On Friday, August 15, 2014 10:50:43 AM UTC-7, pigo wrote:
On Friday, August 15, 2014 11:41:53 AM UTC-6, Richard Henry wrote:



The story from witnesses is that he was originally shot at least once in the back, and then shot at least twice more while kneeling with his hands up. I'm waiting for the autopsy results to decide whether those claims are supported by the facts.



The main "witness" was an accomplice in the robbery. And would now be eligible to be arrested for murder. Pretty reliable eh? And no other witnesses have agenda's do they?



The question I have now concerns the police chief - he knew for six days that there were possible mitigating circumstances concerning the shooting, but said nothing. In a typical robbery at a convenience store, the security tape images are on the news that night with "Have you seen this person?".



I'm hoping that they did it this way in response to the reaction that they anticipated and eventually received. A brilliant strategy IMO given the race industry's tendency to jump to conclusions and blame everything on whitey. One would think (hope?) that the next time this situation will give them pause for a couple of days and let the facts get out before rioting and pillaging the innocent store owners in their own neighborhoods. I doubt that the intelligence for that exists in that community though.

The police wanted various businesses to be looted and burned? Would you classify that as an "agenda"?