Total Body Automation

On Jul 29, 9:10 am, "Bob F" wrote:
"taichiskiing" wrote in message
...

By its original definition, a gapper is a little knowledge who
"couldn't pick up the technical discussion/debate, couldn't put down
his own techniques, only know whining on meaningless innuendos and
mutated small talks to beg attentions on the 'net." The "gap" existed
between what the gapper thinks and does makes him a "gapper."

Thanks for the example.

No; *thank you* for being such a good example.

Taichi moves like water flow--"never resist but ever persist"; as
water leaves no "gap," so is Taichi, so is Taichi Skiing.


IS

In article
,
taichiskiing wrote:

On Jul 28, 12:39 pm, "JQ" wrote:

This is my second try, the first one didn't go through...

IS, title dropping of two unknown people without giving names and no
confirmation of them agreeing with you is below your standards. You don't
allow others to name or title drop to prove their point so you must be held
to the same standards if not higher.

The difference is that I don't lie. "There's nothing more stupid than
one who cheats himself to cheat others," what I said.

For their privacy, I am not going to prove their credentials or their
point on the 'net; nevertheless, I can voucher how they ski. You may
have seen one of them,

http://youtube.com/watch?v=hEpPBnud7jc
all mountain free skiing

Wow.

More video of you on the easiest terrain imaginable.

--
Alan Baker
Vancouver, British Columbia
http://gallery.me.com/alangbaker/100008/DSCF0162/web.jpg

On Jul 29, 10:55 am, taichiskiing
wrote:

A gapper is someone who has a gap in their thinking that makes them think that
they can just make up words, use them to mean whatever they want, and people
will not think they are idiots or trolls. It is also a person that uses such a
word in every message they post.

By its original definition, a gapper is a little knowledge who
"couldn't pick up the technical discussion/debate, couldn't put down
his own techniques, only know whining on meaningless innuendos and
mutated small talks to beg attentions on the 'net." The "gap" existed
between what the gapper thinks and does makes him a "gapper."


IS

Well then, I guess it's a perfectly cromulent word.

On Jul 29, 8:37 am, Clarencedarrow
wrote:
On Jul 29, 11:39 am, taichiskiing
wrote:

The difference is that I don't lie.

Horse****, You're a ****ing fraud - that's lying.

Or you lie so much that you're no longer capable to hear "truth"
anymore?

You bark like an insecure juvenile dog in a cage; wanna come out and
play? You need to see Cesar Millan, the dog whisperer, to learn some
social skills first.


IS

"Alan Baker" wrote in message
...
In article
,
taichiskiing wrote:

On Jul 28, 12:39 pm, "JQ" wrote:

This is my second try, the first one didn't go through...

IS, title dropping of two unknown people without giving names and no
confirmation of them agreeing with you is below your standards. You
don't
allow others to name or title drop to prove their point so you must be
held
to the same standards if not higher.

The difference is that I don't lie. "There's nothing more stupid than
one who cheats himself to cheat others," what I said.

For their privacy, I am not going to prove their credentials or their
point on the 'net; nevertheless, I can voucher how they ski. You may
have seen one of them,

http://youtube.com/watch?v=hEpPBnud7jc
all mountain free skiing

Wow.

More video of you on the easiest terrain imaginable.

--
Alan Baker
Vancouver, British Columbia
http://gallery.me.com/alangbaker/100008/DSCF0162/web.jpg


I actually thought it was on tougher than many of the others that I seen. I
don't know what he was trying to prove other than having a good time and
being videos skiing down the mountain.

IS, I hope this video wasn't supposed to prove you ski with an ex PSIA L3
coaches, and ex
snowboarders. I have higher expectations from you than this type of proof
or lack of proof.

There was another video of "IS" skiing backwards and one leg(?) I think (
All-mountain Skiing: carving backward and one-legged skiing ), it was hard
to tell as the video was not clear enough to see which direction he was
facing, I did not see one leg off the ground but with his definition
(one-legged skiing) could have a different meaning. If he was skiing
backwards he was in very good control and appeared to be in more control
over his balance than he does skiing forward. It reminds me of one of my
martial arts students, on our Black Belt level testing (performance) a good
portion of it is done blind folded. He actually performed much better being
blind folded than he did with site. We could not believe the improvement,
we thought maybe he could see so we made sure he could not see and still he
performed at a much higher level.

JQ
Dancing on the edge

In article ,
"JQ" wrote:

"Alan Baker" wrote in message
...
In article
,
taichiskiing wrote:

On Jul 28, 12:39 pm, "JQ" wrote:

This is my second try, the first one didn't go through...

IS, title dropping of two unknown people without giving names and no
confirmation of them agreeing with you is below your standards. You
don't
allow others to name or title drop to prove their point so you must be
held
to the same standards if not higher.

The difference is that I don't lie. "There's nothing more stupid than
one who cheats himself to cheat others," what I said.

For their privacy, I am not going to prove their credentials or their
point on the 'net; nevertheless, I can voucher how they ski. You may
have seen one of them,

http://youtube.com/watch?v=hEpPBnud7jc
all mountain free skiing

Wow.

More video of you on the easiest terrain imaginable.

--
Alan Baker
Vancouver, British Columbia
http://gallery.me.com/alangbaker/100008/DSCF0162/web.jpg


I actually thought it was on tougher than many of the others that I seen. I
don't know what he was trying to prove other than having a good time and
being videos skiing down the mountain.

Really? Seriously? What was tough about it at all?

Remember, someone was able to follow him all through the run while
running the video camera, and there was never any wind noise to speak of.

My bet is that every part of that run was on green circle terrain.

--
Alan Baker
Vancouver, British Columbia
http://gallery.me.com/alangbaker/100008/DSCF0162/web.jpg

"Alan Baker" wrote in message
...
In article ,
"JQ" wrote:

"Alan Baker" wrote in message
...
In article
,
taichiskiing wrote:

On Jul 28, 12:39 pm, "JQ" wrote:

This is my second try, the first one didn't go through...

IS, title dropping of two unknown people without giving names and no
confirmation of them agreeing with you is below your standards. You
don't
allow others to name or title drop to prove their point so you must
be
held
to the same standards if not higher.

The difference is that I don't lie. "There's nothing more stupid than
one who cheats himself to cheat others," what I said.

For their privacy, I am not going to prove their credentials or their
point on the 'net; nevertheless, I can voucher how they ski. You may
have seen one of them,

http://youtube.com/watch?v=hEpPBnud7jc
all mountain free skiing

Wow.

More video of you on the easiest terrain imaginable.

--
Alan Baker
Vancouver, British Columbia
http://gallery.me.com/alangbaker/100008/DSCF0162/web.jpg


I actually thought it was on tougher than many of the others that I seen.
I
don't know what he was trying to prove other than having a good time and
being videos skiing down the mountain.



Really? Seriously? What was tough about it at all?

Remember, someone was able to follow him all through the run while
running the video camera, and there was never any wind noise to speak of.

My bet is that every part of that run was on green circle terrain.

--
Alan Baker
Vancouver, British Columbia
http://gallery.me.com/alangbaker/100008/DSCF0162/web.jpg

The run looked like it may have been a good blue. When I say tougher than
many of the others, I meant the others of his videos not runs at different
mountains. By the way hearing wind noise on someone's video doesn't make a
run tough or easy.

JQ
Dancing on the edge

In article ,
"JQ" wrote:

"Alan Baker" wrote in message
...
In article ,
"JQ" wrote:

"Alan Baker" wrote in message
...
In article
,
taichiskiing wrote:

On Jul 28, 12:39 pm, "JQ" wrote:

This is my second try, the first one didn't go through...

IS, title dropping of two unknown people without giving names and no
confirmation of them agreeing with you is below your standards. You
don't
allow others to name or title drop to prove their point so you must
be
held
to the same standards if not higher.

The difference is that I don't lie. "There's nothing more stupid than
one who cheats himself to cheat others," what I said.

For their privacy, I am not going to prove their credentials or their
point on the 'net; nevertheless, I can voucher how they ski. You may
have seen one of them,

http://youtube.com/watch?v=hEpPBnud7jc
all mountain free skiing

Wow.

More video of you on the easiest terrain imaginable.

--
Alan Baker
Vancouver, British Columbia
http://gallery.me.com/alangbaker/100008/DSCF0162/web.jpg


I actually thought it was on tougher than many of the others that I seen.
I
don't know what he was trying to prove other than having a good time and
being videos skiing down the mountain.



Really? Seriously? What was tough about it at all?

Remember, someone was able to follow him all through the run while
running the video camera, and there was never any wind noise to speak of.

My bet is that every part of that run was on green circle terrain.

--
Alan Baker
Vancouver, British Columbia
http://gallery.me.com/alangbaker/100008/DSCF0162/web.jpg

The run looked like it may have been a good blue. When I say tougher than
many of the others, I meant the others of his videos not runs at different
mountains. By the way hearing wind noise on someone's video doesn't make a
run tough or easy.

It's an excellent indication that the speeds were low, and if the speeds
were low then the skier being videoed -- who was making no braking
movements -- can hardly have been on even a blue slope.

In fact, you can easily tell from the angle of skiers who are standing
still and the trees (and the chairlift tower at about 1:00 in) that the
slope is minimal.

--
Alan Baker
Vancouver, British Columbia
http://gallery.me.com/alangbaker/100008/DSCF0162/web.jpg

On Jul 29, 3:32*pm, taichiskiing
wrote:
On Jul 29, 8:37 am, Clarencedarrow
wrote:

On Jul 29, 11:39 am, taichiskiing
wrote:

The difference is that I don't lie.

Horse****, You're a ****ing fraud - that's lying.

Or you lie so much that you're no longer capable to hear "truth"
anymore?

You bark like an insecure juvenile dog in a cage; wanna come out and
play? You need to see Cesar Millan, the dog whisperer, to learn some
social skills first.


IS

LOL
You're a fraud, that's lying, period.

On Tue, 29 Jul 2008 06:49:49 -0700 (PDT), pigo
wrote this crap:

On Jul 29, 4:32*am, A mighty Hungarian
wrote:

As for Scottee, he has no honor. *If he really goes to Sturgis, on his
riceburner, he'll be beaten like a red-headed stepson, riding a
government mule.

He's going to ride a rice burner to Sturgis !?!?!? Even he's not
stupid enough to brag about that is he? He's probably going to ride
bitch with "one of his biker buddies".


He's been bragging about hanging out with Harley riders, and going to
Sturgis. If it's true, (and it probably isn't,) he'll come back
looking like a loser in a Scottish bloody soccer riot.

Most likely, he'll be having some prison homo-sex, again.





A mighty Hungarian warrior
The blood of Attila runs through me