A Snow and ski forum. SkiBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » SkiBanter forum » Skiing Newsgroups » Snowboarding
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Let The European and North American Olympics Winter Games Begin



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old February 6th 06, 02:17 AM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Let The European and North American Olympics Winter Games Begin

Where the Rich and Elite Meet to Compete
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...020302280.html

Where the Rich and Elite Meet to Compete

By Paul Farhi
Sunday, February 5, 2006; B01

Never mind the usual puffery about what this month's Winter Olympics
are all about. Sure, there's the beauty of sports, the spirit of
friendly competition, the dedication of great athletes and all that.
But the Winter Games are about a few other things as well: elitism,
exclusion and the triumph of the world's sporting haves over its have
nots.

What the Winter Games are not is a truly international sporting
competition that brings the best of the world together to compete, as
the promotional blather would have you believe. Unlike the widely
attended Summer Olympics, the winter version is almost exclusively the
preserve of a narrow, generally wealthy, predominantly Caucasian
collection of athletes and nations. In fact, I'd suggest that the name
of the Winter Games, which start Friday, be changed. They could be more
accurately branded "The European and North American Expensive Sports
Festival."

Throughout most of the Winter Olympics' history, the parade of
participating nations has been a short one. Until as recently as 1994,
fewer than a third of the planet's countries took part. This year, in
Turin, Italy, the International Olympic Committee (IOC) expects
delegations from about 85 countries, an all-time high, but still barely
43 percent of the world's total. Even that exaggerates the extent of
participation. Many of the nations in the Opening Ceremonies will be
represented by tokens, some consisting entirely of sports bureaucrats,
not athletes. Ethiopia, a nation of 73 million, will send its first
"team" to a Winter Olympics this year -- a single skier.

As always, the biggest delegations, and the big winners, will come from
a familiar pool. In the history of the winter competition, dating from
its inception in 1924, competitors from only six countries -- the
Soviet Union/Russia, Germany (East, West and combined), Norway, the
United States, Austria and Finland, in that order -- have won almost
two-thirds of all the medals awarded. Only 17 countries have ever
amassed more than 10 medals during the past 19 winter Olympiads. Only
38 countries have won even one medal.

This had turned the Winter Olympics into a remarkably insular
competition. The Czech Republic (and Czechoslovakia before it) has won
more medals than China, home to about one-fifth of humanity. Norway, a
nation with a population smaller than metropolitan Washington, has won
three times as many winter medals as the nations of Asia, Latin and
South America, Australia and Polynesia, the Middle East and the
Caribbean Basin combined.

By contrast, the all-time list of summer winners is long and deep,
extending to athletes from 143 countries, including such places as
Tonga, Paraguay and Burundi. The Summer Games have medal hogs, too, but
nothing like winter ones. The top six in the summer -- the United
States, the Soviet Union/Russia, Germany, France, Britain and Italy --
have swept up slightly more than half the medals since the modern games
started in 1896.

Obviously, the climate and terrain in, say, Indonesia or Aruba aren't
highly conducive to molding superstar aerial skiers and biathlon
champions. But it's not just the presence or absence of snow and ice
that determines Winter Olympics success, or even participation. If it
were, some of America's best ice skaters and speedskaters wouldn't live
and train in Southern California or Florida. If it were, athletes from
countries like Peru, Chile, Nepal, Morocco, Afghanistan and Ethiopia --
all blessed with soaring, snow-covered mountains -- would be marching
en masse in the Opening Ceremonies and fighting for the medal stand.

Instead, the more telling factors are economic. Would-be Winter
Olympians need years of training, coaching and competition if they're
going to make it to the Games. All of these things require massive sums
of money. A bobsled (or bobsleigh, in official IOC-speak) costs about
$35,000, to say nothing of what it costs to build an Olympic-caliber
bobsled run. A pair of speedskates might be relatively cheap, but how
many countries have speedskating rinks? Most nations, even those with
plenty of snow and cold, simply can't afford such extravagances.

Remember the Jamaican bobsled team? Those lovable underdogs endeared
themselves to many with their participation in the 1988 games in
Calgary (the four-man team was the subject of the 1993 Disney movie
"Cool Runnings" and finished a surprisingly high 14th in 1994). Less
well-known is what happened -- or didn't happen -- to the Jamaicans in
the 2002 games in Salt Lake City: They didn't show up. The team ran out
of funding and had to stay home.

Unlike the Winter Games, the Summer Olympics level many of the
advantages of national wealth, as well as favorable geography and
climate. It takes all the usual things to become a Summer Olympian --
heart, outsized talent and the ability to devote most of your waking
hours to your sport -- but the barriers to entry are much lower.
Athletes from the poorest African and Caribbean nations have developed
into some of the world's greatest athletes with shockingly minimal, or
even nonexistent, facilities and equipment.

In winter sports, by contrast, the rich keep getting richer. Nations
wealthy enough to host a Winter Olympics tend to be those that win most
of the medals (17 of the 20 Winter Olympics have been held in Western
Europe, Canada or the United States). And hosting the Games tends to
ensure future success; the expensive facilities left behind -- the ski
jumps, skeleton runs, half-pipes, etc. -- become training grounds for
the next generation of Olympians.

Baron Pierre de Coubertin, the founder of the modern Olympics,
recognized some of these global sporting inequities more than a century
ago. De Coubertin objected to the creation of a separate Winter
Olympics for many years, dismissing winter sports in 1921 as "the
snobbish play of the rich." It wasn't until 1924 -- some 28 years after
the first modern Olympics -- that the IOC retroactively recognized
something called the "International Week of Winter Sports" in Chamonix,
France, as the first Winter Olympics.

So why perpetuate an event that could just as easily be contested as a
series of disaggregated annual championships? The reason, of course, is
money and TV. And here again, it's a small world. The Winter Olympics
might collapse were it not for the financial support of American
broadcasters and their (mostly) American advertisers. Like the teams
themselves, the audience for the Winter Olympics is predominantly North
American and European, accounting for about two-thirds of all worldwide
viewing during the Salt Lake City Games of 2002, according to the IOC.
This is just fine by the Olympics' "worldwide" sponsors -- companies
like Coca-Cola, McDonald's, Panasonic and Visa -- whose biggest markets
are in these places, too. Indeed, with NBC paying about half of all the
fees for TV rights the IOC collects, American sponsors and broadcasters
call the tune. In 1994, facing sponsor "fatigue" from same-year Summer
and Winter Olympics, the IOC decided to stagger the two seasons' Games,
so that the Winter Olympics now take place two years after the summer
ones.

This is not to suggest that Winter Olympians aren't dedicated and
superb athletes. They are, of course. But the pool of actual and
potential competitors in, say, luge or curling (or skeleton or biathlon
or bobsledding or freestyle moguls skiing) is ludicrously small and
will probably remain so for years to come. The Winter Olympics simply
aren't, and probably can't be, a truly global sporting contest.

So please, in the next few weeks, spare us the hokum about the nations
of the world joining together in a symbolic celebration of the human
spirit. Some nations and some human spirit maybe, but unfortunately,
all too precious little.

Ads
  #2  
Old February 12th 06, 04:55 PM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I was disappointed when Chris Klug was shut out, not just because
he's a good guy and great competitor, I think its lame that the
US can only send 1 in mens alpine. Pipe is always fun to watch
and takes great skill, but it, like figure skating, diving and
gymnastics - is not a "sport". Not that I think alpine will ever
be anything but niche, it does balance things out and shows theres
more to snowboarding than the superpipe. Glad they put in boarder
cross this year, thats going to be great.
  #3  
Old February 13th 06, 12:10 PM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Sun, 12 Feb 2006 16:55:03 GMT, "Mike M. Miskulin"
allegedly wrote:

Pipe is always fun to watch
and takes great skill, but it, like figure skating, diving and
gymnastics - is not a "sport".


Are you saying that anything that requires judges to give a score is not a
sport? It seems a strange method of categorisation, so maybe I'm making
the wrong assumptions.

Not that I think alpine will ever
be anything but niche, it does balance things out and shows theres
more to snowboarding than the superpipe.


I don't find the slalom stuff interesting at all. The pipe is a little
better for me, and Shaun White's run was awesome.

But like you, I'm definitely pleased about the inclusion of boarder cross,
although it requires judges though Mike :-)

- Dave.

--
The only powder to get high on, falls from the sky.
http://www.vpas.org/ - Snowboarding the worlds pow pow -
Securing your e-mail

The Snowboard FAQ lives here - http://rssFAQ.org/
  #4  
Old February 14th 06, 03:54 PM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Switters wrote in
:

t like you, I'm definitely pleased about the inclusion of boarder
cross, although it requires judges though Mike :-)


AFAIK, the judges only purposes is in determining if a
foul has happened, ie someone taking out another rider.
This is quite a bit different than judging 'artistic merit'
or saying a certain dive rates a 9.85 on 'technicals'. The
same can be said of gymnastics and pipe.

Events such as track, where the judge is there to make sure
rules are not broken, IMHO are sports. One can argue that
a penalty in hockey or basketball, etc, may not always be
100% clear, but for the most part one or two foul calls will
not determine the outcome. The winner is determined by time
or runs/goals/points physically scored.

So no, I don't consider events where the primary score comes
from a group of judges determining technical or artistic merit
as 'sports'. Athletic, yes. Skilled, yes. Sport, no.



  #5  
Old February 14th 06, 04:20 PM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Mike M. Miskulin wrote:
So no, I don't consider events where the primary score comes
from a group of judges determining technical or artistic merit
as 'sports'. Athletic, yes. Skilled, yes. Sport, no.


Dry (non-electric) fencing? Wrestling? Judo? Olympic-style Boxing?
Kendo? All activities where a skilled judgement is required to
determine if someone scores.

Neil
  #6  
Old February 17th 06, 01:52 AM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Well, isn't it logical that the places around the earth that have snow
would be the places that winter athletes come from? Since, most of
the cold areas of land are in the northern hemisphere, and only a
couple in the southern---New Zealand and Australia. I can't imagine
the countries in the tropical zones would be avid snow sports centers
even if they had all the wealth in world.

The only winter sport I know much about is snowboarding. And, I know
that most of the major riders are not what I would call rich. The
vast majority of snowboarders wear whatever they can put together to
stay warm. And that has given riders a loveable reputation for
individuality in dress. And, most riders in the beginning have cheap
boards and boots. When you go big time, you get sponsored the help pay
the bills. Huck

  #7  
Old February 17th 06, 01:52 AM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Well, isn't it logical that the places around the earth that have snow
would be the places that winter athletes come from? Since, most of
the cold areas of land are in the northern hemisphere, and only a
couple in the southern---New Zealand and Australia. I can't imagine
the countries in the tropical zones would be avid snow sports centers
even if they had all the wealth in world.

The only winter sport I know much about is snowboarding. And, I know
that most of the major riders are not what I would call rich. The
vast majority of snowboarders wear whatever they can put together to
stay warm. And that has given riders a loveable reputation for
individuality in dress. And, most riders in the beginning have cheap
boards and boots. When you go big time, you get sponsored the help pay
the bills. Huck

  #8  
Old February 17th 06, 01:52 AM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Well, isn't it logical that the places around the earth that have snow
would be the places that winter athletes come from? Since, most of
the cold areas of land are in the northern hemisphere, and only a
couple in the southern---New Zealand and Australia. I can't imagine
the countries in the tropical zones would be avid snow sports centers
even if they had all the wealth in world.

The only winter sport I know much about is snowboarding. And, I know
that most of the major riders are not what I would call rich. The
vast majority of snowboarders wear whatever they can put together to
stay warm. And that has given riders a loveable reputation for
individuality in dress. And, most riders in the beginning have cheap
boards and boots. When you go big time, you get sponsored the help pay
the bills. Huck

  #9  
Old February 17th 06, 01:52 AM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Well, isn't it logical that the places around the earth that have snow
would be the places that winter athletes come from? Since, most of
the cold areas of land are in the northern hemisphere, and only a
couple in the southern---New Zealand and Australia. I can't imagine
the countries in the tropical zones would be avid snow sports centers
even if they had all the wealth in world.

The only winter sport I know much about is snowboarding. And, I know
that most of the major riders are not what I would call rich. The
vast majority of snowboarders wear whatever they can put together to
stay warm. And that has given riders a loveable reputation for
individuality in dress. And, most riders in the beginning have cheap
boards and boots. When you go big time, you get sponsored the help pay
the bills. Huck

  #10  
Old February 17th 06, 03:46 AM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Neil Gendzwill wrote in
:

Mike M. Miskulin wrote:
So no, I don't consider events where the primary score comes
from a group of judges determining technical or artistic merit
as 'sports'. Athletic, yes. Skilled, yes. Sport, no.


Dry (non-electric) fencing? Wrestling? Judo? Olympic-style

Boxing?

Dont know Fencing or Judo scoring. I've watched some college
wrestling but cant recall seeing a contested fall, but my
experience is limited. Boxing also suffers the judgement
issues (how may pro fights have bogus cards?). But I see
your point that there are certainly some that may fall
between the extremes of 'beat the clock' and 'ooh that
was awesome er.. 9.8522183'
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Let The European and North American Olympics Winter Games Begin Mike Alpine Skiing 20 February 8th 06 05:00 PM
Let The European and North American Olympics Winter Games Begin Mike Nordic Skiing 7 February 8th 06 04:16 AM


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:30 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SkiBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.