Who posts the most?

Ooohh, that's so scary... yet cool It's like when Champion Leagues
of Quake (CLQ) came out. For those of you who don't know, CLQ appeared
suddenly like in 1999 and started tracking people playing online games
like Quake, it would keep track of how long you played and you
weighted average "frag rate" (i.e. the rate as which you could defeat
your opponents) and would automatically rank your place in the
WORLD... now that was a cool thing... of course, it would also
embarrassingly tell you how many minutes you were playing a week. I
admit I was up there in both categories

--arvin

Iain D wrote in message .. .
I dunno if everyone's see this but if not take a look at:
http://netscan.research.microsoft.co...earchdate=2003
Scroll to the bottom to see the most prolific posters (no prizes for
guessing ;-)
Iain

IainD at ukme dot me dot uk

On Wed, 07 Jan 2004 16:33:25 GMT, Iain D allegedly
wrote:

Scroll to the bottom to see the most prolific posters (no prizes for
guessing ;-)

I knew it would be Mike. Then I got worried, because if I added the
total for my current ID with the total from my previous ID, then I'm only
a few posts behind. Luckily I then saw Mike uses/used 2 IDs as well.

Suprised you didn't make it to the list Iain. You've been quiet recently,
but were quite active in the past.

- Dave.

--
The only powder to get high on, falls from the sky.
http://www.vpas.org/ - Snowboarding the worlds pow pow -
Securing your e-mail

The Snowboard FAQ lives here - http://rssFAQ.org/

"Arvin Chang" wrote in message
om...
Ooohh, that's so scary... yet cool It's like when Champion Leagues
of Quake (CLQ) came out. For those of you who don't know, CLQ appeared
suddenly like in 1999 and started tracking people playing online games
like Quake, it would keep track of how long you played and you
weighted average "frag rate" (i.e. the rate as which you could defeat
your opponents) and would automatically rank your place in the
WORLD... now that was a cool thing... of course, it would also
embarrassingly tell you how many minutes you were playing a week. I
admit I was up there in both categories

--arvin

HEy, that's nice, I used to check the same site
Never got in top 1000 though, except in the very end, when I was about the
only QuakeWorld player left )

Too bad it's no longer operational..

Cornelis

PS: i've rediscovered QW, now there's a opengl version that is actually
playable (www.fuhquake.net). Servers are getting pretty thin though
(Netherlands has one, and in the scandic countries there's a few)

"Cornelis Zijlstra" wrote in message ...
"Arvin Chang" wrote in message
om...
Ooohh, that's so scary... yet cool It's like when Champion Leagues
of Quake (CLQ) came out. For those of you who don't know, CLQ appeared
suddenly like in 1999 and started tracking people playing online games
like Quake, it would keep track of how long you played and you
weighted average "frag rate" (i.e. the rate as which you could defeat
your opponents) and would automatically rank your place in the
WORLD... now that was a cool thing... of course, it would also
embarrassingly tell you how many minutes you were playing a week. I
admit I was up there in both categories

--arvin

HEy, that's nice, I used to check the same site
Never got in top 1000 though, except in the very end, when I was about the
only QuakeWorld player left )

I rememeber playing a LOT after finals one in college and got up in
the top 100 for a while in Quake II CTF, but I slowly went down ino
200 I think. Not sure if I'm suppose to be proud or embarrassed about
that fact.

Too bad it's no longer operational..

Yea... well I left the game back in 2000, but it was kind of cool to
be able to look up my player name and see my old stats.

PS: i've rediscovered QW, now there's a opengl version that is actually
playable (www.fuhquake.net). Servers are getting pretty thin though
(Netherlands has one, and in the scandic countries there's a few)

Hmm....

--arvin