how many people read this group
 

On Saturday, July 27, 2013 3:16:45 PM UTC-4, wrote:
Just wondering if there are 10, 100, or 1000 folks who peruse this group?

+1

how many people read this group
 

On Saturday, August 10, 2013 6:05:19 AM UTC-6, RW wrote:

Let's see if it gets through
again? I just have to make
the lines very short.

Speaking of short. Anyone up
for a short hike? No fear of
postholes this time of year.
The trails are nice and firm.
And even if you did, there
would be very little
backlash.

how many people read this group
 

On Sunday, 11 August 2013 06:45:13 UTC-7, pigo wrote:
On Saturday, August 10, 2013 6:05:19 AM UTC-6, RW wrote:



Let's see if it gets through

See the AstroPax thread for the solution....

how many people read this group
 

On Thursday, August 15, 2013 9:32:20 AM UTC-7, wrote:
On Sunday, 11 August 2013 06:45:13 UTC-7, pigo wrote:

On Saturday, August 10, 2013 6:05:19 AM UTC-6, RW wrote:







Let's see if it gets through



See the AstroPax thread for the solution....

78.

how many people read this group
 

On Thursday, August 15, 2013 6:22:16 PM UTC-7, Richard Henry wrote:
On Thursday, August 15, 2013 9:32:20 AM UTC-7, wrote:

On Sunday, 11 August 2013 06:45:13 UTC-7, pigo wrote:



On Saturday, August 10, 2013 6:05:19 AM UTC-6, RW wrote:















Let's see if it gets through







See the AstroPax thread for the solution....



78.

That worked.

What I
tried to
post earlier
is that
the number
of "readers"
is likely
larger than
the number
of posters.

how many people read this group
 

On 8/15/2013 9:55 PM, Richard Henry wrote:


That worked.

What I
tried to
post earlier
is that
the number
of "readers"
is likely
larger than
the number
of posters.


Well, yeah. I suppose it's possible for someone to post
without reading, but for the most part every poster is
also a reader.

So of course there are more readers than posters.


--
//Walt

how many people read this group
 

On 08/16/2013 07:19 AM, Walt wrote:

On 8/15/2013 9:55 PM, Richard Henry wrote:


That worked.

What I
tried to
post earlier
is that
the number
of "readers"
is likely
larger than
the number
of posters.


Well, yeah. I suppose it's possible for someone to post
without reading, but for the most part every poster is
also a reader.

So of course there are more readers than posters.

Trying a different news server.



--
Cheers, Bev
================================================== ============
"I am working for the time when unqualified blacks, browns and
women join the unqualified men in running our government"
-- Cissy Farenthold

how many people read this group
 

On 08/16/2013 01:10 PM, The Real Bev wrote:

On 08/16/2013 07:19 AM, Walt wrote:

On 8/15/2013 9:55 PM, Richard Henry wrote:


That worked.

What I
tried to
post earlier
is that
the number
of "readers"
is likely
larger than
the number
of posters.


Well, yeah. I suppose it's possible for someone to post
without reading, but for the most part every poster is
also a reader.

So of course there are more readers than posters.

Trying a different news server.

OK, that worked. Now I'm going to see if line length matters in any
way, shape or form. Is it conceivable that robomod rejects anything
from Eternal September?

--
Cheers, Bev
================================================== ============
"I am working for the time when unqualified blacks, browns and
women join the unqualified men in running our government"
-- Cissy Farenthold

how many people read this group
 

I tried to post one with more new text than quoted, but aioe ate that one.


--
Cheers, Bev
================================================== ==============
I didn't break it! It was doing that before I broke it... er...

how many people read this group
 

Second attempt:

OK, line length is irrelevant

I just received a warning from aioe to the effect that 'we're not going
to zing you yet, but there was more quoted than original material in
your post'. That's kind of a nuisance, but I guess I can live with
that. I'll just have to abandon my natural inclination toward brevity in
order to comply with a really stup*d (maybe they also want us to be
'nice') requirement. I can see their point when somebody includes 20
pages of quoted material only to add LOL at the end; those people
shouldn't be banned, they should be shot.

--
Cheers, Bev
================================================== ============
"I am working for the time when unqualified blacks, browns and
women join the unqualified men in running our government"
-- Cissy Farenthold