OK, people, still like Bush now?

pigo wrote:

"Sue" wrote in message
...

nothing again so I snipped it

What's going on with that guy in the parliament that was against the war
and it turns out he had received millions from Saddam?

Still suspended from the Labour Party afaik. His "charity" is being
investigated by the Charities Commision and he STILL hasn't sued anyone
as he was adamant he was going to do. Wonder why ?

"BrritSki" wrote in message
...


pigo wrote:

"Sue" wrote in message
...

nothing again so I snipped it

What's going on with that guy in the parliament that was against the
war
and it turns out he had received millions from Saddam?

Still suspended from the Labour Party afaik. His "charity" is being
investigated by the Charities Commision and he STILL hasn't sued
anyone
as he was adamant he was going to do. Wonder why ?

Hmmmmmm don't know :-)

His and scott ritter are the biggest ethical questions of this conflict
IMO.

Was there, really, anyone out there that didn't expect the "war" to be
the easy part and last about a month (turned out to be even shorter) and
the "peace" to take about 5 years and cost the majority of the
casualties? To me that seems to be such a matter of common sense that
it's not worth mentioning until someone disputes the obvious.

"AstroPax" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 27 Jul 2003 12:03:13 -0600, "pigo"
wrote:

His and scott ritter are the biggest ethical questions of this
conflict
IMO.

Peter Arnett also.

I'm glad they fired his ass.

Me too. But he was really a nobody from the start.

These other two have weaseled their way into a position of influence and
used it inappropriately. Criminally IMO.

The far right? I don't think you can get much further right than Bush..

Y'know, I don't like Bush and I don't have a lot of trust for him
either, but this kind of hysteria isn't any better than what the far
right dishes out. The fog of war is mighty thick all around, and this
story, damning as it sounds, could wind up looking about as solid as
the African uranium story was. If we're lucky, hindsight might be
20/20, but the current view most definitely is not. IMHO.

bw

"InMyTree" wrote in message
...
The far right? I don't think you can get much further right than
Bush..

CUT IT OUT!!!!!!!!!!!! You're killin' me here!!!!! rotflmao

"InMyTree" wrote in news:bg3ef3
:

The far right? I don't think you can get much further right than Bush..

Still have that Che poster on your wall do you?

--
Sven Golly
Trolling as usual
Remove the _ to reply

"InMyTree" wrote in
:

I know from what I've said on here I seem really left wing, but I'm
not... I just really really don't like Bush and the way he medels with
with world..

Damn him. Getting rid of the Talaban. Cleaning out Al Qaeda. Spanking
Hussein. Trying to solve the Palestinian problem. Trying to help Liberia.
Damn meddler. Maybe he can meddle a litle in Canada.

--
Sven Golly
Trolling as usual
Remove the _ to reply

In , Sven Golly typed:
"InMyTree" wrote in
:

I know from what I've said on here I seem really left wing, but I'm
not... I just really really don't like Bush and the way he medels
with with world..

Damn him. Getting rid of the Talaban. Cleaning out Al Qaeda. Spanking
Hussein. Trying to solve the Palestinian problem. Trying to help
Liberia. Damn meddler. Maybe he can meddle a litle in Canada.

from a British news coverage perspective

Forcing the Taliban from power, with our help, but the Taliban is still
there and active

Cleaning out Al Qaeda, Are you joking? whereas before we "Knew" where they
where based, now we don't and I don't think we have made much impression
other than perhaps gaining them some new recruits.

Spanking Hussein, they havn't found him yet have they?

Trying to solve the Palestinian problem, eventually after a lot of pressure

Trying to help in Liberia, again under pressure, but up to yesterday when
naval ships where ordered in it was more like trying to ignore Liberia
hoping it will go away

BTW I'm not left wing either


--
Chris

Dave Stallard wrote in :

Here's what Pat Buchanan says about that:

Why would anyone quote Pat Buchanan as an authority on anything other
irrelevancy?

--
Sven Golly
Trolling as usual
Remove the _ to reply

Sven Golly wrote:

Dave Stallard wrote in :

Here's what Pat Buchanan says about that:

Why would anyone quote Pat Buchanan as an authority on anything other
irrelevancy?

Authority or not, he's certainly someone that no one could call left
wing.

Dave