If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#151
|
|||
|
|||
I Was Right Again
On Wednesday, December 17, 2014 4:46:26 PM UTC-7, Alan Baker wrote:
On 2014-12-17 23:39:58 +0000, pigo said: On Wednesday, December 17, 2014 4:27:36 PM UTC-7, Alan Baker wrote: What "juvenile record"? Exactly. Sorry, but what do you mean by that? Do you know if he has a juvenile record? They'd release it if he didn't. |
Ads |
#152
|
|||
|
|||
I Was Right Again
On Wednesday, December 17, 2014 4:47:16 PM UTC-7, Alan Baker wrote:
This breakdown of witness 40's testimony is really good: http://www.dailykos.com/story/2014/12/12/1351303/-Hannity-s-favorite-witness-for-Darren-Wilson-is-a-self-admitted-racist-with-severe-memory-loss kos? really? LOL |
#153
|
|||
|
|||
I Was Right Again
On 2014-12-17 23:51:15 +0000, pigo said:
On Wednesday, December 17, 2014 4:46:26 PM UTC-7, Alan Baker wrote: On 2014-12-17 23:39:58 +0000, pigo said: On Wednesday, December 17, 2014 4:27:36 PM UTC-7, Alan Baker wrote: What "juvenile record"? Exactly. Sorry, but what do you mean by that? Do you know if he has a juvenile record? They'd release it if he didn't. Really? You're so very versed in Missouri law, are you? |
#154
|
|||
|
|||
I Was Right Again
On 2014-12-17 23:52:35 +0000, pigo said:
On Wednesday, December 17, 2014 4:47:16 PM UTC-7, Alan Baker wrote: This breakdown of witness 40's testimony is really good: http://www.dailykos.com/story/2014/12/12/1351303/-Hannity-s-favorite-witness-for-Darren-Wilson-is-a-self-admitted-racist-with-severe-memory-loss kos? really? LOL Once again, attack the source rather than examine the facts... |
#155
|
|||
|
|||
I Was Right Again
On Wednesday, December 17, 2014 3:09:53 PM UTC-7, Alan Baker wrote:
...but if that is based on perjured testimony and prosecutorial misconduct (offering up a law that had been unconstitutional since before any of the prosecutors began practicing law for instance), then that may change. The Canadian constitution? The American one doesn't seem to mean anything anymore. Or is that only if you're president? Sorry but if it's good for him I'm not going to hold anyone to it. Especially for someone who just committed a robbery. You're not denying that now are you? |
#156
|
|||
|
|||
I Was Right Again
On 2014-12-17 23:49:27 +0000, pigo said:
On Wednesday, December 17, 2014 4:40:34 PM UTC-7, Richard Henry wrote: There are some 60+ witnesses. Some of their statements back Officer Wilson's story, some oppose it. Of all the witnesses, Witness 40 was the closest point by point in agreement with Officer Wilson's version. However, only Witness 40's testimony has been shown to be a deliberate falsehood. If we throw that out, we still have 60+ witnesses telling stories that oppose each other on many points. The DA wanted a whitewash and he knew how to get it. No. Is his name Johnson (the accomplice in the robbery)? His version has proven to be a deliberate falsehood. How exactly was that "proven"? Surely you don't mean by the grand jury's decision? As well as the female that I saw reporting that he'd dropped to his knees and was then executed. I don't know what her court testimony was, but I saw that on a new video (as well as Johnson's). How was that "proven" false? One of the shots hit Brown in the top of the head, you know. |
#157
|
|||
|
|||
I Was Right Again
On 2014-12-17 23:56:01 +0000, pigo said:
On Wednesday, December 17, 2014 3:09:53 PM UTC-7, Alan Baker wrote: ...but if that is based on perjured testimony and prosecutorial misconduct (offering up a law that had been unconstitutional since before any of the prosecutors began practicing law for instance), then that may change. The Canadian constitution? The American one doesn't seem to mean anything anymore. Or is that only if you're president? Sorry but if it's good for him I'm not going to hold anyone to it. Especially for someone who just committed a robbery. You're not denying that now are you? Are you claiming that a grand jury's decision attachs jeopardy to a case? Do you want to expose your ignorance of your own law? |
#158
|
|||
|
|||
I Was Right Again
On Wednesday, December 17, 2014 4:54:42 PM UTC-7, Alan Baker wrote:
Once again, attack the source rather than examine the facts... That "source" isn't worth the time. And really, neither are you. This is an American matter. We'll see how it turns out. Still waiting for the jurisdiction to release that juvenile record. He's dead. No reason not to. |
#159
|
|||
|
|||
I Was Right Again
On Wed, 17 Dec 2014 15:46:25 -0800, Alan Baker
wrote this crap: On 2014-12-17 23:39:58 +0000, pigo said: On Wednesday, December 17, 2014 4:27:36 PM UTC-7, Alan Baker wrote: What "juvenile record"? Exactly. Sorry, but what do you mean by that? Do you know if he has a juvenile record? I've got one recorded by Justin Bieber. It's actually a CD. Merry Christmas everyone. God bless us all. God bless America. |
#160
|
|||
|
|||
I Was Right Again
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|