Attention Mark Spittal

On Oct 13, 11:57*am, Ted Waldron wrote:

*Flame Wars are don't have winners or losers, they have a beginning and
an end.

* It time for both sides to lay down their arms. *If Scooter writes
implicit threats to an individual, or carries out some action like
showing up at a gathering when he is told he is not welcome, it
shouldn't be on this board but directed at the proper law enforcement
agency.. *If Scooter feels threatened, then he should do the same. *

The Flame should had ended after the hearing over 11 years ago, it
hasn't because I have continue it, along with others. I think it is time
just to kill file all participants who continue this.

The main reason why it should stop is repetition. *Both sides just are
repeating themselves over and over again. *

There has been some success in not responding to Scooter. I think the
next step is stop talking about him and his ravings, and keeping on
topic as much as possible.

Both sides should stop. *Which means stop poking the raving lunatic in
his cage with pointy sticks.

I think that as long as trunky vows to "keep the group dead", whether
he accomplishes it or not, it is valid to let others know the kind of
person making that vow.

And let's be clear. The allegation is that it was scott barak abraham,
aka, scott spittal, that physically abused his little brother. *Given
trunky's behavior here and elsewhere, that is confirmed and witnessed
by those here, I believe Mark.

All good points. And true too. But some things just don't translate
logically into real life. I could accept for everyone to stop except
Mark. I think that there needs to be some recognition of what trunky
is as long as he insists on intruding.

I haven't read it myself, so correct me if I'm wrong, but take for
example trunky posting himself that he's known as a molester and
convicted felon when no one else posts it ! That's just weird.

On Oct 13, 10:00*am, VtSkier wrote:
On 10/13/2010 12:43 PM, Stuart wrote:



*wrote in message
....
On Oct 13, 10:10 am, *wrote:
Nobody in here is concerned about your alleged bum****ing. This is an
inappropriate place to post this stuff. Why are you posting here, or are
you
infact a sock puppet of Scott? We are unable to verify your story here
even
if anybody felt inclined which we don't Go get outside help if you need
it.

I disagree.

I think that as long as trunky vows to "keep the group dead", whether
he accomplishes it or not, it is valid to let others know the kind of
person making that vow.

And let's be clear. The allegation is that it was scott barak abraham,
aka, scott spittal, that physically abused his little brother. *Given
trunky's behavior here and elsewhere, that is confirmed and witnessed
by those here, I believe Mark.

Maybe you could explain why anyone in an ALPINE SKI oriented newsgroup would
give a rat's ass about who buggered who? Seem to me this story get retold
endlessly for no purpose.

The only way to make this a relevant newsgroup again is to
shut out Scott, his sock puppets, and anyone whose only
purpose is to rebut or otherwise harass Scott with old
stuff dredged up from the distant and not so distant past.

Clue time, you disgusting freak. A decent person would say that the
only way to clean this ******** up is to refuse to be civil to anyone
who lies, defames, and stalks.
Of course, if that happened, no one would talk to YOU.
Allow me to dredge up the past. When a freak threatened to shoot me,
you posted my home address.
What a cowardly asshole!!!!


If someone wants to monitor what's going on in that quarter,
feel free.
1) It ain't gonna be me. I'm too old for this ****.

And you still do not have a conscience. No condemnation of false
allegations of molesting children.

2) If you report back to the group in an incessant
manner like the sock puppet (of whomever) Mark Spittal,
you will soon be plonked by me. And I hope by the
rest of the group.

No condemnation of false allegations of molesting children.

3) I now have two "Mark Spittal"s plonked. You changed
your addy when you started up again. I have no
reservations against plonking you a third time.-

You know who the sockpuppet is, asshole. And you still protect his
identity.

On Oct 13, 10:00*am, "Stuart" wrote:
"twobuddha" wrote in message

...
On Oct 13, 9:10 am, "Stuart" wrote:

Nobody in here is concerned about your alleged bum****ing. This is an
inappropriate place to post this stuff. Why are you posting here, or are
you
infact a sock puppet of Scott? We are unable to verify your story here
even
if anybody felt inclined which we don't Go get outside help if you need
it.

Holy ****, you insane wack job, are you really suggesting that I am
calling MYSELF a child molester, just to **** with you freaks?
How ridiculous can you get?
You lying piece of ****, you know who is doing this and you keep the
secret. *One of your buddies here.
Next time you want to pretend to be a decent, honorable human being,
don't **** yourself by making such a deranged false allegation.

I don't really give a **** waht you think.

You certainly do, or else you would not prove your complete assholity
with this bull****.

Nobody can prove or disprove anything.

Of course I cannot disprove a complete lie fabricated by my brother.
And of course, you and your friends can't prove any of your lies.
Yet you lie and lie and lie. There is no equivalence here, asshole.


You and your accusers so called are being complete jerks by
occupying a group dedicated to SKIING..

Holy ****, you are calling me a complete jerk because your buddies lie
about me and I object to being falsely accused of molesting children
Only a complete jerk would equate the two, you complete jerk.

Why don't you take your war elsewhere.

Why don't you go **** yourself? Your friends who defame and stalk are
trying to intimidate me into going elsewhere. Why don't THEY shut the
**** up, you complete jerk? Stop blaming me or your buddies sick
stalking.

I don't give a **** whether you did or didn'y do whatever and I
am not accussing you of anything pea-brain.

Looks to me like you just accused me of being responsible for freaks
lying and defaming and stalking, pea brain.

On Oct 13, 10:04*am, "Stuart" wrote:
"twobuddha" wrote in message

...
On Oct 13, 9:10 am, "Stuart" wrote:

Nobody in here is concerned about your alleged bum****ing. This is an
inappropriate place to post this stuff. Why are you posting here, or are
you
infact a sock puppet of Scott? We are unable to verify your story here
even
if anybody felt inclined which we don't Go get outside help if you need
it.

BTW, Mark Spittal has been dead since 1999. *Let me know if you get an
answer.

You just don't get it do you I wouldn't waste my time.

You just don't get it, do you? HE"S ****ING DEAD. Clueless.
Absolutely ****ing clueless. Typical Canuck.

On Oct 13, 10:18*am, "Stuart" wrote:
"VtSkier" wrote in message

...





On 10/13/2010 12:43 PM, Stuart wrote:
*wrote in message
....
On Oct 13, 10:10 am, *wrote:
Nobody in here is concerned about your alleged bum****ing. This is an
inappropriate place to post this stuff. Why are you posting here, or are
you
infact a sock puppet of Scott? We are unable to verify your story here
even
if anybody felt inclined which we don't Go get outside help if you need
it.

I disagree.

I think that as long as trunky vows to "keep the group dead", whether
he accomplishes it or not, it is valid to let others know the kind of
person making that vow.

And let's be clear. The allegation is that it was scott barak abraham,
aka, scott spittal, that physically abused his little brother. *Given
trunky's behavior here and elsewhere, that is confirmed and witnessed
by those here, I believe Mark.

Maybe you could explain why anyone in an ALPINE SKI oriented newsgroup
would
give a rat's ass about who buggered who? Seem to me this story get retold
endlessly for no purpose.

The only way to make this a relevant newsgroup again is to
shut out Scott, his sock puppets, and anyone whose only
purpose is to rebut or otherwise harass Scott with old
stuff dredged up from the distant and not so distant past.

If someone wants to monitor what's going on in that quarter,
feel free.
1) It ain't gonna be me. I'm too old for this ****.
2) If you report back to the group in an incessant
manner like the sock puppet (of whomever) Mark Spittal,
you will soon be plonked by me. And I hope by the
rest of the group.
3) I now have two "Mark Spittal"s plonked. You changed
your addy when you started up again. I have no
reservations against plonking you a third time.

I plonked them numerous times. It works for awhile, but then "Scottabe"
starts butting in, unsolicited to other people's conversations with his
inane crap. The he reappears

Excuse me, asshole? I but in and remind people of how the assholes
are acting otherwise, and reminding people of stalking, defaming,
lying, felonies, etc?
EXXXXCCCCUUUUUUSSSEEEEE MEEEEEEEEE.

On Oct 13, 10:29*am, VtSkier wrote:
On 10/13/2010 01:18 PM, Stuart wrote:



*wrote in message
...
On 10/13/2010 12:43 PM, Stuart wrote:
* wrote in message
....
On Oct 13, 10:10 am, * wrote:
Nobody in here is concerned about your alleged bum****ing. This is an
inappropriate place to post this stuff. Why are you posting here, or are
you
infact a sock puppet of Scott? We are unable to verify your story here
even
if anybody felt inclined which we don't Go get outside help if you need
it.

I disagree.

I think that as long as trunky vows to "keep the group dead", whether
he accomplishes it or not, it is valid to let others know the kind of
person making that vow.

And let's be clear. The allegation is that it was scott barak abraham,
aka, scott spittal, that physically abused his little brother. *Given
trunky's behavior here and elsewhere, that is confirmed and witnessed
by those here, I believe Mark.

Maybe you could explain why anyone in an ALPINE SKI oriented newsgroup
would
give a rat's ass about who buggered who? Seem to me this story get retold
endlessly for no purpose.

The only way to make this a relevant newsgroup again is to
shut out Scott, his sock puppets, and anyone whose only
purpose is to rebut or otherwise harass Scott with old
stuff dredged up from the distant and not so distant past.

If someone wants to monitor what's going on in that quarter,
feel free.
1) It ain't gonna be me. I'm too old for this ****.
2) If you report back to the group in an incessant
manner like the sock puppet (of whomever) Mark Spittal,
you will soon be plonked by me. And I hope by the
rest of the group.
3) I now have two "Mark Spittal"s plonked. You changed
your addy when you started up again. I have no
reservations against plonking you a third time.

I plonked them numerous times. It works for awhile, but then "Scottabe"
starts butting in, unsolicited to other people's conversations with his
inane crap. The he reappears

Just keep plonking, and I'm done with this conversation.

No condemnation of false allegations of molesting children.

Skiing soon.

K-mart has a new way to handle early season. Could be
skiing by the end of October. Ambassador refresher this
Saturday. I can't wait to see the 150 friends that I
normally ski with. Yahoo!-

If they read this ********, you'd lose most of them. Ever tell them
how you posted my home address to give directions to someone who had
threatened to shoot me?

On Oct 13, 10:35*am, Alan Baker wrote:
In article ,





*"Stuart" wrote:
"VtSkier" wrote in message
...
On 10/13/2010 01:18 PM, Stuart wrote:
*wrote in message
...
On 10/13/2010 12:43 PM, Stuart wrote:
* wrote in message
...
On Oct 13, 10:10 am, * wrote:
Nobody in here is concerned about your alleged bum****ing. This is an
inappropriate place to post this stuff. Why are you posting here, or
are
you
infact a sock puppet of Scott? We are unable to verify your story here
even
if anybody felt inclined which we don't Go get outside help if you
need
it.

I disagree.

I think that as long as trunky vows to "keep the group dead", whether
he accomplishes it or not, it is valid to let others know the kind of
person making that vow.

And let's be clear. The allegation is that it was scott barak abraham,
aka, scott spittal, that physically abused his little brother. *Given
trunky's behavior here and elsewhere, that is confirmed and witnessed
by those here, I believe Mark.

Maybe you could explain why anyone in an ALPINE SKI oriented newsgroup
would
give a rat's ass about who buggered who? Seem to me this story get
retold
endlessly for no purpose.

The only way to make this a relevant newsgroup again is to
shut out Scott, his sock puppets, and anyone whose only
purpose is to rebut or otherwise harass Scott with old
stuff dredged up from the distant and not so distant past.

If someone wants to monitor what's going on in that quarter,
feel free.
1) It ain't gonna be me. I'm too old for this ****.
2) If you report back to the group in an incessant
manner like the sock puppet (of whomever) Mark Spittal,
you will soon be plonked by me. And I hope by the
rest of the group.
3) I now have two "Mark Spittal"s plonked. You changed
your addy when you started up again. I have no
reservations against plonking you a third time.

I plonked them numerous times. It works for awhile, but then "Scottabe"
starts butting in, unsolicited to other people's conversations with his
inane crap. The he reappears

Just keep plonking, and I'm done with this conversation.

Skiing soon.

K-mart has a new way to handle early season. Could be
skiing by the end of October. Ambassador refresher this
Saturday. I can't wait to see the 150 friends that I
normally ski with. Yahoo!

Sure. what are some of the places you like to ski? I have skied Jay Peak,
Orford, Sutton, Mte St Anne, Tremblant, Blue Mtn, Kissing Bridge and a who
wack of smaller Ontario hills and also Mte St Marie, Calabogie peaks, Camp
Fortune...and a wack of smaller PQ resorts...

Where are you from, Stuart? I grew up skiing in southern Ontario...
...at Talisman, specifically.

No condemnation of false allegations of molesting children. Typical
Wack Job Baker.
Hey, ppppppuuuuusssssyyyy?
Still waiting to hear from SPD. Contact info?
BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

On Oct 13, 10:51*am, pigo wrote:
On Oct 13, 11:18*am, "Stuart" wrote:





The only way to make this a relevant newsgroup again is to
shut out Scott, his sock puppets, and anyone whose only
purpose is to rebut or otherwise harass Scott with old
stuff dredged up from the distant and not so distant past.

If someone wants to monitor what's going on in that quarter,
feel free.
1) It ain't gonna be me. I'm too old for this ****.
2) If you report back to the group in an incessant
manner like the sock puppet (of whomever) Mark Spittal,
you will soon be plonked by me. And I hope by the
rest of the group.
3) I now have two "Mark Spittal"s plonked. You changed
your addy when you started up again. I have no
reservations against plonking you a third time.

I plonked them numerous times. It works for awhile, but then "Scottabe"
starts butting in, unsolicited to other people's conversations with his
inane crap. The he reappears

All true. I don't plonk Mark but have caught up with all of trunky's
new identities.

Of course Bob Thompson does not plonk himself. How drunk is this
asshole, that he admits to not plonking his own sockpuppet?

And I have no problem with the tactic that Vt. Skier
is employing. More power to him. But as long as trunky insists on his
11 year long campaign to disrupt the group I think that any method
used to make him receive a consequence for it is justified.

Once again, Bob Thompson rationalizes his stalking, his defamatory
lies, his threats. Hey, asshole? How about you show up in person
with a consequence?
Ooooooops, forgot. You are not and never will be man enough.

Those of
you that have used the plonk defense are not effected by it. But
anyone that happens by needs some insight into just who this lowlife
is.-

I think anyone who passes by is getting plenty of insight into what a
lowlife Child Molester Bob Thompson is.

On Oct 13, 10:56*am, pigo wrote:
On Oct 13, 11:00*am, "Stuart" wrote:

Holy ****, you insane wack job, are you really suggesting that I am
calling MYSELF a child molester, just to **** with you freaks?
How ridiculous can you get?
You lying piece of ****, you know who is doing this and you keep the
secret. *One of your buddies here.
Next time you want to pretend to be a decent, honorable human being,
don't **** yourself by making such a deranged false allegation.

I don't really give a **** waht you think. Nobody can prove or disprove
anything. You and your accusers so called are being complete jerks by
occupying a group dedicated to SKIING..Why don't you take your war
elsewhere. I don't give a **** whether you did or didn'y do whatever and I
am not accussing you of anything pea-brain.

I've heard that even when people here go for days without mentioning
trunky and his wierdness he posts about it himself !

Translation: I remind newcomers of the vileness of this ********.

What a stooge.

A stooge falsely accuses an innocent man of molesting children while
hiding behind his computer, Stooge Bob

Just goes to show you that the plonk device is working.

It is? See any newcomers, idiot?

And further
demonstrates the totally ****ed up waste of air that we are dealing
with. So it's not out of the question that trunky is Mark just to keep
the attention on himself. Wow?!

Holy ****. Brain Fried Bob Thompson accuses me of falsely accusing
myself of being a child molester.
The mind boggles at the insanity of this asshole.

On Oct 13, 10:57*am, Ted Waldron wrote:
In article
,

*pigo wrote:
I disagree.

*Flame Wars are don't have winners or losers, they have a beginning and
an end.

* It time for both sides to lay down their arms.

What arms, asshole? All I do is tell the truth. You call for peace,
then you start lying and making false accusations, as usual.

*If Scooter writes
implicit threats to an individual, or carries out some action like
showing up at a gathering when he is told he is not welcome, it
shouldn't be on this board but directed at the proper law enforcement
agency.

Translation: Ted Waldron is going to invent imaginary threats and lie
to LE again.
Show the post, Ted.


*If Scooter feels threatened, then he should do the same. *

I'd rather you try to make good on your threats,
pppppuuuuuussssssyyyyyyy. I can and will act appropriately.

The Flame should had ended after the hearing over 11 years ago,

Why? I should have just shut up about you and your friends committing
perjury, participating in a criminal conspiracy that threatened my
life and lied to a judge and a cop? I'm sure you wish I didn't stop
talking about how you humiliated yourself and was laughed out of
court.
But you're right, asshole. You should have stopped lying about me
eleven years ago, but you keep lying and lying and lying.

it
hasn't because I have continue it, along with others. I think it is time
just to kill file all participants who continue this.

How about admitting that you lied in court? Do so, I'll stop
reminding you.
Show the post, Ted. Or admit you committed a felony.

The main reason why it should stop is repetition. *Both sides just are
repeating themselves over and over again. *

Bigdifference, Wack Job. I keep telling the truth over and over
again. You keep lying.

There has been some success in not responding to Scooter. I think the
next step is stop talking about him and his ravings, and keeping on
topic as much as possible.

Sorta contradict yourself, asshole. And when you refer to being
exposed as a lunatic wack job as "ravings", you're lying and defaming.
What a hypocrite!

Both sides should stop. *Which means stop poking the raving lunatic in
his cage with pointy sticks.

You mean I should stop telling the truth about you questioning my
sanity? Holy ****, Ted, you are one insane cowardly pppppuuuussssyyyy