If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
Schmoe wrote:
klaus wrote: So how much vertical do the WPGs give you in a day? The heliguides on the trip were saying 30K was about an average day for the clients. I don't think it was near that much. I'd say it was closer to 18-20k. Were they running three groups per bird? These folks were guides with British Columbian operations where they likely get more vert. And WPG quits pretty early, no? I just hope WPG doesn't decide this latest storm is too much for them to handle and start dropping bombs in the front yard again. Meadow Chutes would have been fine if they'd left it alone. Now the snowpack is pretty complex where they bombed it for fun. Makes me a bit uneasy heading up when they're dropping bombs and triggering slides where I could easily be standing. I mean, if it's gonna be a war with firepower to protect powder rights, maybe the backcountry skiers should start the same tactic. Preemptive strikes seem a bit excessive. -klaus |
Ads |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Sven Golly wrote:
Not necessarily true... http://www.helicoptersonly.com/sayagain_Danger.html Surprised me too. Apparently, if you look at the accident rate for helicopters on a per trip basis or on the basis of hours flown, cars are safer. Not really surprising. Have you ever tried to fly a helicopter? It's nuts. Interesting side note. Recent more sophisticated risk assessments put driving at roughly equal in risk to flying via commercial airline at trip lengths of around 200 miles. Longer than that, flying is safer. Shorter than that, driving is safer. That's because something like 80% of all flying accidents happen during takeoff and landing. And heliski operations are based on lots of landings and take offs. With economic pressure to fly in bad weather, poor visibility, and dubious landing zones. I would bet dollars to donuts that on a per hour basis, heli skiing is far more dangerous than driving, at least during daytime, and once you factor in avy hazard. Christy Brinkley never crashed with Billy Joel but she did in a chopper. -klaus |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
"KentB" wrote in message om... Pigo, I am very sorry to hear what happended to Craig. It is even worse that his wife saw it. Wow...how tramatic. She didn't see it it happened at the bottom. We were in the Gondola, not in view. But thanks for your concern. I can say that accidents like that are EXTREMELY unusual. There were multiple critical mistakes made that contributed to the accident. (You should be able to look up the NTSB accident report on the web - if you want to see it.) Eliminating even one of the mistakes would have prevented the accident. For me (I think everyone should make their own decision on acceptable risk) the risk of such an accident is small enough I would accept it. The risk of being killed driving in a car to the ski area is much higher than a recurrance of accident like Craig's. I still drive or ride in cars on a regular basis. I know that. I was just trying to clarify what actually happened to clear up the false impression that some poser with an agenda was trying to convey. Oddly enough the helicopter I was skiing in the previous spring crashed after picking up a group at the bottom as I was getting ready to ski down from our drop off point. Everyone survived. But again, an accident. It hasn't kept me from helicopters. pigo |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Great article. I wouldn't have believed it if it was in a blog or some
such. But that is from a source that does a very good job of being objective and factual (NASA). "Sven Golly" wrote in message ... "KentB" wrote in om: The risk of being killed driving in a car to the ski area is much higher than a recurrance of accident like Craig's. I still drive or ride in cars on a regular basis. Not necessarily true... http://www.helicoptersonly.com/sayagain_Danger.html Surprised me too. Apparently, if you look at the accident rate for helicopters on a per trip basis or on the basis of hours flown, cars are safer. Interesting side note. Recent more sophisticated risk assessments put driving at roughly equal in risk to flying via commercial airline at trip lengths of around 200 miles. Longer than that, flying is safer. Shorter than that, driving is safer. That's because something like 80% of all flying accidents happen during takeoff and landing. -- Sven Golly Trolling as usual Remove "_" to reply |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
klaus wrote:
Schmoe wrote: klaus wrote: So how much vertical do the WPGs give you in a day? The heliguides on the trip were saying 30K was about an average day for the clients. I don't think it was near that much. I'd say it was closer to 18-20k. Were they running three groups per bird? These folks were guides with British Columbian operations where they likely get more vert. And WPG quits pretty early, no? I just hope WPG doesn't decide this latest storm is too much for them to handle and start dropping bombs in the front yard again. Meadow Chutes would have been fine if they'd left it alone. Now the snowpack is pretty complex where they bombed it for fun. Makes me a bit uneasy heading up when they're dropping bombs and triggering slides where I could easily be standing. I mean, if it's gonna be a war with firepower to protect powder rights, maybe the backcountry skiers should start the same tactic. Preemptive strikes seem a bit excessive. Hey, you're not wrong. WPG should be 100% sure a zone is 100% clear of backcountry skiers before dropping bombs. I gotta believe that clearing a zone of avalanche danger is, at the end of the day, helpful to the hikers too. There have been plenty of avalanche accidents on un-bombed slopes where back country skiers have been hurt/killed. There has to be a happy medium. |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
klaus wrote:
snip And heliski operations are based on lots of landings and take offs. With economic pressure to fly in bad weather, poor visibility, and dubious landing zones. WPG cancels flights plenty based on wind & visibility. The economic pressure to fly is much lower than the insurance pressure if they have an accident. |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
KentB wrote:
Great article. I wouldn't have believed it if it was in a blog or some such. But that is from a source that does a very good job of being objective and factual (NASA). Within the limit of never saying anything that might decrease their funding, of course. "We've found more questions than we've answered" is always good for a few $million more. "Sven Golly" wrote: "KentB" wrote: The risk of being killed driving in a car to the ski area is much higher than a recurrance of accident like Craig's. I still drive or ride in cars on a regular basis. Not necessarily true... http://www.helicoptersonly.com/sayagain_Danger.html Surprised me too. Apparently, if you look at the accident rate for helicopters on a per trip basis or on the basis of hours flown, cars are safer. Interesting side note. Recent more sophisticated risk assessments put driving at roughly equal in risk to flying via commercial airline at trip lengths of around 200 miles. Longer than that, flying is safer. Shorter than that, driving is safer. That's because something like 80% of all flying accidents happen during takeoff and landing. -- Cheers, Bev xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx "Faster, faster, until the thrill of speed overcomes the fear of death." -- Hunter S. Thompson |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
Sven Golly wrote:
I don't view NASA as always being objective and factual (the old hidden "o" ring trick) Hidden? |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
Schmoe wrote:
Hey, you're not wrong. WPG should be 100% sure a zone is 100% clear of backcountry skiers before dropping bombs. I gotta believe that clearing a zone of avalanche danger is, at the end of the day, helpful to the hikers too. There have been plenty of avalanche accidents on un-bombed slopes where back country skiers have been hurt/killed. There has to be a happy medium. The problem is that sometimes, like a few weeks ago, the paths that had previously slid were the dangerous ones. When they selectively cause slides, you have to keep track of what has and hasn't slid. Just another variable you have to keep track of. Plus, if they'd let it stabililize it would still be skiable now. Today there were no tracks on the old slide area (which is *still*) visible. The slope directly adjacent was being skied with no signs of dangerous activity. The WPGs basially took half of Meadow Chutes away and the heli skiers haven't skied it either. So what was the point? It certainly wasn't for skiing. No one has skied it since and it is a very popular area.. usually. There was also an incident a few years ago where they caused a massive slide that took out old growth trees when the slide ran much farther than they expected. It made the cover of the annual UAFC report. http://www.avalanche.org/%7Euac/seas...Report2002.pdf During the eis hearings theyf claimed they only bomb what they plan to ski. They bombed that in one of the biggest cycles in years. They knew it would slide and that they wouldn't ski it. I'm all for happy mediums and balance, but like I said, preemptive strikes seem a bit excessive. If you want that kind of ski experience, there are 7 resorts that offer it within an hour of SLC.. -klaus |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
Sven Golly wrote:
lal_truckee wrote in news:37v26oF5g3l9eU1 @individual.net: Hidden? EWBOK. http://ethics.tamu.edu/ethics/shuttle/shuttle1.htm You didn't know the strap-ons were assembled at Kennedy? And that they had o-rings? And that there had been burnthrough other flights? It was all public knowledge before the failure - nothing hidden. And all approved by risk analysis. Shouldn't have flown the mission outside of climate approval range - o-rings weren't rated for cold weather. But nothing was hidden. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Utah Heliskiing | Schmoe | Alpine Skiing | 176 | December 16th 04 04:47 PM |
TR Utah visit | Ken Roberts | Nordic Skiing | 5 | February 3rd 04 06:23 PM |
Utah in February... can't spend a lot! | Brian Cohen | Alpine Skiing | 0 | January 26th 04 12:25 AM |
Search Resumes for 3 Utah Snowboarders | i n k | Snowboarding | 0 | December 27th 03 05:55 PM |
Ski Utah! | [email protected] | North American Ski Resorts | 1 | September 13th 03 01:19 PM |