On 2014-10-24 01:05:09 +0000, pigo said:

On Thursday, October 23, 2014 4:49:54 PM UTC-6, Alan Baker wrote:

Nope. The evidence presented equally supports the contention that he
was defending himself from the officer.

Inside the officers car? Wow! That's a good one.

You have to examine both accounts of the incident.

The one by Michael Brown's friend has the officer grabbing Brown by the
neck, and so, yes: Brown could have been defending himself.

Strangely enough... ...well, perhaps to you... ...an officer of the law
is not allowed to just grab you.


No. That's the point.

No?

The "sharptons" of the world were there on the ground when it happened
and caught on video tape saying that Brown had his hands up?

http://edition.cnn.com/2014/09/10/us/ferguson-michael-brown-shooting-witnesses/


The ones with anti police sentiments? The ones who's descriptions don't
add up to the forensic evidence?

In what way don't they "add up"?


You're suggesting that this was a "sharpton"?
Those were the people on the ground.

Apparently there are 8 black witnesses testifying that the officers
version is what happened. They don't want to be identified, fearing for
their safety.

Riiiiiiiight.