how much training ...
Ken Roberts wrote:
Joseph wrote
I've heard it expostulated that anyone with a more
or less normal physiology has what it takes to become a top cyclist.
I'm not getting this. Perhaps it would help if it were explained what the
words
"normal physiology"
and
"what it takes"
are supposed to mean in that sentence.
Ken
Normal physiology means no significant deformities or stange
proportions. Basically a normal person. Having what it takes means they
have the raw building blocks on which to build an elite cyclist. By
"top" I didn't mean anyone could win the Tour de France, but I meant
they could be at least good enough to be selected to ride in it.
Joseph
|