On Thu, 23 Aug 2007 18:32:54 -0700, twobuddha
wrote:

No way you gave them the right name, methinks. Because they would
read your bull**** and see you for the lying freak you are, and they
would judge you by the company you keep.

Erm, maybe stating the obvious, but being "judged by the company you
keep" isn't typically a large part of how the judicial process of
finding someone guilty of a crime works.

If this is what you believe, it's no wonder you think everyone else is
guilty of a crime.... but that doesn't make you right, or very smart.

But if that IS the criminal justice system works, since you keep
the company of people you deem to be freaks, vile assassins, liars
etc., it logically follows that you are as guilty as those you
accuse.

And if you are not as guilty as those you accuse, it logically follows
that they cannot be guilty either, according to your value system.

QED.

It's simple: we're either all guilty by association with Schattie, or
we're all as innocent and pure as he claims to be. You can't have it
both ways with that philosophy.

Suzie
--
Suzieflame