My understanding was that "Premium" skis were standard models that you
could buy in the shops and that "Normal" skis were built for the
"fleet" hire market to a basic price and weren't a retail product.

Certainly a lot of the models of normal I've seen, even brand new,
didn't feature in any manufacturers list.

A good ski hire outlet regularly replaces their entire stock as the
business model calls for the capital investment in hire skis and boots
to be paid off within the first four weeks.

Stan




On 10 Nov 2004 21:50:42 GMT, (NIALLBRUCE) wrote:

Any chat on whether the "premium" skis offered by most hire-shops are worth the
extra? I know that it's not the most urgent topic of discussion but it affects
everyone. On average, the "premium" skis demand a 40 pound premium. I've read
the sales pitch from the manufacturers and hire companies but would be
interested to hear about someone's own experience.

Are the 'technological' advancements significant? If so, how do they affect our
skiing? Is there a material difference?

Do they affect different people in different ways ie. depending on their
ability or style of skiing?

I don't know what standard of skiier I am. I'm just learning how to carve.
Should I opt for the "premium" option?? (nb, I am a student - poor!!)

Has anyone tried the twin-tipped skis? I've seen a few kids use them at the
local dry slope. Do they allow freestyle skiing without any sacrifices? In
particular, do they affect the traditional 'freeride' functionality?

Thanks for any replies!

Niall