View Single Post
  #4  
Old July 2nd 03, 02:33 PM
JTN
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default what is more important in downhill, leg strength or aerobic capacity?

your theory is flawed somewhat, dead people in the right vehicle and terrain
are faster than alive in the same terrain.

example, dead person inside a box off Yosemite is faster than one alive. the
alive person would fight for the first few seconds before being thrown off.
the dead person is already traveling at 32.2ft/s /s thus has a 60-90 ft
advantage the alive person would never regain. then once they reach their
destination the aerobic wouldn't matter due to the longs being
collapsed.....



"Kurgan Gringioni" wrote in
message et...
Dead people are definitely slower than people who lack leg strength.
Therefore, I submit that aerobic capacity is more important in the

downhill.




Aaron Daniel Gringioni



ps. I used to hang out with some skiers once, therefore I know what I'm
talking about




Ads