If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
foot2foot wrote:
OK, Britt wants to know the difference, (he claims, maybe he just wants more argument for argument's sake) and it actually comes up all the time, you try to explain magic turns and sooner or later somebody pipes up and says "yeahhh that's just the old stem christy". But it's not. People have for all modern skiing time learned to ski in a wedge for the most part. The question then arose and still does, how do you get the student to move from wedge turns into making parallel turns, often called "matching the skis"? Today, use magic turns. To make a magic turn, traverse, make a wedge to set the edges of both skis, transfer weight to the outside ski and pick up the tail of the inside ski (while leaving the tip of the inside ski on the snow) and put it back next to the outside ski. Always hold hands well in front of you, shoulders square to your direction of travel. Or, at first, keep the shoulders square to the skis. Skiing is done with the legs, not the shoulders. To do the old stem that comes out of the twenties or thirties, traverse, put *all* the weight on the inside ski, (unnatural and difficult at best), while leaving that inside ski in the traverse path you're already on, extend the fully unweighted outside ski to make a "v" shape with both skis, tips close, tails spread apart. *THEN*, transfer all the weight from the inside ski (if you haven't fallen over yet) to the *outside ski*, *THENNN* pick up the inside ski and put it next to the outside ski, and *TTTHHHENNNN* even out the weight onto both skis a bit and turn. Cmon. You *really* can't see the difference? See, there's a lot of unnatural steps and extra motion to the stem that doesn't happen if you initiate a turn with a *wedge*. Right? Serious replies only please. No subject changing, small talk or giggle posts. Pretty please? Picking up from some of the discussion later in this thread, I was wondering if some of the std turns and techniques will apply to snow blades. I am an xc skier (classic, touring, hiking trails and such )and can wedge turn and sort of get the second ski around for something that I might believe is a parallel turn on my xc skis. This year I am trying snowblades (thanks for the previous advice!) and have a pair of 120cm (with releasable bindings!!). Questions; Do the same turn techniques apply that you are discussing, or are snowblades just to far different? I am guessing that if I learn the reasonably proper technique on the short skis, I may someday want longer ones and want to be using the proper technique. Is a hockey stop still reasonable? From an old book on short short skis I gather that making a parallel turn is almost automatic, but does that induce bad habits? Also, seems like the parallel is getting a lot of flak as being old fashioned (I guess in favor of carver turns). thanks! GR |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
New thread LAL, PSIA wedge. | foot2foot | Alpine Skiing | 10 | November 28th 04 10:35 PM |
Time Machine, 1930's -The Pure Stem | foot2foot | Alpine Skiing | 12 | May 28th 04 07:26 PM |
difference Solden- Ischgl | Nigel (Remove NOSPAM) | European Ski Resorts | 6 | March 17th 04 10:55 AM |
The difference swing weight makes | Jeff Potter | Nordic Skiing | 0 | November 8th 03 02:07 PM |
M/L Binding? Is there a huge difference? | John | Snowboarding | 7 | October 27th 03 06:04 PM |