Visual acuity...

"At 12 inches, the normal visual acuity of the human eye is 0.00349
inch."

http://www.ndt-ed.org/EducationResou...PenetrantTest/
Introduction/visualacuity.htm

Now, I realize that I'm supposed to be a liar according to you, but math
doesn't lie.

At 460 meters = 500 yards = 1500 feet, the normal visual acuity of the
human eye is (1500 * 0.00349) 5.235 inches.

You're welcome.

--
Alan Baker
Vancouver, British Columbia
"If you raise the ceiling four feet, move the fireplace from that wall
to that wall, you'll still only get the full stereophonic effect if you
sit in the bottom of that cupboard."

On Apr 13, 9:18*am, Alan Baker wrote:
"At 12 inches, the normal visual acuity of the human eye is 0.00349
inch."

http://www.ndt-ed.org/EducationResou...PenetrantTest/
Introduction/visualacuity.htm

Now, I realize that I'm supposed to be a liar according to you, but math
doesn't lie.

At 460 meters = 500 yards = 1500 feet, the normal visual acuity of the
human eye is (1500 * 0.00349) 5.235 inches.

You're welcome.

Never shot a rifle in your life, have you, Baker?
You're not lying. You really don't know you are insane. I repeat:
the human eye cannot discern a nine inch circle at 460 yards.
Especially Horvath's eye.

In article
,
twobuddha wrote:

On Apr 13, 9:18*am, Alan Baker wrote:
"At 12 inches, the normal visual acuity of the human eye is 0.00349
inch."

http://www.ndt-ed.org/EducationResou...PenetrantTest/
Introduction/visualacuity.htm

Now, I realize that I'm supposed to be a liar according to you, but math
doesn't lie.

At 460 meters = 500 yards = 1500 feet, the normal visual acuity of the
human eye is (1500 * 0.00349) 5.235 inches.

You're welcome.

Never shot a rifle in your life, have you, Baker?

I've shot .22, .303, 7.62mm FN-FAL. (As well as the Canadian Forces SMG,
Browning .30 machine gun (re-calibered for 7.62mm NATO) and the Browning
..50 cal.

You're not lying. You really don't know you are insane. I repeat:
the human eye cannot discern a nine inch circle at 460 yards.

And you're wrong.

If you translate the height of a standard 20/20 target letter to what it
would be at 500 yards, you get 26" high. Clearly, if one can see a 20/20
letter, then one can see details on it that are less than 9".

Especially Horvath's eye.

--
Alan Baker
Vancouver, British Columbia
"If you raise the ceiling four feet, move the fireplace from that wall
to that wall, you'll still only get the full stereophonic effect if you
sit in the bottom of that cupboard."

On Apr 13, 9:38*am, Alan Baker wrote:
In article
,





*twobuddha wrote:
On Apr 13, 9:18*am, Alan Baker wrote:
"At 12 inches, the normal visual acuity of the human eye is 0.00349
inch."

http://www.ndt-ed.org/EducationResou...PenetrantTest/
Introduction/visualacuity.htm

Now, I realize that I'm supposed to be a liar according to you, but math
doesn't lie.

At 460 meters = 500 yards = 1500 feet, the normal visual acuity of the
human eye is (1500 * 0.00349) 5.235 inches.

You're welcome.

Never shot a rifle in your life, have you, Baker?

I've shot .22, .303, 7.62mm FN-FAL. (As well as the Canadian Forces SMG,
Browning .30 machine gun (re-calibered for 7.62mm NATO) and the Browning
.50 cal.

In Canada? BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
You're more full of **** than Horvie.
Of course, I've actually shot a M-16A1. A2. Armalite a month ago in
Nevada, lovely little thing.

You're not lying. *You really don't know you are insane. *I repeat:
the human eye cannot discern a nine inch circle at 460 yards.

And you're wrong.

Geez, on one hand I have a retired Marine gunnery seargeant and
graduate of the Marine Sniper School, and on the other side, I have
you and Horvie.
Not to mention my own experience.
You are insane.

If you translate the height of a standard 20/20 target letter to what it
would be at 500 yards, you get 26" high. Clearly, if one can see a 20/20
letter, then one can see details on it that are less than 9".

You are insane. Horvath is merely a lying bull****ter who just got
exposed.

Dalai Two Buddha

Vail: Where Dalai never carries a weapon

In article
,
twobuddha wrote:

On Apr 13, 9:38*am, Alan Baker wrote:
In article
,





*twobuddha wrote:
On Apr 13, 9:18*am, Alan Baker wrote:
"At 12 inches, the normal visual acuity of the human eye is 0.00349
inch."

http://www.ndt-ed.org/EducationResou.../PenetrantTest
/
Introduction/visualacuity.htm

Now, I realize that I'm supposed to be a liar according to you, but
math
doesn't lie.

At 460 meters = 500 yards = 1500 feet, the normal visual acuity of the
human eye is (1500 * 0.00349) 5.235 inches.

You're welcome.

Never shot a rifle in your life, have you, Baker?

I've shot .22, .303, 7.62mm FN-FAL. (As well as the Canadian Forces SMG,
Browning .30 machine gun (re-calibered for 7.62mm NATO) and the Browning
.50 cal.

In Canada? BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Yup. In Canada. I was in the Queen's York Rangers for most of 1979.

You're more full of **** than Horvie.
Of course, I've actually shot a M-16A1. A2. Armalite a month ago in
Nevada, lovely little thing.

You're not lying. *You really don't know you are insane. *I repeat:
the human eye cannot discern a nine inch circle at 460 yards.

And you're wrong.

Geez, on one hand I have a retired Marine gunnery seargeant and
graduate of the Marine Sniper School, and on the other side, I have
you and Horvie.
Not to mention my own experience.
You are insane.

You have no experience.


If you translate the height of a standard 20/20 target letter to what it
would be at 500 yards, you get 26" high. Clearly, if one can see a 20/20
letter, then one can see details on it that are less than 9".

You are insane. Horvath is merely a lying bull****ter who just got
exposed.

LOL

Unlike you, Scottie. I have the references:

http://www.ndt-ed.org/EducationResou...PenetrantTest/
Introduction/visualacuity.htm

Which you've already been given and which gives a lower limit of 5.235
inches at 500 yards.

"Snellen defined ³standard vision² as the ability to recognize one of
his optotypes when it subtended 5 minutes of arc. Thus the optotype can
only be recognized if the person viewing it can discriminate a spatial
pattern separated by a visual angle of 1 minute of arc."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Snellen_chart

So a person with normal vision can discriminate objects of 1 minute of
arc.

"Firearms
This unit is commonly found in the firearms industry and literature,
particularly that concerning the accuracy of rifles. The industry tends
to refer to it as minute of angle rather than minute of arc. It is
popular because 1 MOA subtends approximately one inch at 100 yards, a
traditional distance on target ranges. "

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minute_of_arc

So a minute of arc is 1" at 100 yards, which makes it 5" at 500 yards.

--
Alan Baker
Vancouver, British Columbia
"If you raise the ceiling four feet, move the fireplace from that wall
to that wall, you'll still only get the full stereophonic effect if you
sit in the bottom of that cupboard."

On Apr 13, 9:18*am, Alan Baker wrote:
"At 12 inches, the normal visual acuity of the human eye is 0.00349
inch."

http://www.ndt-ed.org/EducationResou...PenetrantTest/
Introduction/visualacuity.htm

Now, I realize that I'm supposed to be a liar according to you, but math
doesn't lie.

At 460 meters = 500 yards = 1500 feet, the normal visual acuity of the
human eye is (1500 * 0.00349) 5.235 inches.

You're welcome.

Normal visual acuity, maybe.

Have you seen Scott's glasses?

On Apr 13, 10:03*am, twobuddha wrote:
On Apr 13, 9:38*am, Alan Baker wrote:





In article
,

*twobuddha wrote:
On Apr 13, 9:18*am, Alan Baker wrote:
"At 12 inches, the normal visual acuity of the human eye is 0.00349
inch."

http://www.ndt-ed.org/EducationResou...PenetrantTest/
Introduction/visualacuity.htm

Now, I realize that I'm supposed to be a liar according to you, but math
doesn't lie.

At 460 meters = 500 yards = 1500 feet, the normal visual acuity of the
human eye is (1500 * 0.00349) 5.235 inches.

You're welcome.

Never shot a rifle in your life, have you, Baker?

I've shot .22, .303, 7.62mm FN-FAL. (As well as the Canadian Forces SMG,
Browning .30 machine gun (re-calibered for 7.62mm NATO) and the Browning
.50 cal.

In Canada? *BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
You're more full of **** than Horvie.
Of course, I've actually shot a M-16A1. *A2. *Armalite a month ago in
Nevada, lovely little thing.



You're not lying. *You really don't know you are insane. *I repeat:
the human eye cannot discern a nine inch circle at 460 yards.

And you're wrong.

Geez, on one hand I have a retired Marine gunnery seargeant and
graduate of the Marine Sniper School, and on the other side, I have
you and Horvie.
Not to mention my own experience.
You are insane.

On the other hand, you are a well-known liar.

On Apr 13, 10:13*am, Alan Baker wrote:
In article
,





*twobuddha wrote:
On Apr 13, 9:38*am, Alan Baker wrote:
In article
,

*twobuddha wrote:
On Apr 13, 9:18*am, Alan Baker wrote:
"At 12 inches, the normal visual acuity of the human eye is 0.00349
inch."

http://www.ndt-ed.org/EducationResou.../PenetrantTest
/
Introduction/visualacuity.htm

Now, I realize that I'm supposed to be a liar according to you, but
math
doesn't lie.

At 460 meters = 500 yards = 1500 feet, the normal visual acuity of the
human eye is (1500 * 0.00349) 5.235 inches.

You're welcome.

Never shot a rifle in your life, have you, Baker?

I've shot .22, .303, 7.62mm FN-FAL. (As well as the Canadian Forces SMG,
Browning .30 machine gun (re-calibered for 7.62mm NATO) and the Browning
.50 cal.

In Canada? *BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Yup. In Canada. I was in the Queen's York Rangers for most of 1979.

You're more full of **** than Horvie.
Of course, I've actually shot a M-16A1. *A2. *Armalite a month ago in
Nevada, lovely little thing.

You're not lying. *You really don't know you are insane. *I repeat:
the human eye cannot discern a nine inch circle at 460 yards.

And you're wrong.

Geez, on one hand I have a retired Marine gunnery seargeant and
graduate of the Marine Sniper School, and on the other side, I have
you and Horvie.
Not to mention my own experience.
You are insane.

You have no experience.



If you translate the height of a standard 20/20 target letter to what it
would be at 500 yards, you get 26" high. Clearly, if one can see a 20/20
letter, then one can see details on it that are less than 9".

You are insane. *Horvath is merely a lying bull****ter who just got
exposed.

LOL

Unlike you, Scottie. I have the references:

http://www.ndt-ed.org/EducationResou...PenetrantTest/
Introduction/visualacuity.htm

Which you've already been given and which gives a lower limit of 5.235
inches at 500 yards.

"Snellen defined ³standard vision² as the ability to recognize one of
his optotypes when it subtended 5 minutes of arc. Thus the optotype can
only be recognized if the person viewing it can discriminate a spatial
pattern separated by a visual angle of 1 minute of arc."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Snellen_chart

So a person with normal vision can discriminate objects of 1 minute of
arc.

"Firearms
This unit is commonly found in the firearms industry and literature,
particularly that concerning the accuracy of rifles. The industry tends
to refer to it as minute of angle rather than minute of arc. It is
popular because 1 MOA subtends approximately one inch at 100 yards, a
traditional distance on target ranges. "

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minute_of_arc

So a minute of arc is 1" at 100 yards, which makes it 5" at 500 yards.

Alan! Stop! Not only are you embarrassing Scott by exposing his
ignorance of firearms and lack of visual acuity, you are also testing
the limits of his grammar school arithmetic.

On Sun, 13 Apr 2008 10:03:02 -0700 (PDT), twobuddha
wrote this crap:


I've shot .22, .303, 7.62mm FN-FAL. (As well as the Canadian Forces SMG,
Browning .30 machine gun (re-calibered for 7.62mm NATO) and the Browning
.50 cal.

In Canada? BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
You're more full of **** than Horvie.
Of course, I've actually shot a M-16A1. A2. Armalite a month ago in
Nevada, lovely little thing.


Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha! Another good laugh. I was going to ask you what an
M-16A1. A2 rifle was. Then I checked.

http://rap4.com/paintball/os/m16a2-r...der-p-758.html

I'm not talking about paintball rifles, you big ****en dumbass. If
nothing else, you are quite entertaining.


You're not lying. *You really don't know you are insane. *I repeat:
the human eye cannot discern a nine inch circle at 460 yards.

And you're wrong.

Geez, on one hand I have a retired Marine gunnery seargeant and
graduate of the Marine Sniper School, and on the other side, I have
you and Horvie.
Not to mention my own experience.

You have NO experience. You know nobody from the Marine Corpse.


If you translate the height of a standard 20/20 target letter to what it
would be at 500 yards, you get 26" high. Clearly, if one can see a 20/20
letter, then one can see details on it that are less than 9".

You are insane. Horvath is merely a lying bull****ter who just got
exposed.

Dalai Two Buddha

Vail: Where Dalai never carries a weapon

Paintball weapons.

Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha!





My T-shirt says, "This shirt is the
ultimate power in the universe."

Harry Weiner wrote:

You have NO experience. You know nobody from the Marine Corpse.

He already admitted why he can't hit the target. He shoots blanks!

Paintball weapons.

Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha!


My teenage nieces have more experience with weapons than Scooter. Last
time I took one of them to the range, we had to pare down what to
take. You can only fit so much into a Ferrari.

http://www.xmission.com/~klaus/tmp/DSC_0045.JPG

It was kind of a history lesson, starting with civil war rifles and
moving up to more modern toys. I spent more on ammo in one day than
Scoot makes selling **** stained pants in three years. But I need to
teach my nieces how to protect themselves. The nephew already
knows. He has his own collection..

Scooter has Bert.

-klaus