If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#51
|
|||
|
|||
The consequences of pulling out
On Sat, 05 May 2007 21:43:54 GMT, Alan Baker
wrote: In article , PC Guy wrote: On Sat, 05 May 2007 21:27:35 GMT, Alan Baker wrote: In article , PC Guy wrote: On Sat, 05 May 2007 21:21:57 GMT, Alan Baker wrote: In article , PC Guy wrote: On Sat, 05 May 2007 20:35:41 GMT, Alan Baker wrote: In article , (Jeff Davis) wrote: In article , MuahMan wrote: On May 4, 4:30 pm, Lost Balls Bsker wrote: [Idiocy deleted- context marker only] Ooooh can I take a number. A Maccie fighting, hysterical. Especially a Canadian, fighting maccie. Hysterical. You think that's hysterical, you should catch him playing Unix Guru. A Unix System Analyst friend, Lisa Sauve, just returned from Belgium and authoritatively debunked his contentions regarding Unix operating systems. I've only made one contention, and it's correct: There was never a Version 7 of SunOS. What do you mean by version 7 of SunOS? There is a version of Solaris 7. Is it your assertion that SunOS != Solairs? No. I assert that SunOS and Solaris version numbers for referring to the same release aren't the same. That the Solaris version referred to as 7 is the same as SunOS version 5.7. More correctly speaking: Version 7 of Solaris includes SunOS version 5.7 as a part of it, which also includes OpenWindows 3.6.1 and CDE (Common Desktop Environment) 1.3 I see. It's one of those arguments where you split hairs in order to cover up a mistake you made. I made no mistake. I already understood -- from checking I'd done while having a converstion with Edwin -- that there was never a version 7 of SunOS. As usual the Mactards spend effort on irrelevant crap. Who are these "Mactards" and why do you bring up what they do? They're people such as yourself. That subject in this thread is "irrelevant crap". What I did to learn about SunOS and Solaris is completely relevant to this thread. Face it, "PC Guy", I understood that Solaris and SunOS aren't the same thing and you didn't. I made no claim about it one way or the other. I am, once again, pointing out how Mactards focus on irrelevant crap. I hear people referring to Solairs 7 as Solaris 2.7. Do I spend time nitpicking them to death that it's not "2.7" but "7"? I also hear people using Solaris and SunOS interchangable all the time. Again I don't nitpick this detail. Why? Because it's likely to be completely irrelevant to whatever discussion they're having. But without any actual arguments Mactards focus on this trivial issues in an attempt to make themselves look more intelligent when faced with losing an argument. Ignorance isn't a failing, and now that I've explained it to you (repeatedly), you're no longer ignorant... Never was. ...at least on this topic. You're welcome. :-) |
Ads |
#52
|
|||
|
|||
The consequences of pulling out
On May 5, 1:20 pm, (Jeff Davis) wrote:
In article , bdubya wrote: On Sat, 05 May 2007 02:10:59 GMT, Lost Balls Bsker wrote: Because *I* lack courage, you cut RSA out of the post? I thought it was a mercy-snip. It did seem pretty merciful. I had no idea the guy was such an idiot. We start out discussing avalanches. He flakes out with Bull**** that has nothing to do with mass loss. He was Unix illiterate util Apple released OS X. He has absolutely no horse sense. He's clueless regarding the worth of an Olympic caliber trained 6 year old dressage horse. He's been skiing 38 years, and he's still a Level I ski instructor on a mediocre hill. Stuff just isn't adding up the longer you read his rants. Notice the obligatory ski content, (OSC) You even got that wrong. The term is "obski". |
#53
|
|||
|
|||
The consequences of pulling out
On May 5, 1:11 pm, (Jeff Davis) wrote:
In article , Lost Balls Bsker wrote: Because *I* lack courage, you cut RSA out of the post? Because it has no skiing content you insufferably idiotic ****wad. Nobody in rsa wants to read your ego posts. You admit you weaseld out of meeting Scott, and now you admit it was because you're a chicken****. Happy Cinco De Mayo ****wad. -- According to John Perry Barlow, "Jeff Davis is a truly gifted trouble-maker." Scottish infection symptoms noted. |
#54
|
|||
|
|||
The consequences of pulling out
In article ,
PC Guy wrote: On Sat, 05 May 2007 21:43:54 GMT, Alan Baker wrote: In article , PC Guy wrote: On Sat, 05 May 2007 21:27:35 GMT, Alan Baker wrote: In article , PC Guy wrote: On Sat, 05 May 2007 21:21:57 GMT, Alan Baker wrote: In article , PC Guy wrote: On Sat, 05 May 2007 20:35:41 GMT, Alan Baker wrote: In article , (Jeff Davis) wrote: In article , MuahMan wrote: On May 4, 4:30 pm, Lost Balls Bsker wrote: [Idiocy deleted- context marker only] Ooooh can I take a number. A Maccie fighting, hysterical. Especially a Canadian, fighting maccie. Hysterical. You think that's hysterical, you should catch him playing Unix Guru. A Unix System Analyst friend, Lisa Sauve, just returned from Belgium and authoritatively debunked his contentions regarding Unix operating systems. I've only made one contention, and it's correct: There was never a Version 7 of SunOS. What do you mean by version 7 of SunOS? There is a version of Solaris 7. Is it your assertion that SunOS != Solairs? No. I assert that SunOS and Solaris version numbers for referring to the same release aren't the same. That the Solaris version referred to as 7 is the same as SunOS version 5.7. More correctly speaking: Version 7 of Solaris includes SunOS version 5.7 as a part of it, which also includes OpenWindows 3.6.1 and CDE (Common Desktop Environment) 1.3 I see. It's one of those arguments where you split hairs in order to cover up a mistake you made. I made no mistake. I already understood -- from checking I'd done while having a converstion with Edwin -- that there was never a version 7 of SunOS. As usual the Mactards spend effort on irrelevant crap. Who are these "Mactards" and why do you bring up what they do? They're people such as yourself. That subject in this thread is "irrelevant crap". What I did to learn about SunOS and Solaris is completely relevant to this thread. Face it, "PC Guy", I understood that Solaris and SunOS aren't the same thing and you didn't. I made no claim about it one way or the other. I am, once again, pointing out how Mactards focus on irrelevant crap. I hear people referring to Solairs 7 as Solaris 2.7. Do I spend time nitpicking them to death that it's not "2.7" but "7"? I also hear people using Solaris and SunOS interchangable all the time. Again I don't nitpick this detail. Why? Because it's likely to be completely irrelevant to whatever discussion they're having. But without any actual arguments Mactards focus on this trivial issues in an attempt to make themselves look more intelligent when faced with losing an argument. Ignorance isn't a failing, and now that I've explained it to you (repeatedly), you're no longer ignorant... Never was. Sorry, but your reply to my original statement: Alan: "There was never a Version 7 of SunOS." was this: PC Guy: "What do you mean by version 7 of SunOS? There is a version of Solaris 7. Is it your assertion that SunOS != Solairs?" That shows that you did *not* understand that Solaris 7 and SunOS 7 weren't interchangeable terms. -- "The iPhone doesn't have a speaker phone" -- "I checked very carefully" -- "I checked Apple's web pages" -- Edwin on the iPhone and how he missed the demo of the iPhone speakerphone. |
#55
|
|||
|
|||
The consequences of pulling out
On Sat, 05 May 2007 20:20:01 -0000, (Jeff Davis)
wrote: In article , bdubya wrote: On Sat, 05 May 2007 02:10:59 GMT, Lost Balls Bsker wrote: Because *I* lack courage, you cut RSA out of the post? I thought it was a mercy-snip. It did seem pretty merciful. I had no idea the guy was (snip) Mercy's in REALLY short supply this weekend, I see. bw |
#56
|
|||
|
|||
The consequences of pulling out
"Alan Baker" wrote in message ... In article . com, Dene wrote: On May 4, 2:30 pm, Alan Baker wrote: In article .com, Edwin wrote: Who cares? Go meet up with the guy from alt.skiing.alpine who wants to kick your ass. LOL You should really look at who you're aligning yourself with a little more closely, Edwin (and BTW, it's *rec*.skiing.alpine). Scott Abraham is the only guy to ever get himself banned by court order from posting to a newsgroup. And I presume Alan played the role of peacemaker...... -Greg I played the role of innocent bystander who gets punched by the out of control drunk (Scott Abraham, that is) Hmmmmm. I've never met Baker. He doesn't have the balls. He's a stalking freak who has repeatedly harassed me. Let's count the lies. Not innocent, to be sure. Never met me. I have not had a drink in over eighteen years. Either this freak is insane, or...... |
#57
|
|||
|
|||
The consequences of pulling out
"Edwin" wrote in message
ups.com... On May 4, 5:04 pm, Alan Baker wrote: In article . com, Dene wrote: On May 4, 2:30 pm, Alan Baker wrote: In article .com, Edwin wrote: Who cares? Go meet up with the guy from alt.skiing.alpine who wants to kick your ass. LOL You should really look at who you're aligning yourself with a little more closely, Edwin (and BTW, it's *rec*.skiing.alpine). Scott Abraham is the only guy to ever get himself banned by court order from posting to a newsgroup. And I presume Alan played the role of peacemaker...... -Greg I played the role of innocent bystander who gets punched by the out of control drunk (Scott Abraham, that is) You got hit by a wet noodle. It only felt like a punch to you. He got hit by his own insanity, and made up another whopper. |
#58
|
|||
|
|||
The consequences of pulling out
"Alan Baker" wrote in message
... In article . com, Edwin wrote: On May 4, 5:04 pm, Alan Baker wrote: In article . com, Dene wrote: On May 4, 2:30 pm, Alan Baker wrote: In article .com, Edwin wrote: Who cares? Go meet up with the guy from alt.skiing.alpine who wants to kick your ass. LOL You should really look at who you're aligning yourself with a little more closely, Edwin (and BTW, it's *rec*.skiing.alpine). Scott Abraham is the only guy to ever get himself banned by court order from posting to a newsgroup. And I presume Alan played the role of peacemaker...... -Greg I played the role of innocent bystander who gets punched by the out of control drunk (Scott Abraham, that is) You got hit by a wet noodle. It only felt like a punch to you. LOL I see the idea of a metaphor is far too advanced for you... I see the idea of making up a defamatory lie is well within your insane mind..... |
#59
|
|||
|
|||
The consequences of pulling out
"Alan Baker" wrote in message
... In article , (Jeff Davis) wrote: In article , Lost Balls Bsker wrote: Because *I* lack courage, you cut RSA out of the post? Because it has no skiing content you insufferably idiotic ****wad. Nobody in rsa wants to read your ego posts. You admit you weaseld out of meeting Scott, and now you admit it was because you're a chicken****. Happy Cinco De Mayo ****wad. Shall we start applying the same standard to your posts? What did your original post about meeting Scotty have to do with skiing? Actually, it had to do with you and your sick buddies stalking me on rsa, which has nothing to do with skiing. Apply the same standard to your posts, and shut the **** up, you insane wacko. |
#60
|
|||
|
|||
The consequences of pulling out
In article ,
"Two Buddha" wrote: "Alan Baker" wrote in message ... In article . com, Dene wrote: On May 4, 2:30 pm, Alan Baker wrote: In article .com, Edwin wrote: Who cares? Go meet up with the guy from alt.skiing.alpine who wants to kick your ass. LOL You should really look at who you're aligning yourself with a little more closely, Edwin (and BTW, it's *rec*.skiing.alpine). Scott Abraham is the only guy to ever get himself banned by court order from posting to a newsgroup. And I presume Alan played the role of peacemaker...... -Greg I played the role of innocent bystander who gets punched by the out of control drunk (Scott Abraham, that is) Hmmmmm. I've never met Baker. He doesn't have the balls. He's a stalking freak who has repeatedly harassed me. I've only ever replied to your posts in a public forum, Scotty. How is that stalking or harassing? Let's count the lies. Not innocent, to be sure. Never met me. I have not had a drink in over eighteen years. It's called a *metaphor*, Scotty. Either this freak is insane, or...... -- "The iPhone doesn't have a speaker phone" -- "I checked very carefully" -- "I checked Apple's web pages" -- Edwin on the iPhone and how he missed the demo of the iPhone speakerphone. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Salomon Classic Profile Flexor Pulling Out | Amy Todd | Nordic Skiing | 7 | February 10th 04 09:42 PM |