If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
Ads |
#72
|
|||
|
|||
What's the matter with you idiots??
In article ,
scottabe wrote: in article , Alan Baker at wrote on 10/18/03 9:26 PM: In article , scottabe wrote: in article , Alan Baker at wrote on 10/18/03 8:59 PM: In article , scottabe wrote: in article , Alan Baker at wrote on 10/18/03 8:29 PM: In article , scottabe wrote: in article Iomkb.52782$La.11992@fed1read02, Richard Henry at wrote on 10/18/03 7:10 PM: "Alan Baker" wrote in message ... Don't you wish you had any way at all to prove that. I only wish it was worth my while to take you to court for slander. If you need a statement or some help researching google, let me know. Stalking again, eh, nutcase? Always willing to help someone invent more lies and defamations....or encouraging them to do violence, as you have done on several occasions posting my home address. But what do I expect from a cowardly psychopath like you? For you to show up and try to do your own dirty work, instead of manipulating others to do it for you? Go for it. I've never lied about any of you sick ****s, as you well know. Don't have to. You have lied about me repeatedly. You're insane. Get help. See? You're lying right now. g You are delusional. Get help. You claim that someone can commit "perjury" when not under oath, and commit a "theft" when *given* something. I think you need to examine your own relationship to reality a little more closely before you go calling others "delusional". g You are insane. Get help. You claim that someone can commit "perjury" when not under oath, and commit a "theft" when *given* something. I think you need to examine your own relationship to reality a little more closely before you go calling others "insane". g -- Alan Baker Vancouver, British Columbia "If you raise the ceiling 4 feet, move the fireplace from that wall to that wall, you'll still only get the full stereophonic effect if you sit in the bottom of that cupboard." |
#73
|
|||
|
|||
What's the matter with you idiots??
In article ,
"Bert Hoff" wrote: "Richard Henry" wrote in message news:GRkkb.52461$La.9159@fed1read02... "Alan Baker" wrote in message ... In article , scottabe wrote: I'm not making accusations. I'm telling the truth. Shame you can't tell the difference between criminals and decent men. Apparently no one on the planet can. At least no one has ever posted in support of you that I've seen. Gee. I wonder why. Actually Bert Hoff has said that he fully supports Scott's statements. Proof? Bert Why don't we just ask you? What statements of Scott's do you *not* support? -- Alan Baker Vancouver, British Columbia "If you raise the ceiling 4 feet, move the fireplace from that wall to that wall, you'll still only get the full stereophonic effect if you sit in the bottom of that cupboard." |
#74
|
|||
|
|||
What's the matter with you idiots??
In article ,
scottabe wrote: in article , Alan Baker at wrote on 10/18/03 9:24 PM: In article , scottabe wrote: in article , Alan Baker at wrote on 10/18/03 8:27 PM: In article , scottabe wrote: in article ckmkb.52767$La.25040@fed1read02, Richard Henry at wrote on 10/18/03 7:05 PM: "Alan Baker" wrote in message ... Well you go ahead and post some examples of people who've supported you in this group (other than your little yes-man, Bert). I'll bet you that if we examine the record, pretty much everyone who ever posted a word in defense of you got tired of your bull**** and you then decided that they too were "terrorists" and "stalkers". That includes me. I decided you are a terrorist and a stalker because you are a terrorist and a stalker. Period. But you admit that at one time he made statements in support of you, right? I admit he posted my home address in my hometown newsgroup trying to incite a wacko like you to stalk me. I admit he has lied and defamed and participated in a criminal conspiracy of terrorism. I admit he's an asshole. And I admit you're ****ing insane, dumb****. Posted your address, did he? Show us the link. Uh-huh. Won't. Right. Figures. When I do post a link, you ignore it. When have you *ever* posted a link when I've asked you? So get ****ed. It happened. Keep lying like the psychopath you are. Like I said. Figures. -- Alan Baker Vancouver, British Columbia "If you raise the ceiling 4 feet, move the fireplace from that wall to that wall, you'll still only get the full stereophonic effect if you sit in the bottom of that cupboard." |
#75
|
|||
|
|||
What's the matter with you idiots??
"Bert Hoff" wrote in message ... "Richard Henry" wrote in message news:GRkkb.52461$La.9159@fed1read02... "Alan Baker" wrote in message ... In article , scottabe wrote: I'm not making accusations. I'm telling the truth. Shame you can't tell the difference between criminals and decent men. Apparently no one on the planet can. At least no one has ever posted in support of you that I've seen. Gee. I wonder why. Actually Bert Hoff has said that he fully supports Scott's statements. Proof? tinyurl.com/rgs3 "I support all of my co-moderator's statements." |
#76
|
|||
|
|||
What's the matter with you idiots??
"Richard Henry" wrote in message news:Xupkb.52818$La.24132@fed1read02... Actually Bert Hoff has said that he fully supports Scott's statements. Proof? tinyurl.com/rgs3 "I support all of my co-moderator's statements." That link does not work. And that's no proof that I fully support Scott's statements. PUOSU. Bert |
#77
|
|||
|
|||
What's the matter with you idiots??
In article ,
Alan Baker wrote: Proof? Bert Why don't we just ask you? What statements of Scott's do you *not* support? Well that sure was a conversation killer. Alan, just a guess, but is it raining in Vancouver today? Dave |
#78
|
|||
|
|||
What's the matter with you idiots??
In article ,
"Bert Hoff" wrote: "Richard Henry" wrote in message news:Xupkb.52818$La.24132@fed1read02... Actually Bert Hoff has said that he fully supports Scott's statements. Proof? tinyurl.com/rgs3 "I support all of my co-moderator's statements." That link does not work. Not bright enough to try "http://" in front of it? http://tinyurl.com/rgs3 And that's no proof that I fully support Scott's statements. So you're arguing simultaneously that you don't know what he meant because the link didn't work for you *and* that what was said (that you don't know, mind!) doesn't prove something. PUOSU. Bert -- Alan Baker Vancouver, British Columbia "If you raise the ceiling 4 feet, move the fireplace from that wall to that wall, you'll still only get the full stereophonic effect if you sit in the bottom of that cupboard." |
#79
|
|||
|
|||
What's the matter with you idiots??
In article ,
Vern93 wrote: In article , Alan Baker wrote: Proof? Bert Why don't we just ask you? What statements of Scott's do you *not* support? Well that sure was a conversation killer. Alan, just a guess, but is it raining in Vancouver today? Dave LOL No. I've just been cleaning up my place and doing some home renovations (as well as watching the Hockey Night in Canada double-header! g). -- Alan Baker Vancouver, British Columbia "If you raise the ceiling 4 feet, move the fireplace from that wall to that wall, you'll still only get the full stereophonic effect if you sit in the bottom of that cupboard." |
#80
|
|||
|
|||
What's the matter with you idiots??
"Bert Hoff" wrote in message ... "Richard Henry" wrote in message news:Xupkb.52818$La.24132@fed1read02... Actually Bert Hoff has said that he fully supports Scott's statements. Proof? tinyurl.com/rgs3 "I support all of my co-moderator's statements." That link does not work. Works for me. Posted to rsa by Bert Hoff, 10-10-2003. Here is mo So do you support your co-moderator's statement or not? Sorry, I don't know what a "Csan" is,or how to "Csan." Is that related to C-Span? As far as I know,noneof the events fromMen's have been televised. Why do you mock other people's typos, when you do them? Your post have *not* all been on-topic,on-thread or in defense of yourself. Somehave been outright flaming. "On-thread" is irrelevant. Responding "on thread" means that there are*two* people, not just *one* person, in violation of the guidelines. I support all of my co-moderator's statements. And that's no proof that I fully support Scott's statements. PUOSU. So I should have known better than to believe something you posted? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|