Scottie Sighting

On Feb 22, 5:12 pm, (Jeff Davis) wrote:
In article ,
Sven Golly wrote:



I think he fishes, hunts and jetskis a little. I don't know anything
about Fred Gwynne.

I've yet to meet a professional athelete active in the NFL or MLB that
didn't have a, "No Skiing," Clause in their contract.

Is this where you claim to have personally meet a few active NFL / MLB
players ?

In article .com,
Yabahoobs wrote:

Is this where you claim to have personally meet a few active NFL / MLB
players ?

I'm not claiming. That's a fact Jack.
--
According to John Perry Barlow, "Jeff Davis is a truly gifted trouble-maker."

Jeff Davis wrote:
In article ,
Sven Golly wrote:

I think he fishes, hunts and jetskis a little. I don't know anything
about Fred Gwynne.

I've yet to meet a professional athelete active in the NFL or MLB that
didn't have a, "No Skiing," Clause in their contract.

He didn't start playing in the MLB until he was 22, and he's been
retired for 6 years. He would have had, oh, about 24 years when he was
old enough to ski and wasn't bound by such a contract. So *never* is a
little presumptuous, don't you think?

But at least you provided some reason. Lame reasoning, but ti's
something.

What about Fred?


//Walt

In article ,
Walt wrote:

But at least you provided some reason. Lame reasoning, but ti's
something.

thanks

What about Fred?

Just raw intuition. A hunch. If it pans out, I'll claim Devine Inspiration.
--
According to John Perry Barlow, "Jeff Davis is a truly gifted trouble-maker."

On Feb 22, 3:27 pm, (Jeff Davis) wrote:
In article .com,

Richard Henry wrote:

It seems you are buying Scott's version of the story. The record is
on google, if you care to look.

To read more delusional libel from a pathological liar? I have met
several people in meatspace I met virtually on the 'Net. Abraham was
clear on the time and the place. Baker would rather rant and rave
his bull**** than meet Scott in person and resolve his differences.

Without even reading it, you know what it is?

Bev's fears were right. Scottish is contagious.

On Feb 22, 3:47 pm, (Jeff Davis) wrote:
In article ,
Alan Baker wrote:



There is no mass change. There is a *rate* of mass flow which is being
changed by a constant velocity.

Klaus was talking about a change in mass. You brought up the airplane
wing. I asked you where the mass change was. Now you're countering with
nonsense. The truth is there is no change in the mass of the given body
of air. Velocity sure as **** isn't constant. The velocity of the air
mass on top of the wing is much greater than the velocity of the air mass
below the wing. The ideal gas law accounts for the decrease in pressure
on the upper surface of the wing. The pressure of the air below the wing
provides the lift necessary, (given sufficient velocity), for flight.

That's a fact Jack- that anybody in the Jackson Hole Air Force knows.
This is like kicking puppies, and you continue to type vacuous dreck.

http://www.blueangels.navy.mil/image...2007-ba_10.jpg

In article om,
Richard Henry wrote:

http://www.blueangels.navy.mil/image...2007-ba_10.jpg

And the thrust of your argument is... ?
--
According to John Perry Barlow, "Jeff Davis is a truly gifted trouble-maker."

On Feb 22, 6:08 pm, (Jeff Davis) wrote:
In article om,

Richard Henry wrote:

http://www.blueangels.navy.mil/image...2007-ba_10.jpg

And the thrust of your argument is... ?

Actually, it's lift we're talking about, Thrust is something else

Quoting you:

"The velocity of the air
mass on top of the wing is much greater than the velocity of the air
mass
below the wing. The ideal gas law accounts for the decrease in
pressure
on the upper surface of the wing. The pressure of the air below the
wing
provides the lift necessary, (given sufficient velocity), for
flight."

The plane is upside down, and yet it flies.

In article ,
(Jeff Davis) wrote:

In article ,
Alan Baker wrote:

He was given an opportunity to provide information that I told him was
necessary for me to agree to meet him. He refused.

That's bull****. You had all the information you needed and you posed
out. Look me up any time. And call the Mayor up and run your libelous
defamation past him. You'll do none of this, because you're singing
soprano.

No. I didn't.

See: I know Scotty's track record. Emergency softball games, etc.

I wanted the meeting place to be well defined so that he wouldn't be
able to say after the fact that he'd meant somewhere else.

He insisted that it wasn't necessary to tell me where he meant.

But then *after* the meeting time had passed, *then* he had no trouble
providing a one sentence summation of exactly where he meant.

All this is in the Google Groups record.

--
According to John Perry Barlow, "Jeff Davis is a truly gifted trouble-maker."


"-- "

--
"The iPhone doesn't have a speaker phone" -- "I checked very carefully" --
"I checked Apple's web pages" -- Edwin on the iPhone and how he missed
the demo of the iPhone speakerphone.

In article ,
(Jeff Davis) wrote:

In article ,
Alan Baker wrote:

Actually, I own. A nice (albeit small) condo in Vancouver.
Outright.

I don't see what all the dick whipping is about. If you want to libel
me and hide behind the Canadian border, it substatiates Abraham's
position you have no balls. Oh yeah, you need a comma between
albeit and small. Grammer Flame...

No, actually you don't... ...need a comma.

And I'm laughing at your idea that I'm hiding anywhere. I live where I
live.

You tried to justify your rationale for not suing me for libel on the
basis of my not owning property and when that failed, you're now finding
a new rationale...

--
According to John Perry Barlow, "Jeff Davis is a truly gifted trouble-maker."


"-- "

--
"The iPhone doesn't have a speaker phone" -- "I checked very carefully" --
"I checked Apple's web pages" -- Edwin on the iPhone and how he missed
the demo of the iPhone speakerphone.