If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Why join PSIA?
Walt wrote:
Ron Capik wrote: I'm a long time skier but somewhat new (part time) instructor. I've been thinking about joining PSIA to learn a bit more about the art of instructing. In looking at associated PSIA costs I'm having a rough time balancing the costs and benefits. Seems the costs of membership, clinics, certification programs, etc. would out strip most teaching income. What am I missing? You're thinking about it the wrong way. The real cost of being a ski instructor is "opportunity cost". That is, you spend the better part of the season on the bunny hill or coaxing newbies down the green runs instead of (real) skiing. Missed skiing time is the object of value that you give up, not the piddling $70 (or whatever) membership fee. I suppose one can rationalize the missed opportunity cost if you're doing the full-time ski instructor thing, but for those of us who have real jobs (9-5 M-F or similar) the opportunities to ski are few enough as it is without having a commitment to demonstrate the wedge ad nauseum. Ok, so you've decided to do the instructor thing - great. Might as well get certified. You'll probably learn a bit from the other instructors (but this may be happening already without membership) and you'll get a piece of paper. You're already paying the expensive part of the program (missed opportunity) so pay the couple of extra bucks to complete the project. You forget: if you're an instructor you can be at the mountain all the time, free skiing when you're not teaching. I quote, "real jobs (9-5 M-F or similar)", are at the mountain maybe 1/5 as often as a real instructor, and get zilch days skiing comparatively. Secondly: another bennie of PSIA is working at real mountains - the biggies can be particular, only hiring certified instructors with experience and recommendations. Instructing is an actual career for some of the high level guys, with wealthy repeat clients. Thirdly: while we all like to disparage PSIA and instructors the more rational of us admit some of those guys are dam fine skiers and a treat to watch - I think much of that skill came through PSIA. |
Ads |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Why join PSIA?
lal_truckee wrote:
Walt wrote: Ron Capik wrote: I'm a long time skier but somewhat new (part time) instructor. I've been thinking about joining PSIA to learn a bit more about the art of instructing. In looking at associated PSIA costs I'm having a rough time balancing the costs and benefits. Seems the costs of membership, clinics, certification programs, etc. would out strip most teaching income. What am I missing? You're thinking about it the wrong way. The real cost of being a ski instructor is "opportunity cost". That is, you spend the better part of the season on the bunny hill or coaxing newbies down the green runs instead of (real) skiing. Missed skiing time is the object of value that you give up, not the piddling $70 (or whatever) membership fee. I suppose one can rationalize the missed opportunity cost if you're doing the full-time ski instructor thing, but for those of us who have real jobs (9-5 M-F or similar) the opportunities to ski are few enough as it is without having a commitment to demonstrate the wedge ad nauseum. Ok, so you've decided to do the instructor thing - great. Might as well get certified. You'll probably learn a bit from the other instructors (but this may be happening already without membership) and you'll get a piece of paper. You're already paying the expensive part of the program (missed opportunity) so pay the couple of extra bucks to complete the project. You forget: if you're an instructor you can be at the mountain all the time, free skiing when you're not teaching. I quote, "real jobs (9-5 M-F or similar)", are at the mountain maybe 1/5 as often as a real instructor, and get zilch days skiing comparatively. Secondly: another bennie of PSIA is working at real mountains - the biggies can be particular, only hiring certified instructors with experience and recommendations. Instructing is an actual career for some of the high level guys, with wealthy repeat clients. Thirdly: while we all like to disparage PSIA and instructors the more rational of us admit some of those guys are dam fine skiers and a treat to watch - I think much of that skill came through PSIA. Nah, mileage is the best teacher with lessons/clinics shortening the learning curve. I like to watch ski patrollers ski. Some of them have some "bad habits" but they are damned effective skiers in spite of this. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Why join PSIA?
lal_truckee wrote:
Walt wrote: Ron Capik wrote: I'm a long time skier but somewhat new (part time) instructor. I've been thinking about joining PSIA to learn a bit more about the art of instructing. In looking at associated PSIA costs I'm having a rough time balancing the costs and benefits. Seems the costs of membership, clinics, certification programs, etc. would out strip most teaching income. What am I missing? You're thinking about it the wrong way. The real cost of being a ski instructor is "opportunity cost". That is, you spend the better part of the season on the bunny hill or coaxing newbies down the green runs instead of (real) skiing. Missed skiing time is the object of value that you give up, not the piddling $70 (or whatever) membership fee. I suppose one can rationalize the missed opportunity cost if you're doing the full-time ski instructor thing, but for those of us who have real jobs (9-5 M-F or similar) the opportunities to ski are few enough as it is without having a commitment to demonstrate the wedge ad nauseum. Ok, so you've decided to do the instructor thing - great. Might as well get certified. You'll probably learn a bit from the other instructors (but this may be happening already without membership) and you'll get a piece of paper. You're already paying the expensive part of the program (missed opportunity) so pay the couple of extra bucks to complete the project. You forget: if you're an instructor you can be at the mountain all the time, free skiing when you're not teaching. No, I can't. I've got this thing called a "job" that ties me up 5 days a week. It sucks, but it's better than the alternative. I quote, "real jobs (9-5 M-F or similar)", are at the mountain maybe 1/5 as often as a real instructor, and get zilch days skiing comparatively. Right. People with "real jobs" don't ski as much as a full-time instructor. But people with "real jobs" who try to do the ski instructor thing on the side don't get in as much free skiing as we civilians. Secondly: another bennie of PSIA is working at real mountains - the biggies can be particular, only hiring certified instructors with experience and recommendations. Instructing is an actual career for some of the high level guys, with wealthy repeat clients. Nice work if you can get it. (c: Thirdly: while we all like to disparage PSIA and instructors the more rational of us admit some of those guys are dam fine skiers and a treat to watch - I think much of that skill came through PSIA. I don't disparage PSIA instructors. Most of them are better skiers than I'll ever be. My point is that there are costs and benefits associated with being a ski instructor, and the most expensive cost is the time. Everything else pales in comparison, and to kick about a $70 membership fee after giving up that much free-skiing time is misplacing priorities. The OP is doing the part-time instructor thing and I assume he also has a "real job". So his opportunities to ski is limited to weekends, and a couple of weeks a year - to spend that time instructing instead of free skiing is giving up something of value much greater than the cost of membership. You can say something similar about ski patrol - anybody who thinks it's a way to ski for free is deluding themselves. Like ski instructors, I'm very glad that somebody does it. Somebody else, that is. //Walt |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Why join PSIA?
Walt wrote:
, ...snip... My point is that there are costs and benefits associated with being a ski instructor, and the most expensive cost is the time. Everything else pales in comparison, and to kick about a $70 membership fee after giving up that much free-skiing time is misplacing priorities. The OP is doing the part-time instructor thing and I assume he also has a "real job". So his opportunities to ski is limited to weekends, and a couple of weeks a year - to spend that time instructing instead of free skiing is giving up something of value much greater than the cost of membership. //Walt You assume wrong. Later... Ron Capik -- |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Why join PSIA?
Ron,
Most of the benefits and costs of being a ski instructor have been thoroughly mentioned above save one - Equipment costs. As a current ski instructor (Level 1 Alpine/Level 1 Tele), my equipment costs are better than the typical beginning/end of season sale at your local ski shop. Most local shops have a pro night during the season where instructors can get fit properly and purchase new equipment at 40-50% off. There are many established relationships between ski manufacturers, boot manufacturers, and other associated equipment producers with PSIA. Additionally PSIA members may purchase equipment above and beyond what is available to the general public (for example bindings with higher DIN ranges). Additionally when you travel with your PSIA card there is often discounted lift tickets available at most mountains. Hope this helps. Owen |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Why join PSIA?
The advantage, from my perspective, is that now that I'm certified, I get
higher priority for the advanced classes (and since I'm teaching kids and not adults, there's a much better than average chance on any given day that there will be multiple advanced classes, and that I can go somewhere other than the bunny hill). As far as the quality of the instruction and whatnot, it depends a whole lotsa. Our local PSIA guys are good and they're not a bunch of theory weenies, so when you take a clinic with them, you actually do learn something. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Why join PSIA?
Mary Malmros wrote:
The advantage, from my perspective, is that now that I'm certified, I get higher priority for the advanced classes (and since I'm teaching kids and not adults, there's a much better than average chance on any given day that there will be multiple advanced classes, and that I can go somewhere other than the bunny hill). As far as the quality of the instruction and whatnot, it depends a whole lotsa. Our local PSIA guys are good and they're not a bunch of theory weenies, so when you take a clinic with them, you actually do learn something. Seems I've earned that high priority without certification. I've even gotten advanced assignments ahead of some full time instructors. I was also assigned private lessons my first season teaching. Best class I got was from a high school bus trip. I got the expert kids, with a waver allowing them on the blacks. [mountain policy, no blacks for school groups without special permission.] Seems I'm still not quite sold. Later... Ron Capik -- |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Why join PSIA?
"Ron Capik" wrote in message ... Mary Malmros wrote: The advantage, from my perspective, is that now that I'm certified, I get higher priority for the advanced classes (and since I'm teaching kids and not adults, there's a much better than average chance on any given day that there will be multiple advanced classes, and that I can go somewhere other than the bunny hill). As far as the quality of the instruction and whatnot, it depends a whole lotsa. Our local PSIA guys are good and they're not a bunch of theory weenies, so when you take a clinic with them, you actually do learn something. Seems I've earned that high priority without certification. I've even gotten advanced assignments ahead of some full time instructors. I was also assigned private lessons my first season teaching. Best class I got was from a high school bus trip. I got the expert kids, with a waver allowing them on the blacks. [mountain policy, no blacks for school groups without special permission.] Seems I'm still not quite sold. It sounds like your background is being well respected by your employer. Not everyone has that advantage. Maybe if you joined, you might get into it, and work your way up to a trainer of teachers, or even an examiner. It might be even more interesting, and a good way to share the skills your have refined. Bob |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Why join PSIA?
Ron Capik wrote:
Mary Malmros wrote: The advantage, from my perspective, is that now that I'm certified, I get higher priority for the advanced classes (and since I'm teaching kids and not adults, there's a much better than average chance on any given day that there will be multiple advanced classes, and that I can go somewhere other than the bunny hill). As far as the quality of the instruction and whatnot, it depends a whole lotsa. Our local PSIA guys are good and they're not a bunch of theory weenies, so when you take a clinic with them, you actually do learn something. Seems I've earned that high priority without certification. I've even gotten advanced assignments ahead of some full time instructors. I was also assigned private lessons my first season teaching. Best class I got was from a high school bus trip. I got the expert kids, with a waver allowing them on the blacks. [mountain policy, no blacks for school groups without special permission.] Seems I'm still not quite sold. Later... Ron Capik -- Do you ever have a notion to take your skills to another mountain? Wouldn't you have to start at the bottom again if you did so and were not PSIA certified? |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Why join PSIA?
VtSkier wrote:
Ron Capik wrote: , ...snip... Seems I'm still not quite sold. Later... Ron Capik -- Do you ever have a notion to take your skills to another mountain? Wouldn't you have to start at the bottom again if you did so and were not PSIA certified? Not all that high a probability, I live in New Jersey and don't expect to move in the near future. There aren't many ski [umm.. ] hills near by. ;-} I'll likely visit real mountains now and then just to ski. Later... Ron Capik -- |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Somebody wants to join me for a weekend at Whistler? | Nickolay Samofatov | North American Ski Resorts | 0 | November 5th 05 10:50 PM |
Join Netbux & Pay-Pup Get up to 80 cents & $1 per day :) | ShadyOP | Alpine Skiing | 0 | May 5th 05 07:42 AM |
CASI or PSIA instructor manuals | Heather | Snowboarding | 6 | January 11th 05 02:06 PM |
New thread LAL, PSIA wedge. | foot2foot | Alpine Skiing | 10 | November 28th 04 10:35 PM |
Congrats to BarryB, PSIA-E Master Teacher | Alpine Instructor | Alpine Skiing | 5 | June 3rd 04 11:45 PM |