A Snow and ski forum. SkiBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » SkiBanter forum » Skiing Newsgroups » Alpine Skiing
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Fat powder skis (Atomic) - what length



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old September 19th 04, 05:24 AM
Martino
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Fat powder skis (Atomic) - what length

I decided to get a pair of fat skis for powder (have been boarding on powder
and skiing on anything else but it's time to ski the deep stuff).

It looks like the long units are preferred but Atomic seems to offer much
shorter lengths and advises not to go crazy with long ones.
Sugar Daddy is one of my choices (they have lengths 153, 163, 173, and 183
cm). All are 99 mm in waist and range from 119, 121, 123, 125 tip and 112,
113, 115, 117 tail respectively).

I am an advanced skier 5'10", 160lb.

If I can do good on the shorter ones I like the idea of not carrying much
weight with me across the continents.

I also have a pair of standard skis (Volkl SS6 for anything but the powder
so the fatties are to be exclusive for the deep).

Thanks.

Martino


Ads
  #2  
Old September 20th 04, 02:22 AM
foot2foot
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Martino" wrote in message
...
I decided to get a pair of fat skis for powder (have been boarding on

powder
and skiing on anything else but it's time to ski the deep stuff).

It looks like the long units are preferred but Atomic seems to offer much
shorter lengths and advises not to go crazy with long ones.
Sugar Daddy is one of my choices (they have lengths 153, 163, 173, and 183
cm). All are 99 mm in waist and range from 119, 121, 123, 125 tip and

112,
113, 115, 117 tail respectively).

I am an advanced skier 5'10", 160lb.

If I can do good on the shorter ones I like the idea of not carrying much
weight with me across the continents.

I also have a pair of standard skis (Volkl SS6 for anything but the powder
so the fatties are to be exclusive for the deep).

Thanks.

Martino


183, 99, 125, 117.

Since that's all they're for, get all you can. That is, assuming
you can handle a pair of 183's. Even though you're light,
you're tall. No matter how light the powder gets, you'll still be
able to float in it. It's all about fat.


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Near fatal ski incident Me Nordic Skiing 22 February 27th 04 01:47 PM
skate ski home flex test question .. help! Chris Crawford Nordic Skiing 6 February 26th 04 04:00 AM
Advice on Atomic Skis - SL11 or GS11 Andrew Alpine Skiing 11 February 6th 04 01:21 PM
FS: new atomic skis $100 Phil Marketplace 0 January 23rd 04 03:57 PM
for sale: atomic beta carve 9.26 skis Phil Alpine Skiing 0 October 9th 03 05:13 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:26 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SkiBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.