If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
The longest on-topic thread in recent history - What it takes
klaus wrote: Lisa Horton wrote: I have one friend who's interested in snow sports, and she's a boarder. Tell us more. She's attached too She's the one who got me up to the mountain, it's all her fault. There, that's more. Lisa |
Ads |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
The longest on-topic thread in recent history - What it takes
klaus wrote:
lal_truckee wrote: It's called not jumping to conclusions; it quite nicely compliments jumping cornices. I guess I need to work on my, ahem, skiing. Best time of the year. Best time. From yesterday evenings avalanche report: http://www.avalanche.org/~uac/advisory.html "Storm totals are starting to stack up. Since Sunday, the Cottonwoods have received close to 30" of new snow with over 2 "of water, including 8-12" last night." And just for giggles, divide that out to get snow density. The sun is shining now though. You'll just sink right through that stuff - hardly worth going out. |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
The longest on-topic thread in recent history - What it takes
Lisa Horton wrote:
klaus wrote: They're not odd at all. Everything has it's place. And actually I'm quite the opposite of suspicious. I see. Your contradictions are informative That's a good thing, right? I have no desire to know more, however. You see, this is the first time I've been greeted in a new group with this sort of suspicion. We're skiers. It has less to do with preference than status. Da boyz were hopin' you were single. Take the compliment and run with it. Sounds like work. As you like. You were the one with the gender indeterminate comment. Hmmmmm... methinks you may be the suspicious one. ; You're free to find your answer if you like. Answer??? Usenet relationships infrequently cross over into 3D, so I tend to provisionally accept that people are who and what they say they are. You might want to be more careful round here. Most of the time, it's irrelevant who or what they are in 3D, at least for the sorts of online discussions I pursue. Thanks for the invite. Sure... So I'm guessing like 700's on the SAT. -klaus |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
The longest on-topic thread in recent history - What it takes
Lisa Horton wrote:
She's attached too I knew that. She's the one who got me up to the mountain, it's all her fault. There, that's more. sigh -klaus |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
The longest on-topic thread in recent history - What it takes
klaus wrote: Lisa Horton wrote: klaus wrote: They're not odd at all. Everything has it's place. And actually I'm quite the opposite of suspicious. I see. Your contradictions are informative That's a good thing, right? Of course I have no desire to know more, however. You see, this is the first time I've been greeted in a new group with this sort of suspicion. We're skiers. It has less to do with preference than status. Da boyz were hopin' you were single. Take the compliment and run with it. Sounds like a good plan. Sounds like work. As you like. You were the one with the gender indeterminate comment. Hmmmmm... methinks you may be the suspicious one. ; Did I imply that I was not? You're free to find your answer if you like. Answer??? Usenet relationships infrequently cross over into 3D, so I tend to provisionally accept that people are who and what they say they are. You might want to be more careful round here. Provisionally Most of the time, it's irrelevant who or what they are in 3D, at least for the sorts of online discussions I pursue. Thanks for the invite. Sure... So I'm guessing like 700's on the SAT. You are, of course, free to guess But here's a hint, of sorts: Samantha Carter Lisa |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
The longest on-topic thread in recent history - What it takes
Kurt Knisely wrote: In article , klaus says... Lisa Horton wrote: I have one friend who's interested in snow sports, and she's a boarder. Tell us more. We can almost guarantee some pownography along w/ face-shots if the shred betty is interested? Ah, well, she doesn't do Usenet, so I'd have to explain a number of things before inviting her to join a newsgroup But I'll be happy to pass along links. Lisa |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
The longest on-topic thread in recent history - What it takes
klaus wrote:
Lisa Horton wrote: klaus wrote: They're not odd at all. Everything has it's place. And actually I'm quite the opposite of suspicious. I see. Your contradictions are informative That's a good thing, right? I have no desire to know more, however. You see, this is the first time I've been greeted in a new group with this sort of suspicion. We're skiers. It has less to do with preference than status. Da boyz were hopin' you were single. Take the compliment and run with it. Sounds like work. As you like. You were the one with the gender indeterminate comment. Hmmmmm... methinks you may be the suspicious one. ; You're free to find your answer if you like. Answer??? Usenet relationships infrequently cross over into 3D, so I tend to provisionally accept that people are who and what they say they are. You might want to be more careful round here. Most of the time, it's irrelevant who or what they are in 3D, at least for the sorts of online discussions I pursue. Thanks for the invite. Sure... So I'm guessing like 700's on the SAT. Before or after they watered them down? ObSki: Watering down the SATs is to watering down the Slalom course as fish is to a) sleighs b) bran muffins c) squid d) none of the above |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
The longest on-topic thread in recent history - What it takes
Lisa Horton wrote:
klaus wrote: So I'm guessing like 700's on the SAT. You are, of course, free to guess But here's a hint, of sorts: Samantha Carter Go Bears? |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
The longest on-topic thread in recent history - What it takes
Lisa Horton wrote:
Sounds like work. As you like. You were the one with the gender indeterminate comment. Hmmmmm... methinks you may be the suspicious one. ; Did I imply that I was not? 15 - love. Your serve. You might want to be more careful round here. Provisionally Like everything else. So I'm guessing like 700's on the SAT. You are, of course, free to guess But here's a hint, of sorts: Samantha Carter Impressive. Very Impressive. -klaus |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
The longest on-topic thread in recent history - What it takes
In message , Lisa Horton
writes For the record, I'm definitely female, as is my SO. If that's a problem, just let me know and I'll not bother you again, an invitation that extends to the group as a whole. This group has some rather unsophisticated trolls, so you'd have no way of knowing whether that's really a problem or whether you're just being trolled. Don't let it worry you, just tell 'em where one of those racing poles with the bends in would fit best! -- Sue ];( |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|