If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Skating Elitism.
Over the last year there have been many interesting comments about
classic style skiing here at RSN. One writer stated it was a joke about all the discussion over learning good classical technique when clearly there is more to skating. Another writer suggested there are more classical entrants currently in the Keskinada because they are less fit. This fall several writers stated classical skiing was a fringe thing and basically just required double poling hmmm... After seeing a video posted on this newsgroup of one writer skating, I get a feeling these folks cannot ski classical proficiently, but I digress. It is interesting to understand where they get this sense of elitism versus classical technique. Perhaps, because they ski faster than the tourists, or because they have bigger ones. Yeah... were talking about poles here. To think classic skiing requires less skill, or stamina is a clear disregard for the history of the sport. Can you picture the two birkebeiner's carrying the future king of Norway through the mountains on skate skis. They asked all the peasants to roll logs over the mountain passes to pack the deep snow. Now with peasant grooming they could ski skate the child king to safety. If you think classic skiing requires less skill, fitness, or has no appeal try telling this to over 12,000 entrants who race in the Norwegian Birkebeiner every year. If you don't know, this is a World Loppet Classic event. |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
The main reason that skating is so emphasized in this group is the strong
focus on the relatively minor world of gung-ho racing among most posters, and skating is a race-oriented sport and the faster of the two (given certain caveats, see below). It almost seems its the only reason most r.s.n'ers ski. RSN'ers tend to be more interested in racing results than the recreational aspects of groomed trail skiing, let alone touring or any other cross country endeavor. Absolutely nothing wrong with this. It's a terrific sport which I love although I'm a very slow racer. But it's just a small part of nordic XC, but you wouldn't know that by the emphasis of this group. Really, a better group name would be rec.skiing,nordic-racing. To me there's no doubt that classical skiing requires more skill and technique as well is a far more versitile sport (from racing to trail breaking, to on and off track touring, and everything in between). There's so much beyond fitness and racing involved, and that may be why real athletic skiers, new to the sport, tend to focus on skating and ignore striding. Fitness requirements vs. skating is probably not an issue - elite skiers in both need to be fit. Skating (here I'm referring to those who skate only, and there are a bunch) more likely attracts those who don't want to mess with the nuances of technique and the waxing skill that is needed just to become effective in classical and/or have no interest in touring or off-track skiing. People can just get on skating gear and power their way around the groomed courses without having much technique or having to get out of the comforts of civilization. I think there's a steeper learning curve and more messing around with classical skiing. Atheletic people new to the sport just don't want to or can't mess with it because the skill they have in classic sking at that stage just won't take full advantage of their athletic ability (at least as far as race results go). Of course, there's a lot of technique in skating, and I enjoy it a lot. There's no doubt that given warm winter temps (above 0F) an expensively maintained, wide cleared, highly developed and machine groomed track, it is the faster of the two. But it requires a very well developed trail to do, compared to every type of classic skiing you can name. It's really not a sport you can do on trails that are at all natural. Sort of like hiking on a road vs. a low impact, nearly-natural trail. Classical cross country skiing is the most natural and utilitarian snow sport and has the most history, a history I personally love. Having started skiing as a back country tourer, when striding was the only nordic cross country technique, if anything, I tend to view excellent classic skiers as the more elite skiers - I tend to be elitist in that way. I'll admit that my personal bias is that skater-only skiers are incomplete. I respect an excellent classical skier more than an excellent skater. Just my bias. Classic skiing, in all it's variations from racing to mountain touring is just so much more fun. If I had to give up one, I'd give up skating in a heartbeat. People who don't classic ski are missing the true essence of snow sport, but don't know it. Just one guys personal opinion of course, Cam |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Good trolling..
JT **************************** Remove "remove" to reply Visit http://www.jt10000.com **************************** |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
wrote in message ups.com... Over the last year there have been many interesting comments about classic style skiing here at RSN... (snip) While waiting for the start of the Devil's Thumb Nordic Opener race last weekend, I watched one of the classic style competitors warming up. This guy was amazing - fast, powerful, fluid, graceful, and stylish. I have no doubt that he was the winner of the classic race that day. Watching him would make almost anyone want to take up Nordic skiing. My experience has been that it is far easier to master skating that classic. Classic skiing requires so many subtle movement solutions, and a lot of time on-snow, practicing. Most of us city dwellers (Denver) don't get that much on-snow time (the snow is an hour and a half away, and jobs tend to interfere with ski time). -JJ |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
On Fri, 24 Dec 2004 16:11:12 -0900, "Camilo"
wrote: To me there's no doubt that classical skiing requires more skill and technique as well is a far more versitile sport (from racing to trail breaking, to on and off track touring, and everything in between). There's so much beyond fitness and racing involved, and that may be why real athletic skiers, new to the sport, tend to focus on skating and ignore striding. I'm starting my 6th season x-c skiing coming from an alpine background (being a PSIA alpine instructor for close to 20 years). I took up x-c because many of my cycling cohorts did it as a fun as well as effective winter cross-training, and alpine only keeps the quads in shape. Interestingly, the majority of my group skis classical only, followed by a fair number who both stride and skate, followed by a tiny few who skate only. It never occurred to me taking up the sport that I wouldn't do both. We are lucky to have two private resorts within an hour drive which groom for both, and a huge variety of trail systems all over the place for touring. I rarely if ever go to a resort with grooming without all my equipment, and it is a flip of the coin whether I skate or stride first. But I will do both unless the snow is too warm or too icy for classical. My experience over the past seasons echoes what Nordic PSIA instructors advise: Classical is easier to learn but harder to master; skating is harder to learn, but easier to master. Classical starts out as the more intuitive because the movements are natural, while the skating poling techniques are counter-intuitive and take a while to become coordinated. But once the basics of both are learned and the fine tuning and real mastery of the sports begin, it is fairly clear that classical is the harder and more subtle technique. Not to mention the art and science of grip waxing. So it is no wonder that many skiers new to the sport will opt for glide waxing only, and the speed and relative simplicity of skating technique, even if skating up hills is the hardest physical activity known to mankind :-) But any skater who gets passed on the trail by a classic skier who truly knows how to ski understands what the real deal is. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
"John Forrest Tomlinson" skrev i melding ... Good trolling.. Due to very little snow, the grooming machine have not been used here were I live, until now. The only way to ski has been to make the tracks ourself on a few cm of snow. Skating has been almost impossible. It means that people that do not ski classic, have had a bad month. My humble opinion is that disciplines like biathlon and nordic combined would have been much more fun to watch if classic skiing also had been included, in addition to skating. -- Terje Henriksen Kirkenes |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Personally, I had more fun racing the Birkie when it was all classic than after
skating took over. It was a blast hopping from track to track catching people, passing them, having them pass you back. john wilke milwaukee |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
I spend more of my snow days each year _not_ skating. Because non-skating
techniques and equipment are appropriate for more of the terrain and snow conditions that I encounter -- like this: http://roberts-1.com/t/s04/fr/3c or http://roberts-1.com/t/hra/day_3 But I don't talk about my non-skating much on this newsgroup, because this newsgroup is about skiing at cross-country centers with groomed trails. If the snow is firm enough and wide enough and gentle-sloped enough, I'm going to skate. If it is not, then I use non-skating techniques. It's not a matter of "elitism" -- just what's the way to have the most fun. Like in California last March when Dave and I skied from near Echo Summit to Barker Pass and Blackwood Canyon in a day, we were on light classic skis, and skied classic striding technique most of the way. Except when we reached Lake Aloha we found a supportive wind-crust, so we both had a fun time skating across it. wrote Norwegian Birkebeiner race . . . Can you picture the two birkebeiner's carrying the future king of Norway . . . over the mountain passes . . . deep snow. Can _you_ picture those two guys doing that in 40mm-wide fiberglass racing skis and ultra-light poles with tiny baskets, and carrying backpacks holding only 4 kg of food and warm clothing? The authenticity of this "classic" technique re-enactment is escaping me -- since now the route is nicely groomed the whole way from Rena to Lillehammer. Same with the trails on Sweden's Vasaloppet Classic 90K course. When I got my chance to ski from Salen to Mora, I _skated_ it. No regrets -- skating was obviously more appropriate for the terrain. I feel sorry for all the people who haven't had the chance to skate across the plateau thru Smagan -- because of a fake "classic" historical-authenticity requirement. Ken |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
converting from classical to skating | S. S. | Nordic Skiing | 9 | February 17th 04 02:36 AM |
TR- New York City park skating | Ken Roberts | Nordic Skiing | 2 | January 24th 04 01:19 AM |
skating on classic ski | Sebastian | Nordic Skiing | 4 | January 14th 04 06:03 PM |
glide: skating vs. traditional??? | Ken Roberts | Nordic Skiing | 4 | August 22nd 03 11:57 PM |
Highcountry Skating (was: For inspiration: a truevikingbreaks a record) | Mark | Nordic Skiing | 1 | August 7th 03 02:53 PM |