Gappers convention

On Sep 28, 5:54 pm, "Bob F" wrote:
downhill wrote:
Yabahoobs wrote:
evel to understand it.
What was the topic of your PhD thesis?

If "his" math is the standard suite of collegiate courses (Calc
1,2,3,4, Linear Algebra, differentials, etc) then I think many of us
in here should be able to converse with him in depth about
mathetmatics, and perhaps even his doctoral thesis.

You need to know what "isomorphism" is before you even qualified.

He can not engage in a simple discussion with out changing the meaning
of standard accepted english words. What is the possibility that he
will get that subject correct when the only supplementary proof he
provides is scooter agreeing with him.
The simple comment by him that there is no lift being created when a
plane is flying level shows he is an idiot and might have been
granted a degree but has no real understanding.
I have a harvard phd on my race team he covers chemistry and he
minored in math and did high school in Bulgaria and he has none of the
communication and comprehension issues that tie cheese has.
Itchy the intertubes avenger and protector of stupidity is like a
bogus copy of a monty python skit, when he starts to loose the
argument he hurls insults and makes up words.

Itchie is incapable of learning even simple english usage. He is incapable of
seeing the idiocy of his blathering here and obviously elsewhere. He in
incapable of admitting when he is wrong. He thinks everyone else has his own
faults. Conversing with him is an exercise in futility. Just like scooter.

Gappers party? How cozy. Not here to joint you gappers conversation,
it's mediocre at its best, but to open a thread for you gappers to
wallow in your agony, as the other thread is getting too long for me
to track. Enjoy your head banging sessions.

snowbender

On Sep 28, 11:15 am, Dave Cartman wrote:
In article
,

snowbender wrote:
And you are more like a little knowledge, don't know, won't learn, and
can't learn; yes, 4 years for a college degree, and 4 years make a phD
program, just think how much what 30 years can do and yet you've
learned nothing. It is better not to learn your way.

Is there a BA in Tai Chi? Do you have a 4 year degree in it? If not,
then how can you claim to be proficient in it. Unless there's more to
mastery and excellence than a Liberal Arts curriculum with a few extra
math classes stuck in there.

Though Taichichuans are popular on the "streets," but the classical
Taichi literatures are mostly studied by college professors, that is,
post PhD research. Oops, just realized, I've really stretched you
gappers' little mental capacity too much, my bad. And you do need an
operational concept of "isomorphism" to really "study" Taichi Skiing.

My undergraduate degree was just a starting point for my academic and
professional career. It was little more than a 4 year long, mushy, easy
basic training - sort of a crowded weekend lift line. It wasn't
particularly challenging, just slow and irritating and standing between
me and what I wanted to do..

Yup, undergraduate education teaches not just knowledge but
discipline, (sort of like "learn how to learn,") so the grads may have
a tool to continue their education when they step into the "real"
society. And learning discipline is all about learning the
fundamentals and practicing the basics. Yup, it is "slow and
irritating" to the undisciplined.

The University of Tennessee, despite being a large state school,
actually had a strict and stringent freshman English requirement. Since
the idea of language is to communicate ideas, teaching proper
punctuation and grammar was basic.

Basics are good for building a foundation, nevertheless, when the
techniques and skills advance, holding on the basics will be too
little and too slow. The real world is big, and is a jungle out there;
with your "fixed" domain English, you won't grow, and stuck.

Can you imagine if you were trying to discuss mathematics with someone
who believed that "" and "" were freely interchangeable with
parenthesis and who insisted that a "+" meant to multiply? Because
that's how you act here, with a lot of incoherent insults and name
calling too.

You have described yourself well; when the shoe fit, wear it, little
domain knowledge.

snowbender

On Sep 29, 1:01 am, Alan Baker wrote:
In article
,

snowbender wrote:
On Sep 28, 11:56 am, downhill wrote:
Alan Baker wrote:

snowbender
4 years don't "make" a PhD, Chai-tea.

Yes, they do and did, 2 years graduate school and 2 years PhD program,
which was the standard practice how Taiwanese college grads came to US
study and got their degrees.

No. They don't and did not.

Just say something opposite to what I said does not make an argument,
it only reflects your inner shameless denial nature.

Simply spending four years at it gets you nothing.

You've got that right, and think about how many years you have spent
in RSA, what have you learned?

The time is not the relevant factor.

Actually, time is THE absolute factor; no matter you're a rich man, a
poor man, a powerful man or not, or whatever, you've got 24 hrs a day,
no more and no less, and add up everyday makes your life, and when
they are gone, you are done. Only remaining question then is, was it
worth all the anguish struggles?

snowbender

--
Alan Baker
Vancouver, British Columbia

On Sep 29, 9:04*am, snowbender

Gappers party? How cozy. Not here to joint you gappers conversation,
it's mediocre at its best, but to open a thread for you gappers to
wallow in your agony, as the other thread is getting too long for me
to track. Enjoy your head banging sessions.

So do you actually think that you "joint" someone's conversation? Or
is that a typo? Or are you just using words however they strike your
fancy?

snowblower wrote:


Gappers party? How cozy. Not here to joint you gappers conversation,
it's mediocre at its best, but to open a thread for you gappers to
wallow in your agony, as the other thread is getting too long for me
to track. Enjoy your head banging sessions.


snowblower

On Sep 29, 8:04*am, snowbender
wrote:
On Sep 28, 5:54 pm, "Bob F" wrote:

downhill wrote:
Yabahoobs wrote:
evel to understand it.
What was the topic of your PhD thesis?

If "his" math is the standard suite of collegiate courses (Calc
1,2,3,4, Linear Algebra, differentials, etc) then I think many of us
in here should be able to converse with him in depth about
mathetmatics, and perhaps even his doctoral thesis.

You need to know what "isomorphism" is before you even qualified.

Please continue.

On Sep 29, 8:13 am, pigo wrote:
On Sep 29, 9:04 am, snowbender

Gappers party? How cozy. Not here to joint you gappers conversation,
it's mediocre at its best, but to open a thread for you gappers to
wallow in your agony, as the other thread is getting too long for me
to track. Enjoy your head banging sessions.

So do you actually think that you "joint" someone's conversation? Or
is that a typo? Or are you just using words however they strike your
fancy?

And your out burst changing the subject proves you are a little domain
knowledge. Yes, I've learned the phrase "joint someone's conversation"
from CNN.

snowbender

On Sep 29, 8:29 am, Richard Henry wrote:
On Sep 29, 8:04 am, snowbender
wrote: On Sep 28, 5:54 pm, "Bob F" wrote:

downhill wrote:
Yabahoobs wrote:
evel to understand it.
What was the topic of your PhD thesis?

If "his" math is the standard suite of collegiate courses (Calc
1,2,3,4, Linear Algebra, differentials, etc) then I think many of us
in here should be able to converse with him in depth about
mathetmatics, and perhaps even his doctoral thesis.

You need to know what "isomorphism" is before you even qualified.

Please continue.

So, what do you know about "isomorphism"?

snowbender

snowblower wrote:
On Sep 29, 8:13 am, pigo wrote:
On Sep 29, 9:04 am, snowbender

Gappers party? How cozy. Not here to joint you gappers conversation,
it's mediocre at its best, but to open a thread for you gappers to
wallow in your agony, as the other thread is getting too long for me
to track. Enjoy your head banging sessions.
So do you actually think that you "joint" someone's conversation? Or
is that a typo? Or are you just using words however they strike your
fancy?

And your out burst changing the subject proves you are a little domain
knowledge. Yes, I've learned the phrase "joint someone's conversation"
from CNN.


snowblower

On Sep 29, 10:42*am, snowbender
wrote:
On Sep 29, 8:29 am, Richard Henry wrote:



On Sep 29, 8:04 am, snowbender
wrote: On Sep 28, 5:54 pm, "Bob F" wrote:

downhill wrote:
Yabahoobs wrote:
evel to understand it.
What was the topic of your PhD thesis?

If "his" math is the standard suite of collegiate courses (Calc
1,2,3,4, Linear Algebra, differentials, etc) then I think many of us
in here should be able to converse with him in depth about
mathetmatics, and perhaps even his doctoral thesis.

You need to know what "isomorphism" is before you even qualified.

Please continue.

So, what do you know about "isomorphism"?

snowbender

In mathematics, it is a term that can have subtly different meanings
depending on the application. A general definition, at the synonym
level, is bijective morphism, which descibes a relationship that has a
symmetric, but not necessarily identical operation in both directions
between two sets, groups or structures. That is sometimes described
as one-on-one and onto. A crude and elementary example is
relationship between the set of all integers i and the set of all even
integers 2i.

Does any of that apply to your thesis?