If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
Learning to read on ability vs. flex, thanks! Getting closer already.
Alright, so assuming the exact right flex for his abilities and weight, right lengths, etc. 2 sets of ski's, one as sold everywhere, one customized to be significantly (20%?) wider, that still fits between tracks. How will grip and glide be affected? For glide we'll all agree that a 1cm narrow ski for someone ~60-100kg would be like a knife cutting deep, so very slow gliding. Perhaps great grip, though you'd destroy the trails all by yourself and possibly lose energy pulling skis out of the snow after kicking off. But now let's take a wider-than-regularly-available ski, but still the same ballpark. The aforementioned +20%. Slow or fast, grippy or slippy? Weight-to-surface Joseph is getting a much different figure (+66%) than the 60kg skier of similar height and ability now, as ski's seem to end up around the same width. What if his weight-to-surface came down a bit? Taking it to the extreme, a hypothetical skier, twice the regular height of a human, 12 feet tall, 600kg. Even with proportionate width ski's (~9cms?), his weight-to-surface is greater than with typical humans. This is because a man twice as tall weighs eight times as much (if I'm getting this right), but only gets twice the ski length for practical reasons. Even with 9cm wide skis, weight-to-surface for our giant is twice that of the 6 feet tall skier. I would wager the giant has a hard time gliding, at least on the flat. Grip, well he might rip up the trails with his skinny skis. Snow density doesn't work out for him, something like that. Why not give our giant even wider skis? They won't get in the way for him, and weight might not even end up significantly higher, as they could also be made thinner. The trails will thank him, and my gut says it would glide faster. Now with a 12-foot dinosaur extreme measures seem required to get a good ski fit, but our friendly friend Joseph might already enjoy slightly wider skis that still fit in the trails, while crushing the snow a bit more similarly to his 60kg buddy of identical height and technical ability. As you'll notice, I have a deeply rooted love/hate thing for proportions, probably due to being built XL myself. I'd love to learn and understand how the physics works in case of a skier's weight and his ski's width, for glide and grip, as in other sports and business, the rules of proportion as I understand them, always apply for best performance. I did Google the topic, but the only places where weight to width ratio seems to come up regularly, is mountaineering and alpine, where obviously snow is less dence. A Bianthlon rulebook I came across stated a minimum width of 40mm under the boot, but that doesn't mean narrower is better, does it? Zach wrote : As for a the possibilities of better grip from a wider ski - I would suggest that the overwhelming factor determining grip is the amount of dowforce the skier can apply through the wax. Do you mean downforce per surface unit, or after deducting flex from his boot-on-ski pressure? And: I don't think that a wider ski would help grip in the least - at least not before it completely killed the handling characteristics and running speed of the ski. Specifically, also not for a guy with more weight for his ski length? Does a narrower ski automatically equal faster, for skiers of any weight, or any surface? would theorical inch-wide skis make the best classic skiers even faster? Thanks, J "rw" schreef in bericht oups.com... J A skier of 60kg should never ski on a ski which is closed at 100kg and visa versa. The skier of 60kg: And here is the kicker::::::: if is a super athlete and a excellent classic skier.( see now we have to factor in the persons skiing ability!!!!!) Should buy a ski that closes at 100% of his body weight. A skier like Joseph who admitted he is not an expert in classic technique. Should buy a ski that closes at 50kg or even less. So when Joseph climbs or when he gets tiered he will still be able to close the ski and have excellent grip. Now to answer your question (Which is not real world) For Joseph of course at 100kg he will be faster on the downhills then any body else because he has more weight behind him. Yes he could get a wider ski and have more surface for glide and grip with the same length ski. The wisdom is more base more glide more grip. Now this is if the skis have excactly the flex for him. (His WEIGHT his SKIING ABILITY = SKI FLEX 100kg - 25%= 75kg for a intermediate skier) I hope this was helpful rw |
Ads |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
Zach,
Would your comment that downward force (kick) is the overwhelming factor in comparison to the area of grip wax also apply to loose snow conditions? Downward force is the primary factor when the track is firm and the snow's shear resistance is high enough to resist the kick force. When the snow is soft (e.g. new dry snow drifiting into the track) or where the hill gets turned into marathon powder for the back-of-the-pack skiers like myself, I lose grip when the snow shears. I find that I get less grip on soft or loose snow conditions in comparison to a similar slope inclination with the track packed firm. If snow grip is limited by the shear strength of the snow, more wax area would be needed to reisist the same shear force. Wax area could be increased by either waxing longer (for the same ski width) or using a wider ski for the same kick wax softness. With soft powder conditions, I have had to wax softer such that the kick wax temporarily icing on long steeper climbs with no gliding to get grip. Then if the wax works just right, the snow build-up breaks free of the ski when I start gliding after the hill flattens. (When the ski doesn't free up I'm in trouble). Edgar |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
Hi Zach,
I am impressed. You are one of the best when it comes to cross country technology. Just my thoughts about your two racers Kris and Justin. Since these two are well coached I am certain they are skiing the new way which I would call "power on", so since they are never letting their skis slow down and change legs way faster then a normal skier they would be needing a ski that reflexes this technique. But a average performance skier who is using the normal kick and glide till it slows is using more down force on his skis if he or she has a good technique. I agree 100% weight is a lot if you are skiing several hours and this type of skier is rare but they do exist. rw |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
rw wrote: J A skier of 60kg should never ski on a ski which is closed at 100kg and visa versa. The skier of 60kg: And here is the kicker::::::: if is a super athlete and a excellent classic skier.( see now we have to factor in the persons skiing ability!!!!!) Should buy a ski that closes at 100% of his body weight. A skier like Joseph who admitted he is not an expert in classic technique. Should buy a ski that closes at 50kg or even less. So when Joseph climbs or when he gets tiered he will still be able to close the ski and have excellent grip. My "old" skis close at some force/weight less than my body weight. I don't know where as they have not been measured, but it is obvious from the way they behave. My new skis close at 100% of body weight. At the shop, we weighed me with my gear and discussed a bit my plans for weightloss, etc. We then dialed in the flex machine to 101kg (I weighed 104kg with gear). Each ski was mounted in the machine, and then with 101kg of downforce, the clearance from flat was measured. Marks were put on the skis where the clearance was 0.0mm (flat to base), 0.15mm, etc. These define the grip zones for different waxes, klisters, and temps. The right-left distinction was because the 2 skis are not identical, my stronger and longer leg got the stiffer one. We also did the paper under the sole test to confirm. Now to answer your question (Which is not real world) For Joseph of course at 100kg he will be faster on the downhills then any body else because he has more weight behind him. Yes he could get a wider ski and have more surface for glide and grip with the same length ski. The wisdom is more base more glide more grip. Now this is if the skis have excactly the flex for him. (His WEIGHT his SKIING ABILITY = SKI FLEX 100kg - 25%= 75kg for a intermediate skier) I hope this was helpful Very helpful. This explains why my skis work so well when I use them properly and am not tired. It also explains why I suffer when I am tired and my technique gets sloppy. Joseph |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
rw wrote: Anders, I do not work with a deflection micrometer so I can only guess. But it looks like 1. The thing with left and right ski is probably just a guide not to be too concerned about. There is no left and right ski in today's world. 2. of course he will have a short grip zone for klisters. No rocket science there either. One applies Klister wax just under the foot. (heel to toe) no more or the ski will have no glide. 3. the numbers. 0mm = 100% of bodyweight on ski closed 1.5mm = ? 80% of body weight on uphills 2.0mm = ? 70% of body weight grip when he is tiered ask him about the numbers I have no clue rw Here is a short version of what the number are for: (What they ARE is clearance in mm from flat under load) 0.05 start dry wax for extra grip, or cold conditions, 2 layers max. 0.1 dry condition wax, 4 layers. This is Normal setup. 0.15 start klister zone for extra good grip, or extra cold. 0.2 normal klister zone 0.3 thick klister zone These zones obviously overlap, with 0.05 being most forward, and thus th elongest. Joseph |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
|
#37
|
|||
|
|||
Yeah Edgar - snow shear in soft conditions is definitely a huge
consideration. Most companies are building skis with a pocket extending someplace near 30cm in front of the balance point, and 20 or more cm behind. Under most conditions this is fine. But there are certainly days where you need to stretch the zone further forward and modify your technique a bit (don't try to be so forward - drag the foot through a longer kick motion, etc). I still feel that widening the ski enough to provide a significant difference in shearing conditions will have four effects: heavy skis, slow skis, poor handling characteristics, and better kick. But that's just my own feeling, and certainly geared more toward high-end skiers who probably have the technical tools to deal with snow shear in any case... Z |
#38
|
|||
|
|||
Kris and Justin are probably pretty good models of the "new way" of
skiing. But I don't think the differences are that great. If anything, this quicker, more impulsive style of skiing can allow a skier to use a stiffer ski. The more "old school" long kick and glide technique is usually coupled with a body position pretty far back on the ski and a much less impulsive kick. There are a whole bunch of old-style skiers here in New England - we've got more former Olympians and national team athletes per capita than most places, and most of them are still involved in the sport. Some of these guys THINK they want really stiff skis, because that's what they were on back before ski technology improved to the point where you can actually have kick AND glide. When you get these guys on a well-fit modern ski it's usually a revelation. I've never run into one of these 100% guys. And if I do I'm going to be REALLY careful not to **** him off! Z |
#39
|
|||
|
|||
Z,
Where dit you buy your test bench? Or did you build it yourself? rw |
#40
|
|||
|
|||
I built it. About $900 with a little luck on eBay finding very good
load sensor for $400, and the help of a very patient local machinist. I'm currently close to $7000 into my next flex tester, with about another $4000 to go in order to have it ready to go. But it will be good. Z |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Wax ski with Grip Tape suitable for beginner? | Amadeo | Nordic Skiing | 12 | January 13th 05 07:18 PM |
Start Grip Tape Review | gr | Nordic Skiing | 6 | December 23rd 04 07:52 AM |
Grip tape and "icing" | Laurent Duparchy | Nordic Skiing | 3 | November 18th 04 07:35 AM |
Field Test - START Grip Tape | John O'Connell | Nordic Skiing | 11 | March 19th 04 09:37 PM |
Experience with Start Grip Tape | Gerald Fingerlos | Nordic Skiing | 1 | January 7th 04 05:28 PM |