If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
what I got from the New Skate
The New Skate ideas had a big impact on my early skating, and stayed with me
since. My ski skating started on rollerskis in late 2000, so all the images I tried to emulate and exercises I practiced came from the Team Birkie dryland training video. Then Vordenberg's "New Skate" articles in the 2000-2001 Master Skier magazine hit me, along with some New Skate ideas I heard at summer rollerski camp. Below is my reaction -- how did the New Skate impact your skiing? Ken ___________________________________ (A) Legs -- use both of them equally Measured in hours, this was the biggest impact of the New Skate on my life. I did lots and lots of no-poles dryland skating to learn this (more than with poles). And I loved it, and on snow I felt it definitely helped my skating with poles. And on dryland I now do even more of it. (B) Body position -- "gunslinger" I find I keep re-discovering strong forward ankle flex every few months, and each time it hits me how doing it makes my leg-push more powerful -- and then I wonder why I ever lost track of it. For me this focus on strong ankle bend is the biggest improvement over Audun Endestad and John Teaford's ski-skating book, and the New Skate emphasis on forward hips is useful as a complement to Endestad's focus on knee bend. (C) Quiet Upper Body I became a big convert to this concept -- preached it on this newsgroup -- argued against anybody who tried to distract us from directing all movements into _forward_ motion. Practiced it for hours, felt how cool it was to be so strong and dynamic with my legs and so quiet and stable above, at the same time. And I still think those quiet upper body hours were an excellent training and learning phase for me. (D) Continuous application of force with good turnover More points where I became a big preacher as well as practitioner. Lately I've been backing off on turnover -- to get more joyfully immersed in the amazing possibilities for continuous force offered by inline skates. (E) the Old skate -- what was wrong I had lots of doubts about things in the old dryland training video, so when I read Vordenberg's criticisms, by immediate reaction was, "Yes, that's what I was thinking too!" I never could see the physics of NKT and "complete" weight commitment for _skating_. And I always thought "length of glide" was a false clue for speed (though fun when not racing), so I loved Vordenberg's notorious slogan about "a gliding ski . . . " |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Snow Skate questions | Doug Kanter | Snowboarding | 2 | December 30th 03 09:37 PM |
what was 'the New Skate' ? | Ken Roberts | Nordic Skiing | 21 | December 18th 03 02:33 PM |
herringbone skate: why is it a shame? | revyakin | Nordic Skiing | 5 | December 15th 03 04:50 PM |
Classic poles for "New Skate" technique? | Bruce Toien | Nordic Skiing | 7 | September 27th 03 04:02 PM |
taking skate skis very high | Ken Roberts | Nordic Skiing | 5 | September 8th 03 10:36 PM |