If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Non-cotton underwear
I wouldn't think about using cotton as my first layer on top; I use a good
wicking synthetic or silk. Same for long underwear bottoms. Some how, though, it never occurred to me to wear anything but my regular cotton briefs. They do get sweaty when I ski. SO, I'm thinking perhaps I should get some other sort. Anyone have any views on whether its worth the money to buy new underwear out of something more wickable? |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
DZN wrote:
I wouldn't think about using cotton as my first layer on top; I use a good wicking synthetic or silk. Same for long underwear bottoms. Some how, though, it never occurred to me to wear anything but my regular cotton briefs. They do get sweaty when I ski. SO, I'm thinking perhaps I should get some other sort. Anyone have any views on whether its worth the money to buy new underwear out of something more wickable? It is. It will get smelly though. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 03:52:14 GMT, "DZN"
wrote this crap: I wouldn't think about using cotton as my first layer on top; I use a good wicking synthetic or silk. Same for long underwear bottoms. Some how, though, it never occurred to me to wear anything but my regular cotton briefs. They do get sweaty when I ski. SO, I'm thinking perhaps I should get some other sort. Anyone have any views on whether its worth the money to buy new underwear out of something more wickable? Underwhat? I'm familiar with software, hardware, firmware, but I've never heard of underware. Is it the programs that run in the background? My T-shirt says, "This shirt is the ultimate power in the universe." |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 03:52:14 GMT, "DZN"
wrote: I wouldn't think about using cotton as my first layer on top; I use a good wicking synthetic or silk. Same for long underwear bottoms. Some how, though, it never occurred to me to wear anything but my regular cotton briefs. They do get sweaty when I ski. SO, I'm thinking perhaps I should get some other sort. Anyone have any views on whether its worth the money to buy new underwear out of something more wickable? IMHO, very much worth it. Most outdoor stores have it on the rack right next to the long johns and tops. bw |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
DZN wrote:
I wouldn't think about using cotton as my first layer on top; I use a good wicking synthetic or silk. Same for long underwear bottoms. Some how, though, it never occurred to me to wear anything but my regular cotton briefs. They do get sweaty when I ski. SO, I'm thinking perhaps I should get some other sort. Anyone have any views on whether its worth the money to buy new underwear out of something more wickable? www.sierratradingpost.com has several kinds at good prices, I got the Wickers brand in both std and windblocking style. Really nice not to have soggy drawers!! gr |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Dude whatever I wear boxers and sweats under my snowboard pants (so much
better than ski pants). It's more breathable and the boys are freeeeeeeeeeeeeee. "DZN" wrote in message ... I wouldn't think about using cotton as my first layer on top; I use a good wicking synthetic or silk. Same for long underwear bottoms. Some how, though, it never occurred to me to wear anything but my regular cotton briefs. They do get sweaty when I ski. SO, I'm thinking perhaps I should get some other sort. Anyone have any views on whether its worth the money to buy new underwear out of something more wickable? |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Mike wrote:
Dude whatever I wear boxers and sweats under my snowboard pants (so much better than ski pants). It's more breathable and the boys are freeeeeeeeeeeeeee. Don't boxers let the boys bounce around and become decidedly uncomfortable? gr |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Boxers can let the boys be a little too free for their own good if you
happen to fall wrong. I wear underarmour, which solves the moisture probem and provides needed support. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
DZN wrote: I wouldn't think about using cotton as my first layer on top; I use a good wicking synthetic or silk. Same for long underwear bottoms. Some how, though, it never occurred to me to wear anything but my regular cotton briefs. They do get sweaty when I ski. SO, I'm thinking perhaps I should get some other sort. Anyone have any views on whether its worth the money to buy new underwear out of something more wickable? Rather personal question, eh? I wear wickable on really cold days... it helps me "find myself" for pee breaks... keeps the shinkage down to a minimum, ya know. I think that alone makes it worth the price ;-). Seriously, they work much better to keep you warm, but are not as comfortable. Set your priorities, I guess. RAC |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
"Gabe R" wrote in message ... underarmour Wow, wear do I get some of that? You mean like a cup? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Winter is Over | Simon Brown | European Ski Resorts | 29 | February 24th 04 07:35 AM |