If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Skate technique USST two cents
I could care less about technique because I'm not a coach and I just
like to go out and ski. Yeah, I could be faster if I did everything the right way. I've been skiing and racing over twenty years though and at 46, it's no big deal if I finish a minute or two faster in a 50K. That being said, I don't think you guys need to defend Pete or rip Ken. I'd suggest staying tuned to Ken's posts in fact. I know Pete and I think he is the type of guy who enjoys discussion on technique. I think Borowski was more ****ed at Pete's "new skate" theory because it made what he said obsolete. Marty Hall's column in Ski Trax was meant to add more to the discussion. I think Pete is the type of coach who feeds off the discussion and disagreement. That's how the sport evolves. Marty wants to hear Pete's response to his criticism. About ten years ago, Steve Gaskill, Mike Gallagher and Lee Borowski all disagreed with each other on technique in the pages of the Master Skier. It makes people try new things and is ultimately good for the sport. Pete is one of the most cerebral guys in nordic skiing. Like many here, I would put my faith in what Pete says over the other guys because he is on the World Cup and he is at the center of the action. What he says about core strength is enlightening IMHO. Take a look at Elofsson, Fredriksson and Freeman for example. Their stomachs kind of jut out. Not like a guy carry a few extra pounds, but like a boxer or football player. The core strength thing makes a lot of sense to me. I might even start back with the sit-ups myself. Jay Tegeder "On the podium if the right people don't show up!" JT wrote in message ... Pete, thanks for the great post. And, congrats on the excellent results by the USST the past few years. I've been actively thinking about not "skiing big" in my classic skiing the last couple years and it is good to have that notion reinforced by you. This newsgroup, and life in general, is richer due to the diversity of people/posters. I too give anything written by Ken Roberts nothing more than a quick skin. I think he'd get more out of a 30-second instruction session with Vordenberg than he will ever get from his endless ramblings about the first-principle physics/physiology of ski technique. But, to each his own. Cheers, Brian ... who is very proud of this result (2002 Birkie): 23 Vordenberg, Pete 2:13:36 24 May, Brian 2:14:18 In article , Roger Knight wrote: Pete and others, thanks for the positive flow on this board and in real life. Don't get bogged down by those who will criticize no matter what you say....you know better than to listen to this stuff. Keep the ideas and positive results flowing, otherwise we will never improve as a country....THANK YOU! |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Norwegian Future Skate technique project | Ken Roberts | Nordic Skiing | 0 | December 23rd 03 02:35 PM |
what was 'the New Skate' ? | Ken Roberts | Nordic Skiing | 21 | December 18th 03 02:33 PM |
slide boards (was: skate technique for bicyclists) | Chris Cline | Nordic Skiing | 1 | December 11th 03 08:11 PM |
Classic poles for "New Skate" technique? | Bruce Toien | Nordic Skiing | 7 | September 27th 03 04:02 PM |
book on "new skate" technique (at last) | Ken Roberts | Nordic Skiing | 5 | September 12th 03 04:28 PM |