If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Scott Abraham Syndrome
On May 10, 1:57*pm, twobuddha wrote:
On May 10, 12:08*pm, Dave Cartman wrote: In article , *Richard Henry wrote: In another website not too far away, I characterized another poster as suffering from "Scott Abraham Syndrome". *His particular characteristic was accusing me of lying and then not being able or willing to provide any concrete examples. That got me to thinking - other than empty accusations or insinuations of lying, what other behaviors belong in the SAS definition? This already well described: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Delusional Pervert Dave goes Wikipedia insane defamation again. *How typical. How pathetic. The problem with delusions is you can't talk people out of them. * Anything you say to them becomes part of the delusion. Translation: *No matter how much Pervert Dave Davidson lies, I know the truth and continue to expose him as a lying piece of **** cowardly pervert. Which I just did again. Think of a delusional mind as a big hot fire. *Almost anything you throw into it to "cool it down" become part of the fire and actually makes it burn hotter. Think of the psychopathic mind as a sewer. *Any truth thrown into it gets ignored as the **** floats to the top and gets repeated. How laughable. *How transparently ludicrous. *How typical of the psychopaths of rsa. The novel "Shutter Island" (and to a lesser degree, the movie) do a good job of describing a delusion from the "inside." RSA does a wonderful job in providing examples of the psychopathic mind and how it works, especially with these two assholes. And just for Scott 'Cleveland Steamer' Abraham: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coprophilia Since that's all he's thinking about today. Where's the clock, Porkchop? |
Ads |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Scott Abraham Syndrome
On May 10, 1:39*pm, Alan Baker wrote:
In article , *twobuddha wrote: On May 10, 1:11*pm, Alan Baker wrote: In article , *twobuddha wrote: On May 10, 12:59*pm, Alan Baker wrote: In article , *twobuddha wrote: On May 10, 11:51*am, Richard Henry wrote: In another website not too far away, I characterized another poster as suffering from "Scott Abraham Syndrome". * Translation: you lied and defamed in a futile attempt to diminish my credibility, while hiding behind your computer like the coward you are. No one could possibly diminish your credibility, Scottie. For once, I agree with you. *Compared to you freaks, I am the gold standard of credibility. And your delusions kick in! Translation: another lie by a pathological liar trying to diminish the credibility of the truth teller. What makes this particular lie even more laughable is that a delusional pathological liar makes the claim. The same guy that says if he believes a lie, it is not a lie. No one can diminish your credibility... ...because there is no lower credibility than none. Clue time, dumb****. *If you didn't believe me, you wouldn't need to lie about me. *Your very attacks on my credibility reinforce my credibility. *With honest and sane people, that is. I don't lie about you, Scottie. I wonder if SPD agrees with you? *Obviously, not. *Day 124 of the pathetic embarassment of Dickless Henry. And by the same standard how many days into the embarrassment of Scott Abraham, are we now? How many days since you claimed that Richard was going to jail because he'd been "ratted out". LOL Not embarassment, dumb****. *Disappointent. *Unlike Henry, I didn't lie to LE, and they didn't laugh at me. Sorry, but since your whole case that SPD laughed at Richard is based on the claim that you haven't been contacted, the same applies in reverse. No, it does not, you stupid idiot. *Because I did not lie to LE. *And Henry did. Your only "proof" is that you haven't heard from them. He has that same proof about your discussions with LE about him. But let me know how that goes when SPD throws you out on your dumb**** ass when you try to claim I threatened your life, idiot. I will, Scottie: you may be sure of that. Baker, what is truly scary is that I am sure you will lie to the police.....but not the police in your own country, where they take an even dimmer view of making false police reports. I won't lie to anyone, Scottie. I will present your posts. Oooooohhhhh, I'm so scared. *Don't go ballistic when they laugh you out of the precinct. If you had the balls, you could be there, but I think you'll punk... ...again. His particular characteristic was accusing me of lying and then not being able or willing to provide any concrete examples. I have caught you lying on hundreds of occasions. *You ignore being caught, lie some more, lie about being caught, etc. One thing for su I have not heard from SPD. *They blew you off. How embarassing for you, lying to the cops and getting laughed at. And you've been laughed at by law enforcement in Richard's neck of the woods, then. Excuse me? *I have never contacted any California LE. *You just got busted making up another whopper of a lie, Wack Job. *What were you saying about credibility? You really should remember your lies, Scottie. You've already claimed to have contacted them but that they declined to do anything about it... Busted again, you pathetic idiot. *You really should remember your lies. *I never claimed to have contacted California LE. *Never did. Typical Alan Baker: when exposed as a liar, keep lying. Yes, Scottie, you did. Or don't you remember saying this: No, Baker, I didn't. Once again, when caught in a blatant, obvious, ridiculously transparent lie, you ignore being caught and continue to make up even stranger rationalizations for your lying. 'I acted on it. *LE decided not to. *Shame. *Evidence was there, wasn't worth their time. *Little things like perverts, child molesters, identity thefts aced me out. *If I had been a woman, they probably would have. *But as one investigator told me, "We're not worried about you: you can take care of yourself if they ever decide to escalate, and those asshole ain't got the balls." ' How did LE decide "not to" and how did you know of this decision if you never contacted them? Baker, you pathetic sick freak, you stated I had contacted California LE. Then you offered this as proof when caught lying. You are insane. Talk about lying and never providing proof. *I've ca8ught YOU lying hundreds of times. *You ignore it and just keep on lying. Call it "RSA Syndrome". LOL You just proved my point, you incredibly stupid idiot. *You are insane. *Get help. LOL You are insane. Get help. Caught you lying again, you ignore being caught and keep on lying. You'd think Richard Henry would call this Dickless Henry syndrome, or EMERGENCY SOCCER GAME syndrome. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Scott Abraham Syndrome
On May 10, 2:16*pm, pigo wrote:
On May 10, 2:39*pm, Alan Baker wrote: Yes, Scottie, you did. Or don't you remember saying this: 'I acted on it. *LE decided not to. *Shame. *Evidence was there, wasn't worth their time. *Little things like perverts, child molesters, identity thefts aced me out. *If I had been a woman, they probably would have. *But as one investigator told me, "We're not worried about you: you can take care of yourself if they ever decide to escalate, and those asshole ain't got the balls." ' How did LE decide "not to" and how did you know of this decision if you never contacted them? Ohhhhh...Good one! I thought I remembered his talk of contacting police in Poway. I thought that maybe he left off the pronoun for his CYA? Holy ****, Brain Fried Bob Thompson and Wack Job Baker ignoring reality, ignoring the facts, and continuing to sell the same lie. Hey, freak? Didn't hear from the RCMP either. They laughed at you, idiot. Everybody laugh at Bob Thompson for lying to the cops and getting blown off. It will be interesting to watch him scuttle on this one! Well, probably not. Probably just more of the same ****. C'mon monkeyboy, dance for us. Since you mention scuttling, you pathetic pussy, you claimed that your lies to Canadian LE had gotten me banned from Canada. Had a great time up there last month. Everybody laugh at Bob Thompson for claiming he never stated he had gotten me banned from Canada. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Scott Abraham Syndrome
On May 10, 2:43*pm, Scottum wrote:
On May 10, 1:57*pm, twobuddha wrote: On May 10, 12:08*pm, Dave Cartman wrote: In article , *Richard Henry wrote: In another website not too far away, I characterized another poster as suffering from "Scott Abraham Syndrome". *His particular characteristic was accusing me of lying and then not being able or willing to provide any concrete examples. That got me to thinking - other than empty accusations or insinuations of lying, what other behaviors belong in the SAS definition? This already well described: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Delusional Pervert Dave goes Wikipedia insane defamation again. *How typical. How pathetic. The problem with delusions is you can't talk people out of them. * Anything you say to them becomes part of the delusion. Translation: *No matter how much Pervert Dave Davidson lies, I know the truth and continue to expose him as a lying piece of **** cowardly pervert. Which I just did again. Think of a delusional mind as a big hot fire. *Almost anything you throw into it to "cool it down" become part of the fire and actually makes it burn hotter. Think of the psychopathic mind as a sewer. *Any truth thrown into it gets ignored as the **** floats to the top and gets repeated. How laughable. *How transparently ludicrous. *How typical of the psychopaths of rsa. The novel "Shutter Island" (and to a lesser degree, the movie) do a good job of describing a delusion from the "inside." RSA does a wonderful job in providing examples of the psychopathic mind and how it works, especially with these two assholes. And just for Scott 'Cleveland Steamer' Abraham:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coprophilia Since that's all he's thinking about today. No surprise you know what the word means. First hand experience, eh? |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Scott Abraham Syndrome
In article
, twobuddha wrote: And you've been laughed at by law enforcement in Richard's neck of the woods, then. Excuse me? *I have never contacted any California LE. *You just got busted making up another whopper of a lie, Wack Job. *What were you saying about credibility? You really should remember your lies, Scottie. You've already claimed to have contacted them but that they declined to do anything about it... Busted again, you pathetic idiot. *You really should remember your lies. *I never claimed to have contacted California LE. *Never did. Typical Alan Baker: when exposed as a liar, keep lying. Yes, Scottie, you did. Or don't you remember saying this: No, Baker, I didn't. Once again, when caught in a blatant, obvious, ridiculously transparent lie, you ignore being caught and continue to make up even stranger rationalizations for your lying. 'I acted on it. *LE decided not to. *Shame. *Evidence was there, wasn't worth their time. *Little things like perverts, child molesters, identity thefts aced me out. *If I had been a woman, they probably would have. *But as one investigator told me, "We're not worried about you: you can take care of yourself if they ever decide to escalate, and those asshole ain't got the balls." ' How did LE decide "not to" and how did you know of this decision if you never contacted them? Baker, you pathetic sick freak, you stated I had contacted California LE. Then you offered this as proof when caught lying. You are insane. And it proves you did contact them. Otherwise: 1. How did you know what they decided to do? 2. Why were they deciding anything in the first place? 3. Or are you claiming that that wasn't an actual quote from you? (Be aware, I can produce the link if needed). Since you punked out on answering my question the first time around, I expect nothing more this time, but it's fun watching you splutter. -- Alan Baker Vancouver, British Columbia http://gallery.me.com/alangbaker/100008/DSCF0162/web.jpg |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Scott Abraham Syndrome
On May 10, 4:17*pm, Alan Baker wrote:
In article , *twobuddha wrote: And you've been laughed at by law enforcement in Richard's neck of the woods, then. Excuse me? *I have never contacted any California LE. *You just got busted making up another whopper of a lie, Wack Job. *What were you saying about credibility? You really should remember your lies, Scottie. You've already claimed to have contacted them but that they declined to do anything about it... Busted again, you pathetic idiot. *You really should remember your lies. *I never claimed to have contacted California LE. *Never did. Typical Alan Baker: when exposed as a liar, keep lying. Yes, Scottie, you did. Or don't you remember saying this: No, Baker, I didn't. *Once again, when caught in a blatant, obvious, ridiculously transparent lie, you ignore being caught and continue to make up even stranger rationalizations for your lying. 'I acted on it. *LE decided not to. *Shame. *Evidence was there, wasn't worth their time. *Little things like perverts, child molesters, identity thefts aced me out. *If I had been a woman, they probably would have. *But as one investigator told me, "We're not worried about you: you can take care of yourself if they ever decide to escalate, and those asshole ain't got the balls." ' How did LE decide "not to" and how did you know of this decision if you never contacted them? Baker, you pathetic sick freak, you stated *I had contacted California LE. *Then you offered this as proof when caught lying. *You are insane. And it proves you did contact them. Otherwise: 1. How did you know what they decided to do? 2. Why were they deciding anything in the first place? 3. Or are you claiming that that wasn't an actual quote from you? (Be aware, I can produce the link if needed). Since you punked out on answering my question the first time around, I expect nothing more this time, but it's fun watching you splutter. Baker, you deranged nutjob delusional dumb**** idiot, you claimed I had contacted California LE. I did not. I never said I did. Apologize for lying. Admit you lied. That's what a man would do. And that is why you are incapable of admitting to a lie. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Scott Abraham Syndrome
In article
, twobuddha wrote: On May 10, 4:17*pm, Alan Baker wrote: In article , *twobuddha wrote: And you've been laughed at by law enforcement in Richard's neck of the woods, then. Excuse me? *I have never contacted any California LE. *You just got busted making up another whopper of a lie, Wack Job. *What were you saying about credibility? You really should remember your lies, Scottie. You've already claimed to have contacted them but that they declined to do anything about it... Busted again, you pathetic idiot. *You really should remember your lies. *I never claimed to have contacted California LE. *Never did. Typical Alan Baker: when exposed as a liar, keep lying. Yes, Scottie, you did. Or don't you remember saying this: No, Baker, I didn't. *Once again, when caught in a blatant, obvious, ridiculously transparent lie, you ignore being caught and continue to make up even stranger rationalizations for your lying. 'I acted on it. *LE decided not to. *Shame. *Evidence was there, wasn't worth their time. *Little things like perverts, child molesters, identity thefts aced me out. *If I had been a woman, they probably would have. *But as one investigator told me, "We're not worried about you: you can take care of yourself if they ever decide to escalate, and those asshole ain't got the balls." ' How did LE decide "not to" and how did you know of this decision if you never contacted them? Baker, you pathetic sick freak, you stated *I had contacted California LE. *Then you offered this as proof when caught lying. *You are insane. And it proves you did contact them. Otherwise: 1. How did you know what they decided to do? 2. Why were they deciding anything in the first place? 3. Or are you claiming that that wasn't an actual quote from you? (Be aware, I can produce the link if needed). Since you punked out on answering my question the first time around, I expect nothing more this time, but it's fun watching you splutter. Baker, you deranged nutjob delusional dumb**** idiot, you claimed I had contacted California LE. I did not. I never said I did. So then what law enforcement agency did you contact? You're not really trying to get off on the semantic that it didn't happen to be a California agency, are you? Apologize for lying. Admit you lied. That's what a man would do. And that is why you are incapable of admitting to a lie. How did you know what "LE decided not to" do if you weren't in contact with them? How was there anything to decide in the first place? Punk out again, Scottie: it's what you're good at! -- Alan Baker Vancouver, British Columbia http://gallery.me.com/alangbaker/100008/DSCF0162/web.jpg |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Scott Abraham Syndrome
On May 10, 5:17*pm, Alan Baker wrote:
In article , *twobuddha wrote: On May 10, 4:17*pm, Alan Baker wrote: In article , *twobuddha wrote: And you've been laughed at by law enforcement in Richard's neck of the woods, then. Excuse me? *I have never contacted any California LE. *You just got busted making up another whopper of a lie, Wack Job. *What were you saying about credibility? You really should remember your lies, Scottie. You've already claimed to have contacted them but that they declined to do anything about it... Busted again, you pathetic idiot. *You really should remember your lies. *I never claimed to have contacted California LE. *Never did. Typical Alan Baker: when exposed as a liar, keep lying. Yes, Scottie, you did. Or don't you remember saying this: No, Baker, I didn't. *Once again, when caught in a blatant, obvious, ridiculously transparent lie, you ignore being caught and continue to make up even stranger rationalizations for your lying. 'I acted on it. *LE decided not to. *Shame. *Evidence was there, wasn't worth their time. *Little things like perverts, child molesters, identity thefts aced me out. *If I had been a woman, they probably would have. *But as one investigator told me, "We're not worried about you: you can take care of yourself if they ever decide to escalate, and those asshole ain't got the balls." ' How did LE decide "not to" and how did you know of this decision if you never contacted them? Baker, you pathetic sick freak, you stated *I had contacted California LE. *Then you offered this as proof when caught lying. *You are insane. And it proves you did contact them. Otherwise: 1. How did you know what they decided to do? 2. Why were they deciding anything in the first place? 3. Or are you claiming that that wasn't an actual quote from you? (Be aware, I can produce the link if needed). Since you punked out on answering my question the first time around, I expect nothing more this time, but it's fun watching you splutter. Baker, you deranged nutjob delusional dumb**** idiot, you claimed I had contacted California LE. *I did not. *I never said I did. So then what law enforcement agency did you contact? You're not really trying to get off on the semantic that it didn't happen to be a California agency, are you? Baker, deal with getting busted lying. Nothing semantic about it. You lied. Period. Admit it. Be a man. Apologize for lying. *Admit you lied. *That's what a man would do. And that is why you are incapable of admitting to a lie. How did you know what "LE decided not to" do if you weren't in contact with them? How was there anything to decide in the first place? Punk out again, Scottie: it's what you're good at! I punked out? Amazing. You lied, got busted lying, continue to justify and rationalize lying, and then like the punk you are, you talk ****. Truly amazing. From the cowardly bitch who punked out on Whistler. You are insane. Get help. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Scott Abraham Syndrome
In article
, twobuddha wrote: On May 10, 5:17*pm, Alan Baker wrote: In article , *twobuddha wrote: On May 10, 4:17*pm, Alan Baker wrote: In article , *twobuddha wrote: And you've been laughed at by law enforcement in Richard's neck of the woods, then. Excuse me? *I have never contacted any California LE. *You just got busted making up another whopper of a lie, Wack Job. *What were you saying about credibility? You really should remember your lies, Scottie. You've already claimed to have contacted them but that they declined to do anything about it... Busted again, you pathetic idiot. *You really should remember your lies. *I never claimed to have contacted California LE. *Never did. Typical Alan Baker: when exposed as a liar, keep lying. Yes, Scottie, you did. Or don't you remember saying this: No, Baker, I didn't. *Once again, when caught in a blatant, obvious, ridiculously transparent lie, you ignore being caught and continue to make up even stranger rationalizations for your lying. 'I acted on it. *LE decided not to. *Shame. *Evidence was there, wasn't worth their time. *Little things like perverts, child molesters, identity thefts aced me out. *If I had been a woman, they probably would have. *But as one investigator told me, "We're not worried about you: you can take care of yourself if they ever decide to escalate, and those asshole ain't got the balls." ' How did LE decide "not to" and how did you know of this decision if you never contacted them? Baker, you pathetic sick freak, you stated *I had contacted California LE. *Then you offered this as proof when caught lying. *You are insane. And it proves you did contact them. Otherwise: 1. How did you know what they decided to do? 2. Why were they deciding anything in the first place? 3. Or are you claiming that that wasn't an actual quote from you? (Be aware, I can produce the link if needed). Since you punked out on answering my question the first time around, I expect nothing more this time, but it's fun watching you splutter. Baker, you deranged nutjob delusional dumb**** idiot, you claimed I had contacted California LE. *I did not. *I never said I did. So then what law enforcement agency did you contact? You're not really trying to get off on the semantic that it didn't happen to be a California agency, are you? Baker, deal with getting busted lying. Nothing semantic about it. You lied. Period. Admit it. Be a man. Where was the lie? You posted that you "acted on it" and that "LE decided not to". You couldn't have said either of those things if you were not in contact with law enforcement. Apologize for lying. *Admit you lied. *That's what a man would do. And that is why you are incapable of admitting to a lie. How did you know what "LE decided not to" do if you weren't in contact with them? How was there anything to decide in the first place? Punk out again, Scottie: it's what you're good at! I punked out? Amazing. You lied, got busted lying, continue to justify and rationalize lying, and then like the punk you are, you talk ****. Yup. Punked out... ...again. Truly amazing. From the cowardly bitch who punked out on Whistler. I knew you'd have a weasel -- like a second information tower.... ....and I was right! You are insane. Get help. Can't deal with the questions, huh? Yeah... -- Alan Baker Vancouver, British Columbia http://gallery.me.com/alangbaker/100008/DSCF0162/web.jpg |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Scott Abraham Syndrome
I guess I should also include "attempts to dominate every thread".
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Scott Abraham - Banned from RSA | Dick G[_2_] | Alpine Skiing | 0 | January 15th 10 08:28 PM |
FAQ about Scott Abraham | A mighty Hungarian warrior | Alpine Skiing | 18 | December 5th 08 04:28 PM |
FAQ of Scott Abraham | Harry Weiner | Alpine Skiing | 4 | March 25th 08 01:16 PM |
Scott Abraham ain't nothing but a thing | Jeff | Alpine Skiing | 1 | October 20th 05 10:05 PM |