If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Ace wrote in
: On Mon, 13 Dec 2004 12:52:39 GMT, Greg Hilton wrote: The question isn't so much about fit, but about the pros and cons of touring boots or similar - I know many guides, including some of the ones that can ski, use touring/mountaneering boots all the time, but I'm not sure if it'll ruin my skiing. Ah ok! Your shells are 7 years old, past few years they have been able to keep lateral stiffness in boots for carving and added soft plastics in other areas, so maybe modern, step down from race boots would suit you now? Some additional info there, ta. Pretty much what I was thinking, but didn't know about construction changes. Still tempted by some of the touring-type options, mind. I missed the beginning of this thread, so sorry if this is irrelevant or has already been said, but since I ski in touring boots it may be helpful... THere's quite a range of possibilities, basically trading weight against stiffness. I use Scarpa Denalis, which are amongst the stiffest (and heaviest) randonée boots, and I find not a huge difference in control from downhill boots. When I got them I thought I'd be using them occasionally, but I never went back to the downhill boots afterwards. Pro: obviously, if you want to ski fulltime on a touring setup (I do), there you go. Plus they are incomparably more comfortable than downhill boots for walking around, climbing, etc. They're lighter to carry as well. Con: a little less control than downhill boots - I found I adjusted in an hour and never noticed the difference again, but if you're a racer your experience might differ. You have to be aware that they have Vibram rather than a flat area on the sole for the AFD (this is less of a problem as more bindings have a movable AFD), and the toes are too high for some bindings (a few years ago Salomon Driver were OK, Rossis were not); these last two points are significant if you rent skis. Jeremy |
Ads |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
On Mon, 13 Dec 2004 16:04:59 GMT, Jeremy Mortimer
wrote: I missed the beginning of this thread, so sorry if this is irrelevant or has already been said, but since I ski in touring boots it may be helpful... Indeed it will. THere's quite a range of possibilities, basically trading weight against stiffness. Ah. Interesting. I use Scarpa Denalis, which are amongst the stiffest (and heaviest) randonée boots, and I find not a huge difference in control from downhill boots. When I got them I thought I'd be using them occasionally, but I never went back to the downhill boots afterwards. I suspect I may feel the same. Pro: obviously, if you want to ski fulltime on a touring setup (I do), there you go. Plus they are incomparably more comfortable than downhill boots for walking around, climbing, etc. They're lighter to carry as well. Sounds good so far. I'm not (yet) doing ski-touring per se, although last season we did a fair bit of climbing/hiking to get to some of the best bits of Gressoney, so may be moving in that direction. Con: a little less control than downhill boots - I found I adjusted in an hour and never noticed the difference again, but if you're a racer your experience might differ. Well I'm currently skiing on Pocket Rockets, so that probably answers that point ;-) You have to be aware that they have Vibram rather than a flat area on the sole for the AFD (this is less of a problem as more bindings have a movable AFD), and the toes are too high for some bindings (a few years ago Salomon Driver were OK, Rossis were not); these last two points are significant if you rent skis. Also significant if I'm using them with my existing skis. Best make sure I take them when making a choice. The bindings'll need resetting and possibly remounting anyway. -- Ace (brucedotrogers a.t rochedotcom) Ski Club of Great Britain - http://www.skiclub.co.uk All opinions expressed are personal and in no way represent those of the Ski Club. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
"Jeremy Mortimer" wrote in message
... Ace wrote in : On Mon, 13 Dec 2004 12:52:39 GMT, Greg Hilton wrote: The question isn't so much about fit, but about the pros and cons of touring boots or similar - I know many guides, including some of the ones that can ski, use touring/mountaneering boots all the time, but I'm not sure if it'll ruin my skiing. THere's quite a range of possibilities, basically trading weight against stiffness. I use Scarpa Denalis, which are amongst the stiffest (and heaviest) randonée boots, and I find not a huge difference in control from downhill boots. When I got them I thought I'd be using them occasionally, but I never went back to the downhill boots afterwards. Pro: obviously, if you want to ski fulltime on a touring setup (I do), there you go. Plus they are incomparably more comfortable than downhill boots for walking around, climbing, etc. They're lighter to carry as well. Con: a little less control than downhill boots - I found I adjusted in an hour and never noticed the difference again, but if you're a racer your experience might differ. You have to be aware that they have Vibram rather than a flat area on the sole for the AFD (this is less of a problem as more bindings have a movable AFD), and the toes are too high for some bindings (a few years ago Salomon Driver were OK, Rossis were not); these last two points are significant if you rent skis. Jeremy I would go along with what Jeremy has said. Last season I obtained Scarpa Denali XT boots, Atomic R9 skis and Diamir Freeride touring bindings. Skied a week in Zermatt with only 1 days touring as weather was so unfavourable (for touring). Basically the touring skis/boots are wonderfully enjoyable, especially when you have to carry your skis and walk a lot - as in Zermatt - cablecars etc. I'm very happy with them and I guess I could ski on them always but I'm no longer gung ho etc and not wanting to go as fast as I can on say my Atomic SX11s which weigh a ton and are really solid. That's not to say you can't go fast - just that there must be a bit of loss in technical performance but I haven't experienced this at all. As Jeremy says, I think, you can't use a Scarpa touring boot on a downhill ski binding but could use a downhill skiboot in a Diamir binding - I have. You must still take care getting a good boot fit + I spent about 2 hours getting them sorted, including having the plastic pushed out in places and having foot beds. HTH, Mike |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Ace wrote:
On Mon, 13 Dec 2004 09:08:22 GMT, Greg Hilton wrote: I'd suggest time in a really decent shop, like Precision in Val D'Isere or Footworks in Chamonix, they should be able to look at your feet and discuss the issues and come up with solutions. 3 of us went for new boots during opening weekend in Val last year. For one guy they didn't have the boot for him in his size, so they didn't sell him any boots. Well yeah, that'd be the 'normal' way I'd do things, but next week we're off to Canada, starting in Bannf, and it seems pointless to take my old boots out there, given the exchange rate situation, so I'll be looking to pretty much pre-determine what I want. They have knowledgable ski-shop staff in Canada too you know:-) I've never stayed in Banff so I can't give you any advice on specific shops I'm afraid (r.s.r.n-a might help?). If you were visiting Whistler at any point I can recommend Snowcovers - several of my friends have bought boots there, and I've certainly had great service when I've been in. They offer the same kind of service you'd expect in places like Precision, except with a weaker currency (but don't forget the sales tax which is never included in the sticker price)! |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
"mike" wrote in
: "Jeremy Mortimer" wrote in message ... Con: a little less control than downhill boots - I found I adjusted in an hour and never noticed the difference again, but if you're a racer your experience might differ. You have to be aware that they have Vibram rather than a flat area on the sole for the AFD (this is less of a problem as more bindings have a movable AFD), and the toes are too high for some bindings (a few years ago Salomon Driver were OK, Rossis were not); these last two points are significant if you rent skis. .... As Jeremy says, I think, you can't use a Scarpa touring boot on a downhill ski binding but could use a downhill skiboot in a Diamir binding - I have. You must still take care getting a good boot fit + I spent about 2 hours getting them sorted, including having the plastic pushed out in places and having foot beds. HTH, Mike Actually I intended to communicate that you *can* use Scarpa touring boots in some downhill bindings, though not all. It depends how high the toe piece will adjust, as the flange on the touring boot is higher than on a downhill boot. IME (while testing skis) shop staff will be a bit concerned about the AFD issue, but only to the extent of making sure you know the risk. This is in France; their attitude might be different on other continents. Jeremy |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
On Tue, 14 Dec 2004 08:19:25 GMT, Jeremy Mortimer
wrote: "mike" wrote in : As Jeremy says, I think, you can't use a Scarpa touring boot on a downhill ski binding but could use a downhill skiboot in a Diamir binding - I have. Actually I intended to communicate that you *can* use Scarpa touring boots in some downhill bindings, though not all. It depends how high the toe piece will adjust, as the flange on the touring boot is higher than on a downhill boot. Which was my understanding of your comment too. I've skiied with several guides who do this, plus a few people who use the detachable touring binding adaptor. IME (while testing skis) shop staff will be a bit concerned about the AFD issue, but only to the extent of making sure you know the risk. This is in France; their attitude might be different on other continents. I tried to remember, but can't. What's the AFD exactly? -- Ace (brucedotrogers a.t rochedotcom) Ski Club of Great Britain - http://www.skiclub.co.uk All opinions expressed are personal and in no way represent those of the Ski Club. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
On Mon, 13 Dec 2004 22:33:23 +0000, Steve Haigh
wrote: Ace wrote: On Mon, 13 Dec 2004 09:08:22 GMT, Greg Hilton wrote: I'd suggest time in a really decent shop, like Precision in Val D'Isere snip Well yeah, that'd be the 'normal' way I'd do things, but next week we're off to Canada, starting in Bannf, and it seems pointless to take my old boots out there, given the exchange rate situation, so I'll be looking to pretty much pre-determine what I want. They have knowledgable ski-shop staff in Canada too you know:-) Heh. Who'd have thought it eh? I'm just trying to get an idea first, hopefully to shorten the decision-making process. I've never stayed in Banff so I can't give you any advice on specific shops I'm afraid (r.s.r.n-a might help?). s'OK, I've been there before. Monod Sports will probably be the best, although I've only used their Lake Louise shop, but the Banff one is probably larger and better. (but don't forget the sales tax which is never included in the sticker price)! Yeah, just like in the US. -- Ace (brucedotrogers a.t rochedotcom) Ski Club of Great Britain - http://www.skiclub.co.uk All opinions expressed are personal and in no way represent those of the Ski Club. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
"Ace" wrote in message ... On Tue, 14 Dec 2004 08:19:25 GMT, Jeremy Mortimer wrote: "mike" wrote in : As Jeremy says, I think, you can't use a Scarpa touring boot on a downhill ski binding but could use a downhill skiboot in a Diamir binding - I have. Actually I intended to communicate that you *can* use Scarpa touring boots in some downhill bindings, though not all. It depends how high the toe piece will adjust, as the flange on the touring boot is higher than on a downhill boot. Which was my understanding of your comment too. I've skiied with several guides who do this, plus a few people who use the detachable touring binding adaptor. IME (while testing skis) shop staff will be a bit concerned about the AFD issue, but only to the extent of making sure you know the risk. This is in France; their attitude might be different on other continents. I tried to remember, but can't. What's the AFD exactly? And while you're explaining things could someone enlighten me as to what the dickens you're on about! Well, you know, just the stuff about touring boots and different bindings. Cheers -- Paul Schofield Time flies like an arrow Fruit flies like a banana |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
I tried to remember, but can't. What's the AFD exactly?
http://www.summitsportsinc.com/onlin...ide.html#Parts |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
"Paul Schofield" wrote in
: "Ace" wrote in message ... On Tue, 14 Dec 2004 08:19:25 GMT, Jeremy Mortimer wrote: "mike" wrote in : I tried to remember, but can't. What's the AFD exactly? And while you're explaining things could someone enlighten me as to what the dickens you're on about! Well, you know, just the stuff about touring boots and different bindings. AFD is the Anti Friction Device - either a teflon pad or a movable plate under the front part of the foot that makes it easier for the toe to rotate out of the toepiece of the binding if it releases. Downhill boots have a flat area of the sole over the AFD to minimise sticking - touring boots have a Vibram sole (to maximise sticking!) which means that toe release may be compromised if your AFD is the teflon pad type. Increasingly bindings have a movable plate instead, in which case the Vibram sole isn't a problem. Touring boots are boots for ski touring (otherwise ski mountaineering, ski de randonée in French or alpine touring in N. America). They're like a cross between a ski boot and a mountaineering boot, with a Vibram sole and adjustments to allow them to be used to walk or climb in, and to lock the ankle forward to ski. As previously noted they are comfortable and versatile, but generally less rigid than downhill boots. Touring bindings allow the heel to be released, pivoting at the toe, when you're walking uphill on your skis (which requires you to stick climbing skins on the bottom of the skis. Some lightweight touring bindings are rather specialised, but others are similar to downhill bindings and will take any boot (and release in the same way a downhill binding does). It's increasingly common for people to ski full-time with touring boots and bindings on downhill skis (there are touring skis too, but they are rather soft). This is what I do. The equipment is light and comfortable, and the skins are always in my sack, so at any time if I feel like climbing something I can. It's a good insurance against route-finding errors too - it's easy to walk back up. Jeremy |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
50K Club Mini Report 10-24-04 | Jay Tegeder | Nordic Skiing | 0 | October 24th 04 06:03 PM |
50K Club Report 4-25-04 | Jay Tegeder | Nordic Skiing | 9 | April 29th 04 10:09 PM |
Jay T's Big Saturday Workout - 50K Club Report 4-10,11-04 | Jay Tegeder | Nordic Skiing | 6 | April 19th 04 09:56 PM |
Jay T's BIG and I mean BIG, Saturday Workout - 50K Club Report 4-17-18-04 | Jay Tegeder | Nordic Skiing | 1 | April 19th 04 09:39 AM |
Trip Report - Mt. Baker / Mt. Bachelor | toddjb | Snowboarding | 10 | January 5th 04 11:34 PM |