Is skiing reverse camber-rocker tips skis cheating?

snowbender wrote:
On Oct 22, 2:25 pm, downhill wrote:
Bob F wrote:
snowbender wrote:
I asked a simple question about your claim. Can't answer it?
You said "new way for powder skiing, try teleboarding". Then you showed clips of
groomed run teleboarding. Nothing to even suggest it would work on anything
anyone here would consider powder. Certain, the board shown would dive to the
limits.
You could try real snowboarding. I assure you they work great in the powder.
Or, you could try telemarking. That certainly works superbly in the powder.
One skinny ski? Somehow, I doubt it.
How about cutting out the shameless insults, and actually answering the
question?
No he is just in to insults, as any rational explanation requires using
words with the proper meaning.
We all know how well he responds to that....

You gappers are truly shameless.

snowbender

every time you post you prove you lack comprehension of simple english
words.
In stead of answering the question in a civilized manner you hurl
insults. Which really shows your ignorance.

On Oct 22, 12:39 pm, lal_truckee wrote:
On 10/22/10 11:11 AM, snowbender wrote:

Actually, I'm thinking today's big fat rocker skis of a proper size
can make a nice teleboard; what a deal, buy one pair of skis and get
two teleboards.

Careful - there have been (maybe still?) skis made with different inside
and outside arcs - don't get those if you plan to "teleboard."

Different inside and outside arcs/sidecuts are for [helping] precise
carving on shaped skis, (which really create more problems than they
solved,) don't think rocker skis would have those sidecuts, most
rockers I see are ellipse in shape, no hookup problems, they just
slide all over the places.

snowbender

On Oct 22, 9:52 pm, Alan Baker wrote:
In article
,
snowbender wrote:
On Oct 22, 1:50 pm, "Bob F" wrote:
snowbender wrote:
On Oct 21, 3:34 pm, "Bob F" wrote:
snowbender wrote:
On Oct 20, 5:24 pm, "Bob F" wrote:
snowbender wrote:
On Oct 20, 3:17 am, Evojeesus wrote:
http://www.tetonat.com/2009/07/is-sk...rocker-tips-sk.
..

The answer is no.

Nevertheless, new way for powder skiing, try teleboarding,
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n-HnaOGRM1Y

I don't see any powder. Please show us a video of this rig in
bottomless powder.

Well, it is actually a water skiing technique; if it works on water,
it'd work in powder.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=diKD08dqj0I

and more,

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=in1c6bB4b5M

When you have a video of this in real powder, let us know.

Why? I thought you were interested in the techniques of teleboarding
in powder to improve your knowledge? Or it is prelude to your
shameless bashing again?

I asked a simple question about your claim. Can't answer it?

I did, but you cannot face the right answer, and turned into shameless
denial, as usual, as predicted. The previous answers are still in the
plain view above your shameless denial response.

You were asked to show it working in powder and you didn't.

Those are the facts.

No, those are your shameless denials, and/or your little knowledge
assessment.

You said "new way for powder skiing, try teleboarding". Then you showed
clips of
groomed run teleboarding. Nothing to even suggest it would work on anything
anyone here would consider powder. Certain, the board shown would dive to
the
limits.

So you don't think this clip shows powder snow, or good powder
skiing?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=diKD08dqj0I

No. It doesn't. It shows skiing in approximately 6 - 10 inches of loose
snow over a packed base.

Ok, "6 - 10 inches of loose snow" do not make powder skiing. Yup, I
can see why you never praise anybody's skiing, a conceited little
knowledge doesn't know any better.

Or your little knowledge doesn't know what powder skiing is?

I know that it's not simply the presence of fresh snow.

Given the fact that you don't know what makes the powder snow, you
probably don't know what powder skiing is neither? See if you can see
any powder skiing in this clip,
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OD5QQirJyB4

You could try real snowboarding. I assure you they work great in the
powder.
Or, you could try telemarking. That certainly works superbly in the powder.

Been there, done that, and got pictures; nevertheless, you made the
suggestion, but do you telemark skiing?

One skinny ski? Somehow, I doubt it.

No one says it is a "skinny" ski, though still doable, why make such
retarded/illegitimate reference?

How about cutting out the shameless insults, and actually answering the
question?

Ok, I'll give you another chance, see how long you can hold your
breath without shameless intention of insults,

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fT_EygkFh1I

if you don't know how to read it, watch the right foot forward left
foot back stance, which is essentially the teleboarding stance.

That is not powder skiing. The loose snow is only a few inches deep.

"Ok, '6 - 10 inches of loose snow' do not make powder skiing. Yup, I
can see why you never praise anybody's skiing, a conceited little
knowledge doesn't know any better."

Or you are in the perpetuated shameless denials, Mr. shameless LOL.

snowbender

--
Alan Baker
Vancouver, British Columbia

On Oct 23, 5:48 am, downhill wrote:
snowbender wrote:
On Oct 22, 2:25 pm, downhill wrote:
Bob F wrote:
snowbender wrote:
I asked a simple question about your claim. Can't answer it?
You said "new way for powder skiing, try teleboarding". Then you showed clips of
groomed run teleboarding. Nothing to even suggest it would work on anything
anyone here would consider powder. Certain, the board shown would dive to the
limits.
You could try real snowboarding. I assure you they work great in the powder.
Or, you could try telemarking. That certainly works superbly in the powder.
One skinny ski? Somehow, I doubt it.
How about cutting out the shameless insults, and actually answering the
question?
No he is just in to insults, as any rational explanation requires using
words with the proper meaning.
We all know how well he responds to that....

You gappers are truly shameless.

snowbender

every time you post you prove you lack comprehension of simple english
words.

And you've just proved your own little knowledge gets stuck on its
little domain, like a hamster running on its little cage, on and on
and on...

In stead of answering the question in a civilized manner you hurl
insults. Which really shows your ignorance.

You have no questions, so you don't have to be here, so, you are here
wanting being insulted so you can claim that you are been victimized
by insulted? Quite a trick learned from Scott, utterly pathetic.

snowbender

On Oct 23, 5:48*am, downhill wrote:
snowbender wrote:
On Oct 22, 2:25 pm, downhill wrote:
Bob F wrote:
snowbender wrote:
I asked a simple question about your claim. Can't answer it?
You said "new way for powder skiing, try teleboarding". Then you showed clips of
groomed run teleboarding. Nothing to even suggest it would work on anything
anyone here would consider powder. Certain, the board shown would dive to the
limits.
You could try real snowboarding. I assure you they work great in the powder.
Or, you could try telemarking. That certainly works superbly in the powder.
One skinny ski? Somehow, I doubt it.
How about cutting out the shameless insults, and actually answering the
question?
No he is just in to insults, as any rational explanation requires using
words with the proper meaning.
We all know how well he responds to that....

You gappers are truly shameless.

snowbender

every time you post you prove you lack comprehension of simple english
words.
In stead of answering the question in a civilized manner you hurl
insults. Which really shows your ignorance.-

Holy ****. Irony meter proves it has comprehension of single english
words. An rsa freak talking about answering questions in a civilized
manner.
Truly shameless.
Ok, ppppuuuussssyyyy. What is your real name and verified location.
Pppppppuuuuussssssyyyyy.

On Oct 23, 8:45*am, snowbender
wrote:
On Oct 23, 5:48 am, downhill wrote:





snowbender wrote:
On Oct 22, 2:25 pm, downhill wrote:
Bob F wrote:
snowbender wrote:
I asked a simple question about your claim. Can't answer it?
You said "new way for powder skiing, try teleboarding". Then you showed clips of
groomed run teleboarding. Nothing to even suggest it would work on anything
anyone here would consider powder. Certain, the board shown would dive to the
limits.
You could try real snowboarding. I assure you they work great in the powder.
Or, you could try telemarking. That certainly works superbly in the powder.
One skinny ski? Somehow, I doubt it.
How about cutting out the shameless insults, and actually answering the
question?
No he is just in to insults, as any rational explanation requires using
words with the proper meaning.
We all know how well he responds to that....

You gappers are truly shameless.

snowbender

every time you post you prove you lack comprehension of simple english
words.

And you've just proved your own little knowledge gets stuck on its
little domain, like a hamster running on its little cage, on and on
and on...

In stead of answering the question in a civilized manner you hurl
insults. Which really shows your ignorance.

You have no questions, so you don't have to be here, so, you are here
wanting being insulted so you can claim that you are been victimized
by insulted? Quite a trick learned from Scott, utterly pathetic.


Ichie, you pppppuuuuusssssyyyyy, he didn't learn that bull**** from
me.
Go **** yourself. Dumb****. Shameless hamster. Next thing you know,
Ichie will be accusing me of flatboarding.

snowfake wrote:


You have no questions, so you don't have to be here, so, you are here
wanting being insulted so you can claim that you are been victimized
by insulted? Quite a trick learned from Scott, utterly pathetic.



snowfake

It is a honest question, why do you respond with insults instead of
answering the question?

You are the only one here who thinks that 6 inches of snowfall is powder
skiing, can you explain that?

Or are you going to quote the other loon who seems to be your only
friend and your are following his pattern of behavior by responding with
stupid unrelated comments....

In article
,
snowbender wrote:

On Oct 22, 9:52 pm, Alan Baker wrote:
In article
,
snowbender wrote:
On Oct 22, 1:50 pm, "Bob F" wrote:
snowbender wrote:
On Oct 21, 3:34 pm, "Bob F" wrote:
snowbender wrote:
On Oct 20, 5:24 pm, "Bob F" wrote:
snowbender wrote:
On Oct 20, 3:17 am, Evojeesus wrote:
http://www.tetonat.com/2009/07/is-sk...berrocker-tips
-sk.
..

The answer is no.

Nevertheless, new way for powder skiing, try teleboarding,
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n-HnaOGRM1Y

I don't see any powder. Please show us a video of this rig in
bottomless powder.

Well, it is actually a water skiing technique; if it works on
water,
it'd work in powder.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=diKD08dqj0I

and more,

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=in1c6bB4b5M

When you have a video of this in real powder, let us know.

Why? I thought you were interested in the techniques of teleboarding
in powder to improve your knowledge? Or it is prelude to your
shameless bashing again?

I asked a simple question about your claim. Can't answer it?

I did, but you cannot face the right answer, and turned into shameless
denial, as usual, as predicted. The previous answers are still in the
plain view above your shameless denial response.

You were asked to show it working in powder and you didn't.

Those are the facts.

No, those are your shameless denials, and/or your little knowledge
assessment.

No, Chai-tea. They are facts.


You said "new way for powder skiing, try teleboarding". Then you showed
clips of
groomed run teleboarding. Nothing to even suggest it would work on
anything
anyone here would consider powder. Certain, the board shown would dive
to
the
limits.

So you don't think this clip shows powder snow, or good powder
skiing?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=diKD08dqj0I

No. It doesn't. It shows skiing in approximately 6 - 10 inches of loose
snow over a packed base.

Ok, "6 - 10 inches of loose snow" do not make powder skiing. Yup, I
can see why you never praise anybody's skiing, a conceited little
knowledge doesn't know any better.

That's correct: 6 - 10 inches of loose snow do not make powder skiing.

That's a simple fact.


Or your little knowledge doesn't know what powder skiing is?

I know that it's not simply the presence of fresh snow.

Given the fact that you don't know what makes the powder snow, you
probably don't know what powder skiing is neither? See if you can see
any powder skiing in this clip,
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OD5QQirJyB4

A lot of that is quite certainly powder skiing.

See: I have no trouble telling the truth.

You should try it some time.


You could try real snowboarding. I assure you they work great in the
powder.
Or, you could try telemarking. That certainly works superbly in the
powder.

Been there, done that, and got pictures; nevertheless, you made the
suggestion, but do you telemark skiing?

One skinny ski? Somehow, I doubt it.

No one says it is a "skinny" ski, though still doable, why make such
retarded/illegitimate reference?

How about cutting out the shameless insults, and actually answering the
question?

Ok, I'll give you another chance, see how long you can hold your
breath without shameless intention of insults,

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fT_EygkFh1I

if you don't know how to read it, watch the right foot forward left
foot back stance, which is essentially the teleboarding stance.

That is not powder skiing. The loose snow is only a few inches deep.

"Ok, '6 - 10 inches of loose snow' do not make powder skiing. Yup, I
can see why you never praise anybody's skiing, a conceited little
knowledge doesn't know any better."

I'm neither praising nor condemning the skiing. I'm simply stating the
facts: it isn't powder skiing.

--
Alan Baker
Vancouver, British Columbia
http://gallery.me.com/alangbaker/100008/DSCF0162/web.jpg

On Oct 23, 5:43*pm, Alan Baker wrote:
In article
,





*snowbender wrote:
On Oct 22, 9:52 pm, Alan Baker wrote:
In article
,
*snowbender wrote:
On Oct 22, 1:50 pm, "Bob F" wrote:
snowbender wrote:
On Oct 21, 3:34 pm, "Bob F" wrote:
snowbender wrote:
On Oct 20, 5:24 pm, "Bob F" wrote:
snowbender wrote:
On Oct 20, 3:17 am, Evojeesus wrote:
http://www.tetonat.com/2009/07/is-sk...berrocker-tips
-sk.
..

The answer is no.

Nevertheless, new way for powder skiing, try teleboarding,
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n-HnaOGRM1Y

I don't see any powder. Please show us a video of this rig in
bottomless powder.

Well, it is actually a water skiing technique; if it works on
water,
it'd work in powder.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=diKD08dqj0I

and more,

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=in1c6bB4b5M

When you have a video of this in real powder, let us know.

Why? I thought you were interested in the techniques of teleboarding
in powder to improve your knowledge? Or it is prelude to your
shameless bashing again?

I asked a simple question about your claim. Can't answer it?

I did, but you cannot face the right answer, and turned into shameless
denial, as usual, as predicted. The previous answers are still in the
plain view above your shameless denial response.

You were asked to show it working in powder and you didn't.

Those are the facts.

No, those are your shameless denials, and/or your little knowledge
assessment.

No, Chai-tea. They are facts.







You said "new way for powder skiing, try teleboarding". Then you showed
clips of
groomed run teleboarding. Nothing to even suggest it would work on
anything
anyone here would consider powder. Certain, the board shown would dive
to
the
limits.

So you don't think this clip shows powder snow, or good powder
skiing?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=diKD08dqj0I

No. It doesn't. It shows skiing in approximately 6 - 10 inches of loose
snow over a packed base.

Ok, "6 - 10 inches of loose snow" do not make powder skiing. Yup, I
can see why you never praise anybody's skiing, a conceited little
knowledge doesn't know any better.

That's correct: 6 - 10 inches of loose snow do not make powder skiing.

That's a simple fact.



Or your little knowledge doesn't know what powder skiing is?

I know that it's not simply the presence of fresh snow.

Given the fact that you don't know what makes the powder snow, you
probably don't know what powder skiing is neither? See if you can see
any powder skiing in this clip,
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OD5QQirJyB4

A lot of that is quite certainly powder skiing.

See: I have no trouble telling the truth.

You should try it some time.







You could try real snowboarding. I assure you they work great in the
powder.
Or, you could try telemarking. That certainly works superbly in the
powder.

Been there, done that, and got pictures; nevertheless, you made the
suggestion, but do you telemark skiing?

One skinny ski? Somehow, I doubt it.

No one says it is a "skinny" ski, though still doable, why make such
retarded/illegitimate reference?

How about cutting out the shameless insults, and actually answering the
question?

Ok, I'll give you another chance, see how long you can hold your
breath without shameless intention of insults,

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fT_EygkFh1I

if you don't know how to read it, watch the right foot forward left
foot back stance, which is essentially the teleboarding stance.

That is not powder skiing. The loose snow is only a few inches deep.

"Ok, '6 - 10 inches of loose snow' do not make powder skiing. Yup, I
can see why you never praise anybody's skiing, a conceited little
knowledge doesn't know any better."

I'm neither praising nor condemning the skiing. I'm simply stating the
facts: it isn't powder skiing.

Baker, Baker. A pathological liar with a long and disgusting history
of ignoring facts that do not fit his delusions should not criticize
anyone else.
Especially you.
Remember when you stated I am a "convicted felon"?
I demanded that you provide facts. You weaseled and waffled and never
withdrew your outright defamatory lie. Because you are a lying piece
of **** freak. Fact.
For months, you threatened to tell SPD that I had threatened your
life. Fact. You promised to do so. Fact. You have not done so.
Fact. Because you could get charged with making a false police
report. Fact. You are a dickless, disgusting, laughable, mentally
ill coward. Fact.
Whistler. Fact.
So shut the **** up, asshole. You've been busted lying more often
than you jerk off, and that is one hell of a lot of lying.

On Thu, 21 Oct 2010 08:09:06 -0700 (PDT), pigo
wrote:

On Oct 21, 7:22*am, Dick G wrote:
On Wed, 20 Oct 2010 03:17:42 -0700 (PDT), Evojeesus

wrote:
http://www.tetonat.com/2009/07/is-sk...rocker-tips-sk...

I don't think so, golf equipment continues to evolve allowing poorer
players *to become longer hitters, however IMHO equipment advances
will not compensate for the lack of skill

For one thing "longer hitting" is only part of the equation. I've got
friends that can hit 280/300..............IN THE WRONG DIRECTION !!!
Its amazing the amount of folks who will spend a lot of money on top
of the line ski or golf gear, yet scoff at the idea of taking lessons