If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Is there a skill level system?
This may be a trivial question for some of you -- particularly the
instructors and competitors... Is there a unified system to designate one's skill level in alpine skiing? I notice that some of the resorts use the Levels 1 through 10 system with 10 being the most expert. Is that the standard? -------------------------------------------- W R Chan from Upstate NY (to respond, remove ### from email address) * I have no stinking sig * |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Is there a skill level system?
On 20 Nov 2003 03:13:49 -0500, Wai Chan
wrote: This may be a trivial question for some of you -- particularly the instructors and competitors... Is there a unified system to designate one's skill level in alpine skiing? I notice that some of the resorts use the Levels 1 through 10 system with 10 being the most expert. Is that the standard? Yes - but I ski at "11". JP |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Is there a skill level system?
PSIA (Professional Ski Instructors of America) uses 1 through 9, and a lot
of resorts have adopted this system for their ski schools. Useful if you're traking lessons, but otherwise don't worry about numbers, just ski and have fun. -- mark "Wai Chan" wrote in message . 1.24... This may be a trivial question for some of you -- particularly the instructors and competitors... Is there a unified system to designate one's skill level in alpine skiing? I notice that some of the resorts use the Levels 1 through 10 system with 10 being the most expert. Is that the standard? -------------------------------------------- W R Chan from Upstate NY (to respond, remove ### from email address) * I have no stinking sig * |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Is there a skill level system?
Jay Pique wrote:
On 20 Nov 2003 03:13:49 -0500, Wai Chan wrote: This may be a trivial question for some of you -- particularly the instructors and competitors... Is there a unified system to designate one's skill level in alpine skiing? I notice that some of the resorts use the Levels 1 through 10 system with 10 being the most expert. Is that the standard? Yes - but I ski at "11". Isn't it all tracked out by then? -- //-Walt // // The Volkl Conspiracy |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Is there a skill level system?
"Wai Chan" wrote in message . 1.24... This may be a trivial question for some of you -- particularly the instructors and competitors... Is there a unified system to designate one's skill level in alpine skiing? I notice that some of the resorts use the Levels 1 through 10 system with 10 being the most expert. Is that the standard? Yes it is, but it's a bit subjective at best. In the US at least. Why do you ask? |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Is there a skill level system?
"foot2foot" wrote in
: I notice that some of the resorts use the Levels 1 through 10 system with 10 being the most expert. Is that the standard? Yes it is, but it's a bit subjective at best. In the US at least. Be that as it may. It's still more precise than the green/blue/black system. Why do you ask? More for curiosity than anything else. Also, when asked about level of ability, it would be nice to be able to describe it more definitively than say "high blue at this resort and low black at another". -------------------------------------------- W R Chan from Upstate NY (to respond, remove ### from email address) * I have no stinking sig * |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Is there a skill level system?
I found this:
Level One Congratulations! Your about to participate in an exciting and beautiful sport! You should definitely read before you go. This is the most important time to get into a lesson. Friends and loved ones may mean well but invariably get you into dangerous situations. A half or full day lesson will equip you with the basic skills and concepts you need to enjoy skiing. This small investment of time and money will be an investment for life! Level Two You are able to stop on green runs using the wedge or "snowplow". You may be able to make some direction change but linked turns are yet to come. Level Three You are able to stop and link wedge turns on green runs comfortably. Level Four You are relying more on turn shape than wedge size to slow you down. Your wedge is getting smaller and by the end of the turn your skis are running parallel. This level represents a major milestone. Mastery of level four concepts prepare the student for the transition from green runs to blue ones! Level Five You are using similar wedge-match turning mechanics to the level four skier. The primary difference is that you are able to use the technique comfortably on blue runs. Level Six Your wedge (or stem) is mostly gone and you are making open parallel turns on blue runs. Level Seven You are able to change turn radius and duration comfortably on blue runs. Pole plants are being used to time turns. Blue-black and black diamond runs are starting to look skiable. Level Eight You are comfortable on blue-black terrain. You can ski in the fall line on easier moguls. Level Nine You can ski black diamond bumps, steeps and varied snow conditions comfortably. Sadly, not even all instructors are strong level nine skiers. Wai Chan wrote: This may be a trivial question for some of you -- particularly the instructors and competitors... Is there a unified system to designate one's skill level in alpine skiing? I notice that some of the resorts use the Levels 1 through 10 system with 10 being the most expert. Is that the standard? -------------------------------------------- W R Chan from Upstate NY (to respond, remove ### from email address) * I have no stinking sig * |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Is there a skill level system?
"Wai Chan" wrote in message . 1.24... "foot2foot" wrote in : I notice that some of the resorts use the Levels 1 through 10 system with 10 being the most expert. Is that the standard? Yes it is, but it's a bit subjective at best. In the US at least. Be that as it may. It's still more precise than the green/blue/black system. Why do you ask? More for curiosity than anything else. Also, when asked about level of ability, it would be nice to be able to describe it more definitively than say "high blue at this resort and low black at another". Thanks for the reply to my reply! Perhaps I could put it this way. The first levels, something around one through six can be accomplished in two hours of instruction. The big step is moving from the "stem" of the outside ski, or the use of a wedge to turn, or to begin a turn, to a turn in which skis remain parallel start to finish. A "level 6" skier can do this, though it may not look all that pretty. Then comes the question, *where* can he/she do it? On the bunny hill, then the turn falls apart as the skier tries a steeper slope? This isn't addressed in the "levels" concept. The problem, is, a wedge does not work well on anything but a very gentle slope. A good solution is to simply not spend hardly any time at all in the wedge as the student learns. Not so long ago, the levels referred to at least one lesson or more per level. This meant perhaps a whole year before a student was even introduced to an attempt at parallel skiing. The first two to four hours were spent learning to stand and step on the skis, and how to fall. No wonder that 90 some percent of the first time skiers never returned. The real importance is, not how the skier looks, but will the turn *work* on intermediate slopes, no matter how "ugly" it might be to the purist instructor. You've brought up a highly significant point, though. Green black and blue mean next to nothing. One resort's black is another's blue. Many "double diamond" slopes are far from expert only difficulty. The slopes should actually be rated in terms of the degree of inclination of the slope. This would not be hard to do, and would be of tremendous use to the new, intermediate or experienced skier. At present, there really is no way to realistically assess a slope for your own purposes (do I really want to take my wife down this?) until you go down it yourself. The skier should be greeted at the top of the trail with the name of the trail, a color designation if desired, and a real *number* like "25 degrees" that refers to the steepest part of that trail. The skier could then relate their own abilities to the numbers. "By the end of the year I want to go down a 30 degree trail"."My wife can go down a 25 degree with no problem". |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Is there a skill level system?
foot2foot wrote:
Perhaps I could put it this way. The first levels, something around one through six can be accomplished in two hours of instruction. Never-ever to open parallel in two hours? Are you nuts? Maybe at the school for the naturally gifted athlete. But the average adult is not going to go from "this is a ski" to open parallel on blue slopes in two hours. No matter how much time they've spent jumping over doormats. BTW, the Level 1 through 9 scale is intended as a way to sort students into group lessons and has limited applicability to any other purpose. In particular, I wouldn't use it to rate what terrain the person can (or should) ski. -- //-Walt // // The Volkl Conspiracy |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Is there a skill level system?
In article ,
Walt wrote: foot2foot wrote: Perhaps I could put it this way. The first levels, something around one through six can be accomplished in two hours of instruction. Never-ever to open parallel in two hours? Are you nuts? Maybe at the school for the naturally gifted athlete. But the average adult is not going to go from "this is a ski" to open parallel on blue slopes in two hours. No matter how much time they've spent jumping over doormats. I'm not so sure I agree. I've had some experience teaching absolute beginners and I think it might be possible in more than a few cases. I think that 4 hours would do it for lot of people. BTW, the Level 1 through 9 scale is intended as a way to sort students into group lessons and has limited applicability to any other purpose. In particular, I wouldn't use it to rate what terrain the person can (or should) ski. -- Alan Baker Vancouver, British Columbia "If you raise the ceiling 4 feet, move the fireplace from that wall to that wall, you'll still only get the full stereophonic effect if you sit in the bottom of that cupboard." |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|