It's the 20th anniversary of the Wired magazine article about RSA!
Yes, here it is! Published 20 years ago today. Not much has changed since then, except of course that Bert and Scott are no longer friends.
https://www.wired.com/1999/11/usenet...st%20Amendment. |
It's the 20th anniversary of the Wired magazine article about RSA!
On Saturday, November 16, 2019 at 7:05:39 AM UTC-5, Eviel Dewar wrote:
Yes, here it is! Published 20 years ago today. Not much has changed since then, except of course that Bert and Scott are no longer friends. https://www.wired.com/1999/11/usenet...st%20Amendment. Quote: "Abraham's rejoinder: 'I had hoped that I would never have to carry a weapon again. As I write, I just finished dressing for my normal Sabbath morning trip to synagogue. Suit, tie, and shoulder holster... I hope you are worrying, because I have no intention of forgetting what you have done to me, and no intention of forgiving.'" |
It's the 20th anniversary of the Wired magazine article about RSA!
On Saturday, November 16, 2019 at 5:23:56 PM UTC-5, Scott Abraham wrote:
On Saturday, November 16, 2019 at 2:03:01 PM UTC-8, Eviel Dewar wrote: On Saturday, November 16, 2019 at 7:05:39 AM UTC-5, Eviel Dewar wrote: Yes, here it is! Published 20 years ago today. Not much has changed since then, except of course that Bert and Scott are no longer friends. https://www.wired.com/1999/11/usenet...st%20Amendment. Quote: "Abraham's rejoinder: 'I had hoped that I would never have to carry a weapon again. As I write, I just finished dressing for my normal Sabbath morning trip to synagogue. Suit, tie, and shoulder holster... I hope you are worrying, because I have no intention of forgetting what you have done to me, and no intention of forgiving.'" Holy ****. No surprise you repost one of the most despicable, dishonest, and incompetent jobs of reporting I saw in the whole ****show. Made me embarassed to be a journalist. How telling that the reporter never tried to contact either me or Bert, which means the dumb**** swallowed whole all the ridiculous lies you freaks told. Sort of a Fox News job on rsa. Laughable, disgusting, and of course, your kind of reporting: repeat the lies of pathological liars and call it fact. What specifically is incorrect in this article, Schattie? |
It's the 20th anniversary of the Wired magazine article about RSA!
On Saturday, November 16, 2019 at 9:21:53 PM UTC-5, Scott Abraham wrote:
On Saturday, November 16, 2019 at 6:05:44 PM UTC-8, Alan Baker wrote: On 2019-11-16 5:57 p.m., Scott Abraham wrote: On Saturday, November 16, 2019 at 5:52:57 PM UTC-8, Alan Baker wrote: On 2019-11-16 2:23 p.m., Scott Abraham wrote: On Saturday, November 16, 2019 at 2:03:01 PM UTC-8, Eviel Dewar wrote: On Saturday, November 16, 2019 at 7:05:39 AM UTC-5, Eviel Dewar wrote: Yes, here it is! Published 20 years ago today. Not much has changed since then, except of course that Bert and Scott are no longer friends. https://www.wired.com/1999/11/usenet...st%20Amendment. Quote: "Abraham's rejoinder: 'I had hoped that I would never have to carry a weapon again. As I write, I just finished dressing for my normal Sabbath morning trip to synagogue. Suit, tie, and shoulder holster... I hope you are worrying, because I have no intention of forgetting what you have done to me, and no intention of forgiving.'" Holy ****. No surprise you repost one of the most despicable, dishonest, and incompetent jobs of reporting I saw in the whole ****show. Made me embarassed to be a journalist. How telling that the reporter never tried to contact either me or Bert, which means the dumb**** swallowed whole all the ridiculous lies you freaks told. Sort of a Fox News job on rsa. Laughable, disgusting, and of course, your kind of reporting: repeat the lies of pathological liars and call it fact. BTW, I have no problem telling people who threaten my life on scores of occasions that I can and will defend myself. None of you ever had the balls to try, of course, which mean mission accomplished, cowards. bWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH Well there's a lie right off: Translation: In your deranged mind, truth is a lie and your insane fantasies are reality. 'Abraham took off on a ski trip after Friday's ruling and was unavailable for comment, but the RSA board was bristling anew. There were dozens of sharp stands, both pro and con.' Sounds like they tried to contact you, doesn't it? You pathetic, dickless, ridiculous lying piece of ****, what part of THERE WERE NO SKI AREAS OPEN!!!!!!! They made no attempt to contact me. Period. You just lied. Go **** yourself. You're claiming there were no ski areas open on November 16, 1999, Scottie? Anywhere? That was a record year for snowfall at Mt. Baker... And they actually QUOTE Bert: '"They wrote that I sodomized my stepson using mayonnaise," said Bert Hoff, a friend of Abraham's who has posted his version of the Rec.Skiing saga and is pressing Abraham to appeal. "They said my wife was a crack whore."' 'Hogwash, said Abraham's friend Hoff, a former attorney. "I want to get the ACLU involved. This is an abuse of the Constitution. I think the judge thought she was making a petty ruling on a misdemeanor, but she unwittingly stepped into the deep doo-doo of Internet censorship."' I'll cop to that. I forgot Bert talked to them. See how that works? When you make a mistake, admit it. You just blatantly lied about me and claimed that Wired had contacted me. Admit it, apologize, and go **** yourself. That second quote is clearly in response to the ruling... ...so you're outed as a liar... ...again. So you are outed as an insane pathological liar. Again. Hey, how about the Wired reporter lying his ass off? No comment, as usual. Speaking of facts, when am I ever going to hear from SPD? You said you would report me to them and claim I had threatened your life. So you are outed as a liar. For the thousandth time. Thanks for ****ing yourself in public. REPORT ME!!!!!!!! What did /I/ lie about, Scottie? Hey, bitch? Since you have exhaustively researched my history and are desperate to catch ME lying while always ignoring all the vile lies told about me including your own, here's a challenge. Show you are sane. The incompetent and lying WIRED reported stated I "ran" into Kerrison at Whistler. You are well aware that the rsa gathering at Whistler was planned months in advance, that Kerrison had challenged me to two races and I agree months in advance. I didn't run into the ****, I humiliated her. Much like I have not run into you, and you continue to humiliate yourself at Whistler. Here we have a blatant lie by a pathologically lying reporter who simply did not do his job, and you ignore it in your desperation to try and prove me a liar. Buh-buh-buh-buh! So he got a minor detail wrong. That's not a "lie", Schattie. I love how we can just push a button and you start foaming at the mouth! |
It's the 20th anniversary of the Wired magazine article aboutRSA!
On 11/16/2019 05:52 PM, Alan Baker wrote:
.... And they actually QUOTE Bert: '"They wrote that I sodomized my stepson using mayonnaise," said Bert Hoff... Is he still alive? If so, is he still as clueless? -- Cheers, Bev What if there were no hypothetical questions? |
It's the 20th anniversary of the Wired magazine article about RSA!
On Saturday, November 16, 2019 at 11:35:48 PM UTC-5, Scott Abraham wrote:
On Saturday, November 16, 2019 at 8:34:37 PM UTC-8, Alan Baker wrote: On 2019-11-16 8:32 p.m., Scott Abraham wrote: On Saturday, November 16, 2019 at 7:53:49 PM UTC-8, Eviel Dewar wrote: On Saturday, November 16, 2019 at 9:21:53 PM UTC-5, Scott Abraham wrote: On Saturday, November 16, 2019 at 6:05:44 PM UTC-8, Alan Baker wrote: On 2019-11-16 5:57 p.m., Scott Abraham wrote: On Saturday, November 16, 2019 at 5:52:57 PM UTC-8, Alan Baker wrote: On 2019-11-16 2:23 p.m., Scott Abraham wrote: On Saturday, November 16, 2019 at 2:03:01 PM UTC-8, Eviel Dewar wrote: On Saturday, November 16, 2019 at 7:05:39 AM UTC-5, Eviel Dewar wrote: Yes, here it is! Published 20 years ago today. Not much has changed since then, except of course that Bert and Scott are no longer friends. https://www.wired.com/1999/11/usenet...st%20Amendment. Quote: "Abraham's rejoinder: 'I had hoped that I would never have to carry a weapon again. As I write, I just finished dressing for my normal Sabbath morning trip to synagogue. Suit, tie, and shoulder holster.... I hope you are worrying, because I have no intention of forgetting what you have done to me, and no intention of forgiving.'" Holy ****. No surprise you repost one of the most despicable, dishonest, and incompetent jobs of reporting I saw in the whole ****show. Made me embarassed to be a journalist. How telling that the reporter never tried to contact either me or Bert, which means the dumb**** swallowed whole all the ridiculous lies you freaks told. Sort of a Fox News job on rsa. Laughable, disgusting, and of course, your kind of reporting: repeat the lies of pathological liars and call it fact. BTW, I have no problem telling people who threaten my life on scores of occasions that I can and will defend myself. None of you ever had the balls to try, of course, which mean mission accomplished, cowards. bWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH Well there's a lie right off: Translation: In your deranged mind, truth is a lie and your insane fantasies are reality. 'Abraham took off on a ski trip after Friday's ruling and was unavailable for comment, but the RSA board was bristling anew. There were dozens of sharp stands, both pro and con.' Sounds like they tried to contact you, doesn't it? You pathetic, dickless, ridiculous lying piece of ****, what part of THERE WERE NO SKI AREAS OPEN!!!!!!! They made no attempt to contact me. Period. You just lied. Go **** yourself. You're claiming there were no ski areas open on November 16, 1999, Scottie? Anywhere? That was a record year for snowfall at Mt. Baker... And they actually QUOTE Bert: '"They wrote that I sodomized my stepson using mayonnaise," said Bert Hoff, a friend of Abraham's who has posted his version of the Rec.Skiing saga and is pressing Abraham to appeal. "They said my wife was a crack whore."' 'Hogwash, said Abraham's friend Hoff, a former attorney. "I want to get the ACLU involved. This is an abuse of the Constitution. I think the judge thought she was making a petty ruling on a misdemeanor, but she unwittingly stepped into the deep doo-doo of Internet censorship."' I'll cop to that. I forgot Bert talked to them. See how that works? When you make a mistake, admit it. You just blatantly lied about me and claimed that Wired had contacted me. Admit it, apologize, and go **** yourself. That second quote is clearly in response to the ruling... ...so you're outed as a liar... ...again. So you are outed as an insane pathological liar. Again. Hey, how about the Wired reporter lying his ass off? No comment, as usual.. Speaking of facts, when am I ever going to hear from SPD? You said you would report me to them and claim I had threatened your life. So you are outed as a liar. For the thousandth time. Thanks for ****ing yourself in public. REPORT ME!!!!!!!! What did /I/ lie about, Scottie? Hey, bitch? Since you have exhaustively researched my history and are desperate to catch ME lying while always ignoring all the vile lies told about me including your own, here's a challenge. Show you are sane. The incompetent and lying WIRED reported stated I "ran" into Kerrison at Whistler. You are well aware that the rsa gathering at Whistler was planned months in advance, that Kerrison had challenged me to two races and I agree months in advance. I didn't run into the ****, I humiliated her. Much like I have not run into you, and you continue to humiliate yourself at Whistler. Here we have a blatant lie by a pathologically lying reporter who simply did not do his job, and you ignore it in your desperation to try and prove me a liar. Buh-buh-buh-buh! So he got a minor detail wrong. That's not a "lie", Schattie. Holy ****. He lied his ass off several times. That's a lie, Pussy Fart Nope. The reporter may have got some details wrong... ...but lying is when you say or write something you KNOW is wrong. :-) I love how we can just push a button and you start foaming at the mouth! Holy ****, you go back twenty years for a pack of lies, and I'm the one foaming at the mouth? BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHA Lying is when you make up **** that never happened, which you should know since you did so in this thread. Like having been in Vietnam when you've never been near the place? |
It's the 20th anniversary of the Wired magazine article about RSA!
On Sunday, November 17, 2019 at 12:55:01 AM UTC-5, Scott Abraham wrote:
On Saturday, November 16, 2019 at 9:50:08 PM UTC-8, Eviel Dewar wrote: On Saturday, November 16, 2019 at 11:35:48 PM UTC-5, Scott Abraham wrote: On Saturday, November 16, 2019 at 8:34:37 PM UTC-8, Alan Baker wrote: On 2019-11-16 8:32 p.m., Scott Abraham wrote: On Saturday, November 16, 2019 at 7:53:49 PM UTC-8, Eviel Dewar wrote: On Saturday, November 16, 2019 at 9:21:53 PM UTC-5, Scott Abraham wrote: On Saturday, November 16, 2019 at 6:05:44 PM UTC-8, Alan Baker wrote: On 2019-11-16 5:57 p.m., Scott Abraham wrote: On Saturday, November 16, 2019 at 5:52:57 PM UTC-8, Alan Baker wrote: On 2019-11-16 2:23 p.m., Scott Abraham wrote: On Saturday, November 16, 2019 at 2:03:01 PM UTC-8, Eviel Dewar wrote: On Saturday, November 16, 2019 at 7:05:39 AM UTC-5, Eviel Dewar wrote: Yes, here it is! Published 20 years ago today. Not much has changed since then, except of course that Bert and Scott are no longer friends. https://www.wired.com/1999/11/usenet...st%20Amendment. Quote: "Abraham's rejoinder: 'I had hoped that I would never have to carry a weapon again. As I write, I just finished dressing for my normal Sabbath morning trip to synagogue. Suit, tie, and shoulder holster... I hope you are worrying, because I have no intention of forgetting what you have done to me, and no intention of forgiving.'" Holy ****. No surprise you repost one of the most despicable, dishonest, and incompetent jobs of reporting I saw in the whole ****show. Made me embarassed to be a journalist. How telling that the reporter never tried to contact either me or Bert, which means the dumb**** swallowed whole all the ridiculous lies you freaks told. Sort of a Fox News job on rsa. Laughable, disgusting, and of course, your kind of reporting: repeat the lies of pathological liars and call it fact. BTW, I have no problem telling people who threaten my life on scores of occasions that I can and will defend myself. None of you ever had the balls to try, of course, which mean mission accomplished, cowards. bWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH Well there's a lie right off: Translation: In your deranged mind, truth is a lie and your insane fantasies are reality. 'Abraham took off on a ski trip after Friday's ruling and was unavailable for comment, but the RSA board was bristling anew. There were dozens of sharp stands, both pro and con.' Sounds like they tried to contact you, doesn't it? You pathetic, dickless, ridiculous lying piece of ****, what part of THERE WERE NO SKI AREAS OPEN!!!!!!! They made no attempt to contact me. Period. You just lied. Go **** yourself. You're claiming there were no ski areas open on November 16, 1999, Scottie? Anywhere? That was a record year for snowfall at Mt. Baker... And they actually QUOTE Bert: '"They wrote that I sodomized my stepson using mayonnaise," said Bert Hoff, a friend of Abraham's who has posted his version of the Rec.Skiing saga and is pressing Abraham to appeal. "They said my wife was a crack whore."' 'Hogwash, said Abraham's friend Hoff, a former attorney. "I want to get the ACLU involved. This is an abuse of the Constitution. I think the judge thought she was making a petty ruling on a misdemeanor, but she unwittingly stepped into the deep doo-doo of Internet censorship."' I'll cop to that. I forgot Bert talked to them. See how that works? When you make a mistake, admit it. You just blatantly lied about me and claimed that Wired had contacted me. Admit it, apologize, and go **** yourself. That second quote is clearly in response to the ruling... ...so you're outed as a liar... ...again. So you are outed as an insane pathological liar. Again. Hey, how about the Wired reporter lying his ass off? No comment, as usual. Speaking of facts, when am I ever going to hear from SPD? You said you would report me to them and claim I had threatened your life. So you are outed as a liar. For the thousandth time. Thanks for ****ing yourself in public. REPORT ME!!!!!!!! What did /I/ lie about, Scottie? Hey, bitch? Since you have exhaustively researched my history and are desperate to catch ME lying while always ignoring all the vile lies told about me including your own, here's a challenge. Show you are sane. The incompetent and lying WIRED reported stated I "ran" into Kerrison at Whistler. You are well aware that the rsa gathering at Whistler was planned months in advance, that Kerrison had challenged me to two races and I agree months in advance. I didn't run into the ****, I humiliated her. Much like I have not run into you, and you continue to humiliate yourself at Whistler. Here we have a blatant lie by a pathologically lying reporter who simply did not do his job, and you ignore it in your desperation to try and prove me a liar. Buh-buh-buh-buh! So he got a minor detail wrong. That's not a "lie", Schattie. Holy ****. He lied his ass off several times. That's a lie, Pussy Fart Nope. The reporter may have got some details wrong... ...but lying is when you say or write something you KNOW is wrong. :-) I love how we can just push a button and you start foaming at the mouth! Holy ****, you go back twenty years for a pack of lies, and I'm the one foaming at the mouth? BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHA Lying is when you make up **** that never happened, which you should know since you did so in this thread. Like having been in Vietnam when you've never been near the place? Like you making up a ridiculous lie, with no proof whatsoever LOL. What "ridiculous lie", you dry-drunk loon? |
It's the 20th anniversary of the Wired magazine article about RSA!
On Sunday, November 17, 2019 at 1:08:21 PM UTC-5, Scott Abraham wrote:
On Sunday, November 17, 2019 at 9:17:04 AM UTC-8, Eviel Dewar wrote: On Sunday, November 17, 2019 at 12:55:01 AM UTC-5, Scott Abraham wrote: On Saturday, November 16, 2019 at 9:50:08 PM UTC-8, Eviel Dewar wrote: On Saturday, November 16, 2019 at 11:35:48 PM UTC-5, Scott Abraham wrote: On Saturday, November 16, 2019 at 8:34:37 PM UTC-8, Alan Baker wrote: On 2019-11-16 8:32 p.m., Scott Abraham wrote: On Saturday, November 16, 2019 at 7:53:49 PM UTC-8, Eviel Dewar wrote: On Saturday, November 16, 2019 at 9:21:53 PM UTC-5, Scott Abraham wrote: On Saturday, November 16, 2019 at 6:05:44 PM UTC-8, Alan Baker wrote: On 2019-11-16 5:57 p.m., Scott Abraham wrote: On Saturday, November 16, 2019 at 5:52:57 PM UTC-8, Alan Baker wrote: On 2019-11-16 2:23 p.m., Scott Abraham wrote: On Saturday, November 16, 2019 at 2:03:01 PM UTC-8, Eviel Dewar wrote: On Saturday, November 16, 2019 at 7:05:39 AM UTC-5, Eviel Dewar wrote: Yes, here it is! Published 20 years ago today. Not much has changed since then, except of course that Bert and Scott are no longer friends. https://www.wired.com/1999/11/usenet...st%20Amendment. Quote: "Abraham's rejoinder: 'I had hoped that I would never have to carry a weapon again. As I write, I just finished dressing for my normal Sabbath morning trip to synagogue. Suit, tie, and shoulder holster... I hope you are worrying, because I have no intention of forgetting what you have done to me, and no intention of forgiving.'" Holy ****. No surprise you repost one of the most despicable, dishonest, and incompetent jobs of reporting I saw in the whole ****show. Made me embarassed to be a journalist. How telling that the reporter never tried to contact either me or Bert, which means the dumb**** swallowed whole all the ridiculous lies you freaks told. Sort of a Fox News job on rsa. Laughable, disgusting, and of course, your kind of reporting: repeat the lies of pathological liars and call it fact. BTW, I have no problem telling people who threaten my life on scores of occasions that I can and will defend myself. None of you ever had the balls to try, of course, which mean mission accomplished, cowards. bWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH Well there's a lie right off: Translation: In your deranged mind, truth is a lie and your insane fantasies are reality. 'Abraham took off on a ski trip after Friday's ruling and was unavailable for comment, but the RSA board was bristling anew. There were dozens of sharp stands, both pro and con.' Sounds like they tried to contact you, doesn't it? You pathetic, dickless, ridiculous lying piece of ****, what part of THERE WERE NO SKI AREAS OPEN!!!!!!! They made no attempt to contact me. Period. You just lied. Go **** yourself. You're claiming there were no ski areas open on November 16, 1999, Scottie? Anywhere? That was a record year for snowfall at Mt. Baker... And they actually QUOTE Bert: '"They wrote that I sodomized my stepson using mayonnaise," said Bert Hoff, a friend of Abraham's who has posted his version of the Rec.Skiing saga and is pressing Abraham to appeal. "They said my wife was a crack whore."' 'Hogwash, said Abraham's friend Hoff, a former attorney. "I want to get the ACLU involved. This is an abuse of the Constitution. I think the judge thought she was making a petty ruling on a misdemeanor, but she unwittingly stepped into the deep doo-doo of Internet censorship."' I'll cop to that. I forgot Bert talked to them. See how that works? When you make a mistake, admit it. You just blatantly lied about me and claimed that Wired had contacted me. Admit it, apologize, and go **** yourself. That second quote is clearly in response to the ruling.... ...so you're outed as a liar... ...again. So you are outed as an insane pathological liar. Again. Hey, how about the Wired reporter lying his ass off? No comment, as usual. Speaking of facts, when am I ever going to hear from SPD? You said you would report me to them and claim I had threatened your life. So you are outed as a liar. For the thousandth time. Thanks for ****ing yourself in public. REPORT ME!!!!!!!! What did /I/ lie about, Scottie? Hey, bitch? Since you have exhaustively researched my history and are desperate to catch ME lying while always ignoring all the vile lies told about me including your own, here's a challenge. Show you are sane. The incompetent and lying WIRED reported stated I "ran" into Kerrison at Whistler. You are well aware that the rsa gathering at Whistler was planned months in advance, that Kerrison had challenged me to two races and I agree months in advance. I didn't run into the ****, I humiliated her. Much like I have not run into you, and you continue to humiliate yourself at Whistler. Here we have a blatant lie by a pathologically lying reporter who simply did not do his job, and you ignore it in your desperation to try and prove me a liar. Buh-buh-buh-buh! So he got a minor detail wrong. That's not a "lie", Schattie. Holy ****. He lied his ass off several times. That's a lie, Pussy Fart Nope. The reporter may have got some details wrong... ...but lying is when you say or write something you KNOW is wrong. :-) I love how we can just push a button and you start foaming at the mouth! Holy ****, you go back twenty years for a pack of lies, and I'm the one foaming at the mouth? BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHA Lying is when you make up **** that never happened, which you should know since you did so in this thread. Like having been in Vietnam when you've never been near the place? Like you making up a ridiculous lie, with no proof whatsoever LOL. What "ridiculous lie", you dry-drunk loon? Like you making up a ridiculous lie, with no proof whatsoever. You lied and called me a liar with no evidence whatsoever. Period. I notice you snipped the invitation to show up in person and see the evidence, along with demanding you prove your identity. OK, I'll do all that, on one condition. That you reaffirm your claim that you were in Vietnam during the Vietnam war. Just reaffirm it below in your own words and we can get the process started. |
It's the 20th anniversary of the Wired magazine article about RSA!
On Monday, November 18, 2019 at 11:19:44 PM UTC-5, Scott Abraham wrote:
On Monday, November 18, 2019 at 7:44:47 PM UTC-8, Alan Baker wrote: On 2019-11-18 7:43 p.m., Scott Abraham wrote: On Monday, November 18, 2019 at 7:36:06 PM UTC-8, Eviel Dewar wrote: On Sunday, November 17, 2019 at 1:08:21 PM UTC-5, Scott Abraham wrote: On Sunday, November 17, 2019 at 9:17:04 AM UTC-8, Eviel Dewar wrote: On Sunday, November 17, 2019 at 12:55:01 AM UTC-5, Scott Abraham wrote: On Saturday, November 16, 2019 at 9:50:08 PM UTC-8, Eviel Dewar wrote: On Saturday, November 16, 2019 at 11:35:48 PM UTC-5, Scott Abraham wrote: On Saturday, November 16, 2019 at 8:34:37 PM UTC-8, Alan Baker wrote: On 2019-11-16 8:32 p.m., Scott Abraham wrote: On Saturday, November 16, 2019 at 7:53:49 PM UTC-8, Eviel Dewar wrote: On Saturday, November 16, 2019 at 9:21:53 PM UTC-5, Scott Abraham wrote: On Saturday, November 16, 2019 at 6:05:44 PM UTC-8, Alan Baker wrote: On 2019-11-16 5:57 p.m., Scott Abraham wrote: On Saturday, November 16, 2019 at 5:52:57 PM UTC-8, Alan Baker wrote: On 2019-11-16 2:23 p.m., Scott Abraham wrote: On Saturday, November 16, 2019 at 2:03:01 PM UTC-8, Eviel Dewar wrote: On Saturday, November 16, 2019 at 7:05:39 AM UTC-5, Eviel Dewar wrote: Yes, here it is! Published 20 years ago today. Not much has changed since then, except of course that Bert and Scott are no longer friends. https://www.wired.com/1999/11/usenet...st%20Amendment. Quote: "Abraham's rejoinder: 'I had hoped that I would never have to carry a weapon again. As I write, I just finished dressing for my normal Sabbath morning trip to synagogue. Suit, tie, and shoulder holster... I hope you are worrying, because I have no intention of forgetting what you have done to me, and no intention of forgiving.'" Holy ****. No surprise you repost one of the most despicable, dishonest, and incompetent jobs of reporting I saw in the whole ****show. Made me embarassed to be a journalist. How telling that the reporter never tried to contact either me or Bert, which means the dumb**** swallowed whole all the ridiculous lies you freaks told. Sort of a Fox News job on rsa. Laughable, disgusting, and of course, your kind of reporting: repeat the lies of pathological liars and call it fact. BTW, I have no problem telling people who threaten my life on scores of occasions that I can and will defend myself. None of you ever had the balls to try, of course, which mean mission accomplished, cowards. bWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH Well there's a lie right off: Translation: In your deranged mind, truth is a lie and your insane fantasies are reality. 'Abraham took off on a ski trip after Friday's ruling and was unavailable for comment, but the RSA board was bristling anew. There were dozens of sharp stands, both pro and con.' Sounds like they tried to contact you, doesn't it? You pathetic, dickless, ridiculous lying piece of ****, what part of THERE WERE NO SKI AREAS OPEN!!!!!!! They made no attempt to contact me. Period. You just lied. Go **** yourself. You're claiming there were no ski areas open on November 16, 1999, Scottie? Anywhere? That was a record year for snowfall at Mt. Baker... And they actually QUOTE Bert: '"They wrote that I sodomized my stepson using mayonnaise," said Bert Hoff, a friend of Abraham's who has posted his version of the Rec.Skiing saga and is pressing Abraham to appeal. "They said my wife was a crack whore."' 'Hogwash, said Abraham's friend Hoff, a former attorney. "I want to get the ACLU involved. This is an abuse of the Constitution. I think the judge thought she was making a petty ruling on a misdemeanor, but she unwittingly stepped into the deep doo-doo of Internet censorship."' I'll cop to that. I forgot Bert talked to them. See how that works? When you make a mistake, admit it. You just blatantly lied about me and claimed that Wired had contacted me. Admit it, apologize, and go **** yourself. That second quote is clearly in response to the ruling.... ...so you're outed as a liar... ...again. So you are outed as an insane pathological liar. Again. Hey, how about the Wired reporter lying his ass off? No comment, as usual. Speaking of facts, when am I ever going to hear from SPD? You said you would report me to them and claim I had threatened your life. So you are outed as a liar. For the thousandth time. Thanks for ****ing yourself in public. REPORT ME!!!!!!!! What did /I/ lie about, Scottie? Hey, bitch? Since you have exhaustively researched my history and are desperate to catch ME lying while always ignoring all the vile lies told about me including your own, here's a challenge. Show you are sane. The incompetent and lying WIRED reported stated I "ran" into Kerrison at Whistler. You are well aware that the rsa gathering at Whistler was planned months in advance, that Kerrison had challenged me to two races and I agree months in advance. I didn't run into the ****, I humiliated her. Much like I have not run into you, and you continue to humiliate yourself at Whistler. Here we have a blatant lie by a pathologically lying reporter who simply did not do his job, and you ignore it in your desperation to try and prove me a liar. Buh-buh-buh-buh! So he got a minor detail wrong. That's not a "lie", Schattie. Holy ****. He lied his ass off several times. That's a lie, Pussy Fart Nope. The reporter may have got some details wrong... ...but lying is when you say or write something you KNOW is wrong. :-) I love how we can just push a button and you start foaming at the mouth! Holy ****, you go back twenty years for a pack of lies, and I'm the one foaming at the mouth? BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHA Lying is when you make up **** that never happened, which you should know since you did so in this thread. Like having been in Vietnam when you've never been near the place? Like you making up a ridiculous lie, with no proof whatsoever LOL. What "ridiculous lie", you dry-drunk loon? Like you making up a ridiculous lie, with no proof whatsoever. You lied and called me a liar with no evidence whatsoever. Period. I notice you snipped the invitation to show up in person and see the evidence, along with demanding you prove your identity. OK, I'll do all that, on one condition. That you reaffirm your claim that you were in Vietnam during the Vietnam war. Just reaffirm it below in your own words and we can get the process started. Bull****. ID yourself or go **** yourself. Oooops, forgot. If you ID yourself, you **** yourself. You played this game before, chimo. I reaffirm you are a pathetic, dickless, lying coward. Just reaffirm that you are by refusing to ID yourself. BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHA I've IDed myself, Scottie... ...so tell me. :-) Go **** yourself. Wasn't talking to you. Several of you freaks have tried that particular game, none of you ever had the balls to show up in person.. Saigon Schattie punks again! "Loser dies - I'm alive! Two bullet holes, but alive!" |
It's the 20th anniversary of the Wired magazine article about RSA!
On Tuesday, November 19, 2019 at 11:29:38 AM UTC-5, Scott Abraham wrote:
On Tuesday, November 19, 2019 at 4:45:44 AM UTC-8, Eviel Dewar wrote: On Monday, November 18, 2019 at 11:19:44 PM UTC-5, Scott Abraham wrote: On Monday, November 18, 2019 at 7:44:47 PM UTC-8, Alan Baker wrote: On 2019-11-18 7:43 p.m., Scott Abraham wrote: On Monday, November 18, 2019 at 7:36:06 PM UTC-8, Eviel Dewar wrote: On Sunday, November 17, 2019 at 1:08:21 PM UTC-5, Scott Abraham wrote: On Sunday, November 17, 2019 at 9:17:04 AM UTC-8, Eviel Dewar wrote: On Sunday, November 17, 2019 at 12:55:01 AM UTC-5, Scott Abraham wrote: On Saturday, November 16, 2019 at 9:50:08 PM UTC-8, Eviel Dewar wrote: On Saturday, November 16, 2019 at 11:35:48 PM UTC-5, Scott Abraham wrote: On Saturday, November 16, 2019 at 8:34:37 PM UTC-8, Alan Baker wrote: On 2019-11-16 8:32 p.m., Scott Abraham wrote: On Saturday, November 16, 2019 at 7:53:49 PM UTC-8, Eviel Dewar wrote: On Saturday, November 16, 2019 at 9:21:53 PM UTC-5, Scott Abraham wrote: On Saturday, November 16, 2019 at 6:05:44 PM UTC-8, Alan Baker wrote: On 2019-11-16 5:57 p.m., Scott Abraham wrote: On Saturday, November 16, 2019 at 5:52:57 PM UTC-8, Alan Baker wrote: On 2019-11-16 2:23 p.m., Scott Abraham wrote: On Saturday, November 16, 2019 at 2:03:01 PM UTC-8, Eviel Dewar wrote: On Saturday, November 16, 2019 at 7:05:39 AM UTC-5, Eviel Dewar wrote: Yes, here it is! Published 20 years ago today. Not much has changed since then, except of course that Bert and Scott are no longer friends. https://www.wired.com/1999/11/usenet...st%20Amendment. Quote: "Abraham's rejoinder: 'I had hoped that I would never have to carry a weapon again. As I write, I just finished dressing for my normal Sabbath morning trip to synagogue. Suit, tie, and shoulder holster... I hope you are worrying, because I have no intention of forgetting what you have done to me, and no intention of forgiving.'" Holy ****. No surprise you repost one of the most despicable, dishonest, and incompetent jobs of reporting I saw in the whole ****show. Made me embarassed to be a journalist. How telling that the reporter never tried to contact either me or Bert, which means the dumb**** swallowed whole all the ridiculous lies you freaks told. Sort of a Fox News job on rsa. Laughable, disgusting, and of course, your kind of reporting: repeat the lies of pathological liars and call it fact. BTW, I have no problem telling people who threaten my life on scores of occasions that I can and will defend myself. None of you ever had the balls to try, of course, which mean mission accomplished, cowards. bWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH Well there's a lie right off: Translation: In your deranged mind, truth is a lie and your insane fantasies are reality. 'Abraham took off on a ski trip after Friday's ruling and was unavailable for comment, but the RSA board was bristling anew. There were dozens of sharp stands, both pro and con.' Sounds like they tried to contact you, doesn't it? You pathetic, dickless, ridiculous lying piece of ****, what part of THERE WERE NO SKI AREAS OPEN!!!!!!! They made no attempt to contact me. Period. You just lied. Go **** yourself. You're claiming there were no ski areas open on November 16, 1999, Scottie? Anywhere? That was a record year for snowfall at Mt. Baker... And they actually QUOTE Bert: '"They wrote that I sodomized my stepson using mayonnaise," said Bert Hoff, a friend of Abraham's who has posted his version of the Rec.Skiing saga and is pressing Abraham to appeal. "They said my wife was a crack whore."' 'Hogwash, said Abraham's friend Hoff, a former attorney. "I want to get the ACLU involved. This is an abuse of the Constitution. I think the judge thought she was making a petty ruling on a misdemeanor, but she unwittingly stepped into the deep doo-doo of Internet censorship."' I'll cop to that. I forgot Bert talked to them. See how that works? When you make a mistake, admit it. You just blatantly lied about me and claimed that Wired had contacted me. Admit it, apologize, and go **** yourself. That second quote is clearly in response to the ruling... ...so you're outed as a liar... ...again. So you are outed as an insane pathological liar. Again. Hey, how about the Wired reporter lying his ass off? No comment, as usual. Speaking of facts, when am I ever going to hear from SPD? You said you would report me to them and claim I had threatened your life. So you are outed as a liar. For the thousandth time. Thanks for ****ing yourself in public. REPORT ME!!!!!!!! What did /I/ lie about, Scottie? Hey, bitch? Since you have exhaustively researched my history and are desperate to catch ME lying while always ignoring all the vile lies told about me including your own, here's a challenge. Show you are sane. The incompetent and lying WIRED reported stated I "ran" into Kerrison at Whistler. You are well aware that the rsa gathering at Whistler was planned months in advance, that Kerrison had challenged me to two races and I agree months in advance. I didn't run into the ****, I humiliated her. Much like I have not run into you, and you continue to humiliate yourself at Whistler. Here we have a blatant lie by a pathologically lying reporter who simply did not do his job, and you ignore it in your desperation to try and prove me a liar. Buh-buh-buh-buh! So he got a minor detail wrong. That's not a "lie", Schattie. Holy ****. He lied his ass off several times. That's a lie, Pussy Fart Nope. The reporter may have got some details wrong... ...but lying is when you say or write something you KNOW is wrong. :-) I love how we can just push a button and you start foaming at the mouth! Holy ****, you go back twenty years for a pack of lies, and I'm the one foaming at the mouth? BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHA Lying is when you make up **** that never happened, which you should know since you did so in this thread. Like having been in Vietnam when you've never been near the place? Like you making up a ridiculous lie, with no proof whatsoever LOL. What "ridiculous lie", you dry-drunk loon? Like you making up a ridiculous lie, with no proof whatsoever. You lied and called me a liar with no evidence whatsoever. Period. I notice you snipped the invitation to show up in person and see the evidence, along with demanding you prove your identity. OK, I'll do all that, on one condition. That you reaffirm your claim that you were in Vietnam during the Vietnam war. Just reaffirm it below in your own words and we can get the process started. Bull****. ID yourself or go **** yourself. Oooops, forgot. If you ID yourself, you **** yourself. You played this game before, chimo. I reaffirm you are a pathetic, dickless, lying coward. Just reaffirm that you are by refusing to ID yourself. BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHA I've IDed myself, Scottie... ...so tell me. :-) Go **** yourself. Wasn't talking to you. Several of you freaks have tried that particular game, none of you ever had the balls to show up in person. Saigon Schattie punks again! "Loser dies - I'm alive! Two bullet holes, but alive!" Holy ****, I point out the obvious, that none of you have ever had the balls to show up in person, and you say I am punking when YOU hide and never have had the balls? Sodomite, are the statements below true? Yes or no. "I got my early training in violence as a boxer. Then my mother worked for the Navy, and I lived next to the SEAL training base and took an advanced course in applied mayhem. Then I went to Nam (journalist, not soldier) and spent a lovely time ducking bullets from people who were trying to kill me while I was busy doing the same thing to them. Got down to hand to hand at one point, Jeremiah. Loser dies. I'm alive. Two bullet holes, but alive. No, Jeremiah. You do not know how I fight, because I do not fight. Fighting is for dumb**** morons like you. I'm an ex-cop. Bodyguard. Security. 15 years experience in dealing with stupid dumb punks like you who think youth matters." |
It's the 20th anniversary of the Wired magazine article about RSA!
On Tuesday, November 19, 2019 at 5:52:49 PM UTC-5, Scott Abraham wrote:
On Tuesday, November 19, 2019 at 11:38:23 AM UTC-8, Eviel Dewar wrote: Sodomite, are the statements below true? Yes or no. "I got my early training in violence as a boxer. Then my mother worked for the Navy, and I lived next to the SEAL training base and took an advanced course in applied mayhem. Then I went to Nam (journalist, not soldier) and spent a lovely time ducking bullets from people who were trying to kill me while I was busy doing the same thing to them. Got down to hand to hand at one point, Jeremiah. Loser dies. I'm alive. Two bullet holes, but alive. No, Jeremiah. You do not know how I fight, because I do not fight. Fighting is for dumb**** morons like you. I'm an ex-cop. Bodyguard. Security. 15 years experience in dealing with stupid dumb punks like you who think youth matters." Show up and find out. Why should I have to show up anywhere to find out? Just answer "yes" or "no", you lying sodomite. |
It's the 20th anniversary of the Wired magazine article about RSA!
On Tuesday, November 19, 2019 at 11:38:23 AM UTC-8, Eviel Dewar wrote:
Sodomite, are the statements below true? Yes or no. "I got my early training in violence as a boxer. Then my mother worked for the Navy, and I lived next to the SEAL training base and took an advanced course in applied mayhem. Then I went to Nam (journalist, not soldier) and spent a lovely time ducking bullets from people who were trying to kill me while I was busy doing the same thing to them. Got down to hand to hand at one point, Jeremiah. Loser dies. I'm alive. Two bullet holes, but alive. No, Jeremiah. You do not know how I fight, because I do not fight. Fighting is for dumb**** morons like you. I'm an ex-cop. Bodyguard. Security. 15 years experience in dealing with stupid dumb punks like you who think youth matters." Everything after "I lived next to the SEAL training base" is a lie. Scooter has never been to Vietnam. Look at Scooter as a psychopath, and enoys lying and making up fantasies. He can't even keep his story straight, He went to Vietnam as a Dare by some SEALS, which turned into flying into to see some drafted high school buddies at a "Forward Fire Base". When called on it, he has stated, "I never mentioned anything about artillery", (Forward Fire Bases=Fire Support Bases, which the main purpose is to give artillery support to US Armed Forces and South Vietnamese troops (ARVN=Army of the Republic of Vietnam) for military offensives) His fantasies about seeing military combat, are word by word of a Congressional Medal of Honor Winner. The problems for Scooter and his lies. -The War in 1970, the Peter Lemon won his Congressional of Honor (At a Fire Support Base) was much different than in 1972 the year that Scooter made up his lies about being in Vietnam, when the US pulled out most of their combat troops, and mainly had military advisors on the ground supporting. If there were "Forward Fire Bases", they were manned by ARVN personnel, with a possibly, a US Commission officer there as an advisory role. So, Scooter wouldn't be flying into a "Forward Fire Base", because there wouldn't be US combat soldiers in them -There is no evidence whatsoever that US infantry had some heavy firefights with the NVA (North Vietnamese Army) at Fire Support Bases/Forward Fire Bases in April 1972. (by this time in the Vietnam War, the Viet Cong were wiped out, so NVA troops were the main backbone for the North Vietnam Side) There was very heavy fighting, with the NVA's Easter Offensive, but the main US support was airpower, not US troops on the ground. I doubt US MACV, (Ie the US Military Command in South Vietnam) would allow any Journalist to fly to major combat areas during the Easter Offensive, it was probably too risky, especially by Helicopter. There is no evidence of a Scott Spittal as a journalist in Vietnam, or that any "College" journalist in Vietnam in April 1972. College Journalists have to get accreditation from a Media Company, College Newspaper are training grounds, not places where they spend a huge amount of money to send a trainee to a major combat area. Any journalist have to abide by the rules enforced by the MACV. I doubt Scooter even knows those rules. Scooter could easily for years show some secondary sources to show he was right, and everyone else was wrong. He cannot do this, because there is none. His lies are that bad and pathetic. Scooter can't answer very basic questions about Vietnam and the Vietnam War, or he can't remember anything about his combat time in Vietnam. Asking him, what was the name of the Fire Support Base, the Province in South Vietnam, the Corp Region, the US Division that he was attached to, only gets threats and profanity from Scooter. Scooter made up his fantasies. |
It's the 20th anniversary of the Wired magazine article about RSA!
On Wednesday, November 20, 2019 at 8:53:39 AM UTC-8, Scott Abraham wrote:
You call ME a psychopath You are a psychopath. You have no shame, you are a pathological liar, and you don't have the tools or emotions to deal with people. Even when Bert Hoff abandons you, and he is as disturbed and weird as you, it should be a wake up call to you. You can't feel the clue bat being whacked at you for 20 plus years. You need to get help.. Your whole "How Dare you!" response, is just your regular canned non sensical answer. It is just sad. |
It's the 20th anniversary of the Wired magazine article about RSA!
On Wednesday, November 20, 2019 at 8:53:39 AM UTC-8, Scott Abraham wrote:
There is no evidence to back up your claim. I have evidence. There is no evidence out there to support your fantasy and lies, Scooter. Simple Question, what do you have to do as an accredited Journalist in South Vietnam and and gain support from the US MACV? There is plenty of material about this time of the Vietnam War in 1972.. https://history.army.mil/html/books/...H_Pub_91-7.pdf " General Abrams, with only two American combat brigades left in the country, could influence the ground fighting only at the margins." The North Vietnam Easter Offensive started on March 30th 1972. So I highly doubted that you flew into Saigon, got your Press Card, (I doubt you don't even know how this took place) got a Helicopter to a combat area. It just didn't happened, Scooter, your lies are that bad.. So, if you want to continue this charade. What is the Division, Battalion and Unit that you were embedded with, during this firefight at a Fire Support Base in Vietnam in April 1972? You can't answer, because you don't know, nor you are afraid that you will be caught in your lies.. it is that simple. ooter can't answer very basic questions about Vietnam and the Vietnam War, or he can't remember anything about his combat time in Vietnam. Asking him, what was the name of the Fire Support Base, the Province in South Vietnam, the Corp Region, the US Division that he was attached to, only gets threats and profanity from Scooter. Scooter made up his fantasies. Teddy, Teddy. YOU are making up YOUR fantasies, because you are a schizophrenic manic depressive stalker who hates taking his meds. Allow me to throw in some profanity, too. You are insane. Go **** yourself. SHOW THE POST, TED!!!!!! Tennis today? BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHA |
It's the 20th anniversary of the Wired magazine article about RSA!
On Wednesday, November 20, 2019 at 10:11:30 AM UTC-8, Scott Abraham wrote:
You can't answer, because you don't know, nor you are afraid that you will be caught in your lies.. it is that simple. I can answer. All you have to do is show up in person. You have never had the balls, and never will. You have answered in the past. Guess what? you were lying. https://themedalofhonor.com/medal-of...er-vietnam-war This basically word by word what you wrote in the past. I don't need to show up, nor do I feel like showing up to a bunch of moldy tennis courts, to deal with a weird psychopath.. I guess you have to find me, and show me this information that you were a CMOH equal in combat, and that your imaginary war tale on your imaginary Fire Support Base, with your imaginary high school buddies actually happened. What is so sad and pathetic, is that for years you could had come clean, but instead you threatened people who even questioned your idiotic story... YOU are making up YOUR fantasies, because you are a schizophrenic manic depressive stalker. I am not making up fantasies, Scooter, I am actually quoting from the history books.. https://history.army.mil/html/books/...H_Pub_91-7.pdf https://www.jcs.mil/Portals/36/Docum..._1971-1973.pdf. You could had ended this idiocy long ago, however you are too afraid to admit that you lied about something, that actually can get you in serious trouble. When a bunch of Vietnam Veterans asked you about your idiotic lies, they just mocked and laugh at you. No one believes you, including yourself.. |
It's the 20th anniversary of the Wired magazine article about RSA!
On Wednesday, November 20, 2019 at 11:42:09 AM UTC-8, Scott Abraham wrote:
Show up and prove you are a man. Why don't you show up where I live, and show that you are a man? I have no grudge against you. You showed to be a pathetic lonely person, who lives in a fantasy world. If you have a problem with me, you need to find me, not the other way around. It is all one big Potemkin Village, one big charade. You are the person with the problems, or feel that if you get criticized, you need to resort to physical violence.. So, you are the person wanting to commit physical violence, you better find me.. Loser.. Anyway, you are a huge loser for making up war stories lies. You have never been to Vietnam, during the Vietnam War or afterwards, it is that obvious. Yeah your imaginary bullet wounds, and imaginary grenade explosions.. What a creep.. |
It's the 20th anniversary of the Wired magazine article about RSA!
On Wednesday, November 20, 2019 at 12:46:05 PM UTC-8, Scott Abraham wrote:
Says the huge loser who makes up war stories lies about me, What lies? Who believes your story that you went to Vietnam in April 1972, as a college journalist (ROFL!) saw heavy combat, was wounded twice. However you never showed any secondary source of your battle, no bylines of your reporting, etc. There wasn't enough US Army infantry to support any "Forward Fire Base" in April 1972. So what is different between your fantasy and Peter Lemon's CMOH citation? http://www.cmohs.org/recipient-detai...on-peter-c.php It is funny, that you didn't even get a unit citation or acknowledgement for your CMOH equivalent in heroics? I mean your training in Advance Mayhem would had come in handy.. |
It's the 20th anniversary of the Wired magazine article aboutRSA!
On 21/11/2019 05:03, Scott Abraham wrote:
You'll never be a man, never get the respect you crave, never be treated with respect by any man of integrity and honor. You've been viewed with contempt by any real man because you are a contemptuous freak. Talking of projection... We laugh at clowns like you. "We" ? Those voices back Scat ? |
It's the 20th anniversary of the Wired magazine article about RSA!
On Thursday, November 21, 2019 at 10:54:32 AM UTC-5, Scott Abraham wrote:
On Thursday, November 21, 2019 at 1:18:47 AM UTC-8, BrritSki wrote: On 21/11/2019 05:03, Scott Abraham wrote: You'll never be a man, never get the respect you crave, never be treated with respect by any man of integrity and honor. You've been viewed with contempt by any real man because you are a contemptuous freak. Talking of projection... We laugh at clowns like you. "We" ? Those voices back Scat ? You know, manly men. Who figure you out and laugh at you. Guys like me who know a sociopathic coward when they see one and treat you with contempt. Which is why you hate us. We see you for what you are, and you play the same predictable games. Contempt and loathing. My kind of guys. Clown. You are a manly man who killed to save his own life and the life of his friends. Fact! Because you said so. |
It's the 20th anniversary of the Wired magazine article about RSA!
On Thursday, November 21, 2019 at 11:33:52 AM UTC-5, Scott Abraham wrote:
On Thursday, November 21, 2019 at 8:06:16 AM UTC-8, Eviel Dewar wrote: On Thursday, November 21, 2019 at 10:54:32 AM UTC-5, Scott Abraham wrote: On Thursday, November 21, 2019 at 1:18:47 AM UTC-8, BrritSki wrote: On 21/11/2019 05:03, Scott Abraham wrote: You'll never be a man, never get the respect you crave, never be treated with respect by any man of integrity and honor. You've been viewed with contempt by any real man because you are a contemptuous freak. Talking of projection... We laugh at clowns like you. "We" ? Those voices back Scat ? You know, manly men. Who figure you out and laugh at you. Guys like me who know a sociopathic coward when they see one and treat you with contempt. Which is why you hate us. We see you for what you are, and you play the same predictable games. Contempt and loathing. My kind of guys. Clown. You are a manly man who killed to save his own life and the life of his friends. Fact! Because you said so. I'm also a manly man who has challenged the despicable craven cowards in this ******** to act this way in person for twenty years and none of you have ever had the balls to do so. Scores of meets all over the West. Nobody has ever had the balls to show, and nobody ever will. Speaking of manly men, how about that ID you promised? Bluff called. That promise was conditional. Here's what I said: "OK, I'll do all that, on one condition. That you reaffirm your claim that you were in Vietnam during the Vietnam war. Just reaffirm it below in your own words and we can get the process started." |
It's the 20th anniversary of the Wired magazine article about RSA!
On Thursday, November 21, 2019 at 4:59:08 PM UTC-5, Scott Abraham wrote:
On Thursday, November 21, 2019 at 9:40:11 AM UTC-8, Eviel Dewar wrote: On Thursday, November 21, 2019 at 11:33:52 AM UTC-5, Scott Abraham wrote: On Thursday, November 21, 2019 at 8:06:16 AM UTC-8, Eviel Dewar wrote: On Thursday, November 21, 2019 at 10:54:32 AM UTC-5, Scott Abraham wrote: On Thursday, November 21, 2019 at 1:18:47 AM UTC-8, BrritSki wrote: On 21/11/2019 05:03, Scott Abraham wrote: You'll never be a man, never get the respect you crave, never be treated with respect by any man of integrity and honor. You've been viewed with contempt by any real man because you are a contemptuous freak. Talking of projection... We laugh at clowns like you. "We" ? Those voices back Scat ? You know, manly men. Who figure you out and laugh at you. Guys like me who know a sociopathic coward when they see one and treat you with contempt. Which is why you hate us. We see you for what you are, and you play the same predictable games. Contempt and loathing. My kind of guys. Clown. You are a manly man who killed to save his own life and the life of his friends. Fact! Because you said so. I'm also a manly man who has challenged the despicable craven cowards in this ******** to act this way in person for twenty years and none of you have ever had the balls to do so. Scores of meets all over the West. Nobody has ever had the balls to show, and nobody ever will. Speaking of manly men, how about that ID you promised? Bluff called. That promise was conditional. Here's what I said: "OK, I'll do all that, on one condition. That you reaffirm your claim that you were in Vietnam during the Vietnam war. Just reaffirm it below in your own words and we can get the process started." Bluff called, and as usual, you pussied out. Again. Only a truly cowardly freak would hide in anonymity and tell outrageous lies the way you do, and refuse to ID himself, even when he gives his word. Maggot. That promise came with a condition, and you haven't met the condition, Abrahog. |
It's the 20th anniversary of the Wired magazine article about RSA!
On Thursday, November 21, 2019 at 9:00:37 PM UTC-5, Scott Abraham wrote:
On Thursday, November 21, 2019 at 4:50:44 PM UTC-8, Eviel Dewar wrote: On Thursday, November 21, 2019 at 4:59:08 PM UTC-5, Scott Abraham wrote: On Thursday, November 21, 2019 at 9:40:11 AM UTC-8, Eviel Dewar wrote: On Thursday, November 21, 2019 at 11:33:52 AM UTC-5, Scott Abraham wrote: On Thursday, November 21, 2019 at 8:06:16 AM UTC-8, Eviel Dewar wrote: On Thursday, November 21, 2019 at 10:54:32 AM UTC-5, Scott Abraham wrote: On Thursday, November 21, 2019 at 1:18:47 AM UTC-8, BrritSki wrote: On 21/11/2019 05:03, Scott Abraham wrote: You'll never be a man, never get the respect you crave, never be treated with respect by any man of integrity and honor. You've been viewed with contempt by any real man because you are a contemptuous freak. Talking of projection... We laugh at clowns like you. "We" ? Those voices back Scat ? You know, manly men. Who figure you out and laugh at you. Guys like me who know a sociopathic coward when they see one and treat you with contempt. Which is why you hate us. We see you for what you are, and you play the same predictable games. Contempt and loathing. My kind of guys. Clown. You are a manly man who killed to save his own life and the life of his friends. Fact! Because you said so. I'm also a manly man who has challenged the despicable craven cowards in this ******** to act this way in person for twenty years and none of you have ever had the balls to do so. Scores of meets all over the West. Nobody has ever had the balls to show, and nobody ever will. Speaking of manly men, how about that ID you promised? Bluff called. That promise was conditional. Here's what I said: "OK, I'll do all that, on one condition. That you reaffirm your claim that you were in Vietnam during the Vietnam war. Just reaffirm it below in your own words and we can get the process started." Bluff called, and as usual, you pussied out. Again. Only a truly cowardly freak would hide in anonymity and tell outrageous lies the way you do, and refuse to ID himself, even when he gives his word. Maggot. That promise came with a condition, and you haven't met the condition, Abrahog. You pathetic pussy, you never had any intention whatsoever of identifying yourself under any circumstances (as Baker never had any intention of showing up at Whistler under any circumstances). You were just playing your normal sick games, and I kicked back, punched your buttons, and watched you **** yourself. Just answer yes or no. Were you in Vietnam? Yes or no. |
It's the 20th anniversary of the Wired magazine article about RSA!
On Friday, November 22, 2019 at 4:29:32 PM UTC-5, Scott Abraham wrote:
On Friday, November 22, 2019 at 12:34:12 PM UTC-8, Eviel Dewar wrote: On Thursday, November 21, 2019 at 9:00:37 PM UTC-5, Scott Abraham wrote: On Thursday, November 21, 2019 at 4:50:44 PM UTC-8, Eviel Dewar wrote: On Thursday, November 21, 2019 at 4:59:08 PM UTC-5, Scott Abraham wrote: On Thursday, November 21, 2019 at 9:40:11 AM UTC-8, Eviel Dewar wrote: On Thursday, November 21, 2019 at 11:33:52 AM UTC-5, Scott Abraham wrote: On Thursday, November 21, 2019 at 8:06:16 AM UTC-8, Eviel Dewar wrote: On Thursday, November 21, 2019 at 10:54:32 AM UTC-5, Scott Abraham wrote: On Thursday, November 21, 2019 at 1:18:47 AM UTC-8, BrritSki wrote: On 21/11/2019 05:03, Scott Abraham wrote: You'll never be a man, never get the respect you crave, never be treated with respect by any man of integrity and honor. You've been viewed with contempt by any real man because you are a contemptuous freak. Talking of projection... We laugh at clowns like you. "We" ? Those voices back Scat ? You know, manly men. Who figure you out and laugh at you.. Guys like me who know a sociopathic coward when they see one and treat you with contempt. Which is why you hate us. We see you for what you are, and you play the same predictable games. Contempt and loathing. My kind of guys. Clown. You are a manly man who killed to save his own life and the life of his friends. Fact! Because you said so. I'm also a manly man who has challenged the despicable craven cowards in this ******** to act this way in person for twenty years and none of you have ever had the balls to do so. Scores of meets all over the West. Nobody has ever had the balls to show, and nobody ever will. Speaking of manly men, how about that ID you promised? Bluff called. That promise was conditional. Here's what I said: "OK, I'll do all that, on one condition. That you reaffirm your claim that you were in Vietnam during the Vietnam war. Just reaffirm it below in your own words and we can get the process started." Bluff called, and as usual, you pussied out. Again. Only a truly cowardly freak would hide in anonymity and tell outrageous lies the way you do, and refuse to ID himself, even when he gives his word. Maggot. That promise came with a condition, and you haven't met the condition, Abrahog. You pathetic pussy, you never had any intention whatsoever of identifying yourself under any circumstances (as Baker never had any intention of showing up at Whistler under any circumstances). You were just playing your normal sick games, and I kicked back, punched your buttons, and watched you **** yourself. Just answer yes or no. Were you in Vietnam? Yes or no. Yes, you are a pathetic pussy playing a ridiculous game. Go **** yourself. Happy to answer your question in person. ID? BWHAHAHAHAHA, etc. Idiot. https://s.hdnux.com/photos/66/62/62/.../3/920x920.jpg |
It's the 20th anniversary of the Wired magazine article about RSA!
On Saturday, November 23, 2019 at 12:23:47 PM UTC-5, Scott Abraham wrote:
On Saturday, November 23, 2019 at 7:33:30 AM UTC-8, Eviel Dewar wrote: On Friday, November 22, 2019 at 4:29:32 PM UTC-5, Scott Abraham wrote: On Friday, November 22, 2019 at 12:34:12 PM UTC-8, Eviel Dewar wrote: On Thursday, November 21, 2019 at 9:00:37 PM UTC-5, Scott Abraham wrote: On Thursday, November 21, 2019 at 4:50:44 PM UTC-8, Eviel Dewar wrote: On Thursday, November 21, 2019 at 4:59:08 PM UTC-5, Scott Abraham wrote: On Thursday, November 21, 2019 at 9:40:11 AM UTC-8, Eviel Dewar wrote: On Thursday, November 21, 2019 at 11:33:52 AM UTC-5, Scott Abraham wrote: On Thursday, November 21, 2019 at 8:06:16 AM UTC-8, Eviel Dewar wrote: On Thursday, November 21, 2019 at 10:54:32 AM UTC-5, Scott Abraham wrote: On Thursday, November 21, 2019 at 1:18:47 AM UTC-8, BrritSki wrote: On 21/11/2019 05:03, Scott Abraham wrote: You'll never be a man, never get the respect you crave, never be treated with respect by any man of integrity and honor. You've been viewed with contempt by any real man because you are a contemptuous freak. Talking of projection... We laugh at clowns like you. "We" ? Those voices back Scat ? You know, manly men. Who figure you out and laugh at you. Guys like me who know a sociopathic coward when they see one and treat you with contempt. Which is why you hate us. We see you for what you are, and you play the same predictable games. Contempt and loathing. My kind of guys. Clown. You are a manly man who killed to save his own life and the life of his friends. Fact! Because you said so. I'm also a manly man who has challenged the despicable craven cowards in this ******** to act this way in person for twenty years and none of you have ever had the balls to do so. Scores of meets all over the West. Nobody has ever had the balls to show, and nobody ever will. Speaking of manly men, how about that ID you promised? Bluff called. That promise was conditional. Here's what I said: "OK, I'll do all that, on one condition. That you reaffirm your claim that you were in Vietnam during the Vietnam war. Just reaffirm it below in your own words and we can get the process started." Bluff called, and as usual, you pussied out. Again. Only a truly cowardly freak would hide in anonymity and tell outrageous lies the way you do, and refuse to ID himself, even when he gives his word. Maggot. That promise came with a condition, and you haven't met the condition, Abrahog. You pathetic pussy, you never had any intention whatsoever of identifying yourself under any circumstances (as Baker never had any intention of showing up at Whistler under any circumstances). You were just playing your normal sick games, and I kicked back, punched your buttons, and watched you **** yourself. Just answer yes or no. Were you in Vietnam? Yes or no. Yes, you are a pathetic pussy playing a ridiculous game. Go **** yourself. Happy to answer your question in person. ID? BWHAHAHAHAHA, etc. Idiot. https://s.hdnux.com/photos/66/62/62/.../3/920x920.jpg That's a start on providing ID. Idiot. |
It's the 20th anniversary of the Wired magazine article about RSA!
On Saturday, November 23, 2019 at 12:23:47 PM UTC-5, Scott Abraham wrote:
On Saturday, November 23, 2019 at 7:33:30 AM UTC-8, Eviel Dewar wrote: On Friday, November 22, 2019 at 4:29:32 PM UTC-5, Scott Abraham wrote: On Friday, November 22, 2019 at 12:34:12 PM UTC-8, Eviel Dewar wrote: On Thursday, November 21, 2019 at 9:00:37 PM UTC-5, Scott Abraham wrote: On Thursday, November 21, 2019 at 4:50:44 PM UTC-8, Eviel Dewar wrote: On Thursday, November 21, 2019 at 4:59:08 PM UTC-5, Scott Abraham wrote: On Thursday, November 21, 2019 at 9:40:11 AM UTC-8, Eviel Dewar wrote: On Thursday, November 21, 2019 at 11:33:52 AM UTC-5, Scott Abraham wrote: On Thursday, November 21, 2019 at 8:06:16 AM UTC-8, Eviel Dewar wrote: On Thursday, November 21, 2019 at 10:54:32 AM UTC-5, Scott Abraham wrote: On Thursday, November 21, 2019 at 1:18:47 AM UTC-8, BrritSki wrote: On 21/11/2019 05:03, Scott Abraham wrote: You'll never be a man, never get the respect you crave, never be treated with respect by any man of integrity and honor. You've been viewed with contempt by any real man because you are a contemptuous freak. Talking of projection... We laugh at clowns like you. "We" ? Those voices back Scat ? You know, manly men. Who figure you out and laugh at you. Guys like me who know a sociopathic coward when they see one and treat you with contempt. Which is why you hate us. We see you for what you are, and you play the same predictable games. Contempt and loathing. My kind of guys. Clown. You are a manly man who killed to save his own life and the life of his friends. Fact! Because you said so. I'm also a manly man who has challenged the despicable craven cowards in this ******** to act this way in person for twenty years and none of you have ever had the balls to do so. Scores of meets all over the West. Nobody has ever had the balls to show, and nobody ever will. Speaking of manly men, how about that ID you promised? Bluff called. That promise was conditional. Here's what I said: "OK, I'll do all that, on one condition. That you reaffirm your claim that you were in Vietnam during the Vietnam war. Just reaffirm it below in your own words and we can get the process started." Bluff called, and as usual, you pussied out. Again. Only a truly cowardly freak would hide in anonymity and tell outrageous lies the way you do, and refuse to ID himself, even when he gives his word. Maggot. That promise came with a condition, and you haven't met the condition, Abrahog. You pathetic pussy, you never had any intention whatsoever of identifying yourself under any circumstances (as Baker never had any intention of showing up at Whistler under any circumstances). You were just playing your normal sick games, and I kicked back, punched your buttons, and watched you **** yourself. Just answer yes or no. Were you in Vietnam? Yes or no. Yes, you are a pathetic pussy playing a ridiculous game. Go **** yourself. Happy to answer your question in person. ID? BWHAHAHAHAHA, etc. Idiot. https://s.hdnux.com/photos/66/62/62/.../3/920x920.jpg That's a start on providing ID. Idiot. It's a picture of you. |
It's the 20th anniversary of the Wired magazine article about RSA!
On Saturday, November 23, 2019 at 10:13:11 PM UTC-5, Scott Abraham wrote:
On Saturday, November 23, 2019 at 6:48:54 PM UTC-8, Eviel Dewar wrote: On Saturday, November 23, 2019 at 12:23:47 PM UTC-5, Scott Abraham wrote: On Saturday, November 23, 2019 at 7:33:30 AM UTC-8, Eviel Dewar wrote: On Friday, November 22, 2019 at 4:29:32 PM UTC-5, Scott Abraham wrote: On Friday, November 22, 2019 at 12:34:12 PM UTC-8, Eviel Dewar wrote: On Thursday, November 21, 2019 at 9:00:37 PM UTC-5, Scott Abraham wrote: On Thursday, November 21, 2019 at 4:50:44 PM UTC-8, Eviel Dewar wrote: On Thursday, November 21, 2019 at 4:59:08 PM UTC-5, Scott Abraham wrote: On Thursday, November 21, 2019 at 9:40:11 AM UTC-8, Eviel Dewar wrote: On Thursday, November 21, 2019 at 11:33:52 AM UTC-5, Scott Abraham wrote: On Thursday, November 21, 2019 at 8:06:16 AM UTC-8, Eviel Dewar wrote: On Thursday, November 21, 2019 at 10:54:32 AM UTC-5, Scott Abraham wrote: On Thursday, November 21, 2019 at 1:18:47 AM UTC-8, BrritSki wrote: On 21/11/2019 05:03, Scott Abraham wrote: You'll never be a man, never get the respect you crave, never be treated with respect by any man of integrity and honor. You've been viewed with contempt by any real man because you are a contemptuous freak. Talking of projection... We laugh at clowns like you. "We" ? Those voices back Scat ? You know, manly men. Who figure you out and laugh at you. Guys like me who know a sociopathic coward when they see one and treat you with contempt. Which is why you hate us. We see you for what you are, and you play the same predictable games. Contempt and loathing. My kind of guys. Clown. You are a manly man who killed to save his own life and the life of his friends. Fact! Because you said so. I'm also a manly man who has challenged the despicable craven cowards in this ******** to act this way in person for twenty years and none of you have ever had the balls to do so. Scores of meets all over the West. Nobody has ever had the balls to show, and nobody ever will. Speaking of manly men, how about that ID you promised? Bluff called. That promise was conditional. Here's what I said: "OK, I'll do all that, on one condition. That you reaffirm your claim that you were in Vietnam during the Vietnam war. Just reaffirm it below in your own words and we can get the process started." Bluff called, and as usual, you pussied out. Again. Only a truly cowardly freak would hide in anonymity and tell outrageous lies the way you do, and refuse to ID himself, even when he gives his word. Maggot. That promise came with a condition, and you haven't met the condition, Abrahog. You pathetic pussy, you never had any intention whatsoever of identifying yourself under any circumstances (as Baker never had any intention of showing up at Whistler under any circumstances). You were just playing your normal sick games, and I kicked back, punched your buttons, and watched you **** yourself. Just answer yes or no. Were you in Vietnam? Yes or no. Yes, you are a pathetic pussy playing a ridiculous game. Go **** yourself. Happy to answer your question in person. ID? BWHAHAHAHAHA, etc. Idiot. https://s.hdnux.com/photos/66/62/62/.../3/920x920.jpg That's a start on providing ID. Idiot. It's a picture of you. Kewl. If you ever seen that in the real world, then you will know I found you. Though if you had any sense of history, you would know that is Anthea Kerrison. Surprised you didn't see it as a death threat, lol. |
All times are GMT. The time now is 06:08 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SkiBanter.com