clearance. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
V2 Retro Classic Rollerski Feedback? | Marcuski | Nordic Skiing | 1 | January 2nd 06 01:14 PM |
Rollerski Selection Advice | Jim Howe | Nordic Skiing | 8 | April 23rd 05 04:06 AM |
Sharpening Rollerski Ferrules | [email protected] | Nordic Skiing | 9 | March 29th 05 06:35 PM |
Rollerski Race | Nathan Schultz | Nordic Skiing | 0 | July 29th 03 12:14 AM |