I Was Right Again

On 2014-11-26 19:56:44 +0000, Richard Henry said:

On Wednesday, November 26, 2014 11:15:47 AM UTC-8, Alan Baker wrote:
On 2014-11-26 17:49:03 +0000, Richard Henry said:

On Tuesday, November 25, 2014 1:41:00 PM UTC-8, pigo wrote:
On Tuesday, November 25, 2014 2:16:22 PM UTC-7, Alan Baker wrote:

What is there to say.

The authorities got to run the grand jury, decide how evidence would
be presented...

...and got the result they wanted.

I tried to tell you about the responsible black residents that
witnessed the event. I tried to tell you about the lack of shots to the
back and forensics that didn't match "eyewitness" reports. This entire
thing has come down just as I was saying when this thread started. And
now we know how he got shot in the top of the head. That Officer Wilson
is a very good shot. I'd love for him to work in my neighborhood.

Officer Wilson is a good shot? He fired at least 12 times (12 empty
cartridges are listed in the grand jury evidence) and hit his target 3
to 5 times, one of which was while the target's hand was in the police
car. According to his own testimony, he didn't hit the man until he
was within close range.

Read this:

http://www.vox.com/2014/11/25/7281165/darren-wilsons-story-side

Personally, I agree with the columnist.

:-)

Don't forget the second part -

http://www.vox.com/2014/11/25/728744...-johnson-story

Again, I broadly agree with the column: Johnson is almost certainly
shading the truth in certain areas...

....but he has little reason to lie about the important parts.

And then there's this:

http://www.vox.com/xpress/2014/11/25/7285265/darren-wilson-grand-jury/in/7041840


It seems the prosecuting attorneys were only acting the witnesses who
contradicted Wilson's account where there were discrepancies between
their testimony and physical evidence...

....but Wilson got a complete pass.

On 2014-11-26 21:21:19 +0000, pigo said:

On Wednesday, November 26, 2014 10:49:04 AM UTC-7, Richard Henry wrote:
Officer Wilson is a good shot? He fired at least 12 times (12 empty
cartridges are listed in the grand jury evidence) and hit his target 3
to 5 times, one of which was while the target's hand was in the police
car. According to his own testimony, he didn't hit the man until he
was within close range.

But he hit him right in the top of the head when he needed to :-)

You mean when Brown was on his knees and already dying?

On Wednesday, November 26, 2014 2:22:33 PM UTC-7, Alan Baker wrote:

You mean when Brown was on his knees and already dying?

No. As he was charging in a "football style" rush.

Here's a good video. I hope it gets lots of attention.

http://www.westernjournalism.com/bla...-race-rioters/

On 2014-11-27 16:56:37 +0000, pigo said:

On Wednesday, November 26, 2014 2:22:33 PM UTC-7, Alan Baker wrote:

You mean when Brown was on his knees and already dying?

No. As he was charging in a "football style" rush.

Precisely ONE witness claimed he was coming at the officer and he
didn't claim that...

....and he changed his story considerably from his original statement.

No surprise that the attorneys didn't challenge him the way that they
challenged witnesses whose testimony they didn't like, huh?


Here's a good video. I hope it gets lots of attention.

http://www.westernjournalism.com/bla...-race-rioters/

On Thursday, November 27, 2014 10:05:15 AM UTC-7, Alan Baker wrote:
On 2014-11-27 16:56:37 +0000, pigo said:

On Wednesday, November 26, 2014 2:22:33 PM UTC-7, Alan Baker wrote:

You mean when Brown was on his knees and already dying?

No. As he was charging in a "football style" rush.

Precisely ONE witness claimed he was coming at the officer and he
didn't claim that...

...and he changed his story considerably from his original statement.

No surprise that the attorneys didn't challenge him the way that they
challenged witnesses whose testimony they didn't like, huh?


Here's a good video. I hope it gets lots of attention.

http://www.westernjournalism.com/bla...-race-rioters/

Here is some information about witnesses. From the AP no less. A group of liberal hacks who go out of their way to support kotus agenda.

Why doesn't Canada just invite these rioters and MB types up there to ignore laws, attack cops, and sponge of working people (you're one of those aren't you?)? We don't have any laws keeping them here.

On 2014-11-27 17:22:59 +0000, pigo said:

On Thursday, November 27, 2014 10:05:15 AM UTC-7, Alan Baker wrote:
On 2014-11-27 16:56:37 +0000, pigo said:

On Wednesday, November 26, 2014 2:22:33 PM UTC-7, Alan Baker wrote:

You mean when Brown was on his knees and already dying?

No. As he was charging in a "football style" rush.

Precisely ONE witness claimed he was coming at the officer and he
didn't claim that...

...and he changed his story considerably from his original statement.

No surprise that the attorneys didn't challenge him the way that they
challenged witnesses whose testimony they didn't like, huh?


Here's a good video. I hope it gets lots of attention.

http://www.westernjournalism.com/bla...-race-rioters/

Here is some information about witnesses. From the AP no less. A group
of liberal hacks who go out of their way to support kotus agenda.

Why doesn't Canada just invite these rioters and MB types up there to
ignore laws, attack cops, and sponge of working people (you're one of
those aren't you?)? We don't have any laws keeping them here.

"WesternJournalism.com is a blogging platform built for conservative,
libertarian, free market and pro-family writers and broadcasters by the
Western Center for Journalism

....

The Western Center for Journalism was founded in 1991 by Journalist
Joseph Farah. Since 2007 the WCJ has been led by columnist and veteran
broadcaster Floyd Brown."

"Joseph Francis Farah (born July 6, 1954) is an American author,
journalist and editor-in-chief of the conservative websiteWorldNetDaily
(WND).[1]"

That's your source: right wing nutcases.

On Thursday, November 27, 2014 10:35:18 AM UTC-7, Alan Baker wrote:
On 2014-11-27 17:22:59 +0000, pigo said:

On Thursday, November 27, 2014 10:05:15 AM UTC-7, Alan Baker wrote:
On 2014-11-27 16:56:37 +0000, pigo said:

On Wednesday, November 26, 2014 2:22:33 PM UTC-7, Alan Baker wrote:

You mean when Brown was on his knees and already dying?

No. As he was charging in a "football style" rush.

Precisely ONE witness claimed he was coming at the officer and he
didn't claim that...

...and he changed his story considerably from his original statement.

No surprise that the attorneys didn't challenge him the way that they
challenged witnesses whose testimony they didn't like, huh?


Here's a good video. I hope it gets lots of attention.

http://www.westernjournalism.com/bla...-race-rioters/

Here is some information about witnesses. From the AP no less. A group
of liberal hacks who go out of their way to support kotus agenda.

Why doesn't Canada just invite these rioters and MB types up there to
ignore laws, attack cops, and sponge of working people (you're one of
those aren't you?)? We don't have any laws keeping them here.

"WesternJournalism.com is a blogging platform built for conservative,
libertarian, free market and pro-family writers and broadcasters by the
Western Center for Journalism

...

The Western Center for Journalism was founded in 1991 by Journalist
Joseph Farah. Since 2007 the WCJ has been led by columnist and veteran
broadcaster Floyd Brown."

"Joseph Francis Farah (born July 6, 1954) is an American author,
journalist and editor-in-chief of the conservative websiteWorldNetDaily
(WND).[1]"

That's your source: right wing nutcases.

And yours are left wing, government media? This was reported by the AP. Hardly conservative.

On 2014-11-27 18:13:31 +0000, pigo said:

On Thursday, November 27, 2014 10:35:18 AM UTC-7, Alan Baker wrote:
On 2014-11-27 17:22:59 +0000, pigo said:

On Thursday, November 27, 2014 10:05:15 AM UTC-7, Alan Baker wrote:
On 2014-11-27 16:56:37 +0000, pigo said:

On Wednesday, November 26, 2014 2:22:33 PM UTC-7, Alan Baker wrote:

You mean when Brown was on his knees and already dying?

No. As he was charging in a "football style" rush.

Precisely ONE witness claimed he was coming at the officer and he
didn't claim that...

...and he changed his story considerably from his original statement.

No surprise that the attorneys didn't challenge him the way that they
challenged witnesses whose testimony they didn't like, huh?


Here's a good video. I hope it gets lots of attention.

http://www.westernjournalism.com/bla...-race-rioters/

Here is some information about witnesses. From the AP no less. A group
of liberal hacks who go out of their way to support kotus agenda.

Why doesn't Canada just invite these rioters and MB types up there to
ignore laws, attack cops, and sponge of working people (you're one of
those aren't you?)? We don't have any laws keeping them here.

"WesternJournalism.com is a blogging platform built for conservative,
libertarian, free market and pro-family writers and broadcasters by the
Western Center for Journalism

...

The Western Center for Journalism was founded in 1991 by Journalist
Joseph Farah. Since 2007 the WCJ has been led by columnist and veteran
broadcaster Floyd Brown."

"Joseph Francis Farah (born July 6, 1954) is an American author,
journalist and editor-in-chief of the conservative websiteWorldNetDaily
(WND).[1]"

That's your source: right wing nutcases.

And yours are left wing, government media? This was reported by the AP.
Hardly conservative.

WHAT was reported by AP, Bob.

You seem to have left out that link...

On Thursday, November 27, 2014 11:25:35 AM UTC-7, Alan Baker wrote:

WHAT was reported by AP, Bob.

You seem to have left out that link...

Ahhhh apparently I did. In general coverage of the original accounts and their revised versions once advised that their versions were impossible due to forensic evidence. Along with the consistency of those supporting the officers version and support by forensic evidence. If I find it again I'll post it. But getting ready to get dressed and thank-give. The golf course has cleared. I might go chip a few balls.

On 2014-11-27 18:51:20 +0000, pigo said:

On Thursday, November 27, 2014 11:25:35 AM UTC-7, Alan Baker wrote:
WHAT was reported by AP, Bob.

You seem to have left out that link...

Ahhhh apparently I did. In general coverage of the original accounts
and their revised versions once advised that their versions were
impossible due to forensic evidence. Along with the consistency of
those supporting the officers version and support by forensic evidence.
If I find it again I'll post it. But getting ready to get dressed and
thank-give. The golf course has cleared. I might go chip a few balls.

The officer's version was inconsistent in several important places,
Bob. Only... ...the supposed "prosecuting" attorneys didn't press him
on any of it.

Case in point:

Wilson claimed he was hit twice "full in the face" so hard that he
claimed that he feared he would be knocked out by another punch...

....only the medical report on his "injuries" didn't mention any
bruising of his face...

....at all.