A Snow and ski forum. SkiBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » SkiBanter forum » Skiing Newsgroups » Nordic Skiing
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Windblown (NH) to be redeveloped by non-profit



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old November 30th 09, 01:19 AM posted to rec.skiing.nordic
Lew Lasher[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 12
Default Windblown (NH) to be redeveloped by non-profit

The Windblown cross-country area in New Ipswich, New Hampshire is the
target of an ambitious new non-profit organization.

Last season, Windblown owner Al Jenks announced his plans to retire
after 38 seasons and sell the ski touring center to a non-profit
organization. The non-profit, called Central New England Nordic
Council, now has a Web site at http://cnencxc.org . They are taking
pledges now, and, once they have obtained tax exempt status, will take
money. The site does not seem to mention their fundraising goal, but
it says that their deadline is March 31, 2011.

I happened to run into Al a couple of weeks ago and he told me he will
still be running Windblown for the upcoming 2009-2010 season. (But
last year the shop sold off their rental equipment and other retail
goods.)

The CNENC site has an ambitious master plan (
http://nordicnow.org/images/Windblown_Master_Plan.pdf ), including not
just buying the ski area, but developing a race course (mostly, but
not entirely, on existing trails) and "stadium", putting in snowmaking
and lighting and perhaps a biathlon range.

They are having an informational meeting on December 2 at the Weston
Ski Track.
Ads
  #2  
Old December 3rd 09, 02:17 AM posted to rec.skiing.nordic
Lew Lasher[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 12
Default Windblown (NH) to be redeveloped by non-profit

I went to tonight's informational meeting.

One clarification: the non-profit organization does have tax-exempt
status now (they did not as of the writing of the master plan
document). They are hoping to use the pledges as a way to bootstrap
additional fundraising (e.g., grants). Of course, they also expect
people to pay up on their pledges.

  #3  
Old December 10th 09, 01:36 PM posted to rec.skiing.nordic
Jon[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 50
Default Windblown (NH) to be redeveloped by non-profit

Lew:

Now that the current owners of Weston Ski Track have more formally
announced that they're retiring soon, and that the younger managers
aren't interested in continuing operation, was there any talk at the
meeting of redirecting efforts to keeping Weston going?

I haven't looked at the Windblown proposals in detail, but I've never
really understood the rationale--yes, it's in a nice snow belt, but
it's only about 30 minutes closer to Boston than Waterville Valley,
which already has a great infrastructure in place (facilities, nice 5
K race course, etc.).

Jon
  #4  
Old December 10th 09, 03:49 PM posted to rec.skiing.nordic
Lew Lasher[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 12
Default Windblown (NH) to be redeveloped by non-profit

On Dec 10, 9:36*am, Jon wrote:

Now that the current owners of Weston Ski Track have more formally
announced that they're retiring soon, and that the younger managers
aren't interested in continuing operation, was there any talk at the
meeting of redirecting efforts to keeping Weston going?


No, I wasn't aware of that. I was thinking that there was some
competition between Windblown and Weston for snowmaking trails, but
the people at the meeting seemed to answer that by saying that no one
from Boston would go up to Windblown on weekday evenings. But no
mention that Weston itself might be closing.

I haven't looked at the Windblown proposals in detail, but I've never
really understood the rationale--yes, it's in a nice snow belt, but
it's only about 30 minutes closer to Boston than Waterville Valley ...


I kind of have to agree. (I'd say 45 minutes to an hour's difference,
but, still, yeah.) Much as I love the trails at Windblown, and I love
the fact that it was built by an enthusiastic skier, it isn't the only
good trail system that's a day trip from Boston. Northfield Mountain,
just a little further from Boston than Windblown, has an excellent
trail system, although less snow due to its low elevation. Someone (I
think it was another email list) suggested that Northfield would be a
good candidate for snowmaking since it has that big water reservoir
right there.
  #5  
Old December 11th 09, 04:36 PM posted to rec.skiing.nordic
Jon[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 50
Default Windblown (NH) to be redeveloped by non-profit

*Someone (I
think it was another email list) suggested that Northfield would be a
good candidate for snowmaking since it has that big water reservoir
right there.


Yes, I think I remember in my college days that they used to make snow
(and had a nice lake, also.)

Hope some workeable solution is developed for Weston...I would have
hoped there was some skiing, dot.com millionaire in the area who's
looking for a diversion


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Al Jenks to retire (Windblown) No Name Nordic Skiing 4 February 17th 09 09:32 PM
Trip report - Windblown (New Hampshire) - 15 Jan 2008 Lew Lasher Nordic Skiing 0 January 15th 08 10:12 PM
wanted: 165cm+ pole and/or profit grip/strap Derick Fay Nordic Skiing 0 February 27th 06 02:08 AM
Trip Report - Windblown (New Hampshire) - 11 Dec 2005 Lew Lasher Nordic Skiing 0 December 11th 05 11:28 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:05 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SkiBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.