Busted

On Oct 18, 11:12*am, pigo wrote:
On Oct 18, 11:56*am, Richard Henry wrote:





On Oct 18, 9:53*am, wrote:

On Mon, 18 Oct 2010 10:37:54 -0400, Walt
wrote this crap:

I don't gamble (except the stock market)

Everybody gambles. *You don't buy a lottery ticket? *You don't buy a
raffle ticket from a local charity? *You don't take a chance on an
office pool? *No guts, no glory.

Vote for Palin-Brown in 2012. *Repeal the nightmares.

This signature is now the ultimate
power in the universe

On our multi-day soccer parent trips, we often take a side trip to a
nearby casino (Cache Creek is less than an hour away and Lake Tahoe is
a pleasant day's drive from Davis).

I usually sit at a 20-25 cent video poker machine and shoot for
flushes. *So far this year I am up abour $3.60.

My wife plays $25-$50 minimum 1 or 2-deck blackjack and counts cards.
She is up over $1200 on this year's soccer expeditions. *She doesn't
like me to play blackjack because I have bad habits (I _always_ hit
13) and I disagree with her about whether other players affect her
luck.

I've hit royals on $.25 video poker twice this year! Both times on
golf outings and both times within 2 minutes of arrival and sitting at
a machine. The first was for the standard $1,000. The second was a
progressive for $1,180.

I've hit $1.00 poker for $4,000. twice as well. And again, both times
were within a the first few games played. Out of the other two $.25
jackpots I've hit, one was again with a couple of hands while waiting
for drinks, the other was the only one that I've gotten during an
evening in a casino and after a few hours of play.

I think that's kind of weird.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

The first time I played roulette in Vegas, I demonstrated to everyone
that I knew nothing about the game, but I converted the $20 chip my
wife gave me so I would stop watching over her shoulder into about
$650. I'm not sure of all the details except that I remember that I
put half the money on 27 on the first roll and it came up.

The Real Bev wrote:
On 10/18/10 13:33, downhill wrote:

Walt wrote:
On 10/18/2010 2:39 PM, downhill wrote:

I have given up on posting to rasm it seems to be pointless as not
everybody can post.
machine readable proper e-mail address

Posts from several people with problems came through this morning. All
were approved. Only two have shown up at eternal-september so far, but
I think it will be OK.

Remember, Your Friendly Moderator actually has a life... Well, sort of...

What did you guys do to make it work?

I just showed up now
but I think I sent it yesterday

On Oct 18, 7:02*pm, downhill wrote:
The Real Bev wrote:
On 10/18/10 13:33, downhill wrote:

Walt wrote:
*On 10/18/2010 2:39 PM, downhill wrote:

*I have given up on posting to rasm it seems to be pointless as not
*everybody can post.

* machine readable proper e-mail address

Posts from several people with problems came through this morning. *All
were approved. *Only two have shown up at eternal-september so far, but
I think it will be OK.

Remember, Your Friendly Moderator actually has a life... Well, sort of....

What did you guys do to make it work?

I just showed up now
but I think I sent it yesterday

It does sometimes take more than 24 hours to make it thru the
moderator(s). I had a couple of postings to RSAM rejected by the
moderator because I made mention of he who shall not be named.

In article ,
Walt wrote:

The moderators are
volunteers who have to deal with you-know-who, so cut them some slack.

Voldermort?

wrote:


It does sometimes take more than 24 hours to make it thru the
moderator(s). I had a couple of postings to RSAM rejected by the
moderator because I made mention of he who shall not be named.

The less it gets mentioned the better off the conversation is.
rsam seemed to take my posts in real time now.

Sort of waiting for one of those videos links to be posted as he seems
to cycle, as it been almost two weeks since we have been insulted by
badly miss used & abused english words!

On Oct 18, 12:11*pm, Walt wrote:
On 10/18/2010 2:39 PM, downhill wrote:



I have given up on posting to rasm it seems to be pointless as not
everybody can post.

You need to post with a replyable email address (or one where the
munging is obvious and it's easy *for a human to figure out the actual
address). *Maybe that's the issue.

The whitelist thing seems to be working for me now. *The moderators are
volunteers who have to deal with you-know-who, so cut them some slack.

Translation: the moderators are terrorists and criminals who have not
been able to intimidate me into silence about their vile and
disgusting behavior. They are you.

On Oct 18, 4:55*pm, The Real Bev wrote:
On 10/18/10 13:33, downhill wrote:

Walt wrote:
*On 10/18/2010 2:39 PM, downhill wrote:

*I have given up on posting to rasm it seems to be pointless as not
*everybody can post.

*You need to post with a replyable email address (or one where the
*munging is obvious and it's easy *for a human to figure out the actual
*address). *Maybe that's the issue.

No, *it just falls off the whitelist when it's changed. *As far as I
know it just has to be formatted properlyl. *And everybody knows how to
do that, right?

*The whitelist thing seems to be working for me now. *The moderators are
*volunteers who have to deal with you-know-who, so cut them some slack.

I am pretty sure that even if you do not drop the underscore the address
gets caught in the catch all account anyway so it should not get bounced
back.
Do not think it matters if I cut them some slack still not able to post
there and I suspect other people have the same issue. I would rather not
have this address get filled with crap so I am not inclined to use a
machine readable proper e-mail address

Posts from several people with problems came through this morning. *All
were approved. *Only two have shown up at eternal-september so far, but
I think it will be OK.

Remember, Your Friendly Moderator actually has a life... Well, sort of...

What did you guys do to make it work?

Gives you a true thrill to have control, eh, ****?