If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Going off trail
Ken Roberts wrote:
Yes. But most of that terrain is not within two hours drive from Lausanne, Switzerland. The terrain in the European Alps which is within two hours drive from Lausanne happens to be disproportionately skewed toward Alpine Touring / randonnee gear. That the terrain is skewed for randonee on steep stuff isn't the point: that isn't what the OP seems to want to *do*, and there is /still/ plenty of alternative terrain that may not be advertised in brochures but is nonetheless there and well suited to the skiing he claims to want to do. Sounds like you've never tried a pair of Scarpa F1 boots on truly light skis. I haven't, but since I've yet to encounter any "truly light" skis with metal edges, and using F1s on edgeless skis strikes me as a bit silly, I doubt if you have either! Your solution may well be better for what /you/ want, but the OP wants the option of track work and moderate descents where "moderate" means "just a bit beyond dedicated track skis". NNN BC and a compatible light boot combined with a relatively narrow touring ski (maybe with an edge, maybe not) makes much more sense for this than any randonee setup AFAICT. Pete. -- Peter Clinch Medical Physics IT Officer Tel 44 1382 660111 ext. 33637 Univ. of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital Fax 44 1382 640177 Dundee DD1 9SY Scotland UK net http://www.dundee.ac.uk/~pjclinch/ |
Ads |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Going off trail
Martin Thornquist wrote
... you need relatively skinny skis to fit well in prepared tracks. This is at odds with going off-track in deep snow, for that you want wider skis. Good point. A key reason why most "telemark" setups don't solve the problem. What I use for most of my gentle ungroomed tours is a light ski, just wide enough to fit in most groomed tracks, with an SNS Profil track binding mounted on it. I've got several pairs of skis set up like that, some metal-edged some not, some with no-wax bases some waxable. In very good snow conditions, I've skied 25+ degree slopes on SNS track bindings (e.g. Cornice Bowl at Mammoth, various bump runs at Lake Louise and Mammoth) -- I'm sure others have done steeper and more technically difficult terrain or snow. Of course in difficult snow conditions even a 10 degree slope is tough on that equipment. But I wouldn't care, since if the off-piste snow was difficult and un-fun, I'd be skiing on the groomed track. I used to do lots of skiing on light telemark gear, including a sizable number of tours in the Alps within two hours of Lausanne. But now there's no open "role" in my "arsenal" of skis for telemark bindings and boots. What's happened in recent years is that my usable range of SNS track bindings on track-compatible skis has expanded outward and upward, and my comfortable range with Alpine Touring / randonnee boots and bindings has extended downward. The "middle range of telemark-optimal touring is too small to be worth it for me -- I can't justify maintaining a third kind of incompatible gear for such a small payoff. And I have several athletic skiing friends in different countries with graduate technical education like the original poster, who've made the same choice of limiting to two kinds of ski gear: track skis (mostly for skating) and Alpine Touring skis for both moderate and steep touring. Except for a few die-hards, bored lift-served downhill skiers, and Norwegians, telemarking is over. Ken |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Going off trail
Peter Clinch wrote
there is /still/ plenty of alternative terrain that may not be advertised in brochures but is nonetheless there and well suited to the skiing he claims to want to do. How much ski touring have you actually done within two hours drive from Lausanne? How about just tell us about three interesting and pretty touring areas around Lausanne which get reliable snow -- and (1) are suitable for the "light tele" gear (but mounted on skis narrow enough to fit into groomed Classic ski tracks, and where the whole setup is at least 1 kg _lighter_ than Scarpa F1 boots + Dynafit binding + light randonnee racing skis), but (2) are _not_ suitable for Scarpa F1 boots with light randonnee skis. (3) are _not_ suitable for wider "cross-country" skis with an SNS Profil binding. Ken |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Going off trail
Ken Roberts wrote:
Except for a few die-hards, bored lift-served downhill skiers, and Norwegians, telemarking is over. Telemarking wasn't mentioned by the OP, and of course many people on free heel gear never use (or even aspire to use) a telemark turn. There is a middle ground between track bindings and free heel downhill ("telemark") gear designed and mainly used for exactly what the OP wants here. Pete. -- Peter Clinch Medical Physics IT Officer Tel 44 1382 660111 ext. 33637 Univ. of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital Fax 44 1382 640177 Dundee DD1 9SY Scotland UK net http://www.dundee.ac.uk/~pjclinch/ |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Going off trail
Ken Roberts wrote:
How about just tell us about three interesting and pretty touring areas around Lausanne which get reliable snow -- and (1) are suitable for the "light tele" gear (but mounted on skis narrow enough to fit into groomed Classic ski tracks, and where the whole setup is at least 1 kg _lighter_ than Scarpa F1 boots + Dynafit binding + light randonnee racing skis), but (2) are _not_ suitable for Scarpa F1 boots with light randonnee skis. (3) are _not_ suitable for wider "cross-country" skis with an SNS Profil binding. You can go and ski around the local municipal park on light gear if you want, or around the local farms, or anything like that where the terrain is fairly benign but nobody's driven a track-cutter. Why on earth would anyone want to do that in randonee gear, unless randonee gear was all you had? Might not be your idea of "pretty" or "interesting", but people manage to have scenic fun doing it. My only specific gear suggestion for boot/binding was NNN BC, which is closer to straight SNS Profil than it is to a light tele pin setup, but is a bit chunkier for better downhill control, though substantially less than a "proper" tele setup. Pete. -- Peter Clinch Medical Physics IT Officer Tel 44 1382 660111 ext. 33637 Univ. of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital Fax 44 1382 640177 Dundee DD1 9SY Scotland UK net http://www.dundee.ac.uk/~pjclinch/ |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Going off trail
gr wrote:
New in the past couple years wax grip tape also works very well, lasts hundreds of km, has a very wide temp range, and was what finally worked for me and wax. Where do I get some? I used to wax, but don't go quite often enough (and have to contend with Sierra changing conditions) to bother any more, but that sounds like it might work. It would be fun to resurrect the old Fishers! Dan |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Going off trail
Ken Roberts wrote:
(snip) touring. Except for a few die-hards, bored lift-served downhill skiers, and Norwegians, telemarking is over. I have a fair number of free-heel friends (though I'm not one) who will tell you differently. AT is great coming from an Alpine background, but I would think that "Light Tele" would be equally great coming from a touring/cross-country/Nordic background. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Going off trail
In article ,
Peter Clinch wrote: "just a bit beyond dedicated track skis". NNN BC and a compatible light boot combined with a relatively narrow touring ski (maybe with an edge, maybe not) makes much more sense for this than any randonee setup As a matter of curiousity, why does NNN BC exist, or why did it come into being, in competition with 3 pin bindings? I happen to use NNN BC with waxless edged skiis (Karhu 10th Mountain or the like) for some very low-key backcountry exploring around Lake Tahoe (climb up a ridge or peak, maybe on an unplowed Forest Service road; admire the view; very cautiously ski back down, with hardly any downhill turns), because that's the equipment I was pointed to initially. But the choice in boots seems much more limited for NNN BC than for 3 pin. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Going off trail
Ken Roberts wrote:
The "middle range of telemark-optimal touring is too small to be worth it for me -- I can't justify maintaining a third kind of incompatible gear for such a small payoff. And I have several athletic skiing friends in different countries with graduate technical education like the original poster, who've made the same choice of limiting to two kinds of ski gear: track skis (mostly for skating) and Alpine Touring skis for both moderate and steep touring. Except for a few die-hards, bored lift-served downhill skiers, and Norwegians, telemarking is over. Yes and no: I agree that there's no room at all for three incompatible setups, but I'd skip the alpine touring/randonne gear instead of the telemark skis, simply because it is at least halfway possible to ski flat areas on the telemark skis. OTOH, with sufficient technical ability, a skinny pair with metal edges and NNN BC bindings can do it all. Afaik all the fastest traverses of the "Haute Route" (sp?) has been done with nordic touring skis. Terje -- - "almost all programming can be viewed as an exercise in caching" |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Going off trail
Terje Mathisen wrote:
I agree that there's no room at all for three incompatible setups, but I'd skip the alpine touring/randonne gear instead of the telemark skis, simply because it is at least halfway possible to ski flat areas on the telemark skis.... Terje Terje has a good point about sking the flat areas. Last winter I skied out from Assiniboine Lodge (Canada) with a small group with a mix of equipment ranging from AT to traditional backcountry skis (65mm steel edges) with 3-pin cable and NNN-BC type binding/boot combinations and inb-between gear. The ski out from Assiniboine included one or two KM of steep, narrow switchback type trails and we were carrying packs. The AT gear was the right gear for the steep descent with quick short-radius turns and the rest of us went into survival mode. But two thirds of the 28 or 29 KM ski out were flat to rolling then several KMs of climbing at the end of the day. The ligher gear that could glide was the right gear for rolling terrain and the climb. The AT gear was slow and heavy. The AT gear was also harder to wax (single camber). The climbs were not steep enough to require skins. I had my Fisher Outtabounds (88-68-78mm w/ steel edges) with Garmont Excursion plastic touring boots which was a compromise between AT/Telemark gear and the mountain touring gear. The Outtabounds were "in-between" gear doing neither the steep descents well nor the flats with ease. But they also were easier to handle on the steep swithcbacks than the NNN-BC skis and faster on the flats and climbs than the AT gear. So the right answer is that their is no right answer to the question about what is the best kind of gear for off-trail skiing unless Christos (orignal post) can better define the terrain to be skiied. That said the best answer to Christos may be to pick gear that is similar to the gear used by the rest of the skiers in your group. Edgar |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Pine Hill Trail - Massachusetts | Tommy T. | Backcountry Skiing | 0 | July 23rd 04 05:48 PM |
Near fatal ski incident | Me | Nordic Skiing | 22 | February 27th 04 02:47 PM |
Updated Stowe trail maps | Lew Lasher | Nordic Skiing | 0 | February 16th 04 04:10 PM |
Has anyone ever skied the WB trail in Underhill, Vermont? | Lew Lasher | Nordic Skiing | 8 | September 22nd 03 01:38 AM |
Has anyone ever skied the WB trail in Underhill, Vermont? | Lew Lasher | Backcountry Skiing | 8 | September 22nd 03 01:38 AM |