Speed poll

In article ,
(Jeff Davis) wrote:

In article . com,
taichiskiing wrote:
On Jun 8, 7:36 pm, Lost Balls BSker wrote:
In article . com,

...I don't need to answer...

Ok, it is your integrity and creditability at stake.
I rest,

Baker has neither integrity nor creditability. The Nutless Wonder has no
credibility for that matter. Thus, he has nothing to lose, nothing at stake.

LOL

This coming from the guy who re-posted the "(7)" from a man page from
section 7 to prove that there was a SunOS version 7, despite having had
it explained to him.

The first time could have been ignorance (and in your case, you could
make a very compelling argument), but the second time was simply lying.

--
According to John Perry Barlow, "Jeff Davis is a truly gifted trouble-maker."


--
Alan Baker
Vancouver, British Columbia
"If you raise the ceiling four feet, move the fireplace from that wall
to that wall, you'll still only get the full stereophonic effect if you
sit in the bottom of that cupboard."

On Jun 10, 2:38 pm, Alan Baker wrote:
In article ,
(Jeff Davis) wrote:

In article . com,
taichiskiing wrote:
On Jun 8, 7:36 pm, Lost Balls BSker wrote:
In article . com,

...I don't need to answer...

Ok, it is your integrity and creditability at stake.
I rest,

Baker has neither integrity nor creditability. The Nutless Wonder has no
credibility for that matter. Thus, he has nothing to lose, nothing at stake.

LOL

This coming from the guy who re-posted the "(7)" from a man page from
section 7 to prove that there was a SunOS version 7, despite having had
it explained to him.

The first time could have been ignorance (and in your case, you could
make a very compelling argument), but the second time was simply lying.

I'm cutting him some slack and voting for ignorance both times.

In article ,
(Jeff Davis) wrote:

In article . com,
taichiskiing wrote:
On Jun 5, 9:50 am, Lost Balls BSker wrote:

Hence, her actions aren't relevant.

Yes, her actions show the opposite affect of your statements. If her
actions aren't relevant, so are your statements.

His statement is a symtom of the delusional denial of his malignant ego. His
statement is worse than irrelevant, it's demonstrative pathological mendacity.

So you say. Your credibility is somewhat... ...lacking.

No, it is your credibility is lacking, given your repeated failed
arguments show.

In order for his credibility to lack, he would have to have started with
some semblance of credibility in the first place.

My experience as a ski instructor shows.

Yup, exactly an elementary school teacher's mentality.

So you get stuck with kids skiing program, and you [have to] talk and
ski like them? The question now is how many high level adults lesson
you teach for the season?

That is indicitive of his rudimentary skill set. For readers who need
more clarification, I suggest they study the character of Dexter Rutecki
in, "Aspen Extreme." BTW- That's my old buddy Doug Coombs skiing the
frozen waterfall. R.I.P.

Get stuck with your failed argument? Guess you just have no clue on
how I ski.

He'll weasel around. Rationalize and Justify. He's a mediocre nobody with
an email address.

LOL

And a home address, Jeff; which appears to be more than you can say.

--
According to John Perry Barlow, "Jeff Davis is a truly gifted trouble-maker."


--
Alan Baker
Vancouver, British Columbia
"If you raise the ceiling four feet, move the fireplace from that wall
to that wall, you'll still only get the full stereophonic effect if you
sit in the bottom of that cupboard."

In article ,
(Jeff Davis) wrote:

In article .com,
taichiskiing wrote:
On Jun 5, 11:53 am, Lost Balls BSker wrote:

Sorry, but based on what you've chosen to post, I could
wipe the mountain with you.

if there's nothing new...
Thanks for the chat.

No ****. He'd never Cowboy Up for a heads up ski. Given time and place,
he'd weasel out with additional conditions to meet. He'll never ski wild
snow with me because he lacks the skill set to meet my prerequisites. I
won't ski with the ****er until he ticks off a winter ascent of the Middle
Teton, Solo. He doesn't have to ski it from the summit ridge. He does,
albeit, have to ski Cody Peak from the summit, and the easy way down is a
10'- to 20' cornice drop on to a 55 degree slope at the top. It eases up
to an average 45 degrees in a couple of hundred feet. He lacks the skill
set to survive the prerequisites I require to trust him in the backcountry.

LOL

I've never claimed to be the best skier in the world, Jeff. So what?

You may be a better skier than I. So what?


Live to ski- Ski to Die.
--
According to John Perry Barlow, "Jeff Davis is a truly gifted trouble-maker."


--
Alan Baker
Vancouver, British Columbia
"If you raise the ceiling four feet, move the fireplace from that wall
to that wall, you'll still only get the full stereophonic effect if you
sit in the bottom of that cupboard."

On Jun 10, 1:59 pm, (Jeff Davis) wrote:
In article ,
Lost Balls BSker wrote:



1. The clip doesn't show a 4 year old "bumping skiing" or skiing
"in-n-out" of trees. It shows a 4 year old on a very easy run with some
small bumps traversing back and forth and at one point going on the far
side of *one* tree that is clearly out in the middle of the run.

That is your opinion. It's based on delusion bucked up by the defense
mechanism of denial. Get help. Your opinion is bull****.

WOW. That is sounding *really* familiar. The most familiar "other
person" since bobaloobob I think.

On Jun 10, 12:07 pm, downhill wrote:
Walt wrote:
downhill wrote:

Along the way to me turning 50 which is today...

Wow. It's your 50th birthday and you're spending it arguing with Itchy
about flatboarding?

Man, get away from the computer and go do something *fun*. Then treat
yourself to a nice meal with appropriate beverages and companionship.

We'll all still be here to argue with when you're 51.

//Walt

Walt\\
I doubt I will be paying any attention to flat and boring. I filter his
posts and only catch what other people respond to. Since I have actually
spent time making people go faster I had to pop off on that posting.
My actual birthday is one of the only days I do not work. I spent the
day in the garden. The koi were breeding and eating the eggs as fast as
it was beaten out of the females.
reflecting about reaching the age of fifty is very strange based on
every thing I have done or been involved with, getting to 30 was a
surprise and not expected.So turning 50 with a two year old and a
remission into a racing illness makes for a interesting review of where
I am at in my life.

michael- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

My favorite thing about turning 50 is that when I don't feel like
doing something now I figu "I'm old. I don't have to do that if I
don't want to".

In my inner circle of friends we had our doubts about making past 30
too. Pretty funny! That was about the time you have enough experience
to do something with what you've got! Unfortunately one of that group
died today at 52 after being sick for about 8 months. He never did
slow down on all the **** we thought would get us by 30. Ah
well........

Alan Baker wrote:
In article ,
(Jeff Davis) wrote:


In article .com,
taichiskiing wrote:

On Jun 5, 11:53 am, Lost Balls BSker wrote:

Sorry, but based on what you've chosen to post, I could
wipe the mountain with you.

if there's nothing new...
Thanks for the chat.

No ****. He'd never Cowboy Up for a heads up ski. Given time and place,
he'd weasel out with additional conditions to meet. He'll never ski wild
snow with me because he lacks the skill set to meet my prerequisites. I
won't ski with the ****er until he ticks off a winter ascent of the Middle
Teton, Solo. He doesn't have to ski it from the summit ridge. He does,
albeit, have to ski Cody Peak from the summit, and the easy way down is a
10'- to 20' cornice drop on to a 55 degree slope at the top. It eases up
to an average 45 degrees in a couple of hundred feet. He lacks the skill
set to survive the prerequisites I require to trust him in the backcountry.


LOL

I've never claimed to be the best skier in the world, Jeff. So what?

You may be a better skier than I. So what?

Perhaps he needs to discuss that with Scat

pigo wrote:
On Jun 10, 1:59 pm, (Jeff Davis) wrote:

In article ,
Lost Balls BSker wrote:




1. The clip doesn't show a 4 year old "bumping skiing" or skiing
"in-n-out" of trees. It shows a 4 year old on a very easy run with some
small bumps traversing back and forth and at one point going on the far
side of *one* tree that is clearly out in the middle of the run.

That is your opinion. It's based on delusion bucked up by the defense
mechanism of denial. Get help. Your opinion is bull****.


WOW. That is sounding *really* familiar. The most familiar "other
person" since bobaloobob I think.


Yeah, and Ichin Shen saying "Yup" all the time.
Only person I saw doing that before was Bertie...

On Jun 10, 10:54 am, Richard Henry wrote:
On Jun 10, 7:05 am, taichiskiing
wrote:
On Jun 9, 9:49 pm, Richard Henry wrote:

On Jun 9, 9:34 pm, taichiskiing
wrote:

On Jun 8, 7:36 pm, Alan Baker wrote:

In article . com,
...I don't need to answer...

Ok, it is your integrity and creditability at stake.

I rest,
IS

And your point is well proven.

Yup, I have provided all the proofs to my claims, and you haven't
provided anything to disprove them; just using lower class words to
dispute them won't make a logical argument, only lowering your own
class.

I'm afraid you misunderstood my comment.

Not really, maybe just you behind the curve of the reasoning.

Your trimming of Alan's reply confirms the thesis that you are
more interested in "winning" your verbal argument than in
actually demonstrating any true skill or breakthrough in technique.

Not really, as he only repeated his failed argument, which has been
shown lack of vision, I don't really think that we need to waste the
bandwidths to readdress it. As to my techniques? Demonstration showed
and questions answered and you guys just don't have enough knowledge
to comprehend it.


It's that attitude of petty debate tricks that led to
your shunning at Epicski.

Or just your petty denial. Not sure if I care to be with a bunch of
conceited little characters/barking bears, but you think that Epicski
is some kind of authority in skiing? Are you really studied science
and scientific debate? Not show in your posts.


IS

On Jun 10, 12:57 pm, Alan Baker wrote:
In article ,
(Jeff Davis) wrote:

In article ,
Lost Balls BSker wrote:
In article .com,
taichiskiing wrote:

Actually, I'm more interesting in when did you see it, and how much
you saw, when my computer showed it was only 59% unloaded.

Of course you're more interested in that. It gets away from the fact
that the clip doesn't show what you claim it did: "bump skiing and
in-n-out of trees".

Oh Nutless One. His log shows you are a liar. Get help. There is
medication for your illness. You may not care what his computer shows.
I trust his log, not your deulsions which have been considtantly shoved
up your ass in a plethora of newsgroups across the bandwidth.

His log shows nothing of the kind.

"my computer showed it was only 59% unloaded."


He's admitted that my description of the video was accurate.

Not really, there was no need to refute your failed argument while
your credibility and integrity were at stake. Nevertheless, you didn't
describe the video accurately.

In clip 001 it shows a little girl waved to hurry her mom then skied
out and around a tree, then came back and bumped along the bumps in
the middle of the trail then skied out into the trees again.
http://www.taomartialarts.com/ski/an...vada%20001.mpg

And you tried to use "one" instance to discredit her skiing ability
reflects your narrow-mindedness, and repeated the failed argument over
and over shows your lack of integrity, as well as your creditability.


IS


--
According to John Perry Barlow, "Jeff Davis is a truly gifted trouble-maker."

--
Alan Baker
Vancouver, British Columbia