Scott and Bert, stop making things up
 

Funny, Bert has been claiming to be somehow using RSA to respond to this
post that no one other than Scott and he saw. How curious. If they
weren't both such integrous people, I'd believe that their pants, were,
once again, on fire.

In article ,
Suzieflame wrote:

ski.com.au never heard opf your little "Prophet"/"Scott" posting:

http://search.atomz.com/search/?sp-q...c4e-sp00000000

Not in any forum, not on any web page.

See you at 8pm. Or not, chicken****.

Scott and Bert, stop making things up
 

vern93 wrote:
Funny, Bert has been claiming to be somehow using RSA to respond to this
post that no one other than Scott and he saw. How curious. If they
weren't both such integrous people, I'd believe that their pants, were,
once again, on fire.

In article ,
Suzieflame wrote:


ski.com.au never heard opf your little "Prophet"/"Scott" posting:

http://search.atomz.com/search/?sp-q...c4e-sp00000000

Not in any forum, not on any web page.

See you at 8pm. Or not, chicken****.



Better watch out ... AstroPax will be on your case for top-posting. Oh,
I forgot, the hypocrite wouldn't dare criticize a Kerrison-defender.

Maybe I could respond to the first part, if I could make out the
gibberish. English is a second language for you, I take it?

Bert

Scott and Bert, stop making things up
 

In article ,
Bert Hoff wrote:

vern93 wrote:
Funny, Bert has been claiming to be somehow using RSA to respond to this
post that no one other than Scott and he saw. How curious. If they
weren't both such integrous people, I'd believe that their pants, were,
once again, on fire.

In article ,
Suzieflame wrote:


ski.com.au never heard opf your little "Prophet"/"Scott" posting:

http://search.atomz.com/search/?sp-q...c4e-sp00000000

Not in any forum, not on any web page.

See you at 8pm. Or not, chicken****.



Better watch out ... AstroPax will be on your case for top-posting. Oh,
I forgot, the hypocrite wouldn't dare criticize a Kerrison-defender.

Maybe he doesn't stay up until all hours scouring RSA like you and
Scott. Maybe he went to bed last night and went to work today. Maybe
he doesn't try to correct every post on usenet, just the worst
offenders. Or maybe he thinks you are a big douche bag. I'm guessing
all of the above.


Maybe I could respond to the first part, if I could make out the
gibberish.

Here Bert. I'll retype the first part very, very slowly for you:

"Funny, Bert has been claiming to be somehow using RSA to respond to
this post that no one other than Scott and he saw. How curious."

Rereading it, I can understand how *you* might have trouble with the
rather complicated syntax. Would "PPOSTFU" be easier for you understand?

As for the second part. I was suggesting that as a "liar, liar"... your
pants were most likely be on fire. That is an common aphorism that
shouldn't necessarily be taken literally.

HTH

English is a second language for you, I take it?

No, you're wrong again. It's not my *second* language. What language
would you care to converse in?

Nana-korobi ya-oki. Hachijuu no tenarai.