If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
Near fatal ski incident
I think the commentary on this thread has gotten a little blown out of
proportion. I have hiked the Paradise Valley trail in the summer, but not the winter. I was going to look it up in my guide book, but I loaned it to my daughter when she was working at Lake Louise last year. It does not seem to have come back, so I will have to ask her about it when she gets back from South America in April. I believe the trail starts out along the Moraine Lake road. In summer this is a road and in winter it is groomed and track set for xc skiing. Skiing that part of the trail would be no different from going out to your local ski area. You might want to take some extra grip wax and a water bottle. The trail to Paradise Valley starts with a steep climb through the trees for about a kilometre. After that it flattens out into rolling, gently uphill terrain until it breaks out of the trees into a large alpine meadow with beautiful 360 degree views. There are a few places where avalanche chutes come down close to the trail, but the risk in stable winter conditions is probably not much different from the risk of driving the road from Calgary, to Lake Louise (maybe less considering all the Alberta drivers on the road - I am from BC). This is a popular route and tracks would have been broken by many people skiing ahead. Other than the initial climb, Kim's racing skis would have been adequate. When I was there in the summer I remember thinking that most of the trail would have made a great xc ski trail. As long as you didn't mind taking your time getting down the steep part near the trail-head, light equipment would have done just fine. There are several trails that cross or join the main trail. There is a separate mountain bike trail that joins the trail, runs along it for a while, then heads off somewhere, maybe to Moraine Lake. There is also a trail that goes directly down to Lake Louise. It is possible that the mountain bike trail goes down to the Moraine Lake road with less sharp downhills, I don't know. I can understand Kim wanting to find an easier way down than the original climb near the trail head, and if he met someone on the trail who said another route was easier, that would have been a reasonable choice. Kim said he did not put on a warmer jacket, but I don't know what he had in his pack. With the snow depth it would have been impossible to walk out if he broke a ski or binding on the upper part of the trail. Sudden storms and whiteout conditions are always possible in the area, so I think he would have been wise to have had clothing that would have allowed him to survive a few hours, or even overnight if he had to wait for assistance. Other people could probably have helped him, but I would prefer to be in a position to help rather than be helped. He did not take the trail up to Annette Lake (or whatever it is called, I can't remember). That trail is steep and would not have been suitable for either climbing or descending with the equipment he was using. He could have continued on past the lake and followed the trail that comes out at the far end of the valley, but that would have meant exposure to some serious avalanche slopes. He was not equipped for that either, so he made a good decision not to ski up to the lake. He did not have proper maps, but the trail is self evident and following prior tracks would have been more than adequate. In the summer I had a map, but hardly used it. There are few places to go wrong. I also carried a GPS and only used it to check distance back to the trail head so that I would not spend too long enjoying the meadows and have to walk out in the dark. Using an alternate route that is not on the map is often quite reasonable in the winter. Often trails are built around marshy areas that make easy skiing in the winter. A route that followed the creek closely might not be suitable for a trail in the summer, but could be good for winter travel. Remember that the man who assisted him works for Parks Canada and probably has a fair amount of experience in the area. He also chose the same route. Informally joining the other couple gave a loose group of four that should have been adequate for most situations, one to stay with an accident victim and two to go for help. Falling in the hole was probably one of those unfortunate accidents that happen, like hitting a patch of black ice on the highway, having a moose step out in front of you at night or having another driver run a stop sign. Kim was lucky to survive the accident and have someone there to assist him out of the hole, just like some drivers are lucky to survive a highway accident and have someone stop and give first aid. Kim may have not been fully prepared if he got stranded in the back country, but that was risk he assumed. Most of the rest that happened was just plain misfortune, followed by some good luck. Incidentally, a week after I made my solo trip to Paradise Valley last year they closed the area to groups of less than six because of grizzly problems. I carried bear spray, but would never carry the bear bells that Kim mentioned for summer travel. Some studies have shown they are more likely to attract a bears attention than frighten it away. In Waterton Lakes National Park they were advising people not to carry bear bells. Scott Elliot http://www3.telus.net/selliot/ |
Ads |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Near fatal ski incident
Scott Elliot wrote:
I think the commentary on this thread has gotten a little blown out of proportion. Thanks for providing us your knowledge about the area and reported trip, Scott. My emphasis has been on the planning rather than the misfortune because Kim sent us in that direction with the way he recounted the trip, and how he then tried to redirect our attention when we pointed it out. It could have been told, "We went out on a beautiful day trip and on the return this harrowing experience happened." We all take chances. Since we're still here talking they must have turned out ok, or well enough. Do people who plan better tend to have better luck and fewer misfortunes? I don't know, but in everyday life that's commonly thought to be true. In Kim's recounting, it's the way he thinks through his trips that leaves me unimpressed. The possibity of rapid changes for the worse in weather struck me, too; it's one of those things one always makes a decision about in advance, depending on a number of factors. The absence of that thought in his long detailed story struck me as a sign of big trouble waiting to happen. Those and some of the other risks he took left the sense of someone who makes a habit of knocking on misfortune's door. Gene |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Near fatal ski incident
You may be interested/amused to hear that I fell in a creek while
snow-shoeing yesterday. I was quite aware that the creek was there (i.e., we went there specifically to hike in the creek bed); somewhat surprised how much water was flowing in the creek (i.e., there were some open patches); and not entirely surprised when I ended up knee-deep in water (I should have stuck to the beaten path). We continued on and had a very nice walk. Cheers, Brian In article , Me wrote: Near Fatal Ski Incident |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|