If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#41
|
|||
|
|||
why hardboots?
The recreational skier isn't putting on a pair of twin-tips and hitting the
park, why should that be the marketing focus for recreational riders? Aren't they, these days? At least younger recreational skiers? They're all over the parks that I see, hell, one day I saw a guy who must've been retired in the park on snowblades. Granted, he wasn't hitting anything, but... |
Ads |
#42
|
|||
|
|||
why hardboots?
Neil Gendzwill wrote in message ...
Arvin Chang wrote: Are you saying that you think complete beginner will choose chose alpine setups over freestyle setups when presented the option. Or are you claiming that a beginner/intermediate snowboarder (most common level of ability) would jump at the chance to switch to alpine setups when told about their advantages and disadvantages. Neither. I'm saying that a stiffer setup and more forward angles would help most people ride better for what they do. Hard or soft doesn't matter to me, I just don't buy a freestyle board, flexy boots and duck stance for the recreational rider. There's no reason to ride straight I would agree with that. I personally recommend stiffer freeride boards over freestyle models and stiffer boots. Also I can see the wisdom in starting out beginners with like a 25/10 stance instead of something like a 15/-15 stance. I actually found out that the instructors at my local mountain have stopped encouraging "falling leaf" technique for beginners, opting to get them to link turns on their primary direction (regular or goofy) earlier on and I can see the reasoning behind it as too many people side-slip down the entire mountain. stances unless you want to ride switch. All they do for recreational riders is make it easier to skid down the hill on their heels. The recreational skier isn't putting on a pair of twin-tips and hitting the park, why should that be the marketing focus for recreational riders? Ski magazines are full of tips for skiers to learn how to turn better and handle mountain conditions better. Why do snowboarding magazines have tips on how to do a rodeo 5? How many snowboard magazines are there? Transworld? Snowboarder? Transworld is geared towards freestylers and there is nothing wrong with that - although I've found the explanations for tricks somewhat lack in non-obvious information... like the description for a 540 is "approach jump, bend knees, spin 360, spot landing, spin final 180, and land." Transworld caters to freestylers who are willing to pay for a magazine with more "attitude" and advertisments than content. But you ask why isn't there a magazine for recreational snowboarders. I think that there just aren't enough people to support such a magazine. Most people don't really think about improving their snowboarding skills just like most people don't bother to improve their driving skills - so long as they can get from point A to point B without crashing, they are satisfied. Hence they feel little need to pay for such information and education - why pay $30 a year for a magazine that talks about a activity that you do 4-5 times a year? (note I don't agree with this viewpointbut I see it as a common one). So in reference to the original subtopic... Why are magazines, equipment, and advertising so shifted towards freestyle instead of freeride or freecarve? My belief is that's where the money is for snowboard resorts and companies. |
#43
|
|||
|
|||
why hardboots?
"Mike T" mtovino@ wrote What would be the preferred brand for really really skinny feet and ankles? Raichle/Deeluxe is good for a narrow fit. I got really frugal and just bought these: http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...EBWN%3AIT&rd=1 (if the link is broken up it's item 3666277572, new Oxygen Spectrum 27.5 snowboard hard boot, $107). I also just bought ThirtyTwo TM-One boots (their stiffest high-end model) with Intuition liners, so I plan to re-mold my existing liners to those Spectrum boots and use TM-One for softboot riding (couldn't resist, price was too good to pass up). Now I'm curious what the hell is going on with plate bindings and standards. There are a couple of listings on eBay for old Burton plates (I gather they're pretty crappy), and it also looks like they're somewhat proprietary and I'm not sure they'll fit my boots. There's a mention about some sort of heel modification to Intec standard, what's up with that? Basically, I need some reasonably frugal way to try plate bindings ($270 for new Catec or TD2 is too steep and just not worth it for me now). Any recommendations given that boots are a done deal? TIA! -- Dmitry |
#44
|
|||
|
|||
why hardboots?
"Mike T" wrote laying trenches on a GS board down two bowl or the Face at MHM when it's no hero snow is enough to impress me. Those trails are never groomed on Hero Snow days so they are too steep for me right now I haven't been to Timberline or Meadows yet, could you compare that run with something on Stevens, Baker, Crystal, Blackomb, Whistler, Squaw, Alpine Meadows, Kirkwood, Heavenly, or Northstar? I bet I'm no better a rider than you are Dmitry, we're probably just better at different things. I *suck suck suck suck* at the halfpipe for example. Well, I've never ever tried park or pipe, so I guess this qualifies me as the most sucking pipe rider. Basically all I do is try to keep up with my friends who are really good and extreme skiers (instructors and just plain kick-ass athletes), which by the end of the season I'm pretty good at, maybe even sometimes (not too often) better than they are. that it seems like equipment that is good for riding more extreme terrain is not very good for carving You're right about the equipment being more specific. Many hard-booters bring more than one board to the mountain. I usually ride my GS board in the AM, and then if I stick around after lunch time, go to an all-mountain alpine board. On powder days I do the all-mtn board all day or ride softies. Ok, so then this is just a question of what you want to do most and what compromises you're willing to take. How hopeless are you on GS board in moguls? Powder? Steeps (40 degrees)? One of my friends I ride whith is using these Head Monster 103 Pro skis (a ski with 103mm waist, 193cm length, 41m sidecut - basically, it's just a chopped off piece of railroad rail 8), and he can do crud, moguls, groomers, steeps - almost everythihg just fine on these. But he's a monster himself as far as raw muscle power goes. I'm wondering if that kind of universal "I can do it no problemo" board look like - maybe something like a big stiff BX board? |
#45
|
|||
|
|||
why hardboots?
"Arvin Chang" wrote Steep icy groomers don't exist. Snowcat won't go up a slope of 50 degrees. If you've seen some, please LMK where, I'd be very much interested. I use google to read the newsgroup and it doesn't always show me all the posts so I don't know if someone told you this yet... so anyways... many resorts groomed steeps by having their Snowcats lowered down with a winch. It's kind scary to think about it, but I've seen it done. Ouch. I'd pay just to see that!! Not even talking about riding that. What resort? |
#46
|
|||
|
|||
why hardboots?
"Neil Gendzwill" wrote don't have to go to a narrower waist, but you should absolutely go to steeper angles. Unless you're already at 30 plus in softies. But.. Why? To be able to ride with the shoulders pointing downhill? Partly, although I don't point my shoulders downhill, they're lined up with my binding angles - straight downhill would be too rotated. A more forward-facing stance is a big advantage anytime you want to make tight, quick turns, like on a bump run. It lets you do more with just your legs without having to involve your whole upper body. Not sure if I can agree. In both cases your neand and your ass are going along some smooth line downhill and your legs are jerking back and forth, right? The big difference is that with high angle stance it's harder to bend because the ass-legs joint is not very good at bending sideways. (even though it's a ball joint Another advantage is to be able to get your ass to pressure the edge on a heelside. If you ride flat angles, toesides are OK but on heelside you have your ass hanging off the side. We call this "sitting on the toilet". With higher angles, you get your butt more over the edge which means your bodyweight is pressuring the edge more, thus you trench better. That I can see. Yeah, this is definitely an advantage. I believe you already saw Jason's post on the responsiveness and power hardboots bring to your riding. That was a big reason why I switched - I could never get my softies to work responsively enough, and my feet were killing me from having the straps as tight as I wanted. I suspect modern softboot setups are much better, I haven't ridden softies since around 1990. But people like Jason tell me that it hasn't changed so much that I'm tempted to go back. Ok, so do you think that a setup with hard boots and a board like a Donek Axis is an ultimate all-mountain riding tool? Just asking for your personal preference/opinion. |
#47
|
|||
|
|||
why hardboots?
I use google to read the newsgroup and it doesn't always show me all
the posts so I don't know if someone told you this yet... so anyways... many resorts groomed steeps by having their Snowcats lowered down with a winch. It's kind scary to think about it, but I've seen it done. Ouch. I'd pay just to see that!! Not even talking about riding that. What resort? Mt Hood Meadows for one... Four Bowl, and Twilight / Memorial Bowl on Lower Heather. |
#48
|
|||
|
|||
why hardboots?
I haven't been to Timberline or Meadows yet, could you compare that run
with something on Stevens, Baker, Crystal, Blackomb, Whistler, Squaw, Alpine Meadows, Kirkwood, Heavenly, or Northstar? Hmmm..... think Siberia Bowl face only not groomed as wide. How hopeless are you on GS board in moguls? Powder? Steeps (40 degrees)? I havben't tried a true GS board in any of the above, I got my first one in January and now I'm on the shelf with a sprained ankle. Will try powder next time I get the chance. I'm wondering if that kind of universal "I can do it no problemo" board look like - maybe something like a big stiff BX board? In hard boots, a "universal" board would be an all-mountain alpine such as a Donek Axis, Coiler All-Mtn, or Prior 4x4. I have the Axis 172 and I ride it in bumps, steeps, powder, you name it. I certainly do better in packed bumps and trees on a softie setup but on powder and steeps, my hard-boot abilities are almost caught up to my soft boot abilities. Yeah, it's kind of like a stiff, slightly narrower BX board. |
#49
|
|||
|
|||
why hardboots?
"Mike T" wrote anyways... many resorts groomed steeps by having their Snowcats lowered down with a winch. Ouch. I'd pay just to see that!! Not even talking about riding that. What resort? Mt Hood Meadows for one... Four Bowl, and Twilight / Memorial Bowl on Lower Heather. Ok, this gives some more reasons to drive there and maybe camp out for a night on weekend. When do they usually close Meadows for the season? |
#50
|
|||
|
|||
why hardboots?
On 15 Mar 2004 20:06:22 -0800, Arvin Chang said (and I quote):
Neil Gendzwill wrote in message ... Arvin Chang wrote: Are you saying that you think complete beginner will choose chose alpine setups over freestyle setups when presented the option. Or are you claiming that a beginner/intermediate snowboarder (most common level of ability) would jump at the chance to switch to alpine setups when told about their advantages and disadvantages. Neither. I'm saying that a stiffer setup and more forward angles would help most people ride better for what they do. Hard or soft doesn't matter to me, I just don't buy a freestyle board, flexy boots and duck stance for the recreational rider. There's no reason to ride straight I would agree with that. I personally recommend stiffer freeride boards over freestyle models and stiffer boots. Also I can see the wisdom in starting out beginners with like a 25/10 stance instead of something like a 15/-15 stance. I'd like to see a wider range of hard boots, extending down to a softness that approaches current soft boots. Why? The boot/binding interface is *so* much better with hard boots - you get step-ins that work, and even the non-step-ins are quick, easy, reliable, and have a reproducible fit. It just makes more sense for hard boots to extend in softness down to soft boots, rather than soft boots trying to get as stiff as hard boots. I think hard boots *used* to exist in this niche, and they were used with all-mountain boards at shallow(ish) angles of around 20 to 45 degrees. But this sort of setup fell out of favour. Why? I really think it was largely fashion - the original "new school" took up snowboarding as "skateboarding-on-snow", and set themselves up in opposition to anything that resembled skiing. It was a major trend, and every manufacturer got on it. But it was a baby and bathwater situation, and the industry has been a bit slow to get off it, even though the circumstances have changed. -- A: Top-posters. Q: What's the most annoying thing on usenet? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Beginner - Starting off with soft boots? | Guy Lux | Snowboarding | 7 | January 22nd 04 07:45 PM |
difference between hard and soft boots | Brendon | Snowboarding | 11 | September 17th 03 08:27 AM |