The Cosmic Ski Dance

On Oct 3, 1:54*pm, Yabahoobs wrote:
On Oct 3, 11:24*am, Alan Baker wrote:





In article
,

*snowbender wrote:
On Oct 2, 1:27 pm, Alan Baker wrote:
In article
,
*snowbender wrote:
On Oct 2, 9:05 am, Richard Henry wrote:
On Oct 2, 7:52 am, snowbender wrote:

Well, I had these two nice kiddos, about 10~11 y-o, straight A
students, and never-ever skiers a few years ago. Smart kids, learned
fast too; at the end of the two hours lesson, they can linked wedge
turn down the bunny hill. And they were also seemed enjoyed. So, I
related these information to their parents. Their parents seemed even
more excited so they suggested to the boys to stay over Tahoe(!) one
more night and take another lesson the next day before going home. But
the boys said, no, they've got homework to do.(!???) Good kids?

It loks like given the option of another day with you, or a day of
homework, they took the choice most of us would have taken.

Given the option, do you really take doing the homework over skiing?

No.

"Just say something opposite to what I said does not make an
argument..."

I don't know why there are quotes around that, but you asked a question,
and I answered it.

Which makes one wonder why they did.

They were nerds and geeks, and played too many computer games, so
their parents really liked to get them outside to do some exercises.
That's why their parents were so excited when they learned that their
boys actually can ski. But the kids rather went home and played on the
computers.

So they can ski.

There was one other factor in that choice, wasn't there?

Yup, they were not skiers.

LOL

It was homework over skiing another day with *you*.

You just have to insinuate that twisted idea, don't you? Yup, it could
be, but there's better rationale: skiing to them is the dread
"homework" that they have to do to trade for their favored activities,
which was playing computer games.

I don't have to insinuate it. It is the truth of the situation.

And another question just pops up in my mind, have you gappers ever
praised someone's skiing on this forum? When and who?

Given the recent insight, here's a more specific question,

What insight is that?

"Did you/self ever praise any one's skiing here on RSA? Who and when?"

I've not seen any examples of skiing worthy of praise; mostly because
there have only been a couple of videos of people skiing and they've all
been you.

--
Alan Baker
Vancouver, British Columbia
http://gallery.me.com/alangbaker/100008/DSCF0162/web.jpg

Perhaps if he were to offer a video which he feels depicts his most
difficult, most impressive skiing ?

How about you offer a video in which you spew your **** in person, to
me? Now THAT would be difficult for you, but very impressive.
Oooooops. That stones thing again.

In article
,
snowbender wrote:

On Oct 3, 1:59 pm, Alan Baker wrote:
In article
,
snowbender wrote:
On Oct 3, 11:24 am, Alan Baker wrote:

Just because you answered it doesn't mean you know the right answer.

When the question calls for a personal decision about which thing one
prefers whatever I answer must be right.

Yup, that's how a conceited ego thinks.

That's how any reasonable person thinks and you demonstrate your actual
lack of argument by carefully removing the question you asked:

"Given the option, do you really take doing the homework over skiing?"

If asked that question, what right do you have to call any answer I give
"conceited"?


Which makes one wonder why they did.

They were nerds and geeks, and played too many computer games, so
their parents really liked to get them outside to do some exercises.
That's why their parents were so excited when they learned that their
boys actually can ski. But the kids rather went home and played on
the
computers.

So they can ski.

Yup, good teacher teaches good students.

There was one other factor in that choice, wasn't there?

Yup, they were not skiers.

LOL

Silly.

That's why I'm laughing at you.

That's what you think, remember the DRAGONTAIL? it would always slap
on your face when you laugh it the wrong way.

I have no idea what you're talking about and I doubt that you do either.

That's what's so funny.

:-)


Yup, you may not even know you were insinuating it, and may get
confused with who is saying what. That happens quite often to a
mutated ego.

LOL

So it goes.

Yup. Your foolishness rolls on and on.


And another question just pops up in my mind, have you gappers
ever
praised someone's skiing on this forum? When and who?

Given the recent insight, here's a more specific question,

What insight is that?

You gappers have been bashing here on RSA nonstop for 12 years and not
even once praised other people's skiing? Wow, what a conceited bunch.
So, you gappers must think yourselves as some "best" skiers in the
world? Which may be translated into the "biggest" egotism, and the
worst kind, mutated egotism? The records on RSA support that.

That really says something about you shameless gappers mutated egos.

LOL


"Did you/self ever praise any one's skiing here on RSA? Who and
when?"

I've not seen any examples of skiing worthy of praise; mostly because
there have only been a couple of videos of people skiing and they've
all
been you.

So you think that RSA is only formed by you gappers and me, and no
other good skiers match your skiing ability here on RSA? Yup, you are
living in a small world.

Nope. But I have commented on skiers outside of RSA, so I assumed your
question was about people who post here.

I was talking about the people who have post here, current or not so
current; for the past 12 years, I haven't seen any of you gappers say
anything good to other people!!? What a life you gappers must have
been through.

I can't say anything good or bad about someone's skiing if I haven't
seen it.


Outside of RSA there are so many skiers whose ability is worthy of
praise that it would be utterly inane to even mention it.

So naturally you mentioned it.

So you have been running around bashing on the 'net for all these
years without even met a skier's skiing that you can praise? How
unfortunate for you living in these small domain? Nevertheless,
interesting to see how you justify your reasoning.

I never said that. I have met many skiers whose skiing I *can* praise. I
just don't see the point of doing so.

He My instructor for my CSIA level 1 course was Craig Lessels. Great
skier, Craig.

Does that really help anyone in here? Add to the discussions in any
useful way?

Seriously, Chai-tea: even for you, get a grip.

--
Alan Baker
Vancouver, British Columbia
http://gallery.me.com/alangbaker/100008/DSCF0162/web.jpg

On Oct 3, 2:54*pm, snowbender wrote:

Yup, you may not even know you were insinuating it, and may get
confused with who is saying what. That happens quite often to a
mutated ego.

It is impossible for one to insunuate something and not know it. That
is a contradiction in terms really.
It can be interpreted in a way not meant by the speaker. But
"insinuation" can only happen with the knowledge of the insinuator.

And another question just pops up in my mind, have you gappers ever
praised someone's skiing on this forum? When and who?

I have spoken highly of others skiing and others have spoken highly of
mine. I think that even 'ol trunk ass himself has admitted that I can
ski well.

You gappers have been bashing here on RSA nonstop for 12 years and not
even once praised other people's skiing? Wow, what a conceited bunch.
So, you gappers must think yourselves as some "best" skiers in the
world? Which may be translated into the "biggest" egotism, and the
worst kind, mutated egotism? The records on RSA support that.

Being a good skier and being one of the "best in the world" are very
different things.

"Did you/self ever praise any one's skiing here on RSA? Who and when?"

Answered.


So you think that RSA is only formed by you gappers and me, and no
other good skiers match your skiing ability here on RSA? Yup, you are
living in a small world.

That really makes no sense and has no context.

On Oct 3, 5:57*pm, pigo wrote:

That really makes no sense and has no context.

"Only in our little knowledge shameless denials flightless turkeys
hump-backed wallabys bla bla snarvlegoff booblymoobly".

Plonk this idiot like we all did Scott, man. He's a(nother) waste of
time.

On Oct 3, 4:23 pm, Alan Baker wrote:
In article ,
snowbender wrote:
On Oct 3, 1:59 pm, Alan Baker wrote:
In article ,
snowbender wrote:
On Oct 3, 11:24 am, Alan Baker wrote:

Just because you answered it doesn't mean you know the right answer.

When the question calls for a personal decision about which thing one
prefers whatever I answer must be right.

Yup, that's how a conceited ego thinks.

That's how any reasonable person thinks and you demonstrate your actual
lack of argument by carefully removing the question you asked:

"Given the option, do you really take doing the homework over skiing?"

If asked that question, what right do you have to call any answer I give
"conceited"?

Because you have no clues on what was going on, and what were in these
kids' head, given that you not even there? What makes you think that
you know more than I do, conceited little mind?

LOL

Silly.

That's why I'm laughing at you.

That's what you think, remember the DRAGONTAIL? it would always slap
on your face when you laugh it the wrong way.

I have no idea what you're talking about and I doubt that you do either.

That's what's so funny.

:-)

Yup, you have no idea that you were laughing at your own stupidity.
That will be the legend of the DRAGONTAIL, and you will find out soon
enough.

Yup, you may not even know you were insinuating it, and may get
confused with who is saying what. That happens quite often to a
mutated ego.

LOL

So it goes.

Yup. Your foolishness rolls on and on.

So is your shameless denial.

What insight is that?

You gappers have been bashing here on RSA nonstop for 12 years and not
even once praised other people's skiing? Wow, what a conceited bunch.
So, you gappers must think yourselves as some "best" skiers in the
world? Which may be translated into the "biggest" egotism, and the
worst kind, mutated egotism? The records on RSA support that.

That really says something about you shameless gappers mutated egos.

LOL

Yup, and getting more shameless, as it sticks on you more everyday.

I was talking about the people who have post here, current or not so
current; for the past 12 years, I haven't seen any of you gappers say
anything good to other people!!? What a life you gappers must have
been through.

I can't say anything good or bad about someone's skiing if I haven't
seen it.

So you are living in a small domain and pretending you are the king of
the hill?

So you have been running around bashing on the 'net for all these
years without even met a skier's skiing that you can praise? How
unfortunate for you living in these small domain? Nevertheless,
interesting to see how you justify your reasoning.

I never said that. I have met many skiers whose skiing I *can* praise. I
just don't see the point of doing so.

Or maybe because that you don't have the discipline to appreciate the
finer things?

He My instructor for my CSIA level 1 course was Craig Lessels. Great
skier, Craig.

The one who caused you to break your knee? What's he great about?

Does that really help anyone in here? Add to the discussions in any
useful way?

Of course not, the answer is no; your concession now is a little too
little too late, you cannot change what you have done in the past. And
we know you rather "lie through your teeth to amend your shameless
denials."

Seriously, Chai-tea: even for you, get a grip.

Of course, I'm holding your shameless fox tail...

snowbender

--
Alan Baker
Vancouver, British Columbia

On Oct 3, 6:01*pm, Yabahoobs wrote:
On Oct 3, 5:57*pm, pigo wrote:

That really makes no sense and has no context.

"Only in our little knowledge shameless denials flightless turkeys
hump-backed wallabys bla bla snarvlegoff booblymoobly".

Plonk this idiot like we all did Scott, man. *He's a(nother) waste of
time.

I haven't plonked anyone. I don't respond to Scott anymore, but I
read everything he writes. There is sometimes important material
there.

Richard Henry wrote:
On Oct 3, 6:01 pm, Yabahoobs wrote:
On Oct 3, 5:57 pm, pigo wrote:

That really makes no sense and has no context.
"Only in our little knowledge shameless denials flightless turkeys
hump-backed wallabys bla bla snarvlegoff booblymoobly".

Plonk this idiot like we all did Scott, man. He's a(nother) waste of
time.

I haven't plonked anyone. I don't respond to Scott anymore, but I
read everything he writes. There is sometimes important material
there.

That is a stretch Scooter will post some thing important when Itchy
makes sense.

In article
,
snowbender wrote:

On Oct 3, 4:23 pm, Alan Baker wrote:
In article
,
snowbender wrote:
On Oct 3, 1:59 pm, Alan Baker wrote:
In article
,
snowbender wrote:
On Oct 3, 11:24 am, Alan Baker wrote:

Just because you answered it doesn't mean you know the right answer.

When the question calls for a personal decision about which thing one
prefers whatever I answer must be right.

Yup, that's how a conceited ego thinks.

That's how any reasonable person thinks and you demonstrate your actual
lack of argument by carefully removing the question you asked:

"Given the option, do you really take doing the homework over skiing?"

If asked that question, what right do you have to call any answer I give
"conceited"?

Because you have no clues on what was going on, and what were in these
kids' head, given that you not even there? What makes you think that
you know more than I do, conceited little mind?

You asked what I or anyone else in this group would do. Read your own
question again:

"Given the option, do ***YOU*** really take doing the homework over
skiing?"



LOL

Silly.

That's why I'm laughing at you.

That's what you think, remember the DRAGONTAIL? it would always slap
on your face when you laugh it the wrong way.

I have no idea what you're talking about and I doubt that you do either.

That's what's so funny.

:-)

Yup, you have no idea that you were laughing at your own stupidity.
That will be the legend of the DRAGONTAIL, and you will find out soon
enough.


LOL


Yup, you may not even know you were insinuating it, and may get
confused with who is saying what. That happens quite often to a
mutated ego.

LOL

So it goes.

Yup. Your foolishness rolls on and on.

So is your shameless denial.

What insight is that?

You gappers have been bashing here on RSA nonstop for 12 years and
not
even once praised other people's skiing? Wow, what a conceited bunch.
So, you gappers must think yourselves as some "best" skiers in the
world? Which may be translated into the "biggest" egotism, and the
worst kind, mutated egotism? The records on RSA support that.

That really says something about you shameless gappers mutated egos.

LOL

Yup, and getting more shameless, as it sticks on you more everyday.

LOL


I was talking about the people who have post here, current or not so
current; for the past 12 years, I haven't seen any of you gappers say
anything good to other people!!? What a life you gappers must have
been through.

I can't say anything good or bad about someone's skiing if I haven't
seen it.

So you are living in a small domain and pretending you are the king of
the hill?

So you have been running around bashing on the 'net for all these
years without even met a skier's skiing that you can praise? How
unfortunate for you living in these small domain? Nevertheless,
interesting to see how you justify your reasoning.

I never said that. I have met many skiers whose skiing I *can* praise. I
just don't see the point of doing so.

Or maybe because that you don't have the discipline to appreciate the
finer things?

LOL


He My instructor for my CSIA level 1 course was Craig Lessels. Great
skier, Craig.

The one who caused you to break your knee? What's he great about?

No. He had nothing to do with it.


Does that really help anyone in here? Add to the discussions in any
useful way?

Of course not, the answer is no; your concession now is a little too
little too late, you cannot change what you have done in the past. And
we know you rather "lie through your teeth to amend your shameless
denials."

LOL


Seriously, Chai-tea: even for you, get a grip.

Of course, I'm holding your shameless fox tail...

LOL

--
Alan Baker
Vancouver, British Columbia
http://gallery.me.com/alangbaker/100008/DSCF0162/web.jpg

On Oct 3, 5:57*pm, pigo wrote:
On Oct 3, 2:54*pm, snowbender wrote:

Yup, you may not even know you were insinuating it, and may get
confused with who is saying what. That happens quite often to a
mutated ego.

It is impossible for one to insunuate something and not know it. That
is a contradiction in terms really.
It can be interpreted in a way not meant by the speaker. But
"insinuation" can only happen with the knowledge of the insinuator.

Bob, listen closely. I am not insinuating that you are frying your
brain. Your brain is fried. Period

And another question just pops up in my mind, have you gappers ever
praised someone's skiing on this forum? When and who?

I have spoken highly of others skiing and others have spoken highly of
mine. I think that even 'ol trunk ass himself has admitted that I can
ski well.

I've also admitted that you are a dickless coward who will never be
man enough to say that in person.

You gappers have been bashing here on RSA nonstop for 12 years and not
even once praised other people's skiing? Wow, what a conceited bunch.
So, you gappers must think yourselves as some "best" skiers in the
world? Which may be translated into the "biggest" egotism, and the
worst kind, mutated egotism? The records on RSA support that.

Being a good skier and being one of the "best in the world" are very
different things.

But being a good skier and being a pathetic, laughable asshole are not
different things, in your case.

On Oct 3, 6:01*pm, Yabahoobs wrote:
On Oct 3, 5:57*pm, pigo wrote:

That really makes no sense and has no context.

"Only in our little knowledge shameless denials flightless turkeys
hump-backed wallabys bla bla snarvlegoff booblymoobly".

Plonk this idiot like we all did Scott, man. *He's a(nother) waste of
time.

Yeah. Take cheap shots when you can't even read how I make a fool out
of you. If I am such a waste of time, dumb****, why did you stalk me
to my home? Why do you continue to spew bull**** when you're not even
man enough to read me?
Guess it just hurt too much to read about what a pathetic, cowardly
freak you are, Yabapussy.