|
Toxic Ski and snowboard wax polluting groundwater???
Has anyone ever thought about this, It does not seem like there would
be a lot, but I suppose any amount might matter? Read this press release, it kind of makes you think. http://www.enviromountain.com/Press_Release.htm |
Toxic Ski and snowboard wax polluting groundwater???
"RightEagle" wrote in message ... Has anyone ever thought about this, It does not seem like there would be a lot, but I suppose any amount might matter? Read this press release, it kind of makes you think. http://www.enviromountain.com/Press_Release.htm 2 million pounds of chemicals from the wax? Therefore what - maybe 20 million pounds of wax itself? In the USA in one year? Somehow I doubt it. |
Toxic Ski and snowboard wax polluting groundwater???
On Dec 11, 3:08 am, "Bob F" wrote:
"RightEagle" wrote in message ... Has anyone ever thought about this, It does not seem like there would be a lot, but I suppose any amount might matter? Read this press release, it kind of makes you think. http://www.enviromountain.com/Press_Release.htm 2 million pounds of chemicals from the wax? Therefore what - maybe 20 million pounds of wax itself? In the USA in one year? Somehow I doubt it. The press release should be treated with extreme skepticism, since its real purpose is to help sell the issuing company's own, purportedly environmentally friendly wax: "Enviro Mountain Sports, Inc. is now actively promoting the use of environmentally friendly ski & snowboard waxes. Barker explains, that they have developed an all natural alternative to the toxic chemical waxes." Also note that the company repeatedly points out that most waxes are imported from -- horrors -- foreign countries. Joe Ramirez |
Toxic Ski and snowboard wax polluting groundwater???
On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 15:09:37 GMT, allegedly
wrote: Also note that the company repeatedly points out that most waxes are imported from -- horrors -- foreign countries. Mine certainly is. I buy it in Canada when I'm there, and bring it home to the UK. - Dave. -- The only powder to get high on, falls from the sky. http://www.vpas.org.uk/ - Snowboarding the worlds pow pow. Donek Sasquatch 162, Prior Pow 181, Burton Canyon 162 The Snowboard FAQ lives here - http://www.vpas.fsnet.co.uk/rssFAQ/ |
Toxic Ski and snowboard wax polluting groundwater???
On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 08:08:14 GMT, "Bob F"
allegedly wrote: 2 million pounds of chemicals from the wax? Therefore what - maybe 20 million pounds of wax itself? In the USA in one year? Somehow I doubt it. It was posted by a guy with ties to the company. Smells like spam to me. - Dave. -- The only powder to get high on, falls from the sky. http://www.vpas.org.uk/ - Snowboarding the worlds pow pow. Donek Sasquatch 162, Prior Pow 181, Burton Canyon 162 The Snowboard FAQ lives here - http://www.vpas.fsnet.co.uk/rssFAQ/ |
Toxic Ski and snowboard wax polluting groundwater???
On Dec 11, 8:09 am, wrote:
On Dec 11, 3:08 am, "Bob F" wrote: "RightEagle" wrote in message ... Has anyone ever thought about this, It does not seem like there would be a lot, but I suppose any amount might matter? Read this press release, it kind of makes you think. http://www.enviromountain.com/Press_Release.htm 2 million pounds of chemicals from the wax? Therefore what - maybe 20 million pounds of wax itself? In the USA in one year? Somehow I doubt it. The press release should be treated with extreme skepticism, since its real purpose is to help sell the issuing company's own, purportedly environmentally friendly wax: "Enviro Mountain Sports, Inc. is now actively promoting the use of environmentally friendly ski & snowboard waxes. Barker explains, that they have developed an all natural alternative to the toxic chemical waxes." Also note that the company repeatedly points out that most waxes are imported from -- horrors -- foreign countries. Joe Ramirez Yes, Barker is actively promoting the use of environmentally friendly ski & board waxes. The potential of 2.8 million pounds is based on a 60 million skier vsits in North America, and the 2.8 million pounds is based on that amount of wax. The reason is that the wax alone is toxic and becomes even more toxic when other chemicals are added. The wax base of most ski wax is made from Crude Oil and Petroleum By Products. So, if you could use a wax that is made from plants grown by farmers from around the world, wouldn't that be better than; 1. Drilling for more off shore oil. 2. Drilling in our pristine wilderness areas. 3. And yes, importing more petroleum into your country where ever you reside. It is not good for any economy to import more petroleum products in their country. It doesn't matter where you reside. 4. Contributing to Global Warming. The more petroleum based products that are used, the the worse the global warming problem will become |
Toxic Ski and snowboard wax polluting groundwater???
"RightEagle" wrote in message news:2455c749-35d6-477a-9d39- The press release should be treated with extreme skepticism, since its real purpose is to help sell the issuing company's own, purportedly environmentally friendly wax: "Enviro Mountain Sports, Inc. is now actively promoting the use of environmentally friendly ski & snowboard waxes. Barker explains, that they have developed an all natural alternative to the toxic chemical waxes." Also note that the company repeatedly points out that most waxes are imported from -- horrors -- foreign countries. Joe Ramirez Yes, Barker is actively promoting the use of environmentally friendly ski & board waxes. The potential of 2.8 million pounds is based on a 60 million skier vsits in North America, and the 2.8 million pounds is based on that amount of wax. The reason is that the wax alone is toxic and becomes even more toxic when other chemicals are added. The wax base of most ski wax is made from Crude Oil and Petroleum By Products. So, if you could use a wax that is made from plants grown by farmers from around the world, wouldn't that be better than; 1. Drilling for more off shore oil. 2. Drilling in our pristine wilderness areas. 3. And yes, importing more petroleum into your country where ever you reside. It is not good for any economy to import more petroleum products in their country. It doesn't matter where you reside. 4. Contributing to Global Warming. The more petroleum based products that are used, the the worse the global warming problem will become That's a pound of wax for 20 "skier visits". Really? I can't find my shovel. Has anyone seen my shovel? |
Toxic Ski and snowboard wax polluting groundwater???
Bob F wrote:
That's a pound of wax for 20 "skier visits". Really? Just looking at the Swix website, I note their small pack of wax is 60 g. That's the standard 3 bar pack, and I'll get probably 10 waxings or more for each bar. So that's 2 g of wax per application, and I'll wax every few days. Assuming the entire application transfers to the snow, that's under 1 g/skier visit, so he's out by a factor of 20 or more (1 lb == 454 g). Not to mention that I wax pretty frequently compared to Joe Touron, who at best gets his skis waxed at the start of the season. Neil |
Toxic Ski and snowboard wax polluting groundwater???
On Dec 14, 7:10 pm, Christopher Cox
wrote: Neil Gendzwill wrote: Bob F wrote: That's a pound of wax for 20 "skier visits". Really? Just looking at the Swix website, I note their small pack of wax is 60 g. That's the standard 3 bar pack, and I'll get probably 10 waxings or more for each bar. So that's 2 g of wax per application, and I'll wax every few days. Assuming the entire application transfers to the snow, that's under 1 g/skier visit, so he's out by a factor of 20 or more (1 lb == 454 g). Not to mention that I wax pretty frequently compared to Joe Touron, who at best gets his skis waxed at the start of the season. Neil Oh, it's probably allot less than that. The majority of a hot wax application is scrapped off during/right after a hot wax. Thin to win! Chris- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - It is simple math, the potential quoted is 2,815,500 pounds of wax. If you multiply the 2,815,500 times 16 ounces then you get 45 million ounces. 45 million ounces equates to .75 ounces per skier visit (3/4 of 1 ounce, not 20 pounds). And yes 3/4 of 1 ounce is lot but some people use more on their boards than skis, or it can be switched. Also, you are right alot of it gets scraped off before you ski and ends up on the floor. But those scrapings have to go somewhere. Plus, you know most of your wax is gone after the first few runs anyway so a lot of people use rub on wax during the day. So the potential is 3/4 of 1 ounce (.75) not 20 pounds. Isn't it better to use an all natural alternative than a toxic Crude oil soup? |
Toxic Ski and snowboard wax polluting groundwater???
On Dec 13, 11:58 pm, "Bob F" wrote:
"RightEagle" wrote in message news:2455c749-35d6-477a-9d39- The press release should be treated with extreme skepticism, since its real purpose is to help sell the issuing company's own, purportedly environmentally friendly wax: "Enviro Mountain Sports, Inc. is now actively promoting the use of environmentally friendly ski & snowboard waxes. Barker explains, that they have developed an all natural alternative to the toxic chemical waxes." Also note that the company repeatedly points out that most waxes are imported from -- horrors -- foreign countries. Joe Ramirez Yes, Barker is actively promoting the use of environmentally friendly ski & board waxes. The potential of 2.8 million pounds is based on a 60 million skier vsits in North America, and the 2.8 million pounds is based on that amount of wax. The reason is that the wax alone is toxic and becomes even more toxic when other chemicals are added. The wax base of most ski wax is made from Crude Oil and Petroleum By Products. So, if you could use a wax that is made from plants grown by farmers from around the world, wouldn't that be better than; 1. Drilling for more off shore oil. 2. Drilling in our pristine wilderness areas. 3. And yes, importing more petroleum into your country where ever you reside. It is not good for any economy to import more petroleum products in their country. It doesn't matter where you reside. 4. Contributing to Global Warming. The more petroleum based products that are used, the the worse the global warming problem will become That's a pound of wax for 20 "skier visits". Really? I can't find my shovel. Has anyone seen my shovel?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:20 PM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SkiBanter.com